11 research outputs found

    Mushroom quality related with various substrates’ bioaccumulation and translocation of heavy metals

    Get PDF
    Mushrooms are popular due to the nutrition contents in the fruit bodies and are relatively easy to cultivate. Mushrooms from the white-rot fungi group can be cultivated on agricultural biomass such as sawdust, paddy straw, wheat straw, oil palm frond, oil palm empty fruit bunches, oil palm bark, corn silage, corn cobs, banana leaves, coconut husk, pineapple peel, pineapple leaves, cotton stalk, sugarcane bagasse and various other agricultural biomass. Mushrooms are exceptional decomposers that play important roles in the food web to balance the ecosystems. They can uptake various minerals, including essential and non-essential minerals provided by the substrates. However, the agricultural biomass used for mushroom cultivation is sometimes polluted by heavy metals because of the increased anthropogenic activities occurring in line with urbanisation. Due to their role in mycoremediation, the mushrooms also absorb pollutants from the substrates into their fruit bodies. This article reviews the sources of agricultural biomass for mushroom cultivation that could track how the environmental heavy metals are accumulated and translocated into mushroom fruit bodies. This review also discusses the possible health risks from prolonged uptakes of heavy metal-contaminated mushrooms to highlight the importance of early contaminants’ detection for food security

    Palm press fibre and rice straw for cultivation grey oyster mushroom (Pleurotus sajor-caju)

    Get PDF
    Sawdust (SD) usually sourced from rubber plant is commonly used as substrate to cultivate the grey oyster mushroom Pleurotus sajor-caju in Malaysia. However, the market price of SD is increasing because of its declining availability. Thus, this study aimed to discover an alternative substrate to cultivate grey oyster mushroom. The raw materials used in the substrate were oil palm pressed fiber (PPF), rice straw (RS) and SD, either alone or in combination with different ratios including T1: 90% SD + 10% rice bran (commercial substrate as control); T2: 30% RS + 20% SD + 50% PPF; T3: 50% RS + 50% PPF; T4: 100% RS; and T5: 100% PPF. The suitability of the substrates was determined based on growth, yield, nutrition and mineral content in the mushrooms. The growth and yield of the mushroom fruiting body on the different substrates showed significant differences. The shortest harvesting day was obtained in T4 (100% RS) after 29 days, whereas the longest harvesting day was obtained in T1 (90% SD + 10% rice bran) after 51 days. The highest yield was obtained in T4. Nutrition analysis showed significant difference among the treatments. The highest amounts of protein (26%) and ash (1.29%) were found in T5. Overall, the results showed that mushroom yield performance was good in RS but nutritional content was the highest in PPF. Therefore, RS and PPF have good impact for mushroom growers either in commercial production or in functional food industry to reduce SD dependency

    Nutritive Analysis of Five Aquatic Plants at Selected Area in Kelantan, Malaysia

    No full text
    In terms of providing a low cost feeds for animal consumption, the nutrient component for different species of aquatic plants were evaluated. This study emphasize on the nutrition comparative between 5 species of aquatic plants such as Hydrilla verticillata (order: Hydrocharitales), Pistia stratiotes (order: Arales), Chara corallina (order: Charales), Myriophyllum spicatum (order: Haloragidales) and Azolla pinnata (order: Salviniales) were collected at the selected area in Kelantan (6.1254o N, 102.2381oE). The objectives of this study is to differentiate the nutrient component for five different species of aquatic plants. The study shows that the crude fiber values for H. verticillata, P. stratiotes, C. corallina, M. spicatum, and A. pinnata were 15.35±0.35%, 14.10±0.10%, 20.05±0.55%, 25.60±5.10% and 42.95±2.25% respectively. While the percentage of ash content recorded for H. verticillata, P. stratiotes, C. corallina, M. spicatum, and A. pinnata were 18.8%, 31.8%, 20.6%, 28.9% and 12.0% respectively. The organic matter content for H. verticillata, P. stratiotes, C. corallina, M. spicatum, and A. pinnata were 81.20±0.10%, 68.20±0.10%, 79.40±0.20%, 80.80±0.10% and 88.05±1.45% respectively. The crude protein value for H. verticillata, P. stratiotes, C. corallina, M. spicatum, and A. pinnata were 23.18±0.13%, 16.89±0.08%, 22.30±0.13%, 22.78±0.76% and 21.70±0.09% respectively. While the microbial analysis based on total bacterial count for H. verticillata, P. stratiotes, C. corallina, M. spicatum, and A. pinnata were 2.71CFU/mL, 2.88CFU/mL, 2.16CFU/mL, 0.49CFU/mL and 1.68CFU/mL respectively. In conclusion, the nutrient component for five different species of aquatic plants can are differs from each other. So, the nutrient for five different species of aquatic plants are suitable for animal feed
    corecore