A composite serum biomarker index for the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease: a multicentre, observational, cohort study

OBJECTIVE: In patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), we investigated composite serum biomarker panels for the diagnosis and risk-stratification of SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). METHODS: Twenty-eight biomarkers were analysed in 640 participants: 259 with SSc-ILD and 179 SSc-controls without ILD (Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study), 172 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)-controls (Australian IPF Registry), and 30 healthy controls. A composite index was developed from biomarkers associated with ILD in multivariable analysis derived at empirical thresholds. Performance of the index to identify ILD, and specifically SSc-ILD, and its association with lung function, radiological extent, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were evaluated in derivation and validation cohorts. Biomarkers to distinguish SSc-ILD from IPF-controls were identified. RESULTS: A composite biomarker index, comprising SP-D, Ca15-3 and ICAM-1, was strongly associated with SSc-ILD diagnosis, independent of age, sex, smoking and lung function (index=3: pooled adjusted OR 12.72, 95%CI 4.59-35.21, p<0.001). The composite index strengthened the performance of individual biomarkers for SSc-ILD identification. In SSc patients, a higher index was associated with worse baseline disease severity (index=3 relative to index=0: adjusted absolute change in FVC% - 17.84% and DLCO% - 20.16%, both p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A composite serum biomarker index, comprising SP-D, Ca15-3 and ICAM-1 may improve the identification and risk-stratification of ILD in SSc patients at baseline

Gastroesophageal reflux and antacid therapy in IPF: analysis from the Australia IPF Registry

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is highly prevalent in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and may play a role in its pathogenesis. Recent IPF treatment guidelines suggest that all patients with IPF be considered for antacid therapy. However, emerging evidence suggests that antacid therapy does not improve IPF patient outcomes and may increase the risk of pulmonary infection. METHODS:Using prospectively collected data from the Australian IPF Registry including use of antacid therapy, GORD diagnosis and GORD symptoms, the relationship of these GORD variables to survival and disease progression was assessed. The severity of GORD symptoms using the frequency scale for symptoms of GORD (FSSG) and its relationships to outcomes was also assessed for the first time in an IPF cohort. RESULTS:Five hundred eighty-seven (86%) of the 684 patients in the Australian IPF Registry were eligible for inclusion. Patients were mostly male (69%), aged 71.0 ± 8.5 years with moderate disease (FVC 81.7 ± 21.5%; DLco 48.5 ± 16.4%). Most patients were taking antacids (n = 384; 65%), though fewer had a diagnosis of GORD (n = 243, 41.4%) and typical GORD symptoms were even less common (n = 171, 29.1%). The mean FSSG score was 8.39 ± 7.45 with 43% (n = 251) having a score > 8. Overall, there was no difference in survival or disease progression, regardless of antacid treatment, GORD diagnosis or GORD symptoms. CONCLUSIONS:Neither the use of antacid therapy nor the presence of GORD symptoms affects longer term outcomes in IPF patients. This contributes to the increasing evidence that antacid therapy may not be beneficial in IPF patients and that GORD directed therapy should be considered on an individual basis to treat the symptoms of reflux.Helen E. Jo, Tamera J. Corte, Ian Glaspole, Christopher Grainge, Peter M. A. Hopkins ... Peter A. Bampton ... et al

Disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with mild physiological impairment: analysis from the Australian IPF registry

BACKGROUND:Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal fibrosing lung disease of unknown cause. The advent of anti-fibrotic medications known to slow disease progression has revolutionised IPF management in recent years. However, little is known about the natural history of IPF patients with mild physiological impairment. We aimed to assess the natural history of these patients using data from the Australian IPF Registry (AIPFR). METHODS:Using our cohort of real-world IPF patients, we compared FVC criteria for mild physiological impairment (FVC ≥ 80%) against other proposed criteria: DLco ≥ 55%; CPI ≤40 and GAP stage 1 with regards agreement in classification and relationship with disease outcomes. Within the mild cohort (FVC ≥ 80%), we also explored markers associated with poorer prognosis at 12 months. RESULTS:Of the 416 AIPFR patients (mean age 70.4 years, 70% male), 216 (52%) were classified as 'mild' using FVC ≥ 80%. There was only modest agreement between FVC and DLco (k = 0.30), with better agreement with GAP (k = 0.50) and CPI (k = 0.48). Patients who were mild had longer survival, regardless of how mild physiologic impairment was defined. There was, however, no difference in the annual decline in FVC% predicted between mild and moderate-severe groups (for all proposed criteria). For patients with mild impairment (n = 216, FVC ≥ 80%), the strongest predictor of outcomes at 12 months was oxygen desaturation on a 6 min walk test. CONCLUSION:IPF patients with mild physiological impairment have better survival than patients with moderate-severe disease. Their overall rate of disease progression however, is comparable, suggesting that they are simply at different points in the natural history of IPF disease.Helen E. Jo, Ian Glaspole, Yuben Moodley, Sally Chapman, Samantha Ellis ... Reynolds ... Paul N. Reynolds ... et al

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - a systematic review on methodology for the collection of epidemiological data

Peer reviewe

Vacuum-assisted biopsy and steroid therapy for granulomatous lobular mastitis: report of three cases.

We report the cases of three patients with granulomatous lobular mastitis (GLM), who were treated successfully with low-dose steroid therapy. Furthermore, the findings of our review of 271 patients reported in the literature suggest that steroid therapy is the treatment of choice for GLM

Current Australasian practice for diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: where are we now?

Background and objective: Recent international consensus statements have refined evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study sought to investigate how closely these guidelines are adhered to and to compare current practices with those of a similar cohort 15 years ago. Methods: A questionnaire on IPF diagnosis and management was distributed to respiratory physicians practising in Australia and New Zealand, in 2012–2013, and results were compared with a similar survey conducted in 1999. Results: A total of 172 and 144 questionnaires were completed in 1999 and 2012–2013, respectively. The most important investigations in both survey populations were high-resolution computed tomography scans, spirometry, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, chest X-ray, static lung volumes and autoimmune serology. In 1999, physicians were more likely to perform arterial blood gases, bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial lung biopsy. In the 2012–2013 cohort, 6-min walk tests and pulse oximetry were more widely utilized. Treatment choices differed considerably between the two survey populations. In 1999, the majority would offer a steroid-based regimen, whereas most would not use any specific treatment or would refer for trial participation in 2012–2013. Conclusions: Approach to IPF diagnosis and management is not uniform and has changed over 15 years. Surveyed respiratory physicians were generally practising in accordance with clinical guidelines, although significant variation in practice was identified in both cohorts. This study identifies the need to standardize care of IPF patients across Australia and New Zealand.Lauren K. Troy, Sally A. Chapman, Fiona Lake, Margaret L. Wilsher, Liarna B. Honeysett, Sacha Macansh, and Tamera J. Cort