248 research outputs found

    The development of Russian health-care system: problems and prospects

    Get PDF
    Thus, the implementation of the above mentioned points will assist the efficiency of a modem health-care system in general. It also helps to provide affordable and quality medical service on the basis of common requirements and approaches according to the latest achieve ments of scientific and technical progress, which will be guarantee of sustainable socioΒ­ economic development of Russia in the long ter

    Separate and parallel training as a factor of preserving the health of schoolchildren

    Full text link
    In the article the results of comparative analysis of diagnostic classes separately, parallel studies that showed significant differences between the classes of boys and girls, which allows the teacher to consider gender various mechanisms of knowledge of pupils, allows boys and girls to realize the opportunities of his psyche, which is incorporated in them by natureΠ’ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ‹ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ ΡΡ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° диагностики Π² классах Ρ€Π°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Π»Π»Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ обучСния, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈ сущСствСнныС отличия ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ классами ΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΡ‡ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π΄Π΅Π²ΠΎΡ‡Π΅ΠΊ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ позволяСт ΠΏΠ΅Π΄Π°Π³ΠΎΠ³Ρƒ ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹Π²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π³Π΅Π½Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π½ΠΎ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ‹ познания учащихся, позволяСт ΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΡ‡ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈ Π΄Π΅Π²ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠ°ΠΌ Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Ρ‚Π΅ возмоТности своСй психики, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ Π·Π°Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‹ Π² Π½ΠΈΡ… ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ΄

    Characterization of mechanical properties by inverse technique for composite reinforced by knitted fabric. Part 2. Experimental evaluation of mechanical properties by frequency eigenvalues method

    Get PDF
    This paper is the second part of the research work dedicated to evaluation of mechanical properties of polymer composites reinforced by knitted fabric. Three different approaches were applied for the task. Two of them: a) FEM analysis using Solid Works combined with structural modeling based on experimentally-determined mechanical and geometrical properties of the reinforcement and matrix, and b) direct measurement of mechanical properties (described in Part 1). Present investigation (Part 2) is based on application of vibrational analysis. Modal testing in combination with the mathematical optimization procedure were used for evaluation of elastic properties of a layered material. It is worth mentioning that the application of this approach for materials with high damping ability (laminated composites reinforced by knitted fabric) is still poorly investigated. The inverse technique exploited in this work is based on the direct orthotropic plate free vibration measurements and subsequent mathematical optimization procedure (the planning of experiments or response surface technique), which is based on minimization of error functional. Finally, elastic constants established by the inverse technique were discussed and compared with the results obtained in Part 1

    ABC-Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ обострСний Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ астмы Ρƒ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ Π² условиях стационара

    Get PDF
    Aims. To analyze the costs of pharmacotherapy in children hospitalized with bronchial asthma exacerbations. Materials and methods. The data from 336 medical reports were used. In this study, patients with severe bronchial asthma were analyzed separately from those with moderate asthma. The economic analysis of pharmacotherapy was carried out in accordance with the ABC guidelines for an international non-proprietary name. In relation to the field of medicinal use, the analyzed drugs were distributed into three classes (A, B and C) according to the selected criteria. In the present study, the selection criterion was the amount of expenses needed to purchase the given medicine. Results. The ABCanalysis showed that about 80% of the amounts spent for the treatment of moderately severe asthma were due to the costs of medications. Among them, Montelukast – 31.27%; Budesonide – 28,49%; Umifenovir – 5.69%; Azithromycin – 5.50%; Salmeterol / fluticasone propionate – 4.74%; Formoterol / budesonide – 3.32%; Ipratropium bromide / fenoterol hydrobromide acetylcysteine – 3.20%; (In total, the percentage amounts to 82.15%). In the treatment of severe asthma, the same 80% of the costs consisted of: Montelukast – 28.13%; Salmeterol / fluticasone propionate – 25.54%; Formoterol / budesonide – 13.51%; Acetylcysteine 6.64%; Budesonide – 5.67% (in total, the percentage amounts to 79.48%). In moderately severe asthma, the largest part of the costs is due to inhaled glucocorticosteroids – budesonide (28.42%), while in severe cases, it is due to combined salmeterol / fluticasone propionate (25.54%) and formoterol / budesonide (13.51%). In the treatment of asthma of moderate severity, a certain part of segment A is taken by macrolide antibiotics of the azithromycin group (they account for 5.50% of the total costs) and antiviral drugs – umifenovir (5.59%). The introduction of antibiotics and anti-viral drugs is rationalized by asthma exacerbations developing on the background of viral and / or bacterial, often β€œatypical” infections. Conclusion. This pharmacoepidemiological analysis shows that the costs of treatment with Montelukast of moderate (31.27%) and severe (28.13%) bronchial asthma are comparable. For other drugs, the treatment costs significantly differ between the moderate and severe asthma therapies.Β .ЦСлью Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‹ явилось ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ АВБ-Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ обострСний Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ астмы Ρƒ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ Π² стационарС. ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Π°ΠΌΠΈ для исслСдования послуТили Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ 336 историй Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², госпитализированных Π² стационар мСдицинской ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ с обострСниСм Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ астмы. Анализ Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π±Ρ‹Π» ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ для тяТСлой стСпСни Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ астмы ΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ – для срСднСй стСпСни астмы. ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ исслСдования явился АВБ – Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌΡƒ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌΡƒ названию. Π’ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊ сфСрС лСкарствСнного потрСблСния согласно Π²Ρ‹Π±Ρ€Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ критСриям ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ ΡΠΈΡΡ‚Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ Π½Π° Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈ класса (А, Π’ ΠΈ Π‘). Π’ прСдставлСнном исслСдовании ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π²Ρ‹Π±ΠΎΡ€Π° Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ½Π° Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ лСкарствСнных ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ². Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. Π’ Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ АВБ-Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° установлСно, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ 80% Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ Π² Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ астмы срСднСй стСпСни тяТСсти ΡΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ Π½Π° монтСлукаст – 31,27%; будСсонид – 28,49%; ΡƒΠΌΠΈΡ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ€ – 5,69%; Π°Π·ΠΈΡ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠ½ – 5,50%; салмСтСрол/Ρ„Π»ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΏΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ‚ – 4,74%; Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ»/будСсонид – 3,32%; ипратропия Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ΄/Ρ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ»Π° Π³ΠΈΠ΄Ρ€ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ΄ ацСтилцистСин – 3,20%; (Π² суммС ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚ Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ составляСт 82,15%). Π’ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ тяТСлой стСпСни астмы 80% Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ ΡΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ Π½Π° монтСлукаст – 28,13%; салмСтСрол/Ρ„Π»ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΏΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ‚ – 25,54%; Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ»/будСсонид – 13,51%; ацСтилцистСин – 6,64%; будСсонид – 5,67% (Π² суммС ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚ Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ составляСт 79,48%). ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ срСднСй стСпСни тяТСсти астмы Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡˆΡƒΡŽ долю Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ Π² базисной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ ингаляционныС Π³Π»ΡŽΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Ρ‹ – будСсонид (28,42%), Π² Ρ‚ΠΎ врСмя ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ тяТСлой стСпСни – ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹: салмСтСрол/Ρ„Π»ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΏΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ‚ (25,54%) ΠΈ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ»/будСсонид (13,51%). Π’ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ астмы срСднСй стСпСни тяТСсти ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡƒΡŽ долю Π² сСгмСнтС А Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡŽΡ‚ Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ряда Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹ Π°Π·ΠΈΡ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠ½Π° (Π½Π° Π½ΠΈΡ… приходится 5,50% ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰ΠΈΡ… Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚) ΠΈ противовирусныС ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ – ΡƒΠΌΠΈΡ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ€ (5,59%). НазначСниС Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ противовирусных ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² связано с Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ обострСний астмы Π½Π° Ρ„ΠΎΠ½Π΅ вирусных ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π±Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ…, Π·Π°Ρ‡Π°ΡΡ‚ΡƒΡŽ Β«Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ…Β» ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΉ. Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π’ Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ фармакоэпидСмиологичСского Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° установлСно, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ Π½Π° монтСлукаст сопоставимы ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ срСднСй (31,27%) ΠΈ тяТСлой (28,13%) стСпСни Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ астмы. Для ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… лСкарствСнных ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² доля Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ Π² ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅ΠΉ структурС Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ отличаСтся.

    ΠžΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-экономичСской ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ хроничСских Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ: нСсоотвСтствиС Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² классичСского фармакоэкономичСского ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ-экономичСского Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²

    Get PDF
    The article presents the results of traditional pharmaco-economic analysis (the β€œcost-effectiveness” method) and socio-economic analysis of pharmaco-therapeutic regimens in a chronic disease.The specific aim was to compare the methods of pharmaco-economic and socioeconomic analyses when applied to the treatment of children with chronic asthma exacerbations.Materials and methods. The data on basic therapy of asthma exacerbations in children hospitalized in 2014-2015 were used (total 608 cases).Results. The combination of an inhaled glucocorticosteroid and long-acting Ξ²2-agonists proved to be the most optimal therapy as far as pharmaco-economics is concerned. The ways to calculate the coefficient of incremental costs of therapeutic regimens are shown. The discrepancy between the results of pharmacoeconomic analysis, on the one hand, and the data on socio-economic losses, on the other hand, was documented. The addition of montelukast (a leukotriene receptor antagonist) in the treatment regimen leads to an increase in medical costs from 873.00 rubles to 1515.39 rubles, and to a decrease in the average number of hospitalizations per year. In this case, the number of days of absence from work for a parent also decreases, which contributes to a higher GDP. As exemplified in this model group of 1000 patients, an increase in the direct medical costs by 734 thousand rubles leads to a decrease in the socio-economic losses (saving 34 million rubles.)Π‘onclusion. The traditional pharmacoeconomic analysis is the ideal instrument to compare between the original and generic drugs, and to evaluate the treatment of acute diseases. With respect to chronic diseases, this pharmaco-economic analysis should be used with caution. Without taking into account the effectiveness of the analyzed pharmacotherapy in treating possible exacerbations, or the transition to a more severe / mild form of the disease, the clinical component of the pharmaco-economic analysis may be missed. And if so, only the economic component of the selected therapy will play the major role in the final assessment. In this case, the results of the entire pharmaco-economic analysis may become less significant as they will reflect the least expensive treatment only, leaving behind the clinical aspects, e. g. the number of positive outcomes.Β Π’ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ‹ основныС аспСкты классичСского фармакоэкономичСского Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Β«Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹-ΡΡ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΒ» ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ-экономичСского Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° схСм Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ хроничСского заболСвания.ЦСлью Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‹ явилось исслСдованиС особСнностСй ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-экономичСского Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° лСчСния обострСний хроничСского заболСвания Π² условиях стационара Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ противоастматичСской Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Ρƒ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ Π² ракурсС классичСского фармакоэкономичСского ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ-экономичСского Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ².ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Использовались Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ базисной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ обострСния астмы Ρƒ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ Π² условиях стационара Π·Π° 2014-2015 Π³Π³. (Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ 608 историй Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ). Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. ΠšΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ ингаляционного Π³Π»ΡŽΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π° ΠΈ Π΄Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ Ξ²2 -агониста Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π° с фармакоэкономичСской Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ зрСния Π² качСствС противоастматичСской Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ обострСний астмы Ρƒ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ Π² условиях стационара. ΠŸΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Ρ‹ возмоТности опрСдСлСния коэффициСнта ΠΈΠ½ΠΊΡ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ схСм Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ нСсоотвСтствиС Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² фармакоэкономичСского Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ-экономичСских ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΡŒ. Π’ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² схСму лСчСния анатагониста Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΊ ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ мСдицинских Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ с 873,00 Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. Π΄ΠΎ 1515,39 Ρ€ΡƒΠ±., ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… мСсто ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ использовании противоастматичСских схСм, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… монтСлукаст, срСднСС количСство госпитализаций Π·Π° Π³ΠΎΠ΄ сниТаСтся. Π’ этом случаС суммарноС количСство Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ нСтрудоспособности Π½Π° ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ родитСля Ρ€Π΅Π±Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ сниТаСтся, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡˆΠ°Π΅Ρ‚ΡΡ количСство ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ‰Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‡ΠΈΡ… Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ связано с Π²ΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΎΠΌ Π² Π’Π’ΠŸ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, Π² модСльной Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π² 1000 Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ прямых мСдицинских Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ Π½Π° 734 тыс. Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΊ ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ уровня ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ- экономичСских ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΡŒ (экономия 34 ΠΌΠ»Π½ Ρ€ΡƒΠ±.).Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠšΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ фармакоэкономичСский Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π°Π»Π΅Π½ для сопоставлСния ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ гСнСричСских ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², для ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ схСм лСчСния острых Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π’ ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ хроничСских Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌ фармакоэкономичСского Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Π½ΡƒΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ остороТно, ΠΏΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΌΡƒ Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ, Π½Π΅ принимая Π²ΠΎ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ влияниС Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° количСство обострСний, Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ Π² Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Ρ‚ΡΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡƒΡŽ/Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΡƒΡŽ ΡΡ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡŒ заболСвания, ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ ΡΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‰ΡƒΡŽ фармакоэкономичСского Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°. А выбранная схСма окаТСтся Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ эффСктивной лишь ΠΏΠΎ экономичСской ΡΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ. Π’ этом случаС Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ фармакоэкономичСского Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΡΡŽΡ‚ свою ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡƒΡŽ Ρ†Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ опрСдСлСния Π½Π΅ просто Π½Π°ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠΉ схСмы лСчСния, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ с клиничСской Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ зрСния ΠΏΠΎ достигаСмой частотС ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ².

    ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ Β«Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹-ΡΡ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΒ» Π² ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ острого обструктивного Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π° Ρƒ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ Π² условиях стационара

    Get PDF
    Study objective: pharmacoeconomic evaluation of cephalosporins, protected penicillins and macrolides, most commonly used in the treatmentΒ of acute obstructive bronchitis.Materials and methods. data file of hospitalized patients with acute obstructive bronchitis treatedby antibiotic.Β The study included 2259 patient’s data files. The age of patients ranged from 0 to 18 years old. Β«Cost-effectivenessΒ» analysis was used forΒ comparing of the costs and effectiveness for courses of antibiotics, used in therapy of acute obstructive bronchitis.Results. It is shown that a pharmacoeconomic standpoint, Ceftriaxone (Sintez) was the most effective antibiotic of the cephalosporin group in the treatment of acute obstructive bronchitis in children. The original drug Augmentin (Smithkline Beecham Pharmaceuticals) and generic Amoxiclav (Lek d.d) were used from the group of protected penicillins (combination amoxicillin / clavulanic acid). The effectiveness of Augmentin (0.591) and Amoxiclav (0.530) was comparable. The Augmentin’s course of therapy characterized by a lower value CER in comparison with Amoxiklav. From the pharmacoeconomic point of view treatment course of Azithromycin (Vertex) was the most appropriate of the macrolide antibiotic in the therapy of acute obstructive bronchitis,. The highest value ICER ratio was obtained for Sumamed (Teva), and it amounted to 39 367.50 rubles. Sumamed was characterized by the highest clinical efficacy. Besides Sumamed is original azithromycin. Azitromicin generics Azitral and Hemomitsin had the lowest ICER after Azithromycin (1151.67 rubles and 1812.22 rubles, respectively).ЦСль исслСдования – фармакоэкономичСская ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° лСкарствСнных ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏ цСфалоспоринов, Π·Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠ»Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ², Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ часто ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΠ΅ΠΌΡ‹Ρ… Π² Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ острого обструктивного Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π°.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Π°ΠΌΠΈΒ Π΄Π»Ρ исслСдования слуТили Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠΎ Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², госпитализированных Π² стационары мСдицинских ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ с острым обструктивным Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠΌ. Π’ исслСдованиС Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ истории Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ 2259 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ². Возраст ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² составил ΠΎΡ‚ 0 Π»Π΅Ρ‚ Π΄ΠΎ 18 Π»Π΅Ρ‚. Для сопоставлСния Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ ΠΈ эффСктивности сравниваСмых курсов Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ острого обструктивного Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π° Π±Ρ‹Π» ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ Β«Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹-ΡΡ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΒ».Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. Показано, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ с фармакоэкономичСской Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ зрСния наиболСС эффСктивным ΠΈΠ· Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹ цСфалоспоринов ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ острого обструктивного Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π° Ρƒ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ Π² условиях стационара являлся ЦСфтриаксон (ОАО Π‘ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π·). Из Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹ Π·Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠ»Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ² использовался амоксициллин/клавулановая кислота – ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ АугмСнтин (Smithkline Beecham Pharmaceuticals) ΠΈ гСнСричСский – Амоксиклав (Lek d.d). Π­Ρ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ АугмСнтина (0,591) сопоставима с ΡΡ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ Амоксиклава (0,530). ΠšΡƒΡ€Ρ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ АугмСнтином характСризовался мСньшим Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ коэффициСнта CER ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Амоксиклава. ΠœΡ‹ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ курс Азитромицина (Π—ΠΠž ВСртСкс) с фармакоэкономичСской точки зрСния оказался Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ цСлСсообразным ΠΈΠ· Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²- ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ острого обструктивного Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π°. НаибольшСС Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ коэффициСнта ICER Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΎ для Π‘ΡƒΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π° (Teva) ΠΈ составило 39 367,50 Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. Для Π‘ΡƒΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π° Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ самоС высокоС Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ клиничСской эффСктивности. К Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌΡƒ ΠΆΠ΅ CΡƒΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ являСтся ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π·ΠΈΡ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠ½Π°. Азитрал ΠΈ Π₯Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠ½ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΈ, согласно ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ, наимСньшиС послС Азитромицина значСния коэффициСнта ICERΒ (1151,67 Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. ΠΈ 1812,22 Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. соотвСтствСнно)

    Detection of specific antibodies to Schmallenberg virus using microneutralisation test

    Get PDF
    The article presents data on microneutralization test for detection of specific antibodies to Schmallenberg virus. The method is characterized by high sensitivity and specificity. It can be used for analysis of blood sera of different species of animals

    ДиффСрСнциация ΠΈ субпопуляционный состав VEGFR2+ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ² ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΈ костного ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΈΡˆΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΈ

    Get PDF
    Aim. To identify disturbances of differentiation and subpopulation composition of VEGFR2+ cells in the blood and bone marrow associated with the features of the cytokine profile in the blood and bone marrow in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) with and without ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM).Materials and methods. The study included 74 patients with Π‘AD with and without ICM (30 and 44 people, respectively) and 18 healthy donors. In all patients with Π‘AD, peripheral blood sampling was performed immediately before coronary artery bypass grafting, and bone marrow samples were taken during the surgery via a sternal incision. In the healthy donors, only peripheral blood sampling was performed. In the bone marrow and blood samples, the number of VEGFR2+ cells (CD14+VEGFR2+ cells) and their immunophenotypes CD14++CD16-VEGFR2+, CD14++CD16+VEGFR2+, CD14+CD16++VEGFR2+, and CD14+CD16-VEGFR2+ was determined by flow cytometry. Using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, the levels of VΠ•GF-А, TNFΞ±, M-CSF, and IL-13, as well as the content of MCP-1 (only in the blood) and the M-CSF / IL-13 ratio (only in the bone marrow) were determined.Results. The content of CD14+VEGFR2+ cells in the blood of CAD patients with and without ICM was higher than normal values due to the greater number of CD14++CD16-VEGFR2+, CD14++CD16+VEGFR2+, and CD14+CD16++VEGFR2+. In the bone marrow of the patients with ICM, the content of CD14++CD16-VEGFR2+, CD14+CD16++VEGFR2+, and CD14+CD16-VEGFR2+ was lower than in patients with CAD without ICM, and the number of CD14++CD16+VEGFR2+ cells corresponded to that in the controls. Regardless of the presence of ICM in CAD, a high concentration of TNFΞ± and normal levels of VEGF-A and IL-13 were observed in the blood. In CAD without ICM, an excess of MCP-1 and deficiency of M-CSF were revealed in the blood. In the bone marrow, the levels of VEGF-A, TNFΞ±, M-CSF, and IL-13 were comparable between the groups of patients against the background of a decrease in the M-CSF / IL-13 ratio in the patients with ICM.Conclusion. Unlike CAD without cardiomyopathy, in ICM, no excess of VEGFR2+ cells and MCP-1 in the blood is observed, which hinders active migration of CD14+CD16++VEGFR2+ cells from the myeloid tissue, and a decrease in the M-CSF / IL-13 ratio in the bone marrow disrupts differentiation of other forms of VEGFR2+ cells, preventing vascular repair.ЦСль: ΡƒΡΡ‚Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΈΡ„Ρ„Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ субпопуляционного состава VEGFR2+ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΈ костном ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π΅ Π²ΠΎ взаимосвязи с особСнностями Ρ†ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ профиля ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΈ костного ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π° Ρƒ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈΡˆΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ болСзнью сСрдца (Π˜Π‘Π‘), ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… ΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… ΠΈΡˆΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ (ИКМП).ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π’ исслСдованиС вошли 74 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π˜Π‘Π‘, ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… ΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… ИКМП (30 ΠΈ 44 Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ° соотвСтствСнно), ΠΈ 18 Π·Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ². Π£ всСх Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π˜Π‘Π‘ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΡ€ пСрифСричСской ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ производился нСпосрСдствСнно ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π΄ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ€Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡˆΡƒΠ½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π° костного ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π° – ΠΈΠ· Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€Π΅Π·Π° Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ Π²ΠΎ врСмя ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ. Π£ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² Π·Π°Π±ΠΈΡ€Π°Π»ΠΈ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ„Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΡŒ.Β  Π’ костном ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ†ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ„Π»ΡƒΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ опрСдСляли Ρ‡ΠΈΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ VEGFR2+ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ² (CD14+VΠ•GFR2+ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ) ΠΈ ΠΈΡ… ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΡ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² CD14++CD16-VEGFR2+, CD14++CD16+VEGFR2+, CD14+CD16++VEGFR2+, CD14+CD16-VEGFR2+, ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΡ„Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° рСгистрировали ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡŽ VΠ•GF-А, TNFΞ±, M-CSF, IL-13, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ содСрТаниС MCP-1 (Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ Π² ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ) ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ M-CSF/IL-13 (Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ Π² костном ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π΅).Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. Π‘ΠΎΠ΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ CD14+VEGFR2+ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ Π² ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ Ρƒ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π˜Π‘Π‘ Π±Π΅Π· ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ с ИКМП Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ Π²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅ Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡ‹ ΠΈΠ·-Π·Π° большСй числСнности CD14++CD16-VEGFR2+, CD14++CD16+VEGFR2+ ΠΈ CD14+CD16++VEGFR2+ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌ. Π’ костном ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π΅ Ρƒ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ИКМП содСрТаниС CD14++CD16-VEGFR2+, CD14+CD16++VEGFR2+ ΠΈ CD14+CD16-VEGFR2+ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅, Ρ‡Π΅ΠΌ Ρƒ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π˜Π‘Π‘ Π±Π΅Π· ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΈ, Π° количСство CD14++CD16+VEGFR2+ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ соотвСтствовало ΠΈΡ… числу Π² Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ΅ сравнСния. Π’Π½Π΅ зависимости ΠΎΡ‚ наличия ИКМП ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π˜Π‘Π‘ Π² ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‡Π°Π»Π°ΡΡŒ высокая концСнтрация TNFΞ±, Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡŒ VEGF-А ΠΈ IL-13; ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π˜Π‘Π‘ Π±Π΅Π· ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΈ – ΠΈΠ·Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ МБР-1 ΠΈ Π΄Π΅Ρ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ‚ M-CSF Π² ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ. Π’ костном ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π΅ концСнтрация VΠ•GF-А, TNFΞ±, M-CSF, IL-13 Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° сопоставимой ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π½Π° Ρ„ΠΎΠ½Π΅ сниТСния M-CSF/IL-13 Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с ИКМП.Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π’ ΠΎΡ‚Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡ‚ Π˜Π‘Π‘ Π±Π΅Π· ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ИКМП Π½Π΅ формируСтся ΠΈΠ·Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ VEGFR2+ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ МБР-1 Π² ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ затрудняСт Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΡƒΡŽ ΠΌΠΈΠ³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡŽ CD14+CD16++VEGFR2+ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ ΠΈΠ· ΠΌΠΈΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ, Π° сниТСниС M-CSF/IL-13 Π² костном ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π΅ Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ°Π΅Ρ‚ Π΄ΠΈΡ„Ρ„Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΡƒ ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌ VEGFR2+ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ², прСпятствуя Ρ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ сосудов

    Detection of tick-borne pathogens in wild birds and their ticks in Western Siberia and high level of their mismatch

    Get PDF
    Abstract: The Tomsk region located in the south of Western Siberia is one of the most high-risk areas for tick-borne diseases due to elevated incidence of tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme disease in humans. Wild birds may be considered as one of the reservoirs for tick-borne pathogens and hosts for infected ticks. A high mobility of wild birds leads to unpredictable possibilities for the dissemination of tick-borne pathogens into new geographical regions. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in wild birds and ticks that feed on them as well as to determine the role of different species of birds in maintaining the tickborne infectious foci. We analysed the samples of 443 wild birds (60 species) and 378 ticks belonging to the genus Ixodes Latraille, 1795 collected from the wild birds, for detecting occurrence of eight tick-borne pathogens, the namely tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), West Nile virus (WNV), and species of Borrelia, Rickettsia, Ehrlichia, Anaplasma, Bartonella and Babesia Starcovici, 1893, using RT-PCR/or PCR and enzyme immunoassay. One or more tick-borne infection markers were detected in 43 species of birds. All markers were detected in samples collected from fieldfare Turdus pilaris Linnaeus, Blyth’s reed warbler Acrocephalus dumetorum Blyth, common redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus (Linnaeus), and common chaffinch Fringilla coelebs Linnaeus. Although all pathogens have been identified in birds and ticks, we found that in the majority of cases (75.5%), there were mismatches of pathogens in birds and ticks collected from them. Wild birds and their ticks may play an extremely important role in the dissemination of tick-borne pathogens into different geographical regions
    • …
    corecore