38 research outputs found
A future without forgiveness: beyond reconciliation in transitional justice
This article questions the promotion of reconciliation in transitional justice contexts. The article puts forward a critique of reconciliation in practice and questions mainstream definitions of reconciliation. The principle that these forms of reconciliation are desirable is also questioned. It is argued that examples of genuine reconciliation are difficult to find, that the promotion of reconciliation is frequently emphasised at the expense of substantive societal change, that emphasis on reconciliation (narrowly defined) risks taking agency away from those affected by conflict and that emphasis on reconciliation may obscure injustice and may promote acceptance of the status quo. The article suggests that reconciliation is not a necessary condition of, and should be de-emphasised in, transitional justice and, if it is promoted at all, that a different, less prescriptive notion of reconciliation is necessary
A live cell assay of GPCR coupling allows identification of optogenetic tools for controlling Go and Gi signaling
Affirmation, acknowledgment of in-group responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures.
A novel Ocular Anaesthetic Scoring System, OASS, tool to measure both motor and sensory function following local anaesthesia
Coming to Terms with the Past Marked by Collective Crimes: Collective Moral Responsibility and Reconciliation
Recommended from our members
Perspectives on Gene Therapy: Choroideremia Represents a Challenging Model for the Treatment of Other Inherited Retinal Degenerations.
PurposeTo report combined viewpoints on ocular gene therapy from a select group of clinician scientists and a patient advocacy group.MethodsWith the support of Randy Wheelock and Dr. Chris Moen from the Choroideremia Research Foundation (CRF), a special interest group at the 2019 Annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology in Vancouver, Canada, shared their knowledge, experience, concepts, and ideas and provided a forum to discuss therapeutic strategies for the treatment of inherited retinal disorders, using experience in choroideremia (CHM) as a model.ResultsA member of the CRF presented the patient perspective and role in clinical trials. Five clinician scientists presented reasons for limited long-term visual improvement in many gene therapy trials, including challenges with dose, incomplete understanding of photoreceptor metabolism, vector delivery, inflammation, and identification of patients likely to benefit from treatment.ConclusionsThe shared experience of the five clinician scientists indicates that the results of ocular gene therapy for choroideremia have been less successful than for RPE65-related Leber congenital amaurosis. Improvement in vector delivery and developing a better understanding of gene expression in target tissues, treatment dose and side effects, and inflammation, as well as identifying patients who are most likely to benefit without suffering excessive risk, are necessary to advance the development of effective therapies for inherited retinal degenerations.Translational relevanceAdditional long-term data are required to determine if ocular gene therapy will be sufficient to alter natural progression in choroideremia. Combination therapies may have to be considered, as well as alternative vectors that minimize risk
Characterising visual fields in RPGR related retinitis pigmentosa using Octopus static-automated perimetry
PURPOSE: Peripheral visual fields have not been as well defined by static automated perimetry as kinetic perimetry in RPGR-related retinitis pigmentosa. This study explores the pattern and sensitivities of peripheral visual fields, which may provide an important end point when assessing interventional clinical trials. METHODS: A retrospective observational cross-sectional study of 10 genetically confirmed RPGR subjects was performed. Visual fields were obtained using the Octopus 900 perimeter. Interocular symmetry and repeatability were quantified. Visual fields were subdivided into central and peripheral subfields for analysis. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 32 years old (20 to 49 years old). Average mean sensitivity was 7 dB (SD = 3.67 dB) and 6.8 dB (SD = 3.4 dB) for the right and left eyes, respectively, demonstrating interocular symmetry. Coefficient of repeatability for overall mean sensitivity: <2 dB. Nine out of 10 subjects had a preserved inferotemporal subfield, whose mean sensitivity was highly correlated to the central field (r(2) = 0.78, P = 0.002 and r(2) = 0.72, P = 0.002 for the right and left eyes, respectively). Within the central field, sensitivities were greater in the temporal than the nasal half (t-test, P = 0.01 and P = 0.03 for the right and left eyes, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Octopus static-automated perimeter demonstrates good repeatability. Interocular symmetry permits use of the noninterventional eye as an internal control. In this cohort, the inferotemporal and central visual fields are preserved into later disease stages likely mapping to populations of surviving cones. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: A consistently preserved inferotemporal island of vision highly correlated to that of the central visual field may have significance as a possible future therapeutic site
Recommended from our members
Perspectives on Gene Therapy: Choroideremia Represents a Challenging Model for the Treatment of Other Inherited Retinal Degenerations.
PurposeTo report combined viewpoints on ocular gene therapy from a select group of clinician scientists and a patient advocacy group.MethodsWith the support of Randy Wheelock and Dr. Chris Moen from the Choroideremia Research Foundation (CRF), a special interest group at the 2019 Annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology in Vancouver, Canada, shared their knowledge, experience, concepts, and ideas and provided a forum to discuss therapeutic strategies for the treatment of inherited retinal disorders, using experience in choroideremia (CHM) as a model.ResultsA member of the CRF presented the patient perspective and role in clinical trials. Five clinician scientists presented reasons for limited long-term visual improvement in many gene therapy trials, including challenges with dose, incomplete understanding of photoreceptor metabolism, vector delivery, inflammation, and identification of patients likely to benefit from treatment.ConclusionsThe shared experience of the five clinician scientists indicates that the results of ocular gene therapy for choroideremia have been less successful than for RPE65-related Leber congenital amaurosis. Improvement in vector delivery and developing a better understanding of gene expression in target tissues, treatment dose and side effects, and inflammation, as well as identifying patients who are most likely to benefit without suffering excessive risk, are necessary to advance the development of effective therapies for inherited retinal degenerations.Translational relevanceAdditional long-term data are required to determine if ocular gene therapy will be sufficient to alter natural progression in choroideremia. Combination therapies may have to be considered, as well as alternative vectors that minimize risk