In situ revascularization with silver-coated polyester grafts to treat aortic infection: early and midterm results

AbstractPurposeIn this prospective study we analyzed the immediate and midterm outcome in patients with abdominal aorta infection (mycotic aneurysm, prosthetic graft infection) managed by excision of the aneurysm or the infected vascular prosthesis and in situ replacement with a silver-coated polyester prosthesis.MethodsFrom January 2000 to December 2001, 27 consecutive patients (25 men, 2 women; mean age, 69 years) with an abdominal aortic infection were entered in the study at seven participating centers. Infection was managed with either total (n = 18) or partial (n = 6) excision of the infected aorta and in situ reconstruction with an InterGard Silver (IGS) collagen and silver acetate–coated polyester graft. Assessment of outcome was based on survival, limb salvage, persistent or recurrent infection, and prosthetic graft patency.ResultsTwenty-four patients had prosthetic graft infections, graft–duodenal fistula in 12 and graft-colonic fistula in 1; and the remaining 3 patients had primary aortic infections. Most organisms cultured were of low virulence. The IGS prosthesis was placed emergently in 11 patients (41%). Mean follow-up was 16.5 months (range, 3-30 months). Perioperative mortality was 15%; all four patients who died had a prosthetic graft infection. Actuarial survival at 24 months was 85%. No major amputations were noted in this series. Recurrent infection developed in only one patient (3.7%). Postoperative antibiotic therapy did not exceed 3 months, except in one patient. No incidence of prosthetic graft thrombosis was noted during follow-up.ConclusionPreliminary results in this small series demonstrate favorable outcome with IGS grafts used to treat infection in abdominal aortic grafts and aneurysms caused by organisms with low virulence. Larger series and longer follow-up will be required to compare the role of IGS grafts with other treatment options in infected fields

Proarrhythmia assessment in treatment with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin hospitalized elderly COVID-19 patients - our experience

The aim of our study was to characterize the repolarization disorders propensity induced by drug-drug interaction. In this observational retrospective study, we report our experience on all elderly patients with ascertained diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 through nasopharyngeal swab with real time-polymerase chain reaction at our Pugliese-Ciaccio hospital in Catanzaro, who received hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), with or without azithromycin (AZY). 33 hospitalized patients were examined. We calculated QT value, cQT, QT dispersion, and cQT dispersion and examined possible progression on the basal electrocardiogram (T0) and after the insertion of the drug (T1). The QT value is increased by T0 vs T1 (370±40.74 vs 420±36.91 ms; P=0.000), as well as the cQT value (408±25.40 vs 451.54±58.81; P=0.003), the QT dispersion (QTd: 36.36±14.53 vs 50.90±13.12 ms; P=0.000); the dispersion of cQTc (cQTd 46.27±18.72 vs 63.18±21.93 ms; P=0.001). The ΔQT was 37.44±44.09 while the ΔcQT was 32.01±56.47). The main determinant of QTc prolongation is the number of drug at risk of prolongation of the QT that could influence the ventricular repolarization phase. The use of HCQ in combination with AZY, in patients suffering from severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2, can favor the onset of serious side effects, even potentially fatal. Finally, the measures of QTd and cQTd confirmed additional electrocardiographic parameters useful in identifying patients being treated with drugs at risk of potential adverse arrhythmic events following drug interaction

A cross-sectional study evaluating hospitalization rates for chronic limb-threatening ischemia during the COVID-19 outbreak in Campania, Italy

The expansion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prompted measures of disease containment by the Italian government with a national lockdown on March 9, 2020. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of hospitalization and mode of in-hospital treatment of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) before and during lockdown in the Campania region of Italy. The study population includes all patients with CLTI hospitalized in Campania over a 10-week period: 5 weeks before and 5 weeks during lockdown (n = 453). Patients were treated medically and/or underwent urgent revascularization and/or major amputation of the lower extremities. Mean age was 69.2 +/- 10.6 years and 27.6% of the patients were women. During hospitalization, 21.9% of patients were treated medically, 78.1% underwent revascularization, and 17.4% required amputations. In the weeks during the lockdown, a reduced rate of hospitalization for CLTI was observed compared with the weeks before lockdown (25 vs 74/100,000 inhabitants/year; incidence rate ratio: 0.34, 95% CI 0.32-0.37). This effect persisted to the end of the study period. An increased amputation rate in the weeks during lockdown was observed (29.3% vs 13.4%; p < 0.001). This study reports a reduced rate of CLTI-related hospitalization and an increased in-hospital amputation rate during lockdown in Campania. Ensuring appropriate treatment for patients with CLTI should be prioritized, even during disease containment measures due to the COVID-19 pandemic or other similar conditions

How the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic Impacted Patients’ Hospital Admission and Care in the Vascular Surgery Divisions of the Southern Regions of the Italian Peninsula

Background: To investigate the effects of the COVID-19 lockdowns on the vasculopathic population. Methods: The Divisions of Vascular Surgery of the southern Italian peninsula joined this multicenter retrospective study. Each received a 13-point questionnaire investigating the hospitalization rate of vascular patients in the first 11 months of the COVID-19 pandemic and in the preceding 11 months. Results: 27 out of 29 Centers were enrolled. April-December 2020 (7092 patients) vs. 2019 (9161 patients): post-EVAR surveillance, hospitalization for Rutherford category 3 peripheral arterial disease, and asymptomatic carotid stenosis revascularization significantly decreased (1484 (16.2%) vs. 1014 (14.3%), p = 0.0009; 1401 (15.29%) vs. 959 (13.52%), p = 0.0006; and 1558 (17.01%) vs. 934 (13.17%), p < 0.0001, respectively), while admissions for revascularization or major amputations for chronic limb-threatening ischemia and urgent revascularization for symptomatic carotid stenosis significantly increased (1204 (16.98%) vs. 1245 (13.59%), p < 0.0001; 355 (5.01%) vs. 358 (3.91%), p = 0.0007; and 153 (2.16%) vs. 140 (1.53%), p = 0.0009, respectively). Conclusions: The suspension of elective procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant reduction in post-EVAR surveillance, and in the hospitalization of asymptomatic carotid stenosis revascularization and Rutherford 3 peripheral arterial disease. Consequentially, we observed a significant increase in admissions for urgent revascularization for symptomatic carotid stenosis, as well as for revascularization or major amputations for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

"Delirium Day": A nationwide point prevalence study of delirium in older hospitalized patients using an easy standardized diagnostic tool

Background: To date, delirium prevalence in adult acute hospital populations has been estimated generally from pooled findings of single-center studies and/or among specific patient populations. Furthermore, the number of participants in these studies has not exceeded a few hundred. To overcome these limitations, we have determined, in a multicenter study, the prevalence of delirium over a single day among a large population of patients admitted to acute and rehabilitation hospital wards in Italy. Methods: This is a point prevalence study (called "Delirium Day") including 1867 older patients (aged 65 years or more) across 108 acute and 12 rehabilitation wards in Italian hospitals. Delirium was assessed on the same day in all patients using the 4AT, a validated and briefly administered tool which does not require training. We also collected data regarding motoric subtypes of delirium, functional and nutritional status, dementia, comorbidity, medications, feeding tubes, peripheral venous and urinary catheters, and physical restraints. Results: The mean sample age was 82.0 ± 7.5 years (58 % female). Overall, 429 patients (22.9 %) had delirium. Hypoactive was the commonest subtype (132/344 patients, 38.5 %), followed by mixed, hyperactive, and nonmotoric delirium. The prevalence was highest in Neurology (28.5 %) and Geriatrics (24.7 %), lowest in Rehabilitation (14.0 %), and intermediate in Orthopedic (20.6 %) and Internal Medicine wards (21.4 %). In a multivariable logistic regression, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05), Activities of Daily Living dependence (OR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.12-1.27), dementia (OR 3.25, 95 % CI 2.41-4.38), malnutrition (OR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.29-3.14), and use of antipsychotics (OR 2.03, 95 % CI 1.45-2.82), feeding tubes (OR 2.51, 95 % CI 1.11-5.66), peripheral venous catheters (OR 1.41, 95 % CI 1.06-1.87), urinary catheters (OR 1.73, 95 % CI 1.30-2.29), and physical restraints (OR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.40-2.40) were associated with delirium. Admission to Neurology wards was also associated with delirium (OR 2.00, 95 % CI 1.29-3.14), while admission to other settings was not. Conclusions: Delirium occurred in more than one out of five patients in acute and rehabilitation hospital wards. Prevalence was highest in Neurology and lowest in Rehabilitation divisions. The "Delirium Day" project might become a useful method to assess delirium across hospital settings and a benchmarking platform for future surveys