The mechanism of lens placode formation: A case of matrix-mediated morphogenesis

AbstractAlthough placodes are ubiquitous precursors of tissue invagination, the mechanism of placode formation has not been established and the requirement of placode formation for subsequent invagination has not been tested. Earlier measurements in chicken embryos supported the view that lens placode formation occurs because the extracellular matrix (ECM) between the optic vesicle and the surface ectoderm prevents the prospective lens cells from spreading. Continued cell proliferation within this restricted area was proposed to cause cell crowding, leading to cell elongation (placode formation). This view suggested that continued cell proliferation and adhesion to the ECM between the optic vesicle and the surface ectoderm was sufficient to explain lens placode formation. To test the predictions of this “restricted expansion hypothesis,” we first confirmed that the cellular events that accompany lens placode formation in chicken embryos also occur in mouse embryos. We then showed that the failure of lens placode formation when the transcription factor, Pax6 was conditionally deleted in the surface ectoderm was associated with greatly diminished accumulation of ECM between the optic vesicle and ectoderm and reduced levels of transcripts encoding components of the ECM. In accord with the “restricted expansion hypothesis,” the Pax6-deleted ectoderm expanded, rather than being constrained to a constant area. As a further test, we disrupted the ECM by deleting Fn1, which is required for matrix assembly and cell–matrix adhesion. As in Pax6CKO embryos, the Fn1CKO lens ectoderm expanded, rather than being constrained to a fixed area and the lens placode did not form. Ectoderm cells in Fn1CKO embryos expressed markers of lens induction and reorganized their cytoskeleton as in wild type ectoderm, but did not invaginate, suggesting that placode formation establishes the minimal mechanical requirements for invagination

Chromatin remodeling enzyme Brg1 is required for mouse lens fiber cell terminal differentiation and its denucleation

These studies demonstrate a cell-autonomous role for Brg1 in lens fiber cell terminal differentiation and identified DNase IIβ as a potential direct target of SWI/SNF complexes. Brg1 is directly or indirectly involved in processes that degrade lens fiber cell chromatin. The presence of nuclei and other organelles generates scattered light incompatible with the optical requirements for the lens

Histone posttranslational modifications and cell fate determination: Lens induction requires the lysine acetyltransferases CBP and p300

Lens induction is a classical embryologic model to study cell fate determination. It has been proposed earlier that specific changes in core histone modifications accompany the process of cell fate specification and determination. The lysine acetyltransferases CBP and p300 function as principal enzymes that modify core histones to facilitate specific gene expression. Herein, we performed conditional inactivation of both CBP and p300 in the ectodermal cells that give rise to the lens placode. Inactivation of both CBP and p300 resulted in the dramatic discontinuation of all aspects of lens specification and organogenesis, resulting in aphakia. The CBP/p300(−/−) ectodermal cells are viable and not prone to apoptosis. These cells showed reduced expression of Six3 and Sox2, while expression of Pax6 was not upregulated, indicating discontinuation of lens induction. Consequently, expression of αB- and αA-crystallins was not initiated. Mutant ectoderm exhibited markedly reduced levels of histone H3 K18 and K27 acetylation, subtly increased H3 K27me3 and unaltered overall levels of H3 K9ac and H3 K4me3. Our data demonstrate that CBP and p300 are required to establish lens cell-type identity during lens induction, and suggest that posttranslational histone modifications are integral to normal cell fate determination in the mammalian lens

Pax6 activity in the lens primordium is required for lens formation and for correct placement of a single retina in the eye

The Pax6 transcription factor plays a key role in ocular development of vertebrates and invertebrates. Homozygosity of the Pax6 null mutation in human and mice results in arrest of optic vesicle development and failure to initiate lens formation. This phenotype obscures the understanding of autonomous function of Pax6 in these tissue components and during later developmental stages. We employed the Cre/loxP approach to inactivate Pax6 specifically in the eye surface ectoderm concomitantly with lens induction. Although lens induction occurred in the mutant, as indicated by Sox2 up-regulation in the surface ectoderm, further development of the lens was arrested. Hence, Pax6 activity was found to be essential in the specified ectoderm for lens placode formation. Furthermore, this mutant model allowed us for the first time to address in vivo the development of a completely normal retina in the absence of early lens structures. Remarkably, several independent, fully differentiated neuroretinas developed in a single optic vesicle in the absence of a lens, demonstrating that the developing lens is not necessary to instruct the differentiation of the neuroretina but is, rather, required for the correct placement of a single retina in the eye

Stage-dependent modes of Pax6-Sox2 epistasis regulate lens development and eye morphogenesis

The transcription factors Pax6 and Sox2 have been implicated in early events in lens induction and have been proposed to cooperate functionally. Here, we investigated the activity of Sox2 in lens induction and its genetic relationship to Pax6 in the mouse. Conditional deletion of Sox2 in the lens placode arrests lens development at the pit stage. As previously shown, conditional deletion of Pax6 in the placode eliminates placodal thickening and lens pit invagination. The cooperative activity of Sox2 and Pax6 is illustrated by the dramatic failure of lens and eye development in presumptive lens conditional, compound Sox2, Pax6 heterozygotes. The resulting phenotype resembles that of germ line Pax6 inactivation, and the failure of optic cup morphogenesis indicates the importance of ectoderm-derived signals for all aspects of eye development. We further assessed whether Sox2 and Pax6 were required for N-cadherin expression at different stages of lens development. N-cadherin was lost in Sox2-deficient but not Pax6-deficient pre-placodal ectoderm. By contrast, after the lens pit has formed, N-cadherin expression is dependent on Pax6. These data support a model in which the mode of Pax6-Sox2 inter-regulation is stage-dependent and suggest an underlying mechanism in which DNA binding site availability is regulated

Conditional inactivation of Pax6 in the pancreas causes early onset of diabetes

Pax6 transcription factor is required for islet cell number, morphology, and hormone gene expression. The perinatal lethality of Pax6 null mutants has restricted investigation of the role of Pax6 in normal endocrine cell function. Therefore, we devised the conditional inactivation of Pax6 using the Pdx1 and Pax6 regulatory domains to activate Cre in cells of either the entire pancreatic bud or only in endocrine cell lineages, respectively. Mutant pups died few days after birth, suffering from an overt diabetic phenotype that includes hyperglycemia, hypoinsulinemia, weight loss, and ketosis, indicating an essential role for Pax6 in beta cell function. Glucose-transporter type-2 expression was downregulated, but expression of several transcription factors essential for endocrine development was maintained. Our findings support a role for Pax6 activity in maintaining normal beta cell function after birth, but not for beta cell neogenesis during late embryonic development and early postnatal stages

Chromatin remodelers HELLS and UHRF1 mediate the epigenetic deregulation of genes that drive retinoblastoma tumor progression

The retinoblastoma (Rb) family of proteins are key regulators of cell cycle exit during development and their deregulation is associated with cancer. Rb is critical for normal retinal development and germline mutations lead to retinoblastoma making retinae an attractive system to study Rb family signaling. Rb coordinates proliferation and differentiation through the E2f family of transcription factors, a critical interaction for the role of Rb in retinal development and tumorigenesis. However, whether the roles of the different E2fs are interchangeable in controlling development and tumorigenesis in the retina or if they have selective functions remains unknown. In this study, we found that E2f family members play distinct roles in the development and tumorigenesis. In Rb;p107-deficient retinae, E2f1 and E2f3 inactivation rescued tumor formation but only E2f1 rescued the retinal development phenotype. This allowed the identification of key target genes for Rb/E2f family signaling contributing to tumorigenesis and those contributing to developmental defects. We found that Sox4 and Sox11 genes contribute to the developmental phenotype and Hells and Uhrf1 contribute to tumorigenesis. Using orthotopic human xenografts, we validated that upregulation of HELLS and UHRF1 is essential for the tumor phenotype. Also, these epigenetic regulators are important for the regulation of SYK.status: publishe

Chromatin remodelers HELLS and UHRF1 mediate the epigenetic deregulation of genes that drive retinoblastoma tumor progression.

The retinoblastoma (Rb) family of proteins are key regulators of cell cycle exit during development and their deregulation is associated with cancer. Rb is critical for normal retinal development and germline mutations lead to retinoblastoma making retinae an attractive system to study Rb family signaling. Rb coordinates proliferation and differentiation through the E2f family of transcription factors, a critical interaction for the role of Rb in retinal development and tumorigenesis. However, whether the roles of the different E2fs are interchangeable in controlling development and tumorigenesis in the retina or if they have selective functions remains unknown. In this study, we found that E2f family members play distinct roles in the development and tumorigenesis. In Rb;p107-deficient retinae, E2f1 and E2f3 inactivation rescued tumor formation but only E2f1 rescued the retinal development phenotype. This allowed the identification of key target genes for Rb/E2f family signaling contributing to tumorigenesis and those contributing to developmental defects. We found that Sox4 and Sox11 genes contribute to the developmental phenotype and Hells and Uhrf1 contribute to tumorigenesis. Using orthotopic human xenografts, we validated that upregulation of HELLS and UHRF1 is essential for the tumor phenotype. Also, these epigenetic regulators are important for the regulation of SYK