Reduced Cost and Decreased Length of Stay Associated with Acute Ischemic Stroke Care Provided by Nurse Practitioners: A Single Primary Stroke Center Experience

Nurse practitioner (NP) have a wider role in modern stroke centers providing quality evidence based care to patients with both in and outpatient settings for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients. We studies the outcome measures, length of stay (LOS) and cost before and after implementation of nurse practitioners as the primary medical provider in a community based stroke center.https://digitalcommons.centracare.com/nursing_posters/1075/thumbnail.jp

Prospective randomized controlled trial of the safety and feasibility of a novel mesenchymal precursor cell therapy in hypoplastic left heart syndromeCentral MessagePerspective

Objective: To assess the safety and feasibility of low-dose, novel, allogenic mesenchymal precursor cell (MPC) therapy as an adjunct to left ventricular (LV) recruitment for patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and borderline left ventricles. MPC injections into the hypoplastic left ventricle may stimulate neovascularization and beneficial LV remodeling and may improve the likelihood of achieving biventricular (BiV) or 1.5 ventricle (1.5V) circulation. Methods: Children 1 AE, and 2 patients had SAEs, both deemed unrelated to the trial product. AE severity and frequency were similar in the 2 groups. Baseline PRA levels were high, with no difference between the groups at 12 months. The overall probability of BiV/1.5V conversion was 0.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05 to 0.41) at 12 months and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.77) at 24 months. For patients with imaging data at both time points, increases in LV volumes from baseline to 12 months were larger in the MPC group by 3-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. For children who successfully underwent BiV conversion (n = 12), full BiV conversion was achieved at 24 months in 5 of 5 (100%) MPC-treated children compared with 4 of 7 (57%) controls. Conclusions: MPC injections were considered safe and feasible in HLHS patients. More than 50% of subjects underwent BiV/1.5V conversion within 2 years. Larger trials are needed to investigate the therapeutic potential of MPCs in this population

Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

Background: General anaesthesia (GA) during endovascular thrombectomy has been associated with worse patient outcomes in observational studies compared with patients treated without GA. We assessed functional outcome in ischaemic stroke patients with large vessel anterior circulation occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy under GA, versus thrombectomy not under GA (with or without sedation) versus standard care (ie, no thrombectomy), stratified by the use of GA versus standard care. Methods: For this meta-analysis, patient-level data were pooled from all patients included in randomised trials in PuMed published between Jan 1, 2010, and May 31, 2017, that compared endovascular thrombectomy predominantly done with stent retrievers with standard care in anterior circulation ischaemic stroke patients (HERMES Collaboration). The primary outcome was functional outcome assessed by ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days in the GA and non-GA subgroups of patients treated with endovascular therapy versus those patients treated with standard care, adjusted for baseline prognostic variables. To account for between-trial variance we used mixed-effects modelling with a random effect for trials incorporated in all models. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane method. The meta-analysis was prospectively designed, but not registered. Findings: Seven trials were identified by our search; of 1764 patients included in these trials, 871 were allocated to endovascular thrombectomy and 893 were assigned standard care. After exclusion of 74 patients (72 did not undergo the procedure and two had missing data on anaesthetic strategy), 236 (30%) of 797 patients who had endovascular procedures were treated under GA. At baseline, patients receiving GA were younger and had a shorter delay between stroke onset and randomisation but they had similar pre-treatment clinical severity compared with patients who did not have GA. Endovascular thrombectomy improved functional outcome at 3 months both in patients who had GA (adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) 1·52, 95% CI 1·09–2·11, p=0·014) and in those who did not have GA (adjusted cOR 2·33, 95% CI 1·75–3·10, p<0·0001) versus standard care. However, outcomes were significantly better for patients who did not receive GA versus those who received GA (covariate-adjusted cOR 1·53, 95% CI 1·14–2·04, p=0·0044). The risk of bias and variability between studies was assessed to be low. Interpretation: Worse outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy were associated with GA, after adjustment for baseline prognostic variables. These data support avoidance of GA whenever possible. The procedure did, however, remain effective versus standard care in patients treated under GA, indicating that treatment should not be withheld in those who require anaesthesia for medical reasons