457 research outputs found
Netnography: A novel methodology for nursing research
Aim: The aim of this paper is to critically reflect on our team's experience of using
netnography to explore vaccine-hesitant parents and pregnant women, a group who
have traditionally been difficult to recruit to research studies and a methodology that
is underutilized in nursing research.
Design: This paper takes the form of a discussion paper that will utilize data obtained
from a qualitative netnographic study. Relevant literature was searched including
2015–2023.
Method: This paper utilized data obtained from a qualitative study that used netnography as methodology and an online minable data source. Netnography is a relatively
new methodology that uses the online environment to explore digital cultures and
study networked society. It pays particular attention to cultural insights and conditions that impact the human experience. This methodology is particularly relevant to
nursing research which is often humanistic and always conducted to ensure optimal
patient outcomes.
Results: Using netnography for the first time has resulted in four main insights. These
include the adaptability of the process; the creativity involved in designing the site;
the ready acceptance of the site by participants and the co-creation knowledge that
resulted.
Conclusions: Netnography is a creative methodology that was successful in accessing
and engaging the vaccine-hesitant community, a group who are often marginalized.
Netnography has the advantage of using a platform that is familiar and safe for many
people and provides access to an extensive minable data source
Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities?
In the social sciences and humanities book publishing takes a prominent role, both in terms of communicating with international peers and with a broader intelligentsia (Hicks, 2004; Verleysen & Engels, 2014). Empirical evidence regarding the evolution of the share of scholarly book publications in the total volume of scholarly publications in a given country is rare. In this study we intend to fill this gap with an analysis of the comprehensive coverage data on the share of peer reviewed book publications (book chapters, edited volumes and monographs) that are available from Flanders and Slovenia for the period 2004 to 2015. We supplement these data with data on peer reviewed book chapters and monographs from Norway for the period 2005-2015 as well as data on all types of peer reviewed book publishing for the period 2009 to 2014 for Poland and 2011 to 2015 for Finland
Towards characterising negative impact:Introducing Grimpact
This paper categorises the nature of what we have labelled as the potential for ‘GrImpact’, in the evaluation of the wider influence of research, beyond academia. As the impact agenda broadly defined grows to include more formally criteria that consider the value of research beyond academia, so too does the pressure to ensure that these assessments of public value are conducted with the public’s best interests in mind. In many cases, any negative impact from research cannot be foreseen at the time of the evaluation, making it vital that any kinds of rewards for impact stimulate only positive public benefits (aka “the right type” of impact). Using a series of case studies of identified “negative impact” this paper explores the concept of Grimpact, as well as creates typologies of its characteristics and precursors
Aboriginal children and family connections to primary health care whilst homeless and in high housing mobility: observations from a Nurse Practitioner-led service
Aim:
This article documents the impact of a Nurse Practitioner-led primary health service for disadvantaged children living in housing instability or homelessness. It identifies that First Nations children miss out on essential primary care, particularly immunisation, but have less severe health conditions than non-First Nations children living in housing insecurity.
Background:
Health services for homeless populations focus on the 11% of rough sleepers, little is done for the 22% of children in Australia living in housing instability; many of whom are from First Nations families. Little is known of the health status of these children or their connections to appropriate primary health care.
Methods:
This research implemented an innovative model of extended health care delivery, embedding a Nurse Practitioner in a homeless service to work with families providing health assessments and referrals, using clinically validated assessment tools. This article reports on proof of concept findings on the service that measured immunisation rates, developmental, medical, dental and mental health needs of children, particularly First Nations children, using a three-point severity level scale with Level 3 being the most severe and in need of immediate referral to a specialist medical service.
Findings:
Forty-three children were referred by the service to the Nurse Practitioner over a 6-month period, with nine identifying as First Nations children. Differences in severity levels between First Nations/non-First Nations children were Level 1, First Nations/non-First Nations 0/15%; Level 2, 10/17%; and Level 3, 45/29%. Forty-five percent of First Nations children had no health problems, as compared to 29% on non-First Nations children. Immunisation rates were low for both cohorts. No First Nations child was immunised and only 9% of the non-First Nations children. While numbers for both cohorts are too low for valid statistical analysis, the lower levels of severity for First Nations children suggest stronger extended family support and the positive impact of cultural norms of reciprocity
Journal article publishing in the social sciences and humanities: a comparison of Web of Science coverage for five European countries
This study compares publication pattern dynamics in the social sciences and
humanities in five European countries. Three are Central and Eastern European
countries that share a similar cultural and political heritage (the Czech
Republic, Slovakia, and Poland). The other two are Flanders (Belgium) and
Norway, representing Western Europe and the Nordics, respectively. We analysed
449,409 publications from 2013-2016 and found that, despite persisting
differences between the two groups of countries across all disciplines,
publication patterns in the Central and Eastern European countries are becoming
more similar to those in their Western and Nordic counterparts. Articles from
the Central and Eastern European countries are increasingly published in
journals indexed in Web of Science and also in journals with the highest
citation impacts. There are, however, clear differences between social science
and humanities disciplines, which need to be considered in research evaluation
and science policy
Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities?
© 2018, Tim C.E. Engels, Andreja Istenič Starčič, Emanuel Kulczycki, Janne Pölönen and Gunnar Sivertsen. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach: Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings: As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications: The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like “performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing” are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value: The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH
- …