Comportamiento productivo del frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ante la aplicación de un promotor del crecimiento activado molecularmente

The objective of the investigation was to evaluate the effect of a promoter of the growth, activated molecularly, on the growth and the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production. The design of Latin Square was used with four treatments and parcels of 15 m2. The variants were, VIUSID agro applied each 7, 14 and 21 days and a treatment control. The dependent variables and the agricultural yield. It was observed that the height of the plant in the treatment every 7 days it overcame to the control in 13,92 % and to the applications each 14 and 21 days in 12,02 and 4,5 % respectively. In the fruits per plant the best behavior was when the product was applied each 7 and 14 days. In the grains per fruits didn't have difference significant statistic among the variants with VIUSID and yes of them with regard to the control. In the variable grains per plant, the best behavior was the weekly treatment, with 63.38 grains like average per plant. Equal happened with the mass of 100 grains. With the weekly application 1,8 t ha-1 was obtained more than with the treatment control. It concluded that the VIUSID, in dose of 1,5 mL each 5 liters of water, applied every seven days it improved the productive behavior of the cultivation of the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variety BAT 304.El objetivo de la investigación fue evaluar el efecto de un promotor del crecimiento, activado molecularmente, en el crecimiento y la producción de frijol. En el ensayo se empleó el diseño de Cuadrado Latino con cuatro tratamientos y parcelas de 16 m2. Las variantes fueron, VIUSID agro aplicado cada 7, 14, 21 días y un tratamiento control. Las variables dependientes fueron, altura de la planta, vainas por planta, granos por vaina, granos por planta, masa de 100 granos y el rendimiento agrícola. Se observó que la altura de la planta en el tratamiento semanal superó al control en 13,92 % y aplicado cada 14 y 21 días en 12,02 y 4,5 % respectivamente. En las vainas por planta, el mejor comportamiento fue el de los tratamientos donde se aplicó el producto cada 7 y 14 días. En los granos por vainas no hubo diferencia estadística significativa entre las variantes con VIUSID y sí de ellas con respecto al control. En la variable granos por planta el mejor comportamiento fue el tratamiento semanal, con 63.38 granos como promedio por planta. Igualmente ocurrió con la masa de 100 granos. Con la variante semanal se alcanzó 1,8 t ha-1 más, que con el tratamiento control. Se concluye que el VIUSID agro, en dosis de 1,5 mL cada 5 litros de agua, aplicado cada siete días mejoró el comportamiento productivo del cultivo del frijol variedad BAT 304

Comportamiento productivo del frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ante la aplicación de un promotor del crecimiento activado molecularmente

El objetivo de la investigación fue evaluar el efecto de un promotor del crecimiento, activado molecularmente, en el crecimiento y la producción de frijol. En el ensayo se empleó el diseño de Cuadrado Latino con cuatro tratamientos y parcelas de 16 m2. Las variantes fueron, VIUSID agro aplicado cada 7, 14, 21 días y un tratamiento control. Las variables dependientes fueron, altura de la planta, vainas por planta, granos por vaina, granos por planta, masa de 100 granos y el rendimiento agrícola. Se observó que la altura de la planta en el tratamiento semanal superó al control en 13,92 % y aplicado cada 14 y 21 días en 12,02 y 4,5 % respectivamente. En las vainas por planta, el mejor comportamiento fue el de los tratamientos donde se aplicó el producto cada 7 y 14 días. En los granos por vainas no hubo diferencia estadística significativa entre las variantes con VIUSID y sí de ellas con respecto al control. En la variable granos por planta el mejor comportamiento fue el tratamiento semanal, con 63.38 granos como promedio por planta. Igualmente ocurrió con la masa de 100 granos. Con la variante semanal se alcanzó 1,8 t ha-1 más, que con el tratamiento control. Se concluye que el VIUSID agro, en dosis de 1,5 mL cada 5 litros de agua, aplicado cada siete días mejoró el comportamiento productivo del cultivo del frijol variedad BAT 304.The objective of the investigation was to evaluate the effect of a promoter of the growth, activated molecularly, on the growth and the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production. The design of Latin Square was used with four treatments and parcels of 15 m2. The variants were, VIUSID agro applied each 7, 14 and 21 days and a treatment control. The dependent variables and the agricultural yield. It was observed that the height of the plant in the treatment every 7 days it overcame to the control in 13,92 % and to the applications each 14 and 21 days in 12,02 and 4,5 % respectively. In the fruits per plant the best behavior was when the product was applied each 7 and 14 days. In the grains per fruits didn't have difference significant statistic among the variants with VIUSID and yes of them with regard to the control. In the variable grains per plant, the best behavior was the weekly treatment, with 63.38 grains like average per plant. Equal happened with the mass of 100 grains. With the weekly application 1,8 t ha-1 was obtained more than with the treatment control. It concluded that the VIUSID, in dose of 1,5 mL each 5 liters of water, applied every seven days it improved the productive behavior of the cultivation of the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variety BAT 304

Effects of a growth promoter on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crops in Sancti Spíritus province, Cuba

In order to evaluate the effect of a growth promoter on the productivity performance and seed-quality in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crops, two experiments were carried out, one in the field and under controlled conditions. In the field experiments, a Latin square design was used for four treatments as follows: control, 0.5, 0.8 and 1.0 l.ha-1, respectively, where yield components were evaluated. The seeds used in the controlled conditions experiment were from prior trials, in a totally randomized design, at the dosages above mentioned. Seed germination and seedling growth were evaluated. In the field experiments, the product had a stimulating effect on the production. The highest yields were reached with the 0.8 and 1.0 l.ha-1 dosages in number 1, with values of 3.09 and 3.02 t.ha-1, and in number 2, the treatment with the best results was 1.0 l.ha-1, with a yield of 2.07 t.ha-1. In germination, there were significant differences among variables only in the first assessment at three days after planting. The best performance in seedling growth and in dry matter production was the treatment with seeds from the 0.5 l.ha-1 dosage in experiment 1. In addition, in number 2, performance among variables was similar. Therefore, VIUSID agro improved the bean yield performance and did not affect later seed germination nor initial seedling growth.In order to evaluate the effect of a growth promoter on the productivity performance and seed-quality in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crops, two experiments were carried out, one in the field and under controlled conditions. In the field experiments, a Latin square design was used for four treatments as follows: control, 0.5, 0.8 and 1.0 l.ha-1, respectively, where yield components were evaluated. The seeds used in the controlled conditions experiment were from prior trials, in a totally randomized design, at the dosages above mentioned. Seed germination and seedling growth were evaluated. In the field experiments, the product had a stimulating effect on the production. The highest yields were reached with the 0.8 and 1.0 l.ha-1 dosages in number 1, with values of 3.09 and 3.02 t.ha-1, and in number 2, the treatment with the best results was 1.0 l.ha-1, with a yield of 2.07 t.ha-1. In germination, there were significant differences among variables only in the first assessment at three days after planting. The best performance in seedling growth and in dry matter production was the treatment with seeds from the 0.5 l.ha-1 dosage in experiment 1. In addition, in number 2, performance among variables was similar. Therefore, VIUSID agro improved the bean yield performance and did not affect later seed germination nor initial seedling growth

Effects of a growth promoter on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crops in Sancti Spíritus province, Cuba

In order to evaluate the effect of a growth promoter on the productivity performance and seed-quality in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crops, two experiments were carried out, one in the field and under controlled conditions. In the field experiments, a Latin square design was used for four treatments as follows: control, 0.5, 0.8 and 1.0 l.ha-1, respectively, where yield components were evaluated. The seeds used in the controlled conditions experiment were from prior trials, in a totally randomized design, at the dosages above mentioned. Seed germination and seedling growth were evaluated. In the field experiments, the product had a stimulating effect on the production. The highest yields were reached with the 0.8 and 1.0 l.ha-1 dosages in number 1, with values of 3.09 and 3.02 t.ha-1, and in number 2, the treatment with the best results was 1.0 l.ha-1, with a yield of 2.07 t.ha-1. In germination, there were significant differences among variables only in the first assessment at three days after planting. The best performance in seedling growth and in dry matter production was the treatment with seeds from the 0.5 l.ha-1 dosage in experiment 1. In addition, in number 2, performance among variables was similar. Therefore, VIUSID agro improved the bean yield performance and did not affect later seed germination nor initial seedling growth.In order to evaluate the effect of a growth promoter on the productivity performance and seed-quality in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crops, two experiments were carried out, one in the field and under controlled conditions. In the field experiments, a Latin square design was used for four treatments as follows: control, 0.5, 0.8 and 1.0 l.ha-1, respectively, where yield components were evaluated. The seeds used in the controlled conditions experiment were from prior trials, in a totally randomized design, at the dosages above mentioned. Seed germination and seedling growth were evaluated. In the field experiments, the product had a stimulating effect on the production. The highest yields were reached with the 0.8 and 1.0 l.ha-1 dosages in number 1, with values of 3.09 and 3.02 t.ha-1, and in number 2, the treatment with the best results was 1.0 l.ha-1, with a yield of 2.07 t.ha-1. In germination, there were significant differences among variables only in the first assessment at three days after planting. The best performance in seedling growth and in dry matter production was the treatment with seeds from the 0.5 l.ha-1 dosage in experiment 1. In addition, in number 2, performance among variables was similar. Therefore, VIUSID agro improved the bean yield performance and did not affect later seed germination nor initial seedling growth

Effects of a growth promoter on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crops in Sancti Spíritus province, Cuba

In order to evaluate the effect of a growth promoter on the productivity performance and seed-quality in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crops, two experiments were carried out, one in the field and under controlled conditions. In the field experiments, a Latin square design was used for four treatments as follows: control, 0.5, 0.8 and 1.0 l.ha-1, respectively, where yield components were evaluated. The seeds used in the controlled conditions experiment were from prior trials, in a totally randomized design, at the dosages above mentioned. Seed germination and seedling growth were evaluated. In the field experiments, the product had a stimulating effect on the production. The highest yields were reached with the 0.8 and 1.0 l.ha-1 dosages in number 1, with values of 3.09 and 3.02 t.ha-1, and in number 2, the treatment with the best results was 1.0 l.ha-1, with a yield of 2.07 t.ha-1. In germination, there were significant differences among variables only in the first assessment at three days after planting. The best performance in seedling growth and in dry matter production was the treatment with seeds from the 0.5 l.ha-1 dosage in experiment 1. In addition, in number 2, performance among variables was similar. Therefore, VIUSID agro improved the bean yield performance and did not affect later seed germination nor initial seedling growth

Correction to: Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry

International audienceIn this article, the name of the GLORIA-AF investigator Anastasios Kollias was given incorrectly as Athanasios Kollias in the Acknowledgements. The original article has been corrected

Patterns of oral anticoagulant use and outcomes in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: a post-hoc analysis from the GLORIA-AF Registry

Background: Previous studies suggested potential ethnic differences in the management and outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aim to analyse oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription, discontinuation, and risk of adverse outcomes in Asian patients with AF, using data from a global prospective cohort study. Methods: From the GLORIA-AF Registry Phase II-III (November 2011-December 2014 for Phase II, and January 2014-December 2016 for Phase III), we analysed patients according to their self-reported ethnicity (Asian vs. non-Asian), as well as according to Asian subgroups (Chinese, Japanese, Korean and other Asian). Logistic regression was used to analyse OAC prescription, while the risk of OAC discontinuation and adverse outcomes were analysed through Cox-regression model. Our primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The original studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01468701, NCT01671007, and NCT01937377. Findings: 34,421 patients were included (70.0 ± 10.5 years, 45.1% females, 6900 (20.0%) Asian: 3829 (55.5%) Chinese, 814 (11.8%) Japanese, 1964 (28.5%) Korean and 293 (4.2%) other Asian). Most of the Asian patients were recruited in Asia (n = 6701, 97.1%), while non-Asian patients were mainly recruited in Europe (n = 15,449, 56.1%) and North America (n = 8378, 30.4%). Compared to non-Asian individuals, prescription of OAC and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) was lower in Asian patients (Odds Ratio [OR] and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI): 0.23 [0.22-0.25] and 0.66 [0.61-0.71], respectively), but higher in the Japanese subgroup. Asian ethnicity was also associated with higher risk of OAC discontinuation (Hazard Ratio [HR] and [95% CI]: 1.79 [1.67-1.92]), and lower risk of the primary composite outcome (HR [95% CI]: 0.86 [0.76-0.96]). Among the exploratory secondary outcomes, Asian ethnicity was associated with higher risks of thromboembolism and intracranial haemorrhage, and lower risk of major bleeding. Interpretation: Our results showed that Asian patients with AF showed suboptimal thromboembolic risk management and a specific risk profile of adverse outcomes; these differences may also reflect differences in country-specific factors. Ensuring integrated and appropriate treatment of these patients is crucial to improve their prognosis. Funding: The GLORIA-AF Registry was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH