56 research outputs found
Uncertainties of calculated coincidence-summing correction factors in gamma-ray spectrometry
Uncertainty propagation to the - coincidence-summing
correction factor from the covariances of the nuclear data and detection
efficiencies have been formulated. The method was applied in the uncertainty
analysis of the coincidence-summing correction factors in the -ray
spectrometry of the Cs point source using a p-type coaxial HPGe
detector.Comment: 4 pages, 2 figures, to be published in the proceedings of the "2019
International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology" (ND2019
Nuclear data from AMS & nuclear data for AMS - some examples
We summarize some recent cross-section measurements using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). AMS represents an ultra-sensitive technique for measuring a limited, but steadily increasing number of longer-lived radionuclides. This method implies a two-step procedure with sample activation and subsequent AMS measurement. Applications include nuclear astrophysics, nuclear technology (nuclear fusion, nuclear fission and advanced reactor concepts and radiation dose estimations). A series of additional applications involves cosmogenic radionuclides in environmental, geological and extraterrestrial studies. Lack of information exists for a list of nuclides as pointed out by nuclear data requests. An overview of some recent measurements is given and the method is exemplified for some specific neutron-induced reactions.JRC.D.4-Standards for Nuclear Safety, Security and Safeguard
Nuclear Data from AMS & Nuclear Data for AMS -some examples
We summarize some recent cross-section measurements using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). AMS represents an ultra-sensitive technique for measuring a limited, but steadily increasing number of longer-lived radionuclides. This method implies a two-st
Towards a More Complete and Accurate Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Library (EXFOR): International Collaboration Between Nuclear Reaction Data Centres (NRDC)
The International Network of Nuclear Reaction Data Centres (NRDC) coordinated
by the IAEA Nuclear Data Section (NDS) is successfully collaborating in the
maintenance and development of the EXFOR library. As the scope of published
data expands (e.g., to higher energy, to heavier projectile) to meet the needs
from the frontier of sciences and applications, it becomes nowadays a hard and
challenging task to maintain both completeness and accuracy of the whole EXFOR
library. The paper describes evolution of the library with highlights on recent
developments.Comment: 4 pages, 2 figure
Fast-neutron induced pre-equilibrium reactions on 55Mn and 63,65Cu at energies up to 40 MeV
Excitation functions were measured for the Mn(n,2n)Mn,
Mn(n,)V, Cu(n,)Co,
Cu(n,2n)Cu, and Cu(n,p)Ni reactions from 13.47 to
14.83 MeV. The experimental cross sections are compared with the results of
calculations including all activation channels for the stable isotopes of Mn
and Cu, for neutron incident energies up to 50 MeV. Within the energy range up
to 20 MeV the model calculations are most sensitive to the parameters related
to nuclei in the early stages of the reaction, while the model assumptions are
better established by analysis of the data in the energy range 20-40 MeV. While
the present analysis has taken advantage of both a new set of accurate measured
cross sections around 14 MeV and the larger data basis fortunately available
between 20 and 40 MeV for the Mn and Cu isotopes, the need of additional
measurements below as well as above 40 MeV is pointed out. Keywords: 55Mn,
63,65Cu, E40 MeV, Neutron activation cross section measurements, Nuclear
reactions, Model calculations, Manganese, CopperComment: 39 pages, 12 figure
Π―Π·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ "Π Π΅ΡΡ" Π² ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ΅
The article deals with the problem of language categorization on the sentence level. A cognitive
approach to the sentence study reveals polysemy of a sentence generally depends on the sentence
possibility to categorize different variations of a prototypical situation. These variations stand on
two basic factors. Firstly, great numbers of alike but not equivalent situations exist in real life. A
person, since he / she is capable of categorizing, confines a situation to a certain category. Secondly,
the speaker can differently interpret the same situation. The latter may focus attention on different
dimensions of the situation at different time. As a result, some dimensions of the situation are
highlighted and the others, on the contrary, recede to the background. Nonequivalence of the similar
situations and different interpretation of the same situation determine semantic and syntactical
structure of the sentence. The prototypical situation of speech has been chosen for analysis to
manifest this statementΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅
ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. Π ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π° ΡΠΎ
ΡΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠ΅
Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠΈ Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Ρ, Π²ΠΎ-ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ
, Ρ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π² ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ
Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΏΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡ
, Π½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΊΠ²ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅
ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ, Π² ΡΠΈΠ»Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ, ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡ, Π²ΠΎ-Π²ΡΠΎΡΡΡ
,
Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ.
ΠΠ΄Π½Π° ΠΈ ΡΠ° ΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ-ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΎΡΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π° Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎ Π½Π° Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ
. Π ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ ΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π²ΡΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠ³Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½, Π° Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅, Π½Π°ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡ, β Π·Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡΡΡΡ.
ΠΠ΅ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅
Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π² Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π΅
Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π―Π·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ "Π Π΅ΡΡ" Π² ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ΅
The article deals with the problem of language categorization on the sentence level. A cognitive
approach to the sentence study reveals polysemy of a sentence generally depends on the sentence
possibility to categorize different variations of a prototypical situation. These variations stand on
two basic factors. Firstly, great numbers of alike but not equivalent situations exist in real life. A
person, since he / she is capable of categorizing, confines a situation to a certain category. Secondly,
the speaker can differently interpret the same situation. The latter may focus attention on different
dimensions of the situation at different time. As a result, some dimensions of the situation are
highlighted and the others, on the contrary, recede to the background. Nonequivalence of the similar
situations and different interpretation of the same situation determine semantic and syntactical
structure of the sentence. The prototypical situation of speech has been chosen for analysis to
manifest this statementΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅
ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. Π ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π° ΡΠΎ
ΡΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠ΅
Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠΈ Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Ρ, Π²ΠΎ-ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ
, Ρ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π² ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ
Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΏΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡ
, Π½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΊΠ²ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅
ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ, Π² ΡΠΈΠ»Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ, ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡ, Π²ΠΎ-Π²ΡΠΎΡΡΡ
,
Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ.
ΠΠ΄Π½Π° ΠΈ ΡΠ° ΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ-ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΎΡΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π° Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎ Π½Π° Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ
. Π ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ ΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π²ΡΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠ³Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½, Π° Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅, Π½Π°ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡ, β Π·Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡΡΡΡ.
ΠΠ΅ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅
Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π² Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π΅
Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
New exotic and non-standard radionuclides in AMS
Isobaric interference represents one of the major limitations in mass spectrometry. In the very few
cases in AMS where nature allows isobaric-free measurements, lowest background levels are
accessible. Such conditions are given, if the isobar does not form stable negative ions either as
atomic ion, or by choosing a suitable molecular species; well-known examples are e.g. 14Cβ, 26Alβ,
129Iβ, or 41CaH3
β, respectively, and also for the unstable isotopes in the mass range above Bi.
In this work, we will present a few additional cases where isobaric interference is completely
excluded, among them 55Fe, 68Ge and 202Pb. Applications will be discussed where the exceptional
sensitivity of AMS offers important insights to such different fields like nuclear astrophysics, nuclear
physics and general physics issues.
VERA, a dedicated AMS facility, based on a 3-MV tandem, featuring high mass resolution in
combination with efficient background suppression and an automated measurement procedure,
allows to transport all nuclides from hydrogen to the actinides through the system up to the
detector stations. Such a facility is well suited for developing the tuning and measurement
procedures for new and non-standard isotopes.
We will demonstrate the actual measurement limits of such radionuclides for the VERA facility and
results for selected applications. In order to generate final values AMS usually relies on the parallel
measurement of reference materials. We will discuss the production of such materials for these
non-standard AMS nuclides.Copyright (c) 2011 AMS12
Neutron activation cross sections on lead isotopes
The cross sections for the reactions Pb-204(n,n(')gamma)Pb-204(m), Pb-204(n,2n)Pb-203, Pb-204(n,2n)Pb-203(m1), Pb-204(n,3n)Pb-202(m), Pb-206(n,3n)Pb-204(m), Pb-206(n,alpha)Hg-203, and Pb-208(n,p)Tl-208 were determined at the IRMM van de Graaff laboratory in the neutron energy range from 14 to 21 MeV. Both natural and enriched samples were irradiated with neutrons produced via the H-3(d,n)He-4 reaction. The induced activities were determined by gamma-ray spectrometry using a HPGe detector in a low-background shield. Neutron fluences were determined with the well-known cross section of the Al-27(n,alpha)Na-24 reaction. Enriched samples were essential to determine the cross sections for the reactions with Pb-204(m) and Pb-206(m) isomers in the final state. Accurate results for reactions with Pb-204,Pb-206 as target nuclei with natural lead samples were enabled through a precise measurement of the isotopic ratios. For a first investigation of the consequences of the present data for nuclear reaction models they were confronted with calculations based on global parameter systematics in a phenomenological and in a microscopic approach and with parameters selected to reproduce the available data. The TALYS code was used for the former two calculations involving parameter systematics while the STAPRE code was used for the latter calculation
- β¦