48 research outputs found

    Intravenous N‐acetylcysteine in pediatric patients with nonacetaminophen acute liver failure: A placebo‐controlled clinical trial

    Full text link
    N‐acetylcysteine (NAC) was found to improve transplantation‐free survival in only those adults with nonacetaminophen (non‐APAP) acute liver failure (ALF) and grade 1‐2 hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Because non‐APAP ALF differs significantly between children and adults, the Pediatric Acute Liver Failure (PALF) Study Group evaluated NAC in non‐APAP PALF. Children from birth through age 17 years with non‐APAP ALF enrolled in the PALF registry were eligible to enter an adaptively allocated, doubly masked, placebo‐controlled trial using a continuous intravenous infusion of NAC (150 mg/kg/day in 5% dextrose in water [D5W]) or placebo (D5W) for up to 7 days. The primary outcome was 1‐year survival. Secondary outcomes included liver transplantation‐free survival, liver transplantation (LTx), length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, organ system failure, and maximum HE score. A total of 184 participants were enrolled in the trial with 92 in each arm. The 1‐year survival did not differ significantly ( P = 0.19) between the NAC (73%) and placebo (82%) treatment groups. The 1‐year LTx‐free survival was significantly lower ( P = 0.03) in those who received NAC (35%) than those who received placebo (53%), particularly, but not significantly so, among those less than 2 years old with HE grade 0‐1 (NAC 25%; placebo 60%; P = 0.0493). There were no significant differences between treatment arms for hospital or ICU length of stay, organ systems failing, or highest recorded grade of HE. Conclusion : NAC did not improve 1‐year survival in non‐APAP PALF. One‐year LTx‐free survival was significantly lower with NAC, particularly among those <2 years old. These results do not support broad use of NAC in non‐APAP PALF and emphasizes the importance of conducting controlled pediatric drug trials, regardless of results in adults. (H EPATOLOGY 2013)Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/97484/1/26001_ftp.pd

    Equal antipyretic effectiveness of oral and rectal acetaminophen: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN11886401]

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The antipyretic effectiveness of rectal versus oral acetaminophen is not well established. This study is designed to compare the antipyretic effectiveness of two rectal acetaminophen doses (15 mg/kg) and (35 mg/kg), to the standard oral dose of 15 mg/kg. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-dummy, double-blind study of 51 febrile children, receiving one of three regimens of a single acetaminophen dose: 15 mg/kg orally, 15 mg/kg rectally, or 35 mg/kg rectally. Rectal temperature was monitored at baseline and hourly for a total of six hours. The primary outcome of the study, time to maximum antipyresis, and the secondary outcome of time to temperature reduction by at least 1°C were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures over time was used to compare the secondary outcome: change in temperature from baseline at times1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours among the three groups. Intent-to-treat analysis was planned. RESULTS: No significant differences were found among the three groups in the time to maximum antipyresis (overall mean = 3.6 hours; 95% CI: 3.2–4.0), time to fever reduction by 1°C or the mean hourly temperature from baseline to 6 hours following dose administration. Hypothermia (temperature < 36.5°C) occurred in 11(21.6%) subjects, with the highest proportion being in the rectal high-dose group. CONCLUSION: Standard (15 mg/kg) oral, (15 mg/kg) rectal, and high-dose (35 mg/kg) rectal acetaminophen have similar antipyretic effectiveness

    Pediatric acute liver failure: etiology, outcomes, and the role of serial pediatric end-stage liver disease scores

    No full text
    To describe etiology, short-term outcomes and prognostic accuracy of serial PELD scores in PALF. Retrospective analysis of children aged ≀16 yr, admitted with PALF under the QLTS, Brisbane, Australia, between 1991 and 2011. PELD-MELD scores were ascertained at three time points (i) admission (ii), meeting PALF criteria, and (iii) peak value. Fifty-four children met criteria for PALF, median age 17 months (1 day–15.6 yr) and median weight 10.2 kg (1.9–57 kg). Etiology was known in 69%: 26% metabolic, 15% infective, 13% drug-induced, 6% autoimmune, and 9% hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Age 4. Serial PELD-MELD scores were higher in the 17 (32%) transplant recipients (mean: [i] 26.8, [ii] 31.8, [iii] 42.6); highest in the 12 (22%) non-transplanted non-survivors (mean: [i] 31.6, [ii] 37.2, [iii] 45.7) compared with the 25 (46%) transplant-free survivors (mean: [i] 25.3, [ii] 26.0, [iii] 30.3). PELD-MELD thresholds of ≄27 and ≄42 at (ii) meeting PALF criteria and (iii) peak predicted poor outcome (p < 0.001). High peak bilirubin and peak INR predict poor outcome and serial PELD-MELD is superior to single admission PELD-MELD score for predicting poor outcome
    corecore