A paradox of syntactic priming: why response tendencies show priming for passives, and response latencies show priming for actives

Speakers tend to repeat syntactic structures across sentences, a phenomenon called syntactic priming. Although it has been suggested that repeating syntactic structures should result in speeded responses, previous research has focused on effects in response tendencies. We investigated syntactic priming effects simultaneously in response tendencies and response latencies for active and passive transitive sentences in a picture description task. In Experiment 1, there were priming effects in response tendencies for passives and in response latencies for actives. However, when participants' pre-existing preference for actives was altered in Experiment 2, syntactic priming occurred for both actives and passives in response tendencies as well as in response latencies. This is the first investigation of the effects of structure frequency on both response tendencies and latencies in syntactic priming. We discuss the implications of these data for current theories of syntactic processing

The present tense in English, again

We report on an experimental study examining what aspectual tense forms we use to convey aspectual meanings when talking about present events in English. We test the effect of structural priming on the use of aspectual tense morphosyntax in the English present tense by native speakers, upper-intermediate and advanced L2 learners of English with French as their native language. Comparative production data from a video retell task is used. Aspectual choices from Liszka’s (2009, 2015) studies are compared with our partial replication. While Liszka primes participants to use the progressive tense, our instructions are neutral in this respect. Findings for native speakers point to a high level of individual variation in the use of present progressive and present simple to denote events simultaneous with the speech moment. Not only are choices variable, but they are also influenced by priming. We argue that this variability creates difficulties for learners of English that teachers should know about