Above- and below-ground net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils

Copyright © 2009 European Geosciences Union. This is the published version available at http://www.biogeosciences.net/6/2759/2009/bg-6-2759-2009.html © Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.The net primary productivity (NPP) of tropical forests is one of the most important and least quantified components of the global carbon cycle. Most relevant studies have focused particularly on the quantification of the above-ground coarse wood productivity, and little is known about the carbon fluxes involved in other elements of the NPP, the partitioning of total NPP between its above- and below-ground components and the main environmental drivers of these patterns. In this study we quantify the above- and below-ground NPP of ten Amazonian forests to address two questions: (1) How do Amazonian forests allocate productivity among its above- and below-ground components? (2) How do soil and leaf nutrient status and soil texture affect the productivity of Amazonian forests? Using a standardized methodology to measure the major elements of productivity, we show that NPP varies between 9.3±1.3MgC ha−1 yr−1 (mean±standard error), at a white sand plot, and 17.0±1.4MgC ha−1 yr−1 at a very fertile Terra Preta site, with an overall average of 12.8±0.9MgC ha−1 yr−1. The studied forests allocate on average 64±3% and 36±3% of the total NPP to the above and below-ground components, respectively. The ratio of above-ground and below-ground NPP is almost invariant with total NPP. Litterfall and fine root production both increase with total NPP, while stem production shows no overall trend. Total NPP tends to increase with soil phosphorus and leaf nitrogen status. However, allocation of NPP to below-ground shows no relationship to soil fertility, but appears to decrease with the increase of soil clay content

Applying new inter-individual approaches to assess fine-scale population genetic diversity in a neotropical frog, Eleutherodactylus ockendeni

We assess patterns of genetic diversity of a neotropical leaflitter frog, Eleutherodactylus ockendeni, in the upper Amazon of Ecuador without a priori delineation of biological populations and with sufficiently intensive sampling to assess inter-individual patterns. We mapped the location of each collected frog across a 5.4 1 km landscape at the Jatun Sacha Biological Station, genotyped 185 individuals using five species–specific DNA microsatellite loci, and sequenced a fragment of mitochondrial cytochrome b for a subset of 51 individuals. The microsatellites were characterized by high allelic diversity and homozygote excess across all loci, suggesting that when pooled the sample is not a panmictic population. We conclude that the lack of panmixia is not attributable to the influence of null alleles or biased sampling of consanguineous family groups. Multiple methods of population cluster analysis, using both Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches, failed to identify discrete genetic clusters across the sampled area. Using multivariate spatial autocorrelation, kinship coefficients and relatedness coefficients, we identify a continuous isolation by distance population structure, with a first patch size of ca. 260 m and apparently large population sizes. Analysis of mtDNA corroborates the observation of high genetic diversity at fine scales: there are multiple haplotypes, they are non-randomly distributed and a binary haplotype correlogram shows significant spatial genetic autocorrelation. We demonstrate the utility of inter-individual genetic methods and caution against making a priori assumptions about population genetic structure based simply on arbitrary or convenient patterns of sampling