Complementary and alternative medicine for the treatment and diagnosis of asthma and allergic diseases

The use of Complementary/Alternative Medicines (CAM) is largely diffused and constantly increasing, especially in the field of allergic diseases and asthma. Homeopathy, acupuncture and phytotherapy are the most frequently utilised treatments, whereas complementary diagnostic techniques are mainly used in the field of food allergy- intolerance. Looking at the literature, the majority of clinical trials with CAMS are of low methodological quality, thus difficult to interpret. There are very few studies performed in a rigorously controlled fashion, and those studies provided inconclusive results. In asthma, none of the CAM have thus far been proved more effective than placebo or equally effective as standard treatments. Some herbal products, containing active principles, have displayed some clinical effect, but the herbal remedies are usually not standardised and not quantified, thus carry the risk of toxic effects or interactions. None of the alternative diagnostic techniques (electrodermal testing, kinesiology, leukocytotoxic test, iridology, hair analysis) have been proved able to distinguish between healthy and allergic subjects or to diagnose sensitizations. Therefore these tests must not be used, since they can lead to delayed or incorrect diagnosis and therapy

Resensitization in suspected penicillin allergy

Background The diagnosis of allergic reactions to penicillins (AR-PEN) is very complex as there is a loss of sensitization over time, which leads to negative skin tests (STs) and specific IgE in serum, and even to tolerance to the drug involved. However, STs may become positive after subsequent exposure to the culprit drug (resensitization), with the risk of inducing potentially severe reactions. The exact rate of resensitization to penicillins is unknown, ranging from 0% to 27.9% in published studies. Objectives To analyze the rate of resensitization in patients with suggestive AR-PEN by repeating STs (retest) after an initial evaluation (IE). Material and Methods Patients with suspected AR-PEN were prospectively evaluated between 2017 and 2020. They underwent STs, and a randomized group also underwent a drug provocation test (DPT) with the culprit. Only patients with negative STs and/or DPT were included. All included cases were retested by STs at 2–8 weeks. Results A total of 545 patients were included: 296 reporting immediate reactions (IRs) and 249 non-immediate reactions (NIRs). Eighty (14.7%) cases had positive results in retest (RT+): 63 (21.3%) IRs and 17 (6.8%) NIRs (p < 0.0001). The rate of RT+ was higher in anaphylaxis compared with all other reactions (45.8% vs 9.1%, p < 0.0001). The risk of RT+ was higher from the fifth week after IE (OR: 4.64, CI: 2.1–11.6; p < 0.001) and increased with the patient's age (OR: 1.02; CI: 1.01–1.04; p = 0.009). Conclusions Due to the high rate of resensitization, retest should be included in the diagnostic algorithm of IRs to penicillins after an initial negative study, especially in anaphylaxis, to avoid potentially severe reactions after subsequent prescriptions of these drugs.he present study has been supported by Institute of Health “Carlos III” of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (grants cofunded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): PI18/00095, RETIC ARADYAL RD16/0006/0001). Andalusian Regional Ministry of Economy and Knowledge (grants cofunded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): CTS-06603); Andalusian Regional Ministry Health (grants PI-0241-2016 and PE-0172-2018). GB holds a “Juan Rodes” (JR18/00054), Institute of Health “Carlos III” of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (grants cofunded by European Social Fund [ESF]). ID is a Clinical Investigator (B-0001-2017), Andalusian Regional Ministry Health

Fatal asthma; is it still an epidemic?

Asthma mortality has declined since the 1980s. Nevertheless the World Health Organization (WHO) identified asthma as responsible for 225.000 deaths worldwide in 2005, and 430.000 fatal cases are expected by 2030. Some unexpected and concentrated fatal asthma events all occurred between 2013 and 2015 in Veneto, a North Eastern region of Italy, which prompted a more in-depth investigation of characteristics and risk factors

Adherence issues related to sublingual immunotherapy as perceived by allergists

Objectives: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a viable alternative to subcutaneous immunotherapy to treat allergic rhinitis and asthma, and is widely used in clinical practice in many European countries. The clinical efficacy of SLIT has been established in a number of clinical trials and meta-analyses. However, because SLIT is self-administered by patients without medical supervision, the degree of patient adherence with treatment is still a concern. The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception by allergists of issues related to SLIT adherence. Methods: We performed a questionnaire-based survey of 296 Italian allergists, based on the adherence issues known from previous studies. The perception of importance of each item was assessed by a VAS scale ranging from 0 to 10. Results: Patient perception of clinical efficacy was considered the most important factor (ranked 1 by 54% of allergists), followed by the possibility of reimbursement (ranked 1 by 34%), and by the absence of side effects (ranked 1 by 21%). Patient education, regular follow-up, and ease of use of SLIT were ranked first by less than 20% of allergists. Conclusion: These findings indicate that clinical efficacy, cost, and side effects are perceived as the major issues influencing patient adherence to SLIT, and that further improvement of adherence is likely to be achieved by improving the patient information provided by prescribers. © 2010 Scurati et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd

Balancing efficacy against safety in sublingual immunotherapy with inhalant allergens: what is the best approach?

Over the last 20 years, studies and clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for respiratory allergic diseases. Nevertheless, it seems to be mostly used as a second-line therapeutic option, and adherence to treatment is not always optimal. Selective literature research was done in Medline and PubMed, including guidelines, position papers and Cochrane meta-analyses concerning SLIT in adult patients. The most recent reviews confirm SLIT as viable and efficacious treatment especially for allergic rhinitis, even if the optimal dosage, duration, schedule are not clearly established for most of the products. Despite an optimal safety profile, tolerability and patient-reported outcomes concerning SLIT have received poor attention until now. Recently, new tools have been specifically developed in order to investigate these aspects. Regular assessment of tolerability profile and SLIT-related patient-reported outcomes will allow balancing efficacy with tolerability and all the other patient-related variables that may affect treatment effectiveness beyond its efficacy

What lies beyond Asthma Control Test: Suggestions for clinical practice

Asthma Control Test (ACT ™) validity relies on Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) definition of control. It includes neither reversibility nor inflammation assessment despite their importance as hallmark of asthma, partially unrelated to symptoms. Furthermore though rhinitis may affect the patient's perception of asthma control, its impact on ACT accuracy has not been systematically evaluated

What lies beyond Asthma Control Test: Suggestions for clinical practice

Abstract: Background: Asthma Control Test (ACT \u2122) validity relies on Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) definition of control. It includes neither reversibility nor inflammation assessment despite their importance as hallmark of asthma, partially unrelated to symptoms. Furthermore though rhinitis may affect the patient's perception of asthma control, its impact on ACT accuracy has not been systematically evaluated. Objective: To explore ACT validity according to a definition of control including: forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 65 80%, negative reversibility test, exhaled nitric oxide at a flow rate of 50&nbsp;ml/s (FeNO) &lt; 50 ppb. Results: 177 asthmatics referring to our Unit have been studied. ACT with cut-off score 6520 showed a good positive predictive value (83.5%) but low sensitivity (47.8%), specificity (66.7%), and negative predictive value (26.5%). ROC curves analysis indicates that ACT in patients with mild intermittent rhinitis is more reliable (AUC: 0.714; p &lt; 0.05) than in patients with nasal polyposis/chronic rhino-sinusitis (AUC: 0.176; p &gt; 0.05). Considering asthma classification, the probability that ACT detects patients with uncontrolled asthma is significantly higher in moderate persistent asthma subgroup than in mild persistent asthma one (OR 5.464; IC 95%: 2.5-11,9; p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: As ACT mainly relies on patient's reported outcomes, it may not completely reflect the airways inflammation and airways obstruction. The presence and severity of rhinitis may affect ACT outcome. The awareness of the variables that could influence ACT evaluation is much more important in the primary care setting where ACT may often represent the only tool for asthma assessment

Adherence issues related to sublingual immunotherapy as perceived by allergists.

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a viable alternative to subcutaneous immunotherapy to treat allergic rhinitis and asthma, and is widely used in clinical practice in many European countries. The clinical efficacy of SLIT has been established in a number of clinical trials and meta-analyses. However, because SLIT is self-administered by patients without medical supervision, the degree of patient adherence with treatment is still a concern. The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception by allergists of issues related to SLIT adherence.We performed a questionnaire-based survey of 296 Italian allergists, based on the adherence issues known from previous studies. The perception of importance of each item was assessed by a VAS scale ranging from 0 to 10.Patient perception of clinical efficacy was considered the most important factor (ranked 1 by 54\% of allergists), followed by the possibility of reimbursement (ranked 1 by 34\%), and by the absence of side effects (ranked 1 by 21\%). Patient education, regular follow-up, and ease of use of SLIT were ranked first by less than 20\% of allergists.These findings indicate that clinical efficacy, cost, and side effects are perceived as the major issues influencing patient adherence to SLIT, and that further improvement of adherence is likely to be achieved by improving the patient information provided by prescribers

Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis and Cardiac Involvement: A Case Report

A case report of a young woman with Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis and Cardiac Involvement at the onsetAbstract not availabl