9 research outputs found

    Reproductive parameters of the Turquoise-fronted Parrot (Amazona aestiva) in the dry Chaco forest

    Get PDF
    Fil: Berkunsky, Igor. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la provincia de Buenos Aires. Instituto Multidisciplinario sobre Ecosistemas y Desarrollo Sustentable; ArgentinaFil: Segura, Luciano Noel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. División Zoología Vertebrados; ArgentinaFil: Ruggera, Román A.. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Faegre, Sarah I. K.. University of Washington. Rota Avian Behavioral Ecology Program; United StatesFil: Trofino-Falasco, Clara. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la provincia de Buenos Aires. Instituto Multidisciplinario sobre Ecosistemas y Desarrollo Sustentable; ArgentinaFil: López, Fernando G.. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Centro para el Estudio y Conservación de las Aves Rapaces en Argentina; ArgentinaFil: Velasco, Melina Alicia. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. División Zoología Vertebrados; ArgentinaFil: Kacoliris, Federico Pablo. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. División Zoología Vertebrados; ArgentinaFil: Aramburú, Rosana Mariel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. División Zoología Vertebrados; ArgentinaFil: Reboreda, Juan Carlos. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentin

    Major threats to Turquoise-fronted Amazon’s conservation in the Impenetrable region, Argentina

    No full text
    Las principales causas de la declinación de las poblaciones de Loro Hablador (<i>Amazona aestiva</i>) son la destrucción del hábitat y la explotación para el comercio de aves silvestres. La deforestación y la tala selectiva resultan en pérdida de hábitat. La extracción de pichones reduce el número de individuos y puede reducir el número de cavidades disponibles para nidificar. Se evaluaron las principales amenazas que enfrenta el Loro Hablador en la región del Impenetrable, en Argentina. Se estimaron las pérdidas de cavidades por deforestación, tala selectiva y extracción de pichones. Se analizó si la extracción de pichones y la reparación de las cavidades afectan la probabilidad de reutilización de las mismas. Se estimó si la extracción de pichones afecta la supervivencia de los nidos. La deforestación y la tala selectiva destruyeron por año casi 20000 cavidades potenciales. La extracción de pichones afectó en promedio 486 nidos cada año y en los casos en que la cavidad fue reparada no afectó su probabilidad de reutilización al año siguiente. La mayoría de las nidadas sujetas a extracción tenían tres (68%) o dos (23%) pichones y se extrajeron todos menos un pichón. En promedio se extrajeron 1.6 pichones de 40 días de edad por nido. En el 83% de los casos el pichón que se dejó en el nido fue el más joven. Los nidos con extracción de pichones tuvieron una supervivencia menor a los que no tuvieron extracción (73 vs. 93%).Major causes of Turquoise-fronted Amazon’s population decline include habitat destruction and capture for the pet trade. Deforestation and selective logging result in habitat loss. The extraction of chicks reduces the number of individuals and can reduce the number of available cavities for nesting. We evaluated the main threats that this parrot is facing in the Impenetrable region, Argentina. We estimated loss of cavities by deforestation, selective logging and poaching. We analyzed if chicks’ removal and cavity repair affects the probability that a cavity is reoccupied. We estimated if chicks’ removal affects nest survival. Deforestation and selective logging destroyed almost 20000 potential cavities per year. On average, chick’s removal occurs in 486 nests every year. The probability of reoccupation was not affected by chick removal in those cases where the cavity was properly repaired. Most of nest exposed to removal had three (68%) or two (23%) chicks and in all cases were removed all except one chick per nest. In average 1.6 40-days old chicks were removed per nest. At 83% of cases the youngest chick was left at the nest. Nests subjected to extraction have a lower survival than non-extracted nests (73 vs. 93%)

    Reproductive parameters of the Turquoise-fronted Parrot (Amazona aestiva) in the dry Chaco forest

    Get PDF
    The progressive exploitation and destruction of nesting habitat in recent years, combined with the substantial pressure from legal and illegal removal of wild nestlings and adults, justifies the development of a comprehensive study on the reproductive biology of the Turquoise-fronted Parrot (Amazona aestiva). We analyzed breeding parameters in a wild protected population of Turquoise-fronted Parrots in the Chaco forest, Argentina, examining variation among years, over the course of the breeding season, and in relation to the age of the nest. Mean clutch-size per nesting attempt was 3.68 eggs. Hatching success (proportion of eggs laid that hatch) was 0.73. Fledging success (proportion of nestlings that fledge) was 0.88. The overall breeding success (mean number of fledglings per laying female per year) was 0.95. Clutch size did not vary among years but it decreased with the delay of the nest initiation date. Hatching failure was the greatest cause of egg partial losses, and brood reduction was the main cause of nestling partial loses. Brood reduction was positively correlated with clutch size and with egg-laying date. We did not find interannual variation in any of the clutch or brood size variables. Our results showed that the population of Turquoise-fronted Parrots in the dry Chaco forest has high values of clutch size and nestling survival, and low values of hatching success. However, some aspects of the breeding biology need more attention, especially if the species continues to be harvested

    Paramètres de reproduction de l'amazone à front bleu (<i>Amazona aestiva</i>) dans la forêt sèche du Chaco

    No full text
    The progressive exploitation and destruction of nesting habitat in recent years, combined with the substantial pressure from legal and illegal removal of wild nestlings and adults, justifies the development of a comprehensive study on the reproductive biology of the Turquoise-fronted Parrot (Amazona aestiva). We analyzed breeding parameters in a wild protected population of Turquoise-fronted Parrots in the Chaco forest, Argentina, examining variation among years, over the course of the breeding season, and in relation to the age of the nest. Mean clutch-size per nesting attempt was 3.68 eggs. Hatching success (proportion of eggs laid that hatch) was 0.73. Fledging success (proportion of nestlings that fledge) was 0.88. The overall breeding success (mean number of fledglings per laying female per year) was 0.95. Clutch size did not vary among years but it decreased with the delay of the nest initiation date. Hatching failure was the greatest cause of egg partial losses, and brood reduction was the main cause of nestling partial loses. Brood reduction was positively correlated with clutch size and with egg-laying date. We did not find interannual variation in any of the clutch or brood size variables. Our results showed that the population of Turquoise-fronted Parrots in the dry Chaco forest has high values of clutch size and nestling survival, and low values of hatching success. However, some aspects of the breeding biology need more attention, especially if the species continues to be harvested.L'exploitation et la destruction progressives de l'habitat de nidification advenues ces récentes années, combinées à la pression élevée de captures légale et illégale d'oisillons et d'adultes sauvages, justifient la mise en place d'une étude globale sur la biologie de reproduction de l'Amazone à front bleu (Amazona aestiva). Nous avons analysé les paramètres de reproduction d'une population sauvage protégée de cette amazone dans la forêt du Chaco, en Argentine, examinant les variations interannuelles, tout au long de la saison de reproduction, en relation avec l'âge du nid. La taille moyenne de la ponte par tentative de nidification était de 3,68 oeufs. Le succès d'éclosion (proportion d'oeufs pondus qui ont éclos) était de 0,73. Le succès à l'envol (proportion de jeunes qui ont pris leur envol) était de 0,88. Le succès de nidification d'ensemble (nombre moyen de jeunes à l'envol par femelle nicheuse par année) était de 0,95. La taille de la ponte n'a pas varié d'une année à l'autre, mais était plus faible lorsque la date d'initiation du nid était retardée. L'échec de l'éclosion était la cause la plus importante de perte partielle d'oeufs et une couvée réduite était la cause principale de perte partielle d'oisillons. La couvée réduite était positivement corrélée avec la taille de la ponte et la date de celle-ci. Nous n'avons pas observé de variations interannuelles des variables relatives à la taille de la ponte ou de la couvée. Nos résultats indiquent que la population de l'Amazone à front bleu de la forêt sèche du Chaco montre des valeurs élevées de la taille de ponte et de la survie des oisillons, mais des valeurs faibles du succès d'éclosion. Néanmoins, nous pensons qu'il serait important de se pencher davantage sur certains éléments de la biologie de reproduction de l'espèce, particulièrement si elle continue d'être prélevée.Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Muse

    Paramètres de reproduction de l'amazone à front bleu (<i>Amazona aestiva</i>) dans la forêt sèche du Chaco

    No full text
    The progressive exploitation and destruction of nesting habitat in recent years, combined with the substantial pressure from legal and illegal removal of wild nestlings and adults, justifies the development of a comprehensive study on the reproductive biology of the Turquoise-fronted Parrot (Amazona aestiva). We analyzed breeding parameters in a wild protected population of Turquoise-fronted Parrots in the Chaco forest, Argentina, examining variation among years, over the course of the breeding season, and in relation to the age of the nest. Mean clutch-size per nesting attempt was 3.68 eggs. Hatching success (proportion of eggs laid that hatch) was 0.73. Fledging success (proportion of nestlings that fledge) was 0.88. The overall breeding success (mean number of fledglings per laying female per year) was 0.95. Clutch size did not vary among years but it decreased with the delay of the nest initiation date. Hatching failure was the greatest cause of egg partial losses, and brood reduction was the main cause of nestling partial loses. Brood reduction was positively correlated with clutch size and with egg-laying date. We did not find interannual variation in any of the clutch or brood size variables. Our results showed that the population of Turquoise-fronted Parrots in the dry Chaco forest has high values of clutch size and nestling survival, and low values of hatching success. However, some aspects of the breeding biology need more attention, especially if the species continues to be harvested.L'exploitation et la destruction progressives de l'habitat de nidification advenues ces récentes années, combinées à la pression élevée de captures légale et illégale d'oisillons et d'adultes sauvages, justifient la mise en place d'une étude globale sur la biologie de reproduction de l'Amazone à front bleu (Amazona aestiva). Nous avons analysé les paramètres de reproduction d'une population sauvage protégée de cette amazone dans la forêt du Chaco, en Argentine, examinant les variations interannuelles, tout au long de la saison de reproduction, en relation avec l'âge du nid. La taille moyenne de la ponte par tentative de nidification était de 3,68 oeufs. Le succès d'éclosion (proportion d'oeufs pondus qui ont éclos) était de 0,73. Le succès à l'envol (proportion de jeunes qui ont pris leur envol) était de 0,88. Le succès de nidification d'ensemble (nombre moyen de jeunes à l'envol par femelle nicheuse par année) était de 0,95. La taille de la ponte n'a pas varié d'une année à l'autre, mais était plus faible lorsque la date d'initiation du nid était retardée. L'échec de l'éclosion était la cause la plus importante de perte partielle d'oeufs et une couvée réduite était la cause principale de perte partielle d'oisillons. La couvée réduite était positivement corrélée avec la taille de la ponte et la date de celle-ci. Nous n'avons pas observé de variations interannuelles des variables relatives à la taille de la ponte ou de la couvée. Nos résultats indiquent que la population de l'Amazone à front bleu de la forêt sèche du Chaco montre des valeurs élevées de la taille de ponte et de la survie des oisillons, mais des valeurs faibles du succès d'éclosion. Néanmoins, nous pensons qu'il serait important de se pencher davantage sur certains éléments de la biologie de reproduction de l'espèce, particulièrement si elle continue d'être prélevée.Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Muse

    Seed-dispersal networks are more specialized in the Neotropics than in the Afrotropics

    No full text
    [Aim] Biogeographical comparisons of interaction networks help to elucidate differences in ecological communities and ecosystem functioning at large scales. Neotropical ecosystems have higher diversity and a different composition of frugivores and fleshy-fruited plants compared with Afrotropical systems, but a lack of intercontinental comparisons limits understanding of (a) whether plant–frugivore networks are structured in a similar manner, and (b) whether the same species traits define the roles of animals across continents.[Location] Afrotropics and Neotropics.[Time period] 1977-2015.[Taxa] Fleshy-fruited plants and frugivorous vertebrates.[Methods] We compiled a dataset comprising 17 Afrotropical and 48 Neotropical weighted seed-dispersal networks quantifying frugivory interactions between 1,091 fleshy-fruited plant and 665 animal species, comprising in total 8,251 interaction links between plants and animals. In addition, we compiled information on the body mass of animals and their degree of frugivory. We compared four standard network-level metrics related to interaction diversity and specialization, accounting for differences related to sampling effort and network location. Furthermore, we tested whether animal traits (body mass, degree of frugivory) differed between continents, whether these traits were related to the network roles of species and whether these relationships varied between continents.[Results] We found significant structural differences in networks between continents. Overall, Neotropical networks were less nested and more specialized than Afrotropical networks. At the species level, a higher body mass and degree of frugivory were associated with an increasing diversity of plant partners. Specialization of frugivores increased with the degree of frugivory, but only in the Neotropics.[Main conclusions] Our findings show that Afrotropical networks have a greater overlap in plant partners among vertebrate frugivores than the more diverse networks in the Neotropics that are characterized by a greater niche partitioning. Hence, the loss of frugivore species could have stronger impacts on ecosystem functioning in the more specialized Neotropical communities compared with the more generalized Afrotropical communities.We thank Beth A. Kaplin and Norbert J. Cordeiro for their guidance and support for P.J.D., who received a travel grant by The Center for Tropical Studies and Conservation (CTEC). L.C. and I.G. were supported by the Robert Bosch Foundation. D.M.D. (DE 2754/1‐1), F.S. (HE 3041/20‐1), M.Q., V.S., E.L.N. (Research Unit 823‐825), and K.B.G., M.S. and M.G.R.V. (FOR 1246) thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for funding. F.A.F.J. acknowledges funding by a CAPES scholarship, N.F. and D.G.S. by the Robert Bosch Foundation, M.G., C.E., A.P. and M.A.P. by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2010/52315‐7; 2015/15172‐7; 2016/18355‐8) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico (CNPq), M.C.M. by Doctoral Fellowships from COLCIENCIAS and Rufford, M.S.S. by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and FONCyT (PICT2013‐2759 and PICT2016‐0608), P.G.B. by CONICET (PIP 2014‐592) and FONCyT (PICT 2013‐1280), R.A.R. by a Doctoral Fellowship from CONICET, R.H. and S.T. (IF/00441/2013) and M.C. (SFRH/BD/96050/2013) by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal, and A.T. (CGL2013‐44386‐P) and D.G. (CGL2015‐68963‐C2‐2‐R) by the Spanish government. T
    corecore