7 research outputs found
History of Nicolae Testemitsanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy through its rectors
Nicolae Anestiadi Department of Surgery, Nicolae Testemitsanu Department of Social Medicine and Sanitary Management, Nicolae Testemitsanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, the Republic of MoldovaBackground: The authors present the history of Nicolae Testemitsanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy from the beginning, since the transfer of Leningrad Institute of Medicine No 1 in November 1945. Rectors: Ipatie Sorocean, Nicolai Harauzov, Leonid Ganul, Nicolae Starostenco, Nicolae Testemitsanu, Vasile Anestiadi, Leonid Cobaleanschi, Ion Ababii are presented with a broad feature of their work β teaching, scientific, managerial. A particular attention is given to rectors academicians: Nicolae Testemitsanu, Vasile Anestiadi and current rector Ion Ababii. A decisive role in the development of the university belongs to Nicolae Testemitsanu, who was the first local rector to promote national staff, contributed to the opening of the faculties of Dentistry, Continuous Medical Education, Preventive Medicine and Pharmacy. He sent local staff for advanced studies to different USSR centers, who after returning occupied the positions of heads of departments and laboratories. Vasile Anestiadi continued the promotion of the university, which became one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the former Soviet Union. Ion Ababii, the current rector, has promoted the university applying European ideas, liaising with other universities of the same type, a strategic partnership with future effects. Thus, Nicolae Testemitsanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy reached the anniversary of 70 years, having an imposing history and a foreseeable future, occupying a deserved place among higher educational institutions of the Republic of Moldova. Conclusions: The history of Nicolae Testemitsanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy represents an important page of our countryβs history. The teaching team brings new achievements in the training process of medical staff of the Republic of Moldova
Pulmonary thromboembolism associated with surgical diseases
Nicolae Anestiadi Department of Surgery, Nicolae Testemitsanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, the Republic of MoldovaBackground: The pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) has demonstrated a serious evolution and a high lethality level and is on the third place as
a cause of a sudden death and remains one of the most actual issues in medicine. The actuality of the problem consists not only in the disease severity
and lethality, but also in the difficulties in the diagnostics.
Material and methods: By the necropsy data, the incidence of PTE is estimated as about 15% of cases. A retrospective study of 33 patients who
died from PTE in the period of 2008-2013 is presented. In the studied group the following risk factors have been identified: intravenous catheters,
surgery, immobilization in bed, smoking and atrial fibrillation. In the studied group PTE prophylaxis has been performed with heparin, nadroparin and
enoxaparin. The authors have been dissatisfied with the research due to PTE fatality.
Results: It has been revealaed that an important factor in decreasing the lethality is the administration of antiplatelet drug support to all the patients
with PTE risk.
Conclusions: 1. PTE is a frequent complication with a high lethality even in the case of its prevention. 2. The presence of risk factors, regardless of
their number, strongly requires a preventive treatment. 3. The most effective anticoagulant drugs at the moment are those from the group of anticoagulants
with a low molecular weight in preventive doses (Fondaparinux, Enoxaparin, Nadroparin). 4. It is necessary to reevaluate the anticoagulant medication
support and prescribe it to the people above 40 years old. 5. The problem of PTE remains open for the further research with regard to the evidences of
risk factors and the lethality decrease
Π‘ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°
According to the literature Bouveretβs syndrome is a rare disease with an unclear clinical picture and difficulties in diagnosis. The known diagnostic methods include X-ray examination, ultrasonography, computerized tomography, the endoscopic examination of the gastrointestinal tract. Researchers indicate that the most successful diagnosis can be made when combining ultrasound and contrast radiography. There isnβt a clear opinion about Bouveretβs
syndrome surgical treatment. Preference is given to the simple methods - enterotomy with the extraction of the biliary concrement leaving the elimination of the fistula and cholecystectomy for the second phase of treatment. In this case there appear a risk of the recurrence of biliary obstruction and the occurrence of cholangitis. A clinic case of a 62-year-old woman, who had difficulties in the diagnosis of biliary ileus has been described. The clinical picture has not corresponded to the X-ray examination results. The increase of obstruction syndrome and lack of the effect of conservative therapy have required a classical surgical treatment. In this case the solution of the problem has been reached by one stage treatment: cholecystectomy, enterotomy with gall stone extraction and the liquidation of gastric defect. The postoperative period has been complicated with a bilateral pleurisy, which has been
succesfully cured by carrying out the pleural puncture and antibiotic therapy.Π ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ, ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° β ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎΠ΅ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Ρ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΉ
Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΉ. Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ, ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°Π·Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°Ρ
ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ°. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ
Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π£ΠΠ Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ. ΠΠ΅Ρ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ
Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠ° ΠΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌ β ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ½Ρ, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ° ΠΈ Ρ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ Π½Π° Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΎ, Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²Π° Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΠΏΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ
Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ
ΠΎΠ»Π°Π½Π³ΠΈΡΠ°. ΠΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ 62 Π»Π΅Ρ, Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΠΏΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ
Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π°. ΠΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ
Π½Π΅ΠΏΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΎΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎ Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΌ. Π Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΌ
ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³Π½ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ: Ρ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ, ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ½Ρ ΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅
Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΊΠ°. ΠΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠ»ΡΡ Π΄Π²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π²ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ