13 research outputs found
Damping signatures in future neutrino oscillation experiments
We discuss the phenomenology of damping signatures in the neutrino
oscillation probabilities, where either the oscillating terms or the
probabilities can be damped. This approach is a possibility for tests of
non-oscillation effects in future neutrino oscillation experiments, where we
mainly focus on reactor and long-baseline experiments. We extensively motivate
different damping signatures due to small corrections by neutrino decoherence,
neutrino decay, oscillations into sterile neutrinos, or other mechanisms, and
classify these signatures according to their energy (spectral) dependencies. We
demonstrate, at the example of short baseline reactor experiments, that damping
can severely alter the interpretation of results, e.g., it could fake a value
of smaller than the one provided by Nature. In addition,
we demonstrate how a neutrino factory could constrain different damping models
with emphasis on how these different models could be distinguished, i.e., how
easily the actual non-oscillation effects could be identified. We find that the
damping models cluster in different categories, which can be much better
distinguished from each other than models within the same cluster.Comment: 33 pages, 5 figures, LaTeX. Final version published in JHE
Signature of sterile species in atmospheric neutrino data at neutrino telescopes
The MiniBooNE results have still not been able to comprehensively rule out
the oscillation interpretation of the LSND experiment. So far the so-called
short baseline experiments with energy in the MeV range and baseline of few
meters have been probing the existence of sterile neutrinos. We show how
signatures of these extra sterile states could be obtained in TeV energy range
atmospheric neutrinos travelling distances of thousands of kilometers.
Atmospheric neutrinos in the TeV range would be detected by the upcoming
neutrino telescopes. Of course vacuum oscillations of these neutrinos would be
very small. However, we show that resonant matter effects inside the Earth
could enhance these very tiny oscillations into near-maximal transitions, which
should be hard to miss. We show that imprint of sterile neutrinos could be
unambiguously obtained in this high energy atmospheric neutrino event sample.
Not only would neutrino telescopes tell the presence of sterile neutrinos, it
should also be possible for them to distinguish between the different possible
mass and mixing scenarios with additional sterile states.Comment: 26 pages, 11 figures, Version to appear in JHE
Biosensors based on conductometric detection
The present paper is a self-review on the development of about 20 conductometric biosensors based on planar electrodes and containing different biological material (enzymes, cells, antibodies), bio-mimics or synthetic membranes, including Imprinting polymers, as a sensitive element. Highly specific, sensitive, simple, fast and cheap determination of different analytes makes them promising for needs of medicine, biotechnology, environmental control, agriculture and food industry. Non-specific interference of back-ground ions may be overcome by the differential mode of measurement, the usage of rather concentrated sample buffer and additional negatively or positively charged membranes, which decrease buffer capacity influence and extend a dynamic range of sensors response. For development of easy-to-use small conductometric immunosensors several approaches seem to be promising: i) the usage of polyaniline as electroconductive label for antibodies detection in competitive electroimmunoassay; ii) the elaboration of multilayer structures with phtalocyanine films; iii) the usage of acrylic copolymeric membranes. The advantages and disadvantages of conductometric biosensors created are discussed. For future commercialisation our effort are aimed to unite a thin-film technology with membranes deposition and to find the ways of membrane stabilisation, including bio-mimics creation, utilisation of bioaffinity polymeric membranes, imprinting polymers etc.ΠΠ³Π»ΡΠ΄ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ·Ρ Π²Π»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡ Π· ΡΠΎΠ·ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΊΠΈ Π±Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎ 20 ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π±ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΡΠ² Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ² ΡΠ° ΡΡΠ·Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π»Ρ (ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈ, ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈ, Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ»Π°), ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ ΡΠΊ ΡΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡ
Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ². ΠΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡΡΡ, ΡΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ²ΡΡΡΡ, Π½ΠΈΠ·ΡΠΊΠ° ΡΡΠ½Π°, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠ° Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡ Π²ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡΠ·Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½ ΡΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΡΡ Π±ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΡΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π± ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈ, Π±ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡ, Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈ, ΡΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠ° Ρ
Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΡΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ·Ρ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π·ΡΠ°Π·ΠΊΡΠ² Π½Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π²ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ² ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½Π° ΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈ Π·Π°Π²Π΄ΡΠΊΠΈ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΡ Π²ΠΈΠΌΡΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Ρ, Π±ΡΠ»ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
Π±ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΠ·ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ², Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΆ Π΄ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
Π½Π΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ ΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½, ΡΠΊΡ Π·Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ±ΡΠ³Π°ΡΡΡ Π²ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ²Ρ Π±ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡ ΡΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ° ΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ·ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ² Ρ ΡΠΎΠ·ΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄ΡΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΡΠ². ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΌΡΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΌΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΡΠ² Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡ ΠΏΡΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈ: Π°) Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ»ΡΠ½Ρ ΡΠΊ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡ ΠΌΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π²ΠΈΠ· Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ½Ρ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ» Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠΌΡΠ½ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ·Ρ: Π±) ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π±Π°Π³Π°ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡ Π· ΠΏΠ»ΡΠ²ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ½Ρ; Π²) Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½. ΠΠ±Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²Π°Π³ΠΈ ΡΠ° Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ·ΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π±ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΡΠ². ΠΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΡΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ»Π°Π΄ΡΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠ²'ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π° Π· ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ»ΡΡ
ΡΠ² ΡΡΠ°Π±ΡΠ»ΡΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ ΡΠ° ΡΡΠΌΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ»ΡΠ²ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΠΉ Π· Π½Π°Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ Ρ ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»Ρ.ΠΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Ρ ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎ 20 ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π°. ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π°, (ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ, ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈ, Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π°) ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ². ΠΡΡΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ, Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΈ Π±ΡΡΡΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ² Π΄Π΅Π»Π°ΡΡ Π±ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ Π² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π΅, Π±ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ Ρ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π±ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠ², Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π·Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½, ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΅ΠΌΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΠ»Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ: Π°) ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π» Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅; Π±) ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡ Ρ ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ½Π°; Π²) ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½. ΠΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠ°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π° Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π½Π°Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ Π² Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»Π΅
From parameter space constraints to the precision determination of the leptonic Dirac CP phase
We discuss the precision determination of the leptonic Dirac CP phase
in neutrino oscillation experiments, where we apply the concept
of ``CP coverage''. We demonstrate that this approach carries more information
than a conventional CP violation measurement, since it also describes the
exclusion of parameter regions. This will be very useful for next-generation
long baseline experiments where for sizable first
constraints on can be obtained. As the most sophisticated
experimental setup, we analyze neutrino factories, where we illustrate the
major difficulties in their analysis. In addition, we compare their potential
to the one of superbeam upgrades and next-generation experiments, which also
includes a discussion of synergy effects. We find a strong dependence on the
yet unknown true values of and , as well as
a strong, non-Gaussian dependence on the confidence level. A systematic
understanding of the complicated parameter dependence will be given. In
addition, it is shown that comparisons of experiments and synergy discussions
do in general not allow for an unbiased judgment if they are only performed at
selected points in parameter space. Therefore, we present our results in
dependence of the yet unknown true values of and
. Finally we show that for precision measurements
there exist simple strategies including superbeams, reactor experiments,
superbeam upgrades, and neutrino factories, where the crucial discriminator is
.Comment: 32 pages, 9 figure
Optimized Two-Baseline Beta-Beam Experiment
We propose a realistic Beta-Beam experiment with four source ions and two
baselines for the best possible sensitivity to theta_{13}, CP violation and
mass hierarchy. Neutrinos from 18Ne and 6He with Lorentz boost gamma=350 are
detected in a 500 kton water Cerenkov detector at a distance L=650 km (first
oscillation peak) from the source. Neutrinos from 8B and 8Li are detected in a
50 kton magnetized iron detector at a distance L=7000 km (magic baseline) from
the source. Since the decay ring requires a tilt angle of 34.5 degrees to send
the beam to the magic baseline, the far end of the ring has a maximum depth of
d=2132 m for magnetic field strength of 8.3 T, if one demands that the fraction
of ions that decay along the straight sections of the racetrack geometry decay
ring (called livetime) is 0.3. We alleviate this problem by proposing to trade
reduction of the livetime of the decay ring with the increase in the boost
factor of the ions, such that the number of events at the detector remains
almost the same. This allows to substantially reduce the maximum depth of the
decay ring at the far end, without significantly compromising the sensitivity
of the experiment to the oscillation parameters. We take 8B and 8Li with
gamma=390 and 656 respectively, as these are the largest possible boost factors
possible with the envisaged upgrades of the SPS at CERN. This allows us to
reduce d of the decay ring by a factor of 1.7 for 8.3 T magnetic field.
Increase of magnetic field to 15 T would further reduce d to 738 m only. We
study the sensitivity reach of this two baseline two storage ring Beta-Beam
experiment, and compare it with the corresponding reach of the other proposed
facilities.Comment: 17 pages, 3 eps figures. Minor changes, matches version accepted in
JHE
Processes in resonant domains of metal nanoparticle aggregates and optical nonlinearity of aggregates in pulsed laser fields
Criteria for the Choice of the Optimal Desalination Systems of Sea Water for the Crimean Region
Efficient Tissue Discrimination during Surgical Interventions Using Hyperspectral Imaging
Pioneering space based detector for study of cosmic rays beyond GZK Limit
Space-based detectors for study of extreme energy cosmic rays (EECR) are being prepared as promising new direction of EECR study. Pioneering space device β tracking ultraviolet set up (TUS) is at the last stage of its construction and testing. TUS detector description is presented