On The Blue Hills of New England, Far Away

https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mmb-me/1429/thumbnail.jp

Randomized Controlled Trial of Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Acute Hemodynamically Stable Pulmonary Embolism: Rationale and Design of the PEERLESS Study.

BACKGROUND The identification of hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism (PE) patients who may benefit from advanced treatment beyond anticoagulation is unclear. However, when intervention is deemed necessary by the PE patient's care team, data to select the most advantageous interventional treatment option are lacking. Limiting factors include major bleeding risks with systemic and locally delivered thrombolytics and the overall lack of randomized controlled trial (RCT) data for interventional treatment strategies. Considering the expansion of the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) model, corresponding rise in interventional treatment, and number of thrombolytic and non-thrombolytic catheter-directed devices coming to market, robust evidence is needed to identify the safest and most effective interventional option for patients. METHODS The PEERLESS study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05111613) is a currently enrolling multinational RCT comparing large-bore mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with the FlowTriever System (Inari Medical, Irvine, CA) vs catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). A total of 550 hemodynamically stable PE patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and additional clinical risk factors will undergo 1:1 randomization. Up to 150 additional patients with absolute thrombolytic contraindications may be enrolled into a non-randomized MT cohort for separate analysis. The primary endpoint will be assessed at hospital discharge or 7 days post procedure, whichever is sooner, and is a composite of the following clinical outcomes constructed as a hierarchal win ratio: 1) all-cause mortality, 2) intracranial hemorrhage, 3) major bleeding, 4) clinical deterioration and/or escalation to bailout, and 5) intensive care unit admission and length of stay. The first 4 components of the win ratio will be adjudicated by a Clinical Events Committee, and all components will be assessed individually as secondary endpoints. Other key secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality and readmission within 30 days of procedure and device- and drug-related serious adverse events through the 30-day visit. IMPLICATIONS PEERLESS is the first RCT to compare two different interventional treatment strategies for hemodynamically stable PE and results will inform strategy selection after the physician or PERT determines advanced therapy is warranted

Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Deep-Vein Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: The post-thrombotic syndrome frequently develops in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis despite treatment with anticoagulant therapy. Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (hereafter pharmacomechanical thrombolysis ) rapidly removes thrombus and is hypothesized to reduce the risk of the post-thrombotic syndrome. METHODS: We randomly assigned 692 patients with acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis to receive either anticoagulation alone (control group) or anticoagulation plus pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (catheter-mediated or device-mediated intrathrombus delivery of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and thrombus aspiration or maceration, with or without stenting). The primary outcome was development of the post-thrombotic syndrome between 6 and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Between 6 and 24 months, there was no significant between-group difference in the percentage of patients with the post-thrombotic syndrome (47% in the pharmacomechanical-thrombolysis group and 48% in the control group; risk ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.11; P=0.56). Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis led to more major bleeding events within 10 days (1.7% vs. 0.3% of patients, P=0.049), but no significant difference in recurrent venous thromboembolism was seen over the 24-month follow-up period (12% in the pharmacomechanical-thrombolysis group and 8% in the control group, P=0.09). Moderate-to-severe post-thrombotic syndrome occurred in 18% of patients in the pharmacomechanical-thrombolysis group versus 24% of those in the control group (risk ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.98; P=0.04). Severity scores for the post-thrombotic syndrome were lower in the pharmacomechanical-thrombolysis group than in the control group at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of follow-up (P CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis, the addition of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis to anticoagulation did not result in a lower risk of the post-thrombotic syndrome but did result in a higher risk of major bleeding. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ATTRACT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00790335 .)

Randomized Controlled Trial of Mechanical Thrombectomy vs Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Hemodynamically Stable Pulmonary Embolism: Rationale and Design of the PEERLESS Study

BACKGROUND: The identification of hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism (PE) patients who may benefit from advanced treatment beyond anticoagulation is unclear. However, when intervention is deemed necessary by the PE patient\u27s care team, data to select the most advantageous interventional treatment option are lacking. Limiting factors include major bleeding risks with systemic and locally delivered thrombolytics and the overall lack of randomized controlled trial (RCT) data for interventional treatment strategies. Considering the expansion of the pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) model, corresponding rise in interventional treatment, and number of thrombolytic and nonthrombolytic catheter-directed devices coming to market, robust evidence is needed to identify the safest and most effective interventional option for patients. METHODS: The PEERLESS study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05111613) is a currently enrolling multinational RCT comparing large-bore mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with the FlowTriever System (Inari Medical, Irvine, CA) vs catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). A total of 550 hemodynamically stable PE patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and additional clinical risk factors will undergo 1:1 randomization. Up to 150 additional patients with absolute thrombolytic contraindications may be enrolled into a nonrandomized MT cohort for separate analysis. The primary end point will be assessed at hospital discharge or 7 days post procedure, whichever is sooner, and is a composite of the following clinical outcomes constructed as a hierarchal win ratio: (1) all-cause mortality, (2) intracranial hemorrhage, (3) major bleeding, (4) clinical deterioration and/or escalation to bailout, and (5) intensive care unit admission and length of stay. The first 4 components of the win ratio will be adjudicated by a Clinical Events Committee, and all components will be assessed individually as secondary end points. Other key secondary end points include all-cause mortality and readmission within 30 days of procedure and device- and drug-related serious adverse events through the 30-day visit. IMPLICATIONS: PEERLESS is the first RCT to compare 2 different interventional treatment strategies for hemodynamically stable PE and results will inform strategy selection after the physician or PERT determines advanced therapy is warranted

Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease Consensus Definitions From Peripheral Academic Research Consortium (PARC)

The lack of consistent definitions and nomenclature across clinical trials of novel devices, drugs, or biologics poses a significant barrier to accrual of knowledge in and across peripheral artery disease therapies and technologies. Recognizing this problem, the Peripheral Academic Research Consortium, together with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, has developed a series of pragmatic consensus definitions for patients being treated for peripheral artery disease affecting the lower extremities. These consensus definitions include the clinical presentation, anatomic depiction, interventional outcomes, surrogate imaging and physiological follow-up, and clinical outcomes of patients with lower-extremity peripheral artery disease. Consistent application of these definitions in clinical trials evaluating novel revascularization technologies should result in more efficient regulatory evaluation and best practice guidelines to inform clinical decisions in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease

Rae! Rae! Rae!

A drawing of a woman sitting down smelling flowershttps://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/cht-sheet-music/14158/thumbnail.jp

Isolated Metatarsal Artery Balloon Angioplasty for Toe Salvage in Critical Limb Ischemia: A Case Report

Purpose: To report a case of percutaneous balloon angioplasty (PTA) performed in the second metatarsal artery for treatment of a non-healing forefoot wound without proximal intervention. Methods and Results: An 80-year-old diabetic woman with a 1.5-year history of a non-healing right second digit ulcer refractory to conservative management underwent a lower extremity arteriogram. Angiography demonstrated unobstructed flow from the aortic bifurcation through to the pedal arch, with an isolated occluded segment in the second metatarsal artery wound supply. This was treated with 1.5 mm balloon angioplasty, with completion angiography demonstrating restored flow to the wound base. There were no procedural events and the wound completely healed after 9 months. Conclusion: Isolated angioplasty of the arteries distal to the pedal arch may be technically feasible and clinically valuable in selected cases

There\u27s a little girl, I love her, like the stars that shine [first line of chorus]

Performance Medium: Piano, Voice and Chord

Percutaneous renal artery stent placement for hypertension and azotemia: pilot study.

To evaluate the efficacy of balloon-expandable (Palmaz) stents in the treatment of atheromatous renal artery stenosis, prospective placement of stents in 24 arteries in 20 patients was performed over an 18-month period. Indications were hypertension in 18 patients and renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \u3e 1.5 mg/dL) in 11, and all lesions failed conventional transluminal angioplasty. Technical success was achieved in 96% of cases. Hypertension benefit was noted in 77% of patients followed for 6 months (n = 13) and 67% of patients at 1 year (n = 8). Improvement in serum creatinine was seen in 71% (n = 7) and 100% (n = 3) of azotemic patients evaluated at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Six-month angiographic patency was identified in 13 of 16 treated sites. Renal artery stent placement resulted in one asymptomatic segmental branch occlusion; there were no other procedural complications. In conclusion, renal artery stent placement is a technically and clinically effective treatment for hypertension and azotemia due to renal artery stenosis

Contrast-induced nephropathy

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) has been extensively studied since the 1950s due, in part, to its devastating adverse events. The intellectual push for additional investigation into pathogenesis and prevention has heightened in recent years due to increased utilization of contrast enhanced imaging studies. Lack of a universal CIN definition and varied glomerular filtration rate markers have resulted in a varied reported incidence. Risk assessment and risk reduction strategies have evolved over the past several years. Current evidence supports volume supplementation before the administration of intravascular contrast to reduce the hazard of CIN. Other strategies to reduce the risk of CIN, including low osmolar contrast media, N-acetylcysteine, and intrarenal fenoldopam therapy, have variable levels of evidence, and further randomized trials are necessary