29 research outputs found

    Implementing the 1966 Highway Safety Acts

    Get PDF

    Operational and Maintenance Problems on the Interstate System

    Get PDF

    Randomized clinical trials of dental bleaching – Compliance with the CONSORT Statement: a systematic review

    Full text link

    Image_3_Desmoglein compensation hypothesis fidelity assessment in Pemphigus.jpeg

    No full text
    The pemphigus group of autoimmune blistering diseases encompasses pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF). Lesion location in pemphigus has been elegantly postulated by the Desmoglein Compensation Hypothesis (DCH), which references the distribution of desmoglein (Dsg) proteins in the epidermis along with a patient’s autoantibody profile to describe three different lesion phenotypes: PF is characterized by subcorneal lesions in the presence of anti-Dsg1 antibodies only, while lesions in PV are suprabasilar and accompanied by anti-Dsg3 antibodies only in mucosal PV, or both anti-Dsg3 and anti-Dsg1 in the case of mucocutaneous PV. While the validity of this hypothesis has been supported by several studies and is prominently featured in textbooks of dermatology, a number of logical inconsistencies have been noted and exceptions have been published in several small-scale studies. We sought to comprehensively assess the extent to which patient clinical and autoantibody profiles contradict the DCH, and characterize these contradictions in a large sample size of 266 pemphigus patients. Remarkably, we find that roughly half of active PV and PF patients surveyed present with a combination of lesion morphology and anti-Dsg3/1 levels that contradict the DCH, including: patients with a cutaneous only PV presentation, mucocutaneous disease in the absence of either Dsg3, Dsg1, or both, and mucosal disease in the absence of Dsg3 or presence of Dsg1. We also find stark differences in fidelity to the DCH based on ethnicity and HLA-association, with the lowest proportion of adherence in previously understudied populations. These findings underscore the need to expand our understanding of pemphigus morphology beyond the DCH, in particular for populations that have not been a focus in previous investigation.</p

    Table_1_Desmoglein compensation hypothesis fidelity assessment in Pemphigus.docx

    No full text
    The pemphigus group of autoimmune blistering diseases encompasses pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF). Lesion location in pemphigus has been elegantly postulated by the Desmoglein Compensation Hypothesis (DCH), which references the distribution of desmoglein (Dsg) proteins in the epidermis along with a patient’s autoantibody profile to describe three different lesion phenotypes: PF is characterized by subcorneal lesions in the presence of anti-Dsg1 antibodies only, while lesions in PV are suprabasilar and accompanied by anti-Dsg3 antibodies only in mucosal PV, or both anti-Dsg3 and anti-Dsg1 in the case of mucocutaneous PV. While the validity of this hypothesis has been supported by several studies and is prominently featured in textbooks of dermatology, a number of logical inconsistencies have been noted and exceptions have been published in several small-scale studies. We sought to comprehensively assess the extent to which patient clinical and autoantibody profiles contradict the DCH, and characterize these contradictions in a large sample size of 266 pemphigus patients. Remarkably, we find that roughly half of active PV and PF patients surveyed present with a combination of lesion morphology and anti-Dsg3/1 levels that contradict the DCH, including: patients with a cutaneous only PV presentation, mucocutaneous disease in the absence of either Dsg3, Dsg1, or both, and mucosal disease in the absence of Dsg3 or presence of Dsg1. We also find stark differences in fidelity to the DCH based on ethnicity and HLA-association, with the lowest proportion of adherence in previously understudied populations. These findings underscore the need to expand our understanding of pemphigus morphology beyond the DCH, in particular for populations that have not been a focus in previous investigation.</p

    Combined dermatan sulfate and endothelial progenitor cell treatment: action on the initial inflammatory response after arterial injury in c57bl/6 mice

    No full text
    Dermatan sulfate (DS), an anticoagulant and antithrombotic glycosaminoglycan, also has anti-inflammatory activity. In this study, we investigated the effect of DS treatment in the presence or absence of bone marrow mononuclear cells (MNCs) or endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in the vascular response to carotid artery lesion in C57BL6 mice. Thrombus formation, the expression of adhesion molecules and factors involved in vascular remodeling, inflammation or vascular tone were analyzed by histologic examination, Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunoassay 1 and 3 days after vascular injury. DS injections prevented thrombus formation and decreased P-selectin expression after 3 days of the injury. DS treatment also increased plasma SDF-1 levels but failed to rescue endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression, which is responsible for vascular tone. Treatment with MNCs alone failed to prevent thrombus formation 1 day after injury and increased intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression, likely because of the inflammatory nature of these cells. Treatment with EPCs with DS was the most efficient among all therapies studied. Dual administration of EPCs and DS promoted an increase in the expression of adhesion molecules and, at the same time, induced a higher expression of eNOS at the injury site. Furthermore, it stimulated an elevated number of EPCs to migrate and adhere to the vascular wall. Simultaneous treatment with EPCs and DS increased the expression of adhesion molecules, prevented thrombosis, rescued the expression of eNOS and increased migration of EPCs to the site of injury, thereby affecting thrombus remodeling and inflammation and can be involved in vessel hemostasis.Dermatan sulfate (DS), an anticoagulant and antithrombotic glycosaminoglycan, also has anti-inflammatory activity. In this study, we investigated the effect of DS treatment in the presence or absence of bone marrow mononuclear cells (MNCs) or endothelial171014471464FAPESP - FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULOCNQP - CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO2010/01119-32012/23640-2307784/2013-4This work was supported by grants from Fundação deAmparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp)to J.A.P.G. (2010/01119-3) and C.P.V (2012/23640-2) and to C.C.W. (CNPq 307784/2013-4).We thank Drs. Irene Iorand-Metze and FernandaG. Pereira for their he

    Hyperbaric oxygen affects endothelial progenitor cells proliferation in vitro

    No full text
    Hyperbaric oxygen is a clinical treatment that contributes to wound healing by increasing fibroblasts proliferation, collagen synthesis, and production of growth factors, inducing angiogenesis and inhibiting antimicrobial activity. It also has been shown that hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBO), through the activation of nitric oxide synthase promotes an increase in the nitric oxide levels that may improve endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) mobilization from bone marrow to the peripheral blood and stimulates the vessel healing process. However, cellular mechanisms involved in cell proliferation and activation of EPC after HBO treatment remain unknown. Therefore, the present work aimed to analyze the effect of HBO on the proliferation of pre-treated bone marrow-derived EPC with TNF-alpha. Also, we investigated the expression of ICAM and eNOS by immunochemistry, the production of reactive species of oxygen and performed an in vitro wound healing. Although 1h of HBO treatment did not alter the rate of in vitro wound closure or cell proliferation, it increased eNOS expression and decreased ICAM expression and reactive oxygen species production in cells pre-treated with TNF-alpha. These results indicate that HBO can decrease the inflammatory response in endothelial cells mediated by TNF-alpha, and thus, promote vascular recovery after injury432136146CNPQ - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFAPESP – Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa Do Estado De São Paulo2012/23640‐2308368/2016‐
    corecore