Clinical impact of first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer of mucinous histology: a multicenter, retrospective analysis on 685 patients

In metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC), mucinous histology has been associated with poor response rate and prognosis. We investigated whether bevacizumab combined with different chemotherapy regimens may have an impact on clinical outcomes of MCRC patients with mucinous histology

Association of immune-related adverse events with the outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show a tremendous activity in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but a consistent fraction of patients does not respond. Prognostic/predictive markers are needed. Despite previous investigations in other tumor types, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have not been well evaluated in patients with MSI-H cancers treated with ICIs. Methods: We conducted an international cohort study at tertiary cancer centers collecting clinic-pathological features from 331 patients with MSI-H mCRC treated with ICIs. Of note, the irAEs were summarized using a 'burden score' constructed in a way that the same score value could be obtained by cumulating many low-grade irAEs or few high-grade irAEs; as a result, the lower the burden the better. Clearly, the irAE burden is not a baseline information, thus it was modeled as a time-dependent variable in univariable and multivariable Cox models. Results: Among 331 patients, irAEs were reported in 144 (43.5%) patients. After a median follow-up time of 29.7 months, patients with higher burden of skin, endocrine and musculoskeletal irAEs (the latter two's effect was confirmed at multivariable analysis) had longer overall survival (OS), as opposed to gastrointestinal, pneumonitis, neurological, liver, renal and other irAEs, which showed an harmful effect. Similar results were observed for progression-free survival (PFS). Based on the results retrieved from organ-specific irAEs, 'aggregated' burden scores were developed to distinguish 'protective' (endocrine and musculoskeletal) and 'harmful' (gastrointestinal, pneumonitis, neurological, hepatic) irAEs showing prognostic effects on OS and PFS. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that not all irAEs could exert a protective effect on oncologic outcome. An easy-to-use model for ICIs toxicity (burden score of protective and harmful irAEs) may be used as surrogate marker of response

Emerging role of Lipopolysaccharide binding protein in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury

Sepsis remains a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients, with limited therapeutic options available. Of the several disorders connected with sepsis, acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the major complications. The pathophysiology of sepsis-induced AKI is characterized by severe inflammation in renal parenchyma with endothelial dysfunction, intra-glomerular thrombosis and tubular injury. Endothelial dysfunction is regulated by several mechanisms implicated in cellular de-differentiation, such as endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT). Gram-negative bacteria and their cell wall component lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) are frequently involved in the pathogenesis of AKI. The host recognition of LPS requires a specific receptor, which belongs to the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family of proteins, called TLR4, and two carrier proteins, namely the LPS-binding protein (LBP) and cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14). In particular, LBP is released as a consequence of Gram-negative infection and maximizes the activation of TLR4 signalling. Recent findings regarding the emerging role of LBP in mediating sepsis-induced AKI, and the possible beneficial effects resulting from the removal of this endogenous adaptor protein, will be discussed in this review

Immunotherapy in Gastrointestinal Cancers

Gastrointestinal cancers represent a major public health problem worldwide. Immunotherapeutic strategies are currently under investigation in this setting and preliminary results of ongoing trials adopting checkpoint inhibitors are striking. Indeed, although a poor immunogenicity for GI has been reported, a strong biological rationale supports the development of immunotherapy in this field. The clinical and translational research on immunotherapy for the treatment of GI cancers started firstly with the identification of immune-related mechanisms possibly relevant to GI tumours and secondly with the development of immunotherapy-based agents in clinical trials. In the present review a general overview is firstly provided followed by a focus on major findings on gastric, colorectal, and hepatocellular carcinomas. Finally, pathological and molecular perspectives are provided since many efforts are ongoing in order to identify possible predictive biomarkers and to improve patients’ selection. Many issues are still unsolved in this field; however, we strongly believe that immunotherapy might positively affect the natural history of a subgroup of GI cancer patients improving outcome and the overall quality of life

The role of tumor angiogenesis as a therapeutic target in colorectal cancer

<p><b>Introduction</b>: Angiogenesis is a complex process regulated by several pro- and anti-angiogenic factors, thus the loss of its fine equilibrium plays a key role in colorectal cancer (CRC) development and progression. Therapeutic agents targeting VEGF/VEGFR signaling, the main regulator of this process, proved to be effective across different treatment lines in metastatic CRC (mCRC) and contributed greatly to improve patients’ survival in recent years.</p> <p><b>Areas covered</b>: This review aimed to summarize the actual body of knowledge available on the VEGF pathway in CRC, including currently available anti-angiogenic drugs and treatment challenges, mechanisms of resistance, promising predictive biomarkers and future perspectives.</p> <p><b>Expert commentary</b>: Angiogenesis inhibition in subsequent lines of treatment is a valid strategy in the continuum of care of mCRC patients. In this scenario, the availability of multiple agents warrants to tailor therapy to an individualized approach. However, the validation of predictive biomarkers to aid therapeutic decisions remains an issue. Intrinsic and adaptive resistance to anti-angiogenic agents comprises distinct and intertwined processes, eventually leading to treatment failure and disease progression. The expanding knowledge on the mechanisms underlying the angiogenesis pathway, different potential treatment targets and mechanisms of tumor resistance, may lead to promising new perspectives in this field.</p

Prognostic impact of performance status on the outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibition strategies in patients with dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors&nbsp;yielded unprecedented outcomes in patients with mismatch repair deficient/ microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but clinical decision-making in this rapidly evolving treatment landscape is challenging. Since performance status (PS) represents a well-established prognostic factor in clinical practice, we investigated whether worse PS, overall or related to either patients' frailty or high tumour burden, could affect the outcomes in this whole patients' population and according to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment type. Methods: We conducted a global study at Tertiary Cancer Centres and collected data of patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with anti- programmed-death (ligand)-1 (PD(L)-1) monotherapy or anti-PD-1/anti- cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 combination. Results: The cohort included 502 patients. At a median follow-up of 31.2 months, worse PFS and OS were reported in patients with patient-related PS&nbsp;≥&nbsp;1 (adjusted-HRs: 1.73, 95%CI: 1.06-2.83, p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.004 and 2.06, 95%CI: 1.13-3.74, p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.001, respectively) and cancer-related PS&nbsp;≥&nbsp;1 (adjusted-HRs: 1.61, 95%CI: 1.19-2.17, p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.004 and 1.87, 95%CI: 1.32-2.66, p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.001, respectively). Anti-PD-1/anti- cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 combination did not provide significantly better survival compared to anti-PD(L)-1 monotherapy in PS 0 subgroup (PFS HR&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.62, 95%CI: 0.37-1.02, p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.059; OS HR&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.59, 95%CI: 0.32-1.11, p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.100) and in patient-related PS&nbsp;≥&nbsp;1 (PFS HR 0.93, 95%CI: 0.31-2.83, p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.899; OS HR 1.22, 95%CI: 0.34-4.37, p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.760), but the difference was significant and clinically meaningful in the subgroup with cancer-related PS&nbsp;≥&nbsp;1 (PFS HR&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.32, 95%CI: 0.19-0.53, p&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;0.001; OS HR&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.26, 95%CI: 0.14-0.48, p&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;0.001). Conclusions: In patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, an extensive evaluation of clinical variables including PS may be implemented in the therapy decision-making

Tumour mutational burden as a biomarker in patients with mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard treatment in patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Tumour mutational burden (TMB) is a promising biomarker for the prediction of treatment outcomes.Patients and methods: We screened 203 patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with an anti-PD-(L)1 (anti-Programmed-Death-(Ligand)1) plus or minus an anti-Cytotoxic T -Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) agent at three Italian Academic Centers. TMB was tested by Foundation One Next Generation Sequencing assay and correlated with clinical outcomes, in the overall population and according to ICI regimen.Results: We included 110 patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC. Eighty patients received anti -PD-(L)1 monotherapy and 30 received anti-CTLA-4 combinations. Median TMB was 49 mut/Mb (range: 8-251 mut/Mb). The optimal prognostic cut-off for progression-free survival (PFS) stratification was 23 mut/Mb. Patients with TMB 523 mut/Mb had significantly worse PFS (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] = 4.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.85-9.82, p = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (aHR = 5.14, 95% CI: 1.76-14.98, p = 0.003). Using a cut-off optimised for predicting treatment outcome, anti-CTLA-4 combination was associated with a significant PFS/OS benefit versus anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in patients with TMB &gt; 40 mut/Mb (2-year PFS: 100.0% versus 70.7%, p = 0.002; 2-year OS: 100.0% versus 76.0%, p = 0.025), but not in those with TMB 540 mut/Mb (2-year PFS: 59.7% versus 68.6%, p = 0.888; 2-year OS: 80.0% versus 81.0%, p = 0.949).Conclusion: Patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC and relatively lower TMB value displayed early disease progression when receiving ICIs, whereas patients with the highest TMB values may obtain the maximal benefit from intensified anti-CTLA-4/PD-1 combination.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Transcriptomic Signatures of MSI-High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Predict Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Purpose: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is currently the only predictive biomarker of efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC). However, 10% to 40% of patients with MSI mCRC will experience a primary resistance to ICI.Experimental Design: In two cohorts of patients with MSI mCRC treated with ICI (exploratory, N = 103; validation, N = 35), 30 RNA sequencing was performed from primary tumors. Previously described single-cell transcriptomic signatures of tumor microenvironment (TME) were analyzed.Results: In the exploratory cohort, the unsupervised clustering allowed the identification of three clusters of tumors with distinct transcriptional profiles: cluster A ("stromal(HIGH)-proliferation(LOW)"), cluster B ("stromal(HIGH)-proliferation(MED)"), and cluster C ("stromal(LOW)-proliferation(HIGH)"), with an enrichment of patients progressing at first disease assessment under ICI in cluster A (30% vs. 12% in cluster B and 8.1% in cluster C; P = 0.074). Progressionfree survival (PFS) was also significantly shorter in patients belonging to cluster A, compared with clusters B or C (P &lt; 0.001) with 2-year PFS rates of 33.5%, 80.5%, and 78.3%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, PFS was still significantly longer in patients belonging to cluster B [HR, 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.080.45; P &lt; 0.001] and cluster C (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.59; P = 0.02), compared with patients belonging to cluster A. The association of this clustering with PFS under ICI was confirmed in the validation cohort. PFS related to non-ICI-based regimens was not significantly different according to cluster.Conclusions: This unsupervised transcriptomic classification identified three groups of MSI mCRCs with different compositions of TME cells and proliferative capacities of TME/tumor cells. The "stromalHIGH-proliferationLOW" cluster is associated with a poorer prognosis with ICI treatment