4 research outputs found

    The global impact of adverse childhood experiences on criminal behavior: A cross-continental study

    Get PDF
    Background: Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) have been associated with a greater risk of later criminal offending. However, existing research in this area has been primarily conducted in Western developed countries and cross-cultural studies are rare. Objectives: This study examined the relationship between ACEs and criminal behaviors in young adults living in 10 countries located across five continents, after accounting for sex, age, and cross-national differences. Participants and setting: In total, 3797 young adults aged between 18 and 20 years (M = 18.97; DP = 0.81) were assessed locally in community settings within the 10 countries.Method: The ACE Questionnaire was used to assess maltreatment and household dysfunction during childhood and a subset of questions derived from the Deviant Behavior Variety Scale (DBVS) was used to determine past-year criminal variety pertaining to 10 acts considered crime across participating countries. Results: Physical and sexual abuse, physical neglect, and household substance abuse were related to criminal variety, globally, and independently across sexes and countries ranked differently in the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI). In addition, three out of five experiences of household dysfunction were related to criminal variety, but subsequent analyses indicate that some forms of household dysfunction only hold statistical significance among males or females, or in countries ranking lower in the HDI. Conclusions: This research strengthens the finding that there are cross-cultural mechanisms perpetuating the cycle of violence. It also indicates that forms of household dysfunction have an impact on criminal behavior that is shaped by gender and the country's levels of social well-being.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    ïŧŋāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāļđāļ•āļĢāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāļĄāļŦāļēāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ•āđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĢāļąāļŠāļāļēāļ”āļļāļĐāļŽāļĩāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ• āļŠāļēāļ‚āļēāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĒāļļāļāļ•āđŒ (āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāļđāļ•āļĢāļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ›āļĢāļļāļ‡ 2552)āļŠāļ–āļēāļšāļąāļ™āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢ āđŒāļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĻāļĢāļĩāļ™āļ„āļĢāļīāļ™āļ—āļĢāļ§āļīāđ‚āļĢāļ’

    No full text
    The Evaluation of Master and Doctoral Degree Programs in AppliedBehavioral Science, 2009, Behavioral Science Research Institute,Srinakharinwirot UniversityThis research aimed to evaluate the Master and Doctoral Degree Programs in Applied BehavioralScience Research in 4 dimensions: 1) Program components; 2) Attributes of graduate students,graduates, and lecturers; 3) Program management, learning process, and assessment andevaluation; and 4) learning resources. The survey research methodology was approached, using 11questionnaires and deep interview technique for research samples. The descriptive statistics wereapplied. The research results were as following: 1) Structure and objectives of the program wereprecise, tangible and appropriate, the course contents encourage learners to understand theresearch processes and focus on professional skills; 2) Students and graduates had good desirableattributes and ability to accomplish their certain tasks; 3) Teachers had a great deal of experiencein research, could advice and promote students’ ability in problem solving; 4) The teachingprocess was appropriate, using a variety of teaching techniques and knowledge transfer inresearch methodology and in behavioral science; 5) Measurement and evaluation were clear; and6) Learning resources were advantageous for learning and teaching. Furthermore, the academicclimate of the Institute was satisfied and aided student learning.Keywords: Program Evaluation, Field of Applied Behavioral Science Research,Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (TQF: HEd)āļšāļ—āļ„āļąāļ”āļĒāđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļ§āļąāļ•āļ–āļļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļ‡āļ„āđŒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāļđāļ•āļĢāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāļĄāļŦāļēāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ•āđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĢāļąāļŠāļāļēāļ”āļļāļĐāļŽāļĩāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ• āļŠāļēāļ‚āļēāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĒāļļāļāļ•āđŒ āđƒāļ™āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāļđāļ•āļĢ āļ„āļļāļ“āļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āļ°āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ™āļīāļŠāļīāļ• āļ„āļļāļ“āļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āļ°āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ­āļēāļˆāļēāļĢāļĒāđŒāļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāļđāļ•āļĢ āļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ­āļ™ āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļąāļ”āđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļœāļĨ āđāļĨāļ°āļ—āļĢāļąāļžāļĒāļēāļāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ­āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ­āļ™ āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļĢāļ§āļšāļĢāļ§āļĄāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāđāļšāļšāļŠāļ­āļšāļ–āļēāļĄāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļąāļĄāļ āļēāļĐāļ“āđŒāļˆāļēāļāļœāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ‡ āļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļŠāļ–āļīāļ•āļīāļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāđ€āļ™āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļŦāļē āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđāļĨāļ°āļ§āļąāļ•āļ–āļļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļ‡āļ„āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāļđāļ•āļĢāļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™ āđ€āļ™āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļŦāļēāļĢāļēāļĒāļ§āļīāļŠāļēāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāļđāļ•āļĢ āļŠāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļœāļđāđ‰āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒ āļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŦāļĨāļēāļāļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļĄāļļāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ™āđ‰āļ™āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļœāļđāđ‰āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒ āļ„āļļāļ“āļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āļ°āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ™āļīāļŠāļīāļ•āđāļĨāļ°āļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ•āļ—āļĩāđˆāļžāļķāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļ‡āļ„āđŒāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđƒāļ™āđ€āļāļ“āļ‘āđŒāļ”āļĩ āļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļ”āļĩ āļ­āļēāļˆāļēāļĢāļĒāđŒāļ›āļĢāļ°āļˆāļģāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāļđāļ•āļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļœāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļŠāļđāļ‡ āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļģāļ›āļĢāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ™āļīāļŠāļīāļ•āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđāļāđ‰āđ„āļ‚āļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āđ† āđ„āļ”āđ‰ āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāļđāļ•āļĢ āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē āļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ­āļ™āļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄ āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ­āļ™āļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŦāļĨāļēāļāļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āđ€āļ—āļ„āļ™āļīāļ„āļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ­āļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ–āđˆāļēāļĒāļ—āļ­āļ”āļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āļ—āļēāļ‡āļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒ āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļąāļ”āđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļœāļĨāļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™ āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ­āļ™ āļ•āļģāļĢāļēāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™ āļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļžāļĢāđ‰āļ­āļĄ āđ€āļ­āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ­āļ™ āļ™āļ­āļāļˆāļēāļāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļĒāļąāļ‡āđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ§āđˆāļēāļšāļĢāļĢāļĒāļēāļāļēāļĻāļ—āļēāļ‡āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļ§āļīāļŠāļēāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļ–āļēāļšāļąāļ™āļŊ āļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ™āđˆāļēāļžāļ­āđƒāļˆāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĒāļīāđˆāļ‡āļ„āļģāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļ: āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāļđāļ•āļĢ, āļŠāļēāļ‚āļēāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĒāļļāļāļ•āđŒ, āļāļĢāļ­āļšāļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™āļ„āļļāļ“āļ§āļļāļ’āļīāļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļ­āļļāļ”āļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļēāļ•
    corecore