6 research outputs found

    Left atrial appendage closure in patients with chronic kidney disease: results from the German multicentre LAARGE registry

    Get PDF
    Abstract Objectives Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased complication rate after cardiac interventions. Although CKD has a high prevalence among atrial fibrillation patients, the impact of CKD on periprocedural complications and the outcome after an interventional left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is unclear. The present study, therefore, aimed to investigate whether CKD influences the procedure’s effectiveness and safety. Methods LAARGE is a prospective, non-randomised registry. LAAC was conducted with different standard commercial devices, and the follow-up period was one year. CKD was defined by an eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and subgroups were further analysed (i.e. eGFR < 15, 15–29, and 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively). Results Two hundred ninety-nine of 623 patients (48.0%) revealed a CKD. The prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidity, CHA2DS2-VASc score (4.9 vs. 4.2), and HAS-BLED score (4.3 vs. 3.5) was significantly higher in CKD patients (each p  0.05  vs. eGFR 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2). Non-fatal strokes were absolutely infrequent during follow-up (0 vs. 1.1%). Severe non-fatal bleedings were observed only among CKD patients (1.4 vs. 0%; p = 0.021). Conclusions Despite an increased cardiovascular risk profile of CKD patients, device implantation was safe, and LAAC was associated with effective stroke prevention across all CKD stages

    Left atrial appendage closure in patients with chronic kidney disease: results from the German multicentre LAARGE registry

    No full text
    Objectives!#!Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased complication rate after cardiac interventions. Although CKD has a high prevalence among atrial fibrillation patients, the impact of CKD on periprocedural complications and the outcome after an interventional left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is unclear. The present study, therefore, aimed to investigate whether CKD influences the procedure's effectiveness and safety.!##!Methods!#!LAARGE is a prospective, non-randomised registry. LAAC was conducted with different standard commercial devices, and the follow-up period was one year. CKD was defined by an eGFR &amp;lt; 60 mL/min/1.73 m!##!Results!#!Two hundred ninety-nine of 623 patients (48.0%) revealed a CKD. The prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidity, CHA!##!Conclusions!#!Despite an increased cardiovascular risk profile of CKD patients, device implantation was safe, and LAAC was associated with effective stroke prevention across all CKD stages
    corecore