Anti-drug antibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease affecting the brain and spinal cord and it is the main cause of neurological disability among young adults. Recombinant interferon beta (IFNβ) and natalizumab are commonly used disease-modifying drugs that reduce disease severity. Even though these treatments show beneficial clinical effects they are associated with the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), which at high titer levels reduce drug efficacy. Although ADAs are known to adversely affect the clinical effect of the treatment on a group level, the treatment response in individual patients is less characterized. In addition, it is unknown why only a subgroup of treated MS patients develops ADAs. The objective of this thesis was to identify biologically relevant ADA titer cut-points that can be used to predict treatment response and persistence of ADAs in individual patients, and to investigate if genetic and immunological factors influence the development of ADAs in MS patients. MS patients analyzed for the presence of ADAs against IFNβ or natalizumab in the routine NAb laboratory at Karolinska Institutet were included in this project. In Sweden, NAb monitoring became clinical practice in 2003 and during 2003-2004 the overall seroprevalence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against IFNβ was 32%. When the NAb seroprevalence was analyzed five years later, in 2009-2010, the overall frequency of NAb-positive patients had decreased significantly to 19%. Importantly, the greatest reduction was observed in patients with high NAb titers (study I). By correlating the in vivo IFNβ bioactivity with patients’ NAb titers we identified that a NAb titer of 150 TRU/ml is a biologically functional cut-point for treatment response, since titers above 150 TRU/ml completely block IFNβ bioactivity (study II). Furthermore, characterization of ADA responses in natalizumab-treated patients revealed that the level of total anti-natalizumab antibodies in a first positive sample can be used to predict patients at risk of becoming persistently antibody positive (study V). It is known that factors such as protein modifications and/or impurities impact the immunogenicity of IFNβ, which can explain the variation in NAb positivity between IFNβ preparations. In addition, since only a subgroup of IFNβ-treated patients develops NAbs, patient-related factors are likely to influence the immunogenicity of IFNβ. In study III, we hypothesized that MS patients with and without intrathecal production of oligoclonal IgG bands (OCB) have different propensities to induce humoral immune responses. The presence of OCB was found to be associated with NAb development, and this risk was confined to NAbs against IFNβ-1a. From these results we proposed that MS patients with and without OCB differ immunologically, potentially influenced by distinct human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles. The role of HLA in the immunogenicity of IFNβ was further investigated in study IV, in which we found that HLA-DRB1*15 carriage was associated with increased risk of developing NAbs. Stratification on type of IFNβ preparation showed that HLA-DRB1*15 increased the risk of NAbs against IFNβ-1a, while HLA-DRB1*04 increased the risk of NAbs against IFNβ-1b, indicating that there is an IFNβ preparation-specific genetically determined risk to develop NAbs. Overall, these results can be used to assist when making decisions about whether treatment should be discontinued or not. In addition, the identification of factors contributing to the immunogenicity of protein therapeutics can increase our understanding of the immunological mechanisms leading to ADA responses, possibly resulting in less immunogenic drugs in the future

Clinical practice of analysis of anti-drug antibodies against interferon beta and natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients in Europe: A descriptive study of test results

Antibodies; Interferon beta; Multiple sclerosisAnticossos; Interferó beta; Esclerosi múltipleAnticuerpos; Interferón beta; Esclerosis múltipleAntibodies against biopharmaceuticals (anti-drug antibodies, ADA) have been a well-integrated part of the clinical care of multiple sclerosis (MS) in several European countries. ADA data generated in Europe during the more than 10 years of ADA monitoring in MS patients treated with interferon beta (IFNβ) and natalizumab have been pooled and characterized through collaboration within a European consortium. The aim of this study was to report on the clinical practice of ADA testing in Europe, considering the number of ADA tests performed and type of ADA assays used, and to determine the frequency of ADA testing against the different drug preparations in different countries. A common database platform (tranSMART) for querying, analyzing and storing retrospective data of MS cohorts was set up to harmonize the data and compare results of ADA tests between different countries. Retrospective data from six countries (Sweden, Austria, Spain, Switzerland, Germany and Denmark) on 20,695 patients and on 42,555 samples were loaded into tranSMART including data points of age, gender, treatment, samples, and ADA results. The previously observed immunogenic difference among the four IFNβ preparations was confirmed in this large dataset. Decreased usage of the more immunogenic preparations IFNβ-1a subcutaneous (s.c.) and IFNβ-1b s.c. in favor of the least immunogenic preparation IFNβ-1a intramuscular (i.m.) was observed. The median time from treatment start to first ADA test correlated with time to first positive test. Shorter times were observed for IFNβ-1b-Extavia s.c. (0.99 and 0.94 years) and natalizumab (0.25 and 0.23 years), which were introduced on the market when ADA testing was already available, as compared to IFNβ-1a i.m. (1.41 and 2.27 years), IFNβ-1b-Betaferon s.c. (2.51 and 1.96 years) and IFNβ-1a s.c. (2.11 and 2.09 years) which were available years before routine testing began. A higher rate of anti-IFNβ ADA was observed in test samples taken from older patients. Testing for ADA varies between different European countries and is highly dependent on the policy within each country. For drugs where routine monitoring of ADA is not in place, there is a risk that some patients remain on treatment for several years despite ADA positivity. For drugs where a strategy of ADA testing is introduced with the release of the drug, there is a reduced risk of having ADA positive patients and thus of less efficient treatment. This indicates that potential savings in health cost might be achieved by routine analysis of ADA

Drug Tolerant Anti-drug Antibody Assay for Infliximab Treatment in Clinical Practice Identifies Positive Cases Earlier

Publisher's version (útgefin grein)A subgroup of patients treated with infliximab lose response to the treatment and one reason for this is the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). If used optimally, measuring drug and ADA level could lead to a more personalized and efficient treatment regime, and enable identification of ADA-positive patients before the underlying disease flares or allergic reactions occur. With the use of a drug-tolerant ADA assay which can detect ADA irrespective of drug levels in the sample, we determined the impact of ADA on treatment failure to infliximab. The aims of this study were to estimate the real-life optimal serum infliximab (sIFX) level and set a clinical threshold value for a drug-tolerant ADA assay. Trough levels of sIFX were measured with ELISA. Free ADA was measured with two drug-sensitive methods (ELISA and a bioassay) and one drug-tolerant method (PandA). Two real-life cohorts treated with infliximab were included; a cross-sectional cohort including patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (n = 270) and a prospective cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (n = 73) followed for 1 year. Normal range of sIFX was estimated from the prospective cohort and an arbitrary optimal drug level was set to be between 1 and 6 μg/mL. Using this range, optimal sIFX was found in only 60% (163/270) of the patients in the cross-sectional cohort. These patients had significantly better treatment response than those with a drug level under 1 μg/mL, who had an ADA frequency of 34% (19/56) using the drug-tolerant method. In the prospective cohort, the drug-tolerant assay could identify 34% (53/155 samples) as ADA positive in samples with sIFX level >0.2 μg/mL. ADA were seldom detected in patients with >1 μg/mL sIFX, with three interesting exceptions. A clinically relevant ADA threshold was determined to be >3 RECL as measured with the drug-tolerant assay. In a real-life setting, there was a substantial number of patients with suboptimal drug levels and a proportion of these had ADA. Both too low and too high drug levels correlated with worse disease, but for different reasons. Adding a drug-tolerant assay enabled detection of ADA earlier and regardless of drug level at time of sampling.We would like to thank all patients for their participation in this study. We would also like to thank Consuelo Gomez, Pascual Gonzalez, Anna G. Mattsson, Arne St?hl, and Yousra Rehouma for excellent technical assistance. Funding. The research leading to these results has received support from Swelife, Stockholm County Council (ALF project) #20140333 and the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no. 115303, resources of which are composed of financial contribution from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and EFPIA companies' in kind contribution. This work was also supported by the grants from Aina (Ann) Wallstr?ms och Mary-Ann Sj?bloms Foundation for Medical Research, Professor Nanna Svartz Foundation, the Gothenburg Medical Society (GLS-889421 to RP), the Swedish Rheumatism Association (R-862061 and R-663511 to RP), Adlerbertska research Foundation and the Regional agreement on medical training and clinical research between the Western G?taland county council and the University of Gothenburg (ALFGBG-926621).Peer Reviewe

Treatment- and population-specific genetic risk factors for anti-drug antibodies against interferon-beta: a GWAS

BackgroundUpon treatment with biopharmaceuticals, the immune system may produce anti-drug antibodies (ADA) that inhibit the therapy. Up to 40% of multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon beta (IFN beta) develop ADA, for which a genetic predisposition exists. Here, we present a genome-wide association study on ADA and predict the occurrence of antibodies in multiple sclerosis patients treated with different interferon beta preparations.MethodsWe analyzed a large sample of 2757 genotyped and imputed patients from two cohorts (Sweden and Germany), split between a discovery and a replication dataset. Binding ADA (bADA) levels were measured by capture-ELISA, neutralizing ADA (nADA) titers using a bioassay. Genome-wide association analyses were conducted stratified by cohort and treatment preparation, followed by fixed-effects meta-analysis.ResultsBinding ADA levels and nADA titers were correlated and showed a significant heritability (47% and 50%, respectively). The risk factors differed strongly by treatment preparation: The top-associated and replicated variants for nADA presence were the HLA-associated variants rs77278603 in IFN beta -1a s.c.- (odds ratio (OR)=3.55 (95% confidence interval=2.81-4.48), p=2.1x10(-26)) and rs28366299 in IFN beta -1b s.c.-treated patients (OR=3.56 (2.69-4.72), p=6.6x10(-19)). The rs77278603-correlated HLA haplotype DR15-DQ6 conferred risk specifically for IFN beta -1a s.c. (OR=2.88 (2.29-3.61), p=7.4x10(-20)) while DR3-DQ2 was protective (OR=0.37 (0.27-0.52), p=3.7x10(-09)). The haplotype DR4-DQ3 was the major risk haplotype for IFN beta -1b s.c. (OR=7.35 (4.33-12.47), p=1.5x10(-13)). These haplotypes exhibit large population-specific frequency differences. The best prediction models were achieved for ADA in IFN beta -1a s.c.-treated patients. Here, the prediction in the Swedish cohort showed AUC=0.91 (0.85-0.95), sensitivity=0.78, and specificity=0.90;patients with the top 30% of genetic risk had, compared to patients in the bottom 30%, an OR =73.9 (11.8-463.6, p=4.4x10(-6)) of developing nADA. In the German cohort, the AUC of the same model was 0.83 (0.71-0.92), sensitivity=0.80, specificity=0.76, with an OR=13.8 (3.0-63.3, p=7.5x10(-4)).ConclusionsWe identified several HLA-associated genetic risk factors for ADA against interferon beta, which were specific for treatment preparations and population backgrounds. Genetic prediction models could robustly identify patients at risk for developing ADA and might be used for personalized therapy recommendations and stratified ADA screening in clinical practice. These analyses serve as a roadmap for genetic characterizations of ADA against other biopharmaceutical compounds

Occurrence of Anti-Drug Antibodies against Interferon-Beta and Natalizumab in Multiple Sclerosis: A Collaborative Cohort Analysis

Immunogenicity of biopharmaceutical products in multiple sclerosis is a frequent side effect which has a multifactorial etiology. Here we study associations between anti-drug antibody (ADA) occurrence and demographic and clinical factors. Retrospective data from routine ADA test laboratories in Sweden, Denmark, Austria and Germany (Dusseldorf group) and from one research study in Germany (Munich group) were gathered to build a collaborative multi-cohort dataset within the framework of the ABIRISK project. A subset of 5638 interferon-beta (IFN beta)-treated and 3440 natalizumab-treated patients having data on at least the first two years of treatment were eligible for interval-censored time-to-event analysis. In multivariate Cox regression, IFN beta-1a subcutaneous and IFN beta-1b subcutaneous treated patients were at higher risk of ADA occurrence compared to IFN beta-1a intramuscular-treated patients (pooled HR = 6.4, 95% CI 4.9-8.4 and pooled HR = 8.7, 95% CI 6.6-11.4 respectively). Patients older than 50 years at start of IFN beta therapy developed ADA more frequently than adult patients younger than 30 (pooled HR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3). Men developed ADA more frequently than women (pooled HR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6). Interestingly we observed that in Sweden and Germany, patients who started IFN beta in April were at higher risk of developing ADA (HR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4 and HR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.9 respectively). This result is not confirmed in the other cohorts and warrants further investigations. Concerning natalizumab, patients older than 45 years had a higher ADA rate (pooled HR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.8) and women developed ADA more frequently than men (pooled HR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-2.0). We confirmed previously reported differences in immunogenicity of the different types of IFN beta. Differences in ADA occurrence by sex and age are reported here for the first time. These findings should be further investigated taking into account other exposures and biomarkers

Occurrence of Anti-Drug Antibodies against Interferon-Beta and Natalizumab in Multiple Sclerosis: A Collaborative Cohort Analysis

Immunogenicity of biopharmaceutical products in multiple sclerosis is a frequent side effect which has a multifactorial etiology. Here we study associations between anti-drug antibody (ADA) occurrence and demographic and clinical factors. Retrospective data from routine ADA test laboratories in Sweden, Denmark, Austria and Germany (Dusseldorf group) and from one research study in Germany (Munich group) were gathered to build a collaborative multi-cohort dataset within the framework of the ABIRISK project. A subset of 5638 interferon-beta (IFN beta)-treated and 3440 natalizumab-treated patients having data on at least the first two years of treatment were eligible for interval-censored time-to-event analysis. In multivariate Cox regression, IFN beta-1a subcutaneous and IFN beta-1b subcutaneous treated patients were at higher risk of ADA occurrence compared to IFN beta-1a intramuscular-treated patients (pooled HR = 6.4, 95% CI 4.9-8.4 and pooled HR = 8.7, 95% CI 6.6-11.4 respectively). Patients older than 50 years at start of IFN beta therapy developed ADA more frequently than adult patients younger than 30 (pooled HR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3). Men developed ADA more frequently than women (pooled HR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6). Interestingly we observed that in Sweden and Germany, patients who started IFN beta in April were at higher risk of developing ADA (HR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4 and HR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.9 respectively). This result is not confirmed in the other cohorts and warrants further investigations. Concerning natalizumab, patients older than 45 years had a higher ADA rate (pooled HR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.8) and women developed ADA more frequently than men (pooled HR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-2.0). We confirmed previously reported differences in immunogenicity of the different types of IFN beta. Differences in ADA occurrence by sex and age are reported here for the first time. These findings should be further investigated taking into account other exposures and biomarkers

Clinical practice of analysis of anti-drug antibodies against interferon beta and natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients in Europe:A descriptive study of test results

Antibodies against biopharmaceuticals (anti-drug antibodies, ADA) have been a well-integrated part of the clinical care of multiple sclerosis (MS) in several European countries. ADA data generated in Europe during the more than 10 years of ADA monitoring in MS patients treated with interferon beta (IFNβ) and natalizumab have been pooled and characterized through collaboration within a European consortium. The aim of this study was to report on the clinical practice of ADA testing in Europe, considering the number of ADA tests performed and type of ADA assays used, and to determine the frequency of ADA testing against the different drug preparations in different countries. A common database platform (tranSMART) for querying, analyzing and storing retrospective data of MS cohorts was set up to harmonize the data and compare results of ADA tests between different countries. Retrospective data from six countries (Sweden, Austria, Spain, Switzerland, Germany and Denmark) on 20,695 patients and on 42,555 samples were loaded into tranSMART including data points of age, gender, treatment, samples, and ADA results. The previously observed immunogenic difference among the four IFNβ preparations was confirmed in this large dataset. Decreased usage of the more immunogenic preparations IFNβ-1a subcutaneous (s.c.) and IFNβ-1b s.c. in favor of the least immunogenic preparation IFNβ-1a intramuscular (i.m.) was observed. The median time from treatment start to first ADA test correlated with time to first positive test. Shorter times were observed for IFNβ-1b-Extavia s.c. (0.99 and 0.94 years) and natalizumab (0.25 and 0.23 years), which were introduced on the market when ADA testing was already available, as compared to IFNβ-1a i.m. (1.41 and 2.27 years), IFNβ-1b-Betaferon s.c. (2.51 and 1.96 years) and IFNβ-1a s.c. (2.11 and 2.09 years) which were available years before routine testing began. A higher rate of anti-IFNβ ADA was observed in test samples taken from older patients. Testing for ADA varies between different European countries and is highly dependent on the policy within each country. For drugs where routine monitoring of ADA is not in place, there is a risk that some patients remain on treatment for several years despite ADA positivity. For drugs where a strategy of ADA testing is introduced with the release of the drug, there is a reduced risk of having ADA positive patients and thus of less efficient treatment. This indicates that potential savings in health cost might be achieved by routine analysis of ADA

First exposure to rituximab is associated to high rate of anti-drug antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus but not in ANCA-associated vasculitis

Background Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) can impact on the efficacy and safety of biologicals, today used to treat several chronic inflammatory conditions. Specific patient groups may be more prone to develop ADAs. Rituximab is routinely used for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and as off-label therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but data on occurrence and predisposing factors to ADAs in these diseases is limited. Objectives To elucidate the rate of occurrence, and risk factors for ADAs against rituximab in SLE and AAV. Methods ADAs were detected using a bridging electrochemiluminescent (ECL) immunoassay in sera from rituximab-naive (AAV; n = 41 and SLE; n = 62) and rituximab-treated (AAV; n = 22 and SLE; n = 66) patients. Clinical data was retrieved from medical records. Disease activity was estimated by the SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2 K) and the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS). Results After first rituximab cycle, no AAV patients were ADA-positive compared to 37.8% of the SLE patients. Samples were obtained at a median (IQR) time of 5.5 (3.7-7.0) months (AAV), and 6.0 (5.0-7.0) months (SLE). ADA-positive SLE individuals were younger (34.0 (25.9-40.8) vs 44.3 (32.7-56.3) years, p = 0.002) and with more active disease (SLEDAI-2 K 14.0 (10.0-18.5) vs. 8.0 (6.0-14), p = 0.0017) and shorter disease duration (4.14 (1.18-10.08) vs 9.19 (5.71-16.93), p = 0.0097) compared to ADA-negative SLE. ADAs primarily occurred in nephritis patients, were associated with anti-dsDNA positivity but were not influenced by concomitant use of corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide or previous treatments. Despite overall reduction of SLEDAI-2 K (12.0 (7.0-16) to 4.0 (2.0-6.7), p &amp;lt; 0.0001), ADA-positive individuals still had higher SLEDAI-2 K (6.0 (4.0-9.0) vs 4.0 (2.0-6.0), p = 0.004) and their B cell count at 6 months follow-up was higher (CD19 + % 4.0 (0.5-10.0) vs 0.5 (0.4-1.0), p = 0.002). At retreatment, two ADA-positive SLE patients developed serum sickness (16.7%), and three had infusion reactions (25%) in contrast with one (5.2%) serum sickness in the ADA-negative group. Conclusions In contrast to AAV, ADAs were highly prevalent among rituximab-treated SLE patients already after the first course of treatment and were found to effect on both clinical and immunological responses. The high frequency in SLE may warrant implementations of ADA screening before retreatment and survey of immediate and late-onset infusion reactions.Funding Agencies|Region Stockholm by the ALF (Avtal for Lakarutbildning och Forskning); Swedish Rheumatism Association; Ingegerd Johanssons Fund; Karolinska Institutet FoundationsKarolinska Institutet; Swedish Kidney Foundation; Vinnova/Swelife [2017-04936]; Karolinska InstituteKarolinska Institutet; King Gustaf Vs 80-year Foundation</p

Human leukocyte antigen genes and interferon beta preparations influence risk of developing neutralizing anti-drug antibodies in multiple sclerosis.

A significant proportion of patients with multiple sclerosis who receive interferon beta (IFNβ) therapy develop neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) that reduce drug efficacy. To investigate if HLA class I and II alleles are associated with development of NAbs against IFNβ we analyzed whether NAb status and development of NAb titers high enough to be biologically relevant (>150 tenfold reduction units/ml) correlated with the HLA allele group carriage in a cohort of 903 Swedish patients with multiple sclerosis treated with either intramuscular IFNβ-1a, subcutaneous IFNβ-1a or subcutaneous IFNβ-1b. Carriage of HLA-DRB1*15 was associated with increased risk of developing NAbs and high NAb titers. After stratification based on type of IFNβ preparation, HLA-DRB1*15 carriage was observed to increase the risk of developing NAbs as well as high NAb titers against both subcutaneous and intramuscular IFNβ-1a. Furthermore, in patients receiving subcutaneous IFNβ-1a carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 decreased the risk for high NAb titers. In IFNβ-1b treated patients, HLA-DRB1*04 increased the risk of developing high NAb titers, and in a subgroup analysis of DRB1*04 alleles the risk for NAbs was increased in DRB1*04:01 carriers. In conclusion, there is a preparation-specific genetically determined risk to develop NAbs against IFNβ high enough to be clinically relevant in treatment decisions for patients with multiple sclerosis if confirmed in future studies. However, choice of IFNβ preparation still remains the single most significant determinant for the risk of developing NAbs

HLA association to development of NAbs and biologically relevant titers.

a<p>Major HLA alleles (>5% allele frequency) nominally associated or previously reported to be associated with development of NAbs and biologically relevant titers are presented. All HLA alleles can be found in <b><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0090479#pone.0090479.s002" target="_blank">Table S2</a></b> and <b>S3</b>.</p>b<p>nominal <i>P</i>-values assessed by Chi square test,</p>c<p>Bonferroni corrected <i>P</i>-values (76 allele groups tested).</p><p>Abbreviations: BRT = biologically relevant titers, C.I. = confidence interval, NAb = neutralizing antibodies, OR = odds ratio.</p