Uso da reação em cadeia da polimerase para o diagnóstico de infecção assintomática por Leishmania em área endêmica de leishmaniose visceral

The diagnosis of asymptomatic infection with Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi has become more important over recent years. Expansion of visceral leishmaniasis might be associated with other routes of transmission such as transfusion, congenital or even vector transmission, and subjects with asymptomatic infection are potential reservoirs. Moreover, the identification of infection may contribute to the management of patients with immunosuppressive conditions (HIV, transplants, use of immunomodulators) and to the assessment of the effectiveness of control measures. In this study, 149 subjects living in a visceral leishmaniasis endemic area were evaluated clinically and submitted to genus-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), serological testing, and the Montenegro skin test. Forty-nine (32.9%) of the subjects had a positive PCR result and none of them developed the disease within a follow-up period of three years. No association was observed between the results of PCR, serological and skin tests. A positive PCR result in subjects from the endemic area did not indicate a risk of progression to visceral leishmaniasis and was not associated with a positive result in the serological tests.O diagnóstico de infecção assintomática por Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi tem assumido crescente importância nos últimos anos. A expansão da leishmaniose visceral pode estar associada a outras vias de transmissão tais como transfusional, congênita, ou mesmo vetorial, sendo os indivíduos com infecção assintomática, potenciais reservatórios. Ademais, a identificação da infecção poderia auxiliar na condução dos pacientes com condições de imunossupressão (HIV, transplante, uso de imunomoduladores) e na avaliação da efetividade das medidas de controle. Neste estudo, foram avaliados clinicamente 149 indivíduos residentes em área endêmica de leishmaniose visceral e realizada a reação em cadeia da polimerase (PCR) gênero-específica, testes sorológicos e teste de Montenegro. Destes, 49 (32,9%) apresentaram PCR positiva, dos quais nenhum evoluiu com clínica de leishmaniose visceral nos três anos subsequentes. Não houve associação entre o resultado da PCR, dos exames sorológicos e do teste cutâneo. A positividade da PCR em indivíduos da área endêmica estudada não indicou risco de progressão para leishmaniose visceral e também não foi associada à maior positividade dos testes sorológicos

Comparação de dois antígenos para intradermorreação de Montenegro

Foram feitas reações intradérmicas em 399 indivíduos usando-se, simultaneamente, o antígeno fabricado pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais e pela Fundação Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Ambos antígenos manufaturados com promastigotas de Leishmania (L) amazonensis (IFLA/BR/67/PH8). O antígeno da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz produziu maior número de reações positivas. Houve 22% de reações discordantes

Antileishmania Immunological Tests for Asymptomatic Subjects Living in a Visceral Leishmaniasis-Endemic Area in Brazil

The objective of this study was to evaluate the behavior of different tests used for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in asymptomatic subjects living in an endemic area. No gold standard is available for the diagnosis of asymptomatic infection with Leishmania. In continuation of a previous study, 1,017 subjects living in a VL-endemic area were clinically reevaluated. Of these, 576 had at least one positive serological test in a first assessment. About 3 years after the first evaluation, none of the subjects had progressed to clinical VL. Among this group, 246 subjects were selected, and five serological tests (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay p [ELISAp], ELISArK39, ELISArK26, indirect immunofluorescence test [IIFT] using L. amazonensis promastigote antigen, and an immunochromatographic test using rK39 antigen [TRALd]) and the Montenegro skin test (MST) were repeated. There was a significant increase in the number of subjects who tested positive in the MST, IIFT, ELISAp, and ELISArK39 in the second evaluation. For all tests, there were subjects who tested positive in the first evaluation and negative in the second evaluation. A positive result in the serological tests and MST in subjects from the endemic area studied did not indicate a risk of progression to VL and may only be temporary