Racial Differences in the Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer in a Large Urban Integrated Health System

Background. Racial differences in breast cancer survival may be in part due to variation in patterns of care. To better understand factors influencing survival disparities, we evaluated patterns of receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy among 2,234 women with invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer treated at the Henry Ford Health System (HFHS) from 1996 through 2005. Methods. Sociodemographic and clinical information were obtained from linked datasets from the HFHS, Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance Systems, and U.S. Census. Comorbidity was measured using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and economic deprivation was categorized using a neighborhood deprivation index. Results. African American (AA) women were more likely than whites to have advanced tumors with more aggressive clinical features, to have more comorbidity and to be socioeconomically deprived. While in the unadjusted model, AAs were more likely to receive chemotherapy (odds ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.46) and to have a delay in receipt of chemotherapy beyond 60 days (OR 1.68, 95% CI, 1.26–1.48), after multivariable adjustment there were no racial differences in receipt (odds ratio (OR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73–1.43), or timing of chemotherapy (OR 1.18, 95 CI, 0.8–1.74). Conclusions. Societal factors and not race appear to have an impact on treatment delay among African American women with early breast cancer

The Burden of Chronic Health Conditions among Iraqi Refugees in Michigan

The vast majority of refugees in Michigan is from Iraq, and yet the health status of this population is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to describe chronic disease prevalence of Iraqi refugees and examine associations between sociodemographic characteristics and chronic disease. This study reviewed medical charts of 613 Iraqi refugees to examine the association between demographic characteristics and chronic conditions. The dependent variables were body mass index, non-fasting blood glucose, and history of hypertension and diabetes. The independent variables were birth place, age, sex, and smoking history. Men were 3.99 times (95% CI=1.88, 8.48) as likely as women to have abnormal non-fasting blood glucose levels. Compared to never smokers, former smokers were 3.19 times (95% CI=1.11, 9.13) as likely to have a history of diabetes. The findings will be used to develop tailored prevention interventions to prevent chronic conditions among refugees

Risk of renal cell carcinoma in relation to blood telomere length in a population-based case–control study

Background: There are few known risk factors for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Two small hospital-based case–control studies suggested an association between short blood telomere length (TL) and increased RCC risk. Methods: We conducted a large population-based case–control study in two metropolitan regions of the United States comparing relative TL in DNA derived from peripheral blood samples from 891 RCC cases and 894 controls. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using unconditional logistic regression in both unadjusted and adjusted models. Results: Median TL was 0.85 for both cases and controls (P=0.40), and no differences in RCC risk by quartiles of TL were observed. Results of analyses stratified by age, sex, race, tumour stage, and time from RCC diagnosis to blood collection were similarly null. In multivariate analyses among controls, increasing age and history of hypertension were associated with shorter TL (P<0.001 and P=0.07, respectively), and African Americans had longer TL than Caucasians (P<0.001). Conclusion: These data do not support the hypothesis that blood TL is associated with RCC. This population-based case–control study is, to our knowledge, the largest investigation to date of TL and RCC

Clinical Characteristics of Breast Cancers in African‐American Women with Benign Breast Disease: A Comparison to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program

Benign breast disease ( BBD ) is a very common condition, diagnosed in approximately half of all A merican women throughout their lifecourse. White women with BBD are known to be at substantially increased risk of subsequent breast cancer; however, nothing is known about breast cancer characteristics that develop after a BBD diagnosis in A frican‐ A merican women. Here, we compared 109 breast cancers that developed in a population of A frican‐ A merican women with a history of BBD to 10,601 breast cancers that developed in a general population of A frican‐ A merican women whose cancers were recorded by the M etropolitan D etroit C ancer S urveillance S ystem ( MDCSS population). Demographic and clinical characteristics of the BBD population were compared to the MDCSS population, using chi‐squared tests, F isher's exact tests, t ‐tests, and W ilcoxon tests where appropriate. K aplan– M eier curves and Cox regression models were used to examine survival. Women in the BBD population were diagnosed with lower grade (p = 0.02), earlier stage cancers (p = 0.003) that were more likely to be hormone receptor‐positive (p = 0.03) compared to the general metropolitan Detroit A frican‐ A merican population. In situ cancers were more common among women in the BBD cohort (36.7%) compared to the MDCSS population (22.1%, p < 0.001). Overall, women in the BBD population were less likely to die from breast cancer after 10 years of follow‐up (p = 0.05), but this association was not seen when analyses were limited to invasive breast cancers. These results suggest that breast cancers occurring after a BBD diagnosis may have more favorable clinical parameters, but the majority of cancers are still invasive, with survival rates similar to the general A frican‐ A merican population.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109284/1/tbj12331.pd

Racial Differences in the Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer in a Large Urban Integrated Health System

Background. Racial differences in breast cancer survival may be in part due to variation in patterns of care. To better understand factors influencing survival disparities, we evaluated patterns of receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy among 2,234 women with invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer treated at the Henry Ford Health System (HFHS) from 1996 through 2005. Methods. Sociodemographic and clinical information were obtained from linked datasets from the HFHS, Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance Systems, and U.S. Census. Comorbidity was measured using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and economic deprivation was categorized using a neighborhood deprivation index. Results. African American (AA) women were more likely than whites to have advanced tumors with more aggressive clinical features, to have more comorbidity and to be socioeconomically deprived. While in the unadjusted model, AAs were more likely to receive chemotherapy (odds ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.46) and to have a delay in receipt of chemotherapy beyond 60 days (OR 1.68, 95% CI, 1.26-1.48), after multivariable adjustment there were no racial differences in receipt (odds ratio (OR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.43), or timing of chemotherapy (OR 1.18, 95 CI,. Conclusions. Societal factors and not race appear to have an impact on treatment delay among African American women with early breast cancer. Background Despite improvements in available options for breast cancer treatment, there continues to be a considerable gap in survival between African American (AA) and white women with breast cancer Adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy have had a dramatic impact on breast cancer survival, and in order to optimize longevity, it is critical for patients to receive treatment according to standard clinical guidelines International Journal of Breast Cancer Previous reports on patterns of care have indicated that AA women are less likely to receive standard breast cancer treatment compared with white women We hypothesized that racial disparities in breast cancer survival may be at least in part due to differences in the receipt of standard adjuvant chemotherapy as defined by national treatment guidelines. In order to address this question, we evaluated patterns of breast cancer care provided at the Henry Ford Health System (HFHS), a large integrated health system serving southeastern MI. The goal of this study was to assess patterns of adjuvant chemotherapy administration among women with invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer comparing AA and white women, and focusing on receipt of standard chemotherapy, duration of treatment, and timing of treatment in relationship to diagnosis. Methods Study Design. This study consisted of a descriptive analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy received by AA and white women diagnosed with invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer at the HFHS between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2005. HFHS is a large urban integrated health system located in southeast Michigan founded in 1915 to provide for the health care needs of the city of Detroit and surrounding metropolitan area. HFHS currently consists of 5 hospitals, anchored by Henry Ford Hospital, a 903 bed tertiary care, research and teaching facility; and 36 ambulatory care facilities including 5 sites located within the city of Detroit, and 31 sites located in Wayne (outside of Detroit), Macomb, Oakland, and Washtenaw counties. A single lifetime medical record number (MRN) is used throughout the system to provide continuity of record keeping and medical care. For the purposes of this project, patient sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment information was derived through analyses of linked datasets using the HFHS administrative databases, the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System (MDCSS), and the U.S. Census Bureau. The MDCSS is home for the Detroit SEER registry, which registers all cancers of residents from Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb counties. In the current study, case records were matched from the SEER and HFHS databases using MRN, social security number (SSN), last name, and date of birth. Records that matched for only one variable were manually reviewed to look for character or punctuation errors in other nonmatched fields. Matching resulted in 3,630 record matches. We excluded matches with unknown American Joint Cancer Committee (AJCC) stage (n = 51); first breast surgery at another institution (n = 147); history of a prior malignancy within 6 months of breast cancer diagnosis (n = 52); duplicate records (n = 3); histology code indicating non-breast origin (n = 1); stage IV disease (n = 978), other race (n = 45); no definitive breast surgery (n = 52); and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 67). These exclusions resulted in a study population of 2,234 (61.5%) white and AA women treated for invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer at the HFHS. Measurement of Variables. Detailed information on breast cancer treatment, clinical, and socio-demographic data were derived from the HFHS and SEER database and information on neighborhood-level economic deprivation (see deprivation index below) was obtained form the U.S. Census Bureau. All primary breast surgery consisting of lumpectomy (partial mastectomy) or mastectomy (modified radical mastectomy, radical mastectomy, or simple mastectomy) and standard axillary lymph node dissection was performed at the HFHS. Guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) corresponding to the years of diagnosis were used to define standard adjuvant chemotherapy treatment recommendations according to AJCC stage Patient and clinical characteristics included race (from the medical record listing), age at diagnosis, tumor size, lymph node positivity, histology, grade, and estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PR) status. Insurance status was available from the HFHS records and was classified based on the most frequent insurance charged for each treatment visit, and categorized into 3 groups (private, Medicare, and other, including uninsured). Comorbidity was assessed using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) a prospectively verified method for classifying comorbid medical conditions which could affect the risk of mortality in longitudinal studies Statistical Analysis. The clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of AA and white women with invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer were compared by chi-square tests for categorical variables and Student&apos;s t-tests for continuous variables. Separate analyses were conducted to determine racial differences in the use of standard chemotherapy (yes versus no), timing of chemotherapy as determined by the date of diagnosis and the date of chemotherapy initiation (dichotomized using the sample median, 60 days) for cases where detailed chemotherapy records were available and completion of standard chemotherapy (i.e., completing the NCCN recommended number of cycles of treatment). Odds ratios (ORs) for receipt of chemotherapy for AA versus white women and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression analyses. Race, age at diagnosis, tumor size, lymph node positivity, hormone receptor status, tumor grade, CCI, deprivation index, and insurance status were assessed individually and in multivariable adjusted models. Unconditional logistic regression was also used to estimate the odds of beginning chemotherapy within 60 days of the date of diagnosis. The analyses consisted of three models, first adjusting for clinical factors only (race, age, tumor size, lymph node positivity, hormone receptor status, tumor grade, and CCI), second adjusting for societal factors (race, deprivation index, and insurance status), and third adjusting for all listed variables. The purpose of performing three different models was to determine whether clinical versus societal factors had a greater impact on racial differences in receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy or in timing of chemotherapy. All regression models were run with and without a clustering correction for census tract. Results There were no significant racial differences in age at diagnosis adjuvant chemotherapy for AA women compared with white women. The average time from diagnosis to initiation of chemotherapy for white women was 67.9 days (S.D. 38.6) compared to 73.2 (S.D. 36.4) for AA women, P = 0.049. When time to adjuvant chemotherapy was stratified at 60 days (the sample median), white women were more likely to be treated prior to 60 days (55%) compared to AA women (43%), P &lt; 0.001. Discussion While breast cancer survival rates continue to improve over time http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975 2008/, there remains a marked discrepancy in survival by race, Strengths of this study include the inclusion of women enrolled in a large integrated urban heath care system which provides uniform access to high-quality medical care. In addition, the linked HFHS and SEER database allowed for availability of detailed and accurate clinical, demographic, and treatment data including details on adjuvant chemotherapy received. Our measure of socioeconomic deprivation was a sophisticated measure developed through the linkage with U.S. Census data, however, the derived deprivation index was not based on factors specific to the individual patient such as income, education, or family support, and may therefore be subject to misclassification. In conclusion, race had no direct impact on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy or timing of chemotherapy among a cohort of women treated at a large urban integrated health care system in Detroit. The fact that AA women were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy in the unadjusted model was largely explained by the more advanced stage at diagnosis among AAs that suggests the need for better screening and access to early treatment interventions. Delay in receipt of chemotherapy among AA women was largely explained by societal factors which likely have a direct effect on access to care. However, the delay was on average less than one week and may not have had significant clinical impact. Nevertheless, it serves to remind health care providers of the importance of making health care accessible to all

A Case-Control Study of Peripheral Blood Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Risk of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background: Low mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number is a common feature of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and may influence tumor development. Results: from a recent case-control study suggest that low mtDNA copy number in peripheral blood may be a marker for increased RCC risk. In an attempt to replicate that finding, we measured mtDNA copy number in peripheral blood DNA from a U.S. population-based case-control study of RCC. Methodology/Principal Findings: Relative mtDNA copy number was measured in triplicate by a quantitative real-time PCR assay using DNA extracted from peripheral whole blood. Cases (n = 603) had significantly lower mtDNA copy number than controls (n = 603; medians 0.85, 0.91 respectively; P = 0.0001). In multiple logistic regression analyses, the lowest quartile of mtDNA copy number was associated with a 60% increase in RCC risk relative to the highest quartile (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1–2.2; Ptrend = 0.009). This association remained in analyses restricted to cases treated by surgery alone (OR Q1 = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.0–2.1) and to localized tumors (2.0, 1.3–2.8). Conclusions/Significance: Our findings from this investigation, to our knowledge the largest of its kind, offer important confirmatory evidence that low mtDNA copy number is associated with increased RCC risk. Additional research is needed to assess whether the association is replicable in prospective studies

Risk factors for endometrial cancer in black and white women: a pooled analysis from the epidemiology of endometrial cancer consortium (E2C2)

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States. Over the last decade, the incidence rate has been increasing, with a larger increase among blacks. The aim of this study was to compare risk factors for EC in black and white women

Global survival trends for brain tumors, by histology: analysis of individual records for 556,237 adults diagnosed in 59 countries during 2000–2014 (CONCORD-3)

Background: Survival is a key metric of the effectiveness of a health system in managing cancer. We set out to provide a comprehensive examination of worldwide variation and trends in survival from brain tumors in adults, by histology. Methods: We analyzed individual data for adults (15–99 years) diagnosed with a brain tumor (ICD-O-3 topography code C71) during 2000–2014, regardless of tumor behavior. Data underwent a 3-phase quality control as part of CONCORD-3. We estimated net survival for 11 histology groups, using the unbiased nonparametric Pohar Perme estimator. Results: The study included 556,237 adults. In 2010–2014, the global range in age-standardized 5-year net survival for the most common sub-types was broad: in the range 20%–38% for diffuse and anaplastic astrocytoma, from 4% to 17% for glioblastoma, and between 32% and 69% for oligodendroglioma. For patients with glioblastoma, the largest gains in survival occurred between 2000–2004 and 2005–2009. These improvements were more noticeable among adults diagnosed aged 40–70 years than among younger adults. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the largest account to date of global trends in population-based survival for brain tumors by histology in adults. We have highlighted remarkable gains in 5-year survival from glioblastoma since 2005, providing large-scale empirical evidence on the uptake of chemoradiation at population level. Worldwide, survival improvements have been extensive, but some countries still lag behind. Our findings may help clinicians involved in national and international tumor pathway boards to promote initiatives aimed at more extensive implementation of clinical guidelines