Pelvic reorientation osteotomies and acetabuloplasties in children. Surgical technique

SummaryThe objectives of pelvic osteotomies are to improve femoral head coverage and coxofemoral joint stability. The most currently used osteotomies can be divided into reorientation osteotomies (Salter and Pol le Cœur triple osteotomy) and acetabuloplasties (Pemberton and Dega). All these osteotomies share an identical installation on the table and bikini-type incision. The Salter osteotomy uses a single osteotomy line located at the inferior gluteal line. The Pol Le Cœur triple pelvic osteotomy combines innominate osteotomies of the iliopubic and ischiopubic rami via a genitofemoral approach (inguinal). In these two reorientation osteotomies, the acetabulum tilts in retroversion, improving the anterior and lateral coverage but reducing the posterior coverage. In the Pemberton acetabuloplasty, the osteotomy line is incomplete. It begins anteriorly between the iliac spines and ends posteriorly immediately above the triradiate cartilage. The posterior part of the ilium remains intact. The Pemberton acetabuloplasty causes retroversion and plicature of the acetabulum responsible for reducing its diameter. Anterior and lateral coverage of the femoral head is improved and posterior coverage remains unchanged. In the Dega acetabuloplasty, the osteotomy line is incomplete. It begins laterally above the acetabulum and terminates just above the triradiate cartilage. The medial part of the ilium remains intact. The Dega acetabuloplasty reduces the diameter of the acetabulum and improves overall femoral head coverage (anterior, lateral, and posterior)

Meniscoplasty for stable osteochondritis dissecans of the lateral femoral condyle combined with a discoid lateral meniscus: a case report

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Osteochondritis dissecans of the lateral femoral condyle is relatively rare, and it is reported to often be combined with a discoid lateral meniscus. Given the potential for healing, conservative management is indicated for stable osteochondritis dissecans in patients who are skeletally immature. However, patients with osteochondritis dissecans of the lateral femoral condyle combined with a discoid lateral meniscus often have persistent symptoms despite conservative management.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We present the case of a seven-year-old Korean girl who had osteochondritis dissecans of the lateral femoral condyle combined with a discoid lateral meniscus, which healed after meniscoplasty for the symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus without surgical intervention for the osteochondritis dissecans. In addition, healing of the osteochondritis dissecans lesion was confirmed by an MRI scan five months after the operation.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Meniscoplasty can be recommended for symptomatic stable juvenile osteochondritis dissecans of the lateral femoral condyle combined with a discoid lateral meniscus when conservative treatment fails.</p

All inside transtibial arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature: Surgical technique and a case report

SummaryPosterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears are rare in children and may cause posterior instability of the knee. We present an original reconstruction technique. An 11-year-old boy sustained a PCL rupture. Despite initial immobilization followed by physiotherapy, he could not resume his previous sporting activities at the pre-injury level and complained of anterior knee pain. We performed an arthroscopic PCL reconstruction using a single bundle four-strand hamstring autograft. The femoral tunnel was drilled through the epiphysis and the tibial tunnel went through the physis under both arthroscopic and fluoroscopic control. The graft was secured using absorbable interference screws. At 2years follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic and resumed sports at the same level as before the injury. Clinical examination was normal. There was no sign of growth disturbance. PCL injury is extremely rare in children. This original technique seemed appropriate in a symptomatic patient.Level of evidenceIV

Bone lengthening using the Fitbone ® motorized intramedullary nail: The first experience in France

International audienceINTRODUCTION:Intramedullary limb lengthening systems include mechanical systems (the Albizzia nail and the ISKD nail) as well as motorized systems with the Fitbone(®) (Wittenstein, Igersheim, Germany) and the Precice(®) (Ellipse Technologies, Irvine, CA, USA) nails. We hypothesized that limb lengthening using the Fitbone(®) nail was reliable, reproducible, and comfortable for the patient.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Between 2010 and 2013, a prospective single-center, single-operator (FA) study was conducted on patients who had undergone limb lengthening using the Fitbone(®) nail. The inclusion criteria were length discrepancy of the limbs equal to or greater than 25 mm or a short stature. The exclusion criteria were indications for cosmetic reasons and/or growth plates that were still open. The lengthening parameters were assessed postoperatively and at the last follow-up. Lengthening was considered achieved when the lengthening objective did not differ by more than 5 mm. All complications were noted. A statistical analysis was performed.RESULTS:Twenty-six Fitbone(®) nails were implanted in 23 patients, in the femur in 15 cases and the tibia in 11 cases. The patients' mean age was 22.5 years (range: 15-53 years) and the mean follow-up was 3.4 years (range: 2-5.3 years). The limb lengthening targeted was obtained in 23 cases (88%) and the mean lengthening was 45.3±18 mm (range: 20-80 mm). The mean time to healing was 277±167 days (range: 86-638 days). The mean healing index was 73±57 days/cm for the femurs and 83.5±65 days/cm for the tibias. The mean complication rate was 15.4%.DISCUSSION:This study emphasizes the good short-term results of this motorized intramedullary lengthening system. An evaluation over the longer term and with a higher number of patients remains necessary.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:IV: uncontrolled, prospective, continuous study

Induced-membrane femur reconstruction after resection of bone malignancies: Three cases of massive graft resorption in children

SummaryBone reconstruction after surgical resection of bone malignancies in children remains a difficult challenge. Induced-membrane reconstruction as described by Masquelet et al. was originally reported in traumatic or septic bone defects and is now adapted to this field. We report here three cases of massive femoral graft resorption requiring surgical revision in two boys aged 3 and 6years and a 9-year-old girl. Hypotheses include the long delay between the two stages, nature of the bone graft, high varus loads specific to this location, and lack of stability of the fixation. This technique has recently provided promising preliminary results when applied to the field of bone tumours. However, reconstruction of the femur seems to be specifically associated with a risk of graft resorption. Identification of the origin of this major complication is needed to amend the technique or its indications

Traumatic diaphyseal bone defects in children.

AbstractTraumatic bone defects (BD) are rare in children. There are no pediatric series in the literature on this topic. The aim of this first pediatric series was to determine the epidemiological characteristics and evaluate the results of different treatments in this entity.MATERIAL AND METHODS:This retrospective multicenter study evaluated diaphyseal bone defects in cases in which bone reconstruction was performed. BD was either initial and associated with trauma or secondary, resulting from infected non-union.RESULTS:The series included 27 patients (17 boys and 10 girls), mean age 11.4 years old (3-16) (20 traffic accidents). At the outset of all patients' history was an open fracture (one stage 1, seven stage 2, 11 stage 3A and seven stage 3B, 1 NR). BD involved 13 tibias, 9 femurs, three humerus, one radius and one ulna. Bone defects were initial in 20 cases and secondary in seven cases. They were less than 2 cm in two cases, between 2 and 5 cm in 9 cases, between 5 and 10 cm in 10 cases and more than 10 cm in six cases. Treatment of BD was immediate in one case and delayed in 26 cases. Techniques used included: induced membrane in 10 cases, bone transport in seven cases, bone autograft in eight cases, vascularized fibular transfer in one case, no bone reconstruction in one case. Union was obtained in 27 patients. Union was obtained within a mean 12.3 months BD (3-62). Fifteen patients presented with sequellae.DISCUSSION:Traumatic bone defects have a better prognosis in children than in adults. The thicker, more active and richly vascularized periosteum in children is an important prognostic factor. Treatment of BD requires good initial bone stabilization. Reconstruction depends on the integrity of the periosteum. In case of an intact periosteum, bone reconstruction does not seem necessary in young children. If one part of the periosteum is intact, a simple autograft seems sufficient even with extensive bone defects. In the absence of the periosteum or especially in case of infection, the induced membrane technique seems preferable, with bone transport or a vascularized bone transfer