Value of Early Circulating Tumor Cells Dynamics to Estimate Docetaxel Benefit in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Patients

Biomarcadores; Células tumorales circulantes; DocetaxelBiomarkers; Circulating tumor cells; DocetaxelBiomarcadors; Cèl·lules tumorals circulants; DocetaxelCirculating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration and changes following treatment have been demonstrated to be superior to PSA response in determining mCRPC outcome in patients receiving AR signaling inhibitors but not taxanes. We carried out a pooled analysis of two prospective studies in mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel. CTCs were measured at baseline and 3–6 weeks post treatment initiation. Cox regression models were constructed to compare 6-month radiographical progression-free survival (rPFS), CTCs and PSA changes predicting outcome. Among the subjects, 80 and 52 patients had evaluable baseline and post-treatment CTC counts, respectively. A significant association of higher baseline CTC count with worse overall survival (OS), PFS and time to PSA progression (TTPP) was observed. While CTC response at 3–6 weeks (CTC conversion (from ≥5 to <5 CTCs), CTC30 (≥30% decline in CTC) or CTC0 (decline to 0 CTC)) and 6-month rPFS were significantly associated with OS (all p < 0.005), the association was not significant for PSA30 or PSA50 response. CTC and PSA response were discordant in over 50% of cases, with outcome driven by CTC response in these patients. The c-index values for OS were superior for early CTC changes compared to PSA response endpoints, and similar to 6-month rPFS. Early CTC declines were good predictors of improved outcomes in mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel in this small study, offering a superior and/or earlier estimation of docetaxel benefit in comparison to PSA or rPFS that merits further confirmation in larger studies.The results reported here were generated as part of two academic studies supported by various grants. The funding sources had no role in study design, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report. R.L., D.L. and D.O. had full access to all of the data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. This project represents independent research supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care

Plasma Androgen Receptor and Docetaxel for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Càncer de pròstata; Receptor d'andrògens; DocetaxelCáncer de próstata; Receptor de andrógenos; DocetaxelProstate cancer; Androgen receptor; DocetaxelPlasma androgen receptor (AR) gain identifies metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with worse outcome on abiraterone/enzalutamide, but its relevance in the context of taxane chemotherapy is unknown. We aimed to evaluate whether docetaxel is active regardless of plasma AR and to perform an exploratory analysis to compare docetaxel with abiraterone/enzalutamide. This multi-institutional study was a pooled analysis of AR status, determined by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, on pretreatment plasma samples. We evaluated associations between plasma AR and overall/progression-free survival (OS/PFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate in 163 docetaxel-treated patients. OS was significantly shorter in case of AR gain (hazard ratio [HR]=1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.08-2.39, p=0.018), but not PFS (HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.74-1.46, p=0.8) or PSA response (odds ratio=1.14, 95% CI=0.65-1.99, p=0.7). We investigated the interaction between plasma AR and treatment type after incorporating updated data from our prior study of 73 chemotherapy-naïve, abiraterone/enzalutamide-treated patients, with data from 115 first-line docetaxel patients. In an exploratory analysis of mCRPC patients receiving first-line therapies, a significant interaction was observed between plasma AR and docetaxel versus abiraterone/enzalutamide for OS (HR=0.16, 95% CI=0.06-0.46, p<0.001) and PFS (HR=0.31, 95% CI=0.12-0.80, p=0.02). Specifically, we reported a significant difference for OS favoring abiraterone/enzalutamide for AR-normal patients (HR=1.93, 95% CI=1.19-3.12, p=0.008) and a suggestion favoring docetaxel for AR-gained patients (HR=0.53, 95% CI=0.24-1.16, p=0.11). These data suggest that AR-normal patients should receive abiraterone/enzalutamide and AR-gained could benefit from docetaxel. This treatment selection merits prospective evaluation in a randomized trial. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated whether plasma androgen receptor (AR) predicted outcome in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with docetaxel, and we performed an exploratory analysis in patients treated with docetaxel or AR-directed drugs as first-line mCRPC therapy. We showed that plasma AR normal favored hormonal treatment, whilst plasma AR-gained patients may have had a longer response to docetaxel, suggesting that plasma AR status could be a useful treatment selection biomarker.Funding/Support and role of the sponsor: V. Conteduca was funded by a European Society of Medical Oncology Translational Clinical Research Fellowship. A. Jayaram is supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council (MR/P002072/1). G. Attard is supported by a Cancer Research UK Advanced Clinician Scientist Grant (A22744). This work was funded in part by Prostate Cancer UK (PG12-49), the “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (ISCII) PI16/01565 grant. E. Gonzalez-Billalabeitia was funded by a grant from the “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (ISCIII) PI15/01499. N. RomeroLaorden was funded by a grant from the “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (CM14-00200). E. Castro is supported by a Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award (2017). E. Castro and D. Olmos are supported by grants from the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (JCI-2014-19129 to E.C., RYC-2015-18625 to D.O.). B. Mellado and M. Marin-Aguilera work were supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos IIISubdirección General de Evaluación y Fomento de la Investigación (PI12/ 01226 and PI15/676) and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund. Funding from CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya is gratefully acknowledged. During the conduct of the study, E. Castro was supported by a grant from the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deportes (CAS17/00182). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding authors had full access to all data and had the final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication

When should we order a next generation sequencing test in a patient with cancer?

Technical advances in genome sequencing and the implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical oncology have paved the way for individualizing cancer patient therapy based on molecular profiles. When and how to use NGS testing in the clinic is at present an unsolved issue, although new research results provide evidence favoring this approach in some types of advanced cancer. Clinical research is evolving rapidly, from basket and umbrella trials to adaptative design precision oncology clinical studies, and genomic and molecular data often displace the classical clinical validation procedures of biomarkers. In this context, physicians must be aware of the clinical evidence behind these new biomarkers and NGS tests available, in order to use them in the right moment, and with a critical point of view. This review will present the status of currently available targeted drugs that can be effective based on actionable molecular alterations, and the NGS tests that are currently available, offering a practical guide for the application of Clinical Precision Oncology in the real world routine practice.probability of identifying a targetable mutation is low[62], the canceris in early stages with recognized and effective forms of standardtreatment, or the patient has an irreversible disease with very shortlife-expectancy. As with any other laboratory test, doctors andpatients must be sure before ordering an NGS test that its result willhave an impact of the therapeutic plan. In any case, standard single-gene molecular testing must always be performed when indicated,since important therapeutic targets might be potentially missed if nomolecular analyses were performed.Clinical trials are showing that NGS testing can have an impact inthe response rate and progression-free survival of patients, and cantherefore be a very useful strategy leading to new molecularly-tar-geted treatment indications. Key factors responsible for improvedresults in precision-oriented clinical research, include refining themolecular pathways studied, developing molecular testing that inte-grates standarised genomic tests with transcriptomic analysis andimmunohistochemistry, selecting more active targeted agents,designing combinations of targeted agents -also with other forms oftherapy, and providing early treatment recommendations with avail-able Molecular Multidisciplinary Boards. Interdisciplinary discussionare very important to help with the interpretation of unclear molecu-lar results that are oftentimes seen with NGS testing.Important unsolved issues that will need to be addressed in thefuture include deciding which is the best tissue to perform NGS (pri-mary tumor vs metastasis, tumor DNA vs circulating tumor DNA),when is the right moment to test (atfirst diagnosis of advanced dis-ease or when the disease is refractory), and whether there are NGSclinical trial designs that allow for the use of control groups. Finally,using a complete informed consent before NGS testing and communi-cating NGS reports to patients are two very important aspects of theprocedure that have raised ethical concerns, and that must be alwaysaddressed by the practicing oncologists when ordering a NGS test.Search strategy and selection criteriaWe identified references through PubMed with the search terms“cancer AND NGS,”“cancer AND next generation sequencing,”“can-cer AND genomics,”for articles published to March 30, 2020. Thefinalreference list was generated on the basis of originality and relevanceto the broad scope of this Review.FundingThis Review was funded in part by research funds from projectsPIE15/00068andPI17/01865(Instituto de Salud Carlos III) awardedto RC, projectsJR17/00007andPI17/008(Instituto de Salud CarlosIII), awarded to NR-L,PI15/01491andPI19/00549(Instituto de SaludCarlos III) awarded to AA, projectsSAF2017 82886-R(Ministerio deEconomía y Competitividad), INDISNET-S2011/BMD-2332(Fundaci on Ram on Areces), andHR17-00016("La Caixa" Foundation)awarded to FS-M, and projectsPI16/00354(Instituto de Salud CarlosIII) andB2017/BMD-3733from the Consejería de Educaci on, Juventudy Deporte, Comunidad de Madrid, awarded to MQ-F. The manuscriptis part of the activities of the endowed Chair of Personalised PrecisionOncology, Universidad Aut onoma de Madrid (UAM-Fundaci on Insti-tuto Roche)S

Prognostic Score and Benefit from Abiraterone in First-line Metastatic, Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Most available prognostic nomograms in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are derived from datasets not representative of the current treatment landscape. A prognostic nomogram for first-line mCRPC treatment was developed from patients treated in the PREVAIL study. To validate the Armstrong model in the COU-AA-302 trial. A post hoc analysis of mCRPC patients treated in the COU-AA-302 trial was carried out (NCT00887198). The Armstrong prognostic model was applied to patients treated in COU-AA-302. A continuous risk score was derived from coefficients from the original model. Time-dependent area under the curve (tAUC) was used to evaluate the overall predictive ability of the model. Patients were categorized according to the number of risk factors present into those at a low (three or fewer risk factors), intermediate (four to six risk factors), and high (seven to ten risk factors) risk. The association with survival was assessed with Cox regression models. Interaction tests were used to assess the impact of treatment arm in each of the prognostic groups. A total of 1088 patients were analyzed. The risk score was associated with overall survival (OS; tAUC 0.733). Most patients were at a low (49%) or intermediate (41%) risk. Risk category was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-2.4; p < 0.001), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.5-1.8; p < 0.001), and prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.5-1.9; p < 0.001). A significant interaction between risk group and OS (p = 0.007) and rPFS (p = 0.009) was observed. Survival was superior in low-risk patients (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59-0.89; p = 0.009), but similar in intermediate-risk (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.79-1.21; p = 0.9) and high-risk (HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 0.80-2.28; p = 0.5) patients. Two-year OS rates in abiraterone versus placebo were 82% versus 74% in low-risk, 55% versus 52% in intermediate-risk, and 28% versus 31% in high-risk patients. We validate the prognostic value of the Armstrong risk model in patients treated with first-line androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. Abiraterone provided a greater benefit in low-risk patients with less aggressive disease. Further research is needed to establish the role of Armstrong risk groups for treatment selection in mCRPC patients. In this report, we validated the Armstrong nomogram in the COU-AA-302 trial population. We found a similar prognostic performance to that of the original model. Good-risk patients received the greatest benefit from abiraterone.Authors acknowledge funding support from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad de España -Instituto de Salud Carlos III: grants CM17-00221 (Rebeca Lozano), CM19/00234 (Casilda Llacer), JR17/00007 (Nuria Romero-Laorden), and JR18/00011 (Elena Castro); Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación: RYC-2015-18625 (David Olmos); and Prostate Cancer Foundation: Young Investi-gator Award (2014 David Olmos, 2017 Elena Castro).S

Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Predict Therapeutic Efficacy of Immunotherapy in NSCLC

In lung cancer immunotherapy, biomarkers to guide clinical decisions are limited. We now explore whether the detailed immunophenotyping of circulating peripheral blood mononu-clear cells (PBMCs) can predict the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We determined 107 PBMCs subpopulations in a prospective cohort of NSCLC patients before starting single-agent anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (study group), an-alyzed by flow cytometry. As a control group, we studied patients with advanced malignancies before initiating non-immunotherapy treatment. The frequency of PBMCs was correlated with treatment outcome. Patients were categorized as having either high or low expression for each bi-omarker, defined as those above the 55th or below the 45th percentile of the overall marker expres-ion within the cohort. In the study group, three subpopulations were associated with significant differences in outcome: high pretreatment levels of circulating CD4+CCR9+, CD4+CCR10+, or CD8+CXCR4+ T cells correlated with poorer overall survival (15.7 vs. 35.9 months, HR 0.16, p = 0.003; 22.0 vs. NR months, HR 0.10, p = 0.003, and 22.0 vs. NR months, HR 0.29, p = 0.02). These differences were specific to immunotherapy-treated patients. High baseline levels of circulating T cell subpopulations related to tissue lymphocyte recruitment are associated with poorer outcomes of immunotherapy-treated advanced NSCLC patientsProjects PIE15/00068, PI17/01865, and PI20/01458 (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) awarded to R.C.; Projects FIS PI19/01491 and CIBER Cardiovascular (Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria del Instituto de Salud Carlos III with co-funding from the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional FEDER) awarded to A.A.; CNIO Bioinformatics Unit is supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII); Project RETOS RTI2018-097596-B-I00 (AEI/10.13039/501100011033 MCI/FEDER, UE); Projects PI17/00801 and PI21/01111 grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III and JR17/00007 awarded to N.R.-L., and Project Molecular Analysis of the Exhaled Breath Condensate in the Management of Solitary Pulmonary Nodule (ideas semilla AECC 2019), from Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC), awarded to J.

Effect of excess weight and immune-related adverse events on the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies

Immunotherapy is an effective treatment in advanced cancer, although predictors of response are limited. We studied whether excess weight influences the efficacy outcomes of immunotherapy. We have also evaluated the combined prognostic effect of excess weight and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Efficacy of anti-PD-1 treatment was evaluated with both objective radiological response (ORR) rate and progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity with irAEs. We studied the association between excess weight and ORR, PFS or irAEs. 132 patients diagnosed with advanced cancer were included. Median body mass index (BMI) was 24.9 kg/m2. 64 patients had normal weight (BMI&lt;25 kg/m2), and 64 patients had excess weight (BMI≥25 kg/m2). Four patients had underweight and were excluded from further analysis. ORR was achieved in 50 patients (38.0%), median PFS was 6 months. 44 patients developed irAEs (33.3%). ORR was higher in excess weight patients than in patients with normal weight (51.6% vs 25.0%; OR 3.45, p = .0009). PFS was improved in patients with excess weight (7.25 months vs 4 months, HR 1.72, p = .01). The incidence of IrAEs was not different in patients with excess weight (54.5% vs 43.2%, p = .21). When high BMI and irAEs were combined, we observed a marked prognostic trend in ORR rate (87.5% vs 6.2%; OR 161.0, p &lt; .00001), and in PFS (14 months vs 3 months; HR 5.89, p &lt; .0001). Excess weight patients with advanced cancer that receive single-agent anti-PD-1 antibody therapy exhibit a significantly improved clinical outcome compared with normal BMI patients. This association was especially marked when BMI and irAEs were considered combined.This study was funded in part by the project Discovery, Validation and Implementation of Biomarkers for Precision Oncology [PIE15/00068], and the project FIS PI17/01865 from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, awarded to RC, and the projects [JR 17/00007 and PI17/008], awarded to NRL

A mutation in the POT1 gene is responsible for cardiac angiosarcoma in TP53-negative Li-Fraumeni-like families

Cardiac angiosarcoma (CAS) is a rare malignant tumour whose genetic basis is unknown. Here we show, by whole-exome sequencing of a TP53-negative Li-Fraumeni-like (LFL) family including CAS cases, that a missense variant (p.R117C) in POT1 (protection of telomeres 1) gene is responsible for CAS. The same gene alteration is found in two other LFL families with CAS, supporting the causal effect of the identified mutation. We extend the analysis to TP53-negative LFL families with no CAS and find the same mutation in a breast AS family. The mutation is recently found once in 121,324 studied alleles in ExAC server but it is not described in any other database or found in 1,520 Spanish controls. In silico structural analysis suggests how the mutation disrupts POT1 structure. Functional and in vitro studies demonstrate that carriers of the mutation show reduced telomere-bound POT1 levels, abnormally long telomeres and increased telomere fragility

Clonal chromosomal mosaicism and loss of chromosome Y in elderly men increase vulnerability for SARS-CoV-2

The pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19) had an estimated overall case fatality ratio of 1.38% (pre-vaccination), being 53% higher in males and increasing exponentially with age. Among 9578 individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 in the SCOURGE study, we found 133 cases (1.42%) with detectable clonal mosaicism for chromosome alterations (mCA) and 226 males (5.08%) with acquired loss of chromosome Y (LOY). Individuals with clonal mosaic events (mCA and/or LOY) showed a 54% increase in the risk of COVID-19 lethality. LOY is associated with transcriptomic biomarkers of immune dysfunction, pro-coagulation activity and cardiovascular risk. Interferon-induced genes involved in the initial immune response to SARS-CoV-2 are also down-regulated in LOY. Thus, mCA and LOY underlie at least part of the sex-biased severity and mortality of COVID-19 in aging patients. Given its potential therapeutic and prognostic relevance, evaluation of clonal mosaicism should be implemented as biomarker of COVID-19 severity in elderly people. Among 9578 individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 in the SCOURGE study, individuals with clonal mosaic events (clonal mosaicism for chromosome alterations and/or loss of chromosome Y) showed an increased risk of COVID-19 lethality

Plasma Androgen Receptor and Docetaxel for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Càncer de pròstata; Receptor d'andrògens; DocetaxelCáncer de próstata; Receptor de andrógenos; DocetaxelProstate cancer; Androgen receptor; DocetaxelPlasma androgen receptor (AR) gain identifies metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with worse outcome on abiraterone/enzalutamide, but its relevance in the context of taxane chemotherapy is unknown. We aimed to evaluate whether docetaxel is active regardless of plasma AR and to perform an exploratory analysis to compare docetaxel with abiraterone/enzalutamide. This multi-institutional study was a pooled analysis of AR status, determined by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, on pretreatment plasma samples. We evaluated associations between plasma AR and overall/progression-free survival (OS/PFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate in 163 docetaxel-treated patients. OS was significantly shorter in case of AR gain (hazard ratio [HR]=1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.08-2.39, p=0.018), but not PFS (HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.74-1.46, p=0.8) or PSA response (odds ratio=1.14, 95% CI=0.65-1.99, p=0.7). We investigated the interaction between plasma AR and treatment type after incorporating updated data from our prior study of 73 chemotherapy-naïve, abiraterone/enzalutamide-treated patients, with data from 115 first-line docetaxel patients. In an exploratory analysis of mCRPC patients receiving first-line therapies, a significant interaction was observed between plasma AR and docetaxel versus abiraterone/enzalutamide for OS (HR=0.16, 95% CI=0.06-0.46, p<0.001) and PFS (HR=0.31, 95% CI=0.12-0.80, p=0.02). Specifically, we reported a significant difference for OS favoring abiraterone/enzalutamide for AR-normal patients (HR=1.93, 95% CI=1.19-3.12, p=0.008) and a suggestion favoring docetaxel for AR-gained patients (HR=0.53, 95% CI=0.24-1.16, p=0.11). These data suggest that AR-normal patients should receive abiraterone/enzalutamide and AR-gained could benefit from docetaxel. This treatment selection merits prospective evaluation in a randomized trial. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated whether plasma androgen receptor (AR) predicted outcome in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with docetaxel, and we performed an exploratory analysis in patients treated with docetaxel or AR-directed drugs as first-line mCRPC therapy. We showed that plasma AR normal favored hormonal treatment, whilst plasma AR-gained patients may have had a longer response to docetaxel, suggesting that plasma AR status could be a useful treatment selection biomarker.Funding/Support and role of the sponsor: V. Conteduca was funded by a European Society of Medical Oncology Translational Clinical Research Fellowship. A. Jayaram is supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council (MR/P002072/1). G. Attard is supported by a Cancer Research UK Advanced Clinician Scientist Grant (A22744). This work was funded in part by Prostate Cancer UK (PG12-49), the “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (ISCII) PI16/01565 grant. E. Gonzalez-Billalabeitia was funded by a grant from the “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (ISCIII) PI15/01499. N. RomeroLaorden was funded by a grant from the “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (CM14-00200). E. Castro is supported by a Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award (2017). E. Castro and D. Olmos are supported by grants from the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (JCI-2014-19129 to E.C., RYC-2015-18625 to D.O.). B. Mellado and M. Marin-Aguilera work were supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos IIISubdirección General de Evaluación y Fomento de la Investigación (PI12/ 01226 and PI15/676) and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund. Funding from CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya is gratefully acknowledged. During the conduct of the study, E. Castro was supported by a grant from the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deportes (CAS17/00182). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding authors had full access to all data and had the final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication

The Homologous Recombination Deficiency Scar in Advanced Cancer: Agnostic Targeting of Damaged DNA Repair.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most recognized tumor-suppressor genes involved in double-strand DNA break repair through the homologous recombination (HR) system. Widely known for its role in hereditary cancer, HR deficiency (HRD) has turned out to be critical beyond breast and ovarian cancer: for prostate and pancreatic cancer also. The relevance for the identification of these patients exceeds diagnostic purposes, since results published from clinical trials with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) have shown how this type of targeted therapy can modify the long-term evolution of patients with HRD. Somatic aberrations in other HRD pathway genes, but also indirect genomic instability as a sign of this DNA repair impairment (known as HRD scar), have been reported to be relevant events that lead to more frequently than expected HR loss of function in several tumor types, and should therefore be included in the current diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. However, the optimal strategy to identify HRD and potential PARPi responders in cancer remains undefined. In this review, we summarize the role and prevalence of HRD across tumor types and the current treatment landscape to guide the agnostic targeting of damaged DNA repair. We also discuss the challenge of testing patients and provide a special insight for new strategies to select patients who benefit from PARPi due to HRD scarring