9 research outputs found

    Secondary contact and genomic admixture between rhesus and long‐tailed macaques in the Indochina Peninsula

    Get PDF
    Understanding the process and consequences of hybridization is one of the major challenges in evolutionary biology. A growing body of literature has reported evidence of ancient hybridization events or natural hybrid zones in primates, including humans; however, we still have relatively limited knowledge about the pattern and history of admixture because there have been little studies that simultaneously achieved genome‐scale analysis and a geographically wide sampling of wild populations. Our study applied double‐digest restriction site‐associated DNA sequencing to samples from the six localities in and around the provisional hybrid zone of rhesus and long‐tailed macaques and evaluated population structure, phylogenetic relationships, demographic history, and geographic clines of morphology and allele frequencies. A latitudinal gradient of genetic components was observed, highlighting the transition from rhesus (north) to long‐tailed macaque distribution (south) as well as the presence of one northern population of long‐tailed macaques exhibiting unique genetic structure. Interspecific gene flow was estimated to have recently occurred after an isolation period, and the migration rate from rhesus to long‐tailed macaques was slightly greater than in the opposite direction. Although some rhesus macaque‐biased alleles have widely introgressed into long‐tailed macaque populations, the inflection points of allele frequencies have been observed as concentrated around the traditionally recognized interspecific boundary where morphology discontinuously changed; this pattern was more pronounced in the X chromosome than in autosomes. Thus, due to geographic separation before secondary contact, reproductive isolation could have evolved, contributing to the maintenance of an interspecific boundary and species‐specific morphological characteristics

    Ancestry, Plasmodium cynomolgi prevalence and rhesus macaque admixture in cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) bred for export in Chinese breeding farms

    Get PDF
    Background: Most cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) used in the United States as animal models are imported from Chinese breeding farms without documented ancestry. Cynomolgus macaques with varying rhesus macaque ancestry proportions may exhibit differences, such as susceptibility to malaria, that affect their suitability as a research model. Methods: DNA of 400 cynomolgus macaques from 10 Chinese breeding farms was genotyped to characterize their regional origin and rhesus ancestry proportion. A nested PCR assay was used to detect Plasmodium cynomolgi infection in sampled individuals. Results: All populations exhibited high levels of genetic heterogeneity and low levels of inbreeding and genetic subdivision. Almost all individuals exhibited an Indochinese origin and a rhesus ancestry proportion of 5%-48%. The incidence of P. cynomolgi infection in cynomolgus macaques is strongly associated with proportion of rhesus ancestry. Conclusions: The varying amount of rhesus ancestry in cynomolgus macaques underscores the importance of monitoring their genetic similarity in malaria research

    An inter-laboratory study of DNA-based identity, parentage and species testing in animal forensic genetics

    Get PDF
    The probative value of animal forensic genetic evidence relies on laboratory accuracy and reliability. Inter-laboratory comparisons allow laboratories to evaluate their performance on specific tests and analyses and to continue to monitor their output. The International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG) administered animal forensic comparison tests (AFCTs) in 2016 and 2018 to assess the limitations and capabilities of laboratories offering forensic identification, parentage and species determination services. The AFCTs revealed that analyses of low DNA template concentrations (≤300 pg/µL) constitute a significant challenge that has prevented many laboratories from reporting correct identification and parentage results. Moreover, a lack of familiarity with species testing protocols, interpretation guidelines and representative databases prevented over a quarter of the participating laboratories from submitting correct species determination results. Several laboratories showed improvement in their genotyping accuracy over time. However, the use of forensically validated standards, such as a standard forensic short tandem repeat (STR) kit, preferably with an allelic ladder, and stricter guidelines for STR typing, may have prevented some common issues from occurring, such as genotyping inaccuracies, missing data, elevated stutter products and loading errors. The AFCTs underscore the importance of conducting routine forensic comparison tests to allow laboratories to compare results from each other. Laboratories should keep improving their scientific and technical capabilities and continuously evaluate their personnel’s proficiency in critical techniques such as low copy number (LCN) analysis and species testing. Although this is the first time that the ISAG has conducted comparison tests for forensic testing, findings from these AFCTs may serve as the foundation for continuous improvements of the overall quality of animal forensic genetic testing.Fil: Kanthaswamy, Sreetharan. Arizona State University; Estados Unidos. University of California at Davis; Estados UnidosFil: Brendel, Torsten. Eurofins Genomics Europe Applied Genomics GmbH; AlemaniaFil: Cancela, Luis. Identitas; UruguayFil: Andrade de Oliveira, Denise A.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; BrasilFil: Brenig, Bertram. Universität Göttingen; AlemaniaFil: Cons, Carmen. Universidad de Zaragoza. Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragon; EspañaFil: Crespi, Julian Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico CONICET- La Plata. Instituto de Genética Veterinaria "Ing. Fernando Noel Dulout". Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Genética Veterinaria; ArgentinaFil: Dajbychová, Markéta. Genomia s.r.o.; República ChecaFil: Feldl, Andreas. Eurofins Genomics Europe Applied Genomics GmbH; AlemaniaFil: Itoh, Tomohito. Livestock Improvement Association of Japan; JapónFil: Landi, Vincenzo. Università degli Studi di Bari; ItaliaFil: Martinez, Amparo. Universidad de Córdoba; EspañaFil: Natonek-Wisniewska, Malgorzata. National Research Institute of Animal Production; PoloniaFil: Oldt, Robert F.. Arizona State University; Estados Unidos. University of California at Davis; Estados UnidosFil: Radko, Anna. Vetgenomics S.L., Barcelona; EspañaFil: Ramírez, Oscar. Vetgenomics S.L., Barcelona; EspañaFil: Rodellar, Clementina. Universidad de Zaragoza. Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragon; EspañaFil: Ruiz Girón, Manuel. Hispalis Biolab S.L.U., Sevilla; EspañaFil: Schikorski, David. Laboratoire LABOFARM-GENINDEXE; FranciaFil: Turba, María Elena. Genefast SRL ; ItaliaFil: Giovambattista, Guillermo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico CONICET- La Plata. Instituto de Genética Veterinaria "Ing. Fernando Noel Dulout". Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Genética Veterinaria; Argentin
    corecore