Factors that Can Promote or Impede the Advancement of Women as Leaders in Surgery : Results from an International Survey

Compared with male surgeons, women have less success advancing their careers and are underrepresented in leadership positions in surgery. The purpose of this study is to identify the qualifications necessary to become leaders in surgery and the career barriers faced by women surgeons in various cultural environments. A survey was performed with women surgeons in Japan, USA, Finland, and Hong Kong, China, to assess various barriers faced by women surgeons in the respective countries. To develop appropriate survey tool, a preliminary questionnaire was distributed to leaders in surgery and also in various organizations worldwide. The response rate was 23 % with 225 of 964 survey returned. Japanese women surgeons identify lacked family support as impeding a successful surgical career. US women surgeons feel more latent gender discrimination. Finnish women surgeons are less likely to need to sacrifice work-life balance, when holding leadership positions. Women surgeons worldwide are highly motivated to develop their career and agree the percentage of women surgeons in leadership positions should be increased. Women surgeons in different countries perceive different challenges. We must develop strategies and should not hesitate to negotiate to overcome these issues to reach leadership positions in surgery. This may be accomplished through networking worldwide to improve current conditions and obstacles.Peer reviewe

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPSS) insertion as a prelude to orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with severe portal hypertension

Objective: To investigate the impact of preoperative transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPSS) on patients undergoing liver transplantation. Design: A retrospective non-randomized comparative clinical study. Setting: Tertiary referral institution. Patients, participants: Twenty-four patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and gastro-oesophageal varices who underwent liver transplantation. Interventions: TIPSS insertion had been performed preoperatively in 12 patients. Main outcome measures: Operative dissection times and blood transfusion requirements during liver transplantation. Postoperative complication rate. Cumulative patient and graft survival. Results: There were no significant differences in outcome measures between patients with and without previous TIPSS insertion with respect to recipient hepatectomy times (mean 192 min (126-280) versus 196 min (145-254)), total operating time (mean 484 min (330-690) versus 486 min (370-580)), intraoperative blood transfusion (mean 11 units (2-29) versus 12 units (2-30)), intraoperative fresh frozen plasma transfusion (mean 9 units (1-16) versus 11 (2-23) units), patient survival (83% versus 92% cumulative 1-year survival), graft survival (80% versus 83% cumulative 1-year survival), or postoperative complication rates. Conclusion: TIPSS insertion is feasible and relatively safe as a 'bridge to transplantation' in patients who have had a variceal haemorrhage. There is little evidence that preoperative TIPSS insertion directly affects the performance of liver transplantation as TIPSS neither, hinders nor facilitates surgery or post operative survival. Although it is important that the potential hazards of TIPSS extension into the inferior vena cava or superior mesenteric vein be recognized, liver transplant surgeons need not be unduly concerned about the overall impact of TIPSS as it becomes more universally available in the management of variceal haemorrhage