1,865 research outputs found

    Building a Community on the Fast Track: ENG. 09/111 at Central Virginia Community College (CVCC) as a Tier C Model

    Get PDF
    This author organized and taught the new ENG 09/111 classes at her college, as well as authoring the course text and workbook. In this article, she details the course structure, discusses its statistical assessment, and includes the reactions from students who have taken the class

    Exploring Circle Packing Algorithms

    Get PDF
    We present an interactive tool for visualizing and experimenting with different circle packing algorithms

    An Examination of Finish Time Variation for Collegiate Cross Country National Championships by Gender

    Get PDF
    In cross country, women compete over shorter distances than men with little justification for these differences. The purpose of this study was to assess gender differences for the spread of finishing times and examine the appropriateness of shorter competition distances for females. Forty-six cross country national championship data sets (nmales = 10,788; nfemales = 10,884) from the NCAA (1999-2011) and NAIA (2005-2011) were utilized for analyses. Several measures of variation were computed to assess spread of finishing times data (i.e., Coefficient of Variation [CV]; Interpercentile Ranges [IR], and Rates of Separation [RS; IR divided by the distance of the race]). Independent t-tests revealed significant gender differences on all three measures of variations. Males and females differed on CV (Mmales = 3.93, SD = 1.04; Mfemales = 4.84, SD = 1.05, p \u3c .001), as well as each percentile range for IR and RS. Specifically, males and females differed on IR for NCAA Division I, IR5th-95th (Mmales = 194.32; Mfemales = 167.93, p \u3c .001), IR10th-90th (Mmales = 146.66; Mfemales = 127.51, p \u3c .001), and Division II, IR10th-90th (Mmales = 237.32; Mfemales = 203.37, p = .001). Males and females also differed on all RSs for all four levels of competition. For women, a race distance at 68.6% of the distance of the men could generate equivalent variations between genders. Finish times for women’s races were more spread out than for men’s races when adjusted for distance and time. The spread of finishing times may justify shorter distances run by women

    An Analysis of Horizontal Forces Between Sports

    Get PDF
    Different sports have various demands that athletes must meet to perform at the requisite level. For example, hockey athletes produce primarily horizontal forces due to skating. However, in basketball, there are a combination of horizontal forces from running and vertical forces from frequent jumping. Therefore, utilizing forces exclusively in one direction as a metric to compare athletes of different sports could provide a limited analysis. PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the relationship between horizontal and vertical forces between athletes who participate in the 4 major sports in the US by using a ratio of horizontal and vertical forces produced, called Fmax ratios. We hypothesized that athletes who move primary horizontally, like hockey players, would have greater Fmax ratios than athletes who participate in sports that involve jumping, like basketball. METHODS: Kinetic data were collected on 28 male athletes (8 baseball, 8 basketball, 6 hockey, 3 football, 22.4±4.53 yrs., 1.86±0.08m, 86.39±8.64kg) who participate in the 4 major US sports. All athletes had their horizontal forces measured using a DynaSpeed MUSCLELAB system. Athletes ran at various %’s of bodyweight using the DynaSpeed, and regression was used to predict peak horizontal forces. To measure vertical forces, athletes performed a countermovement jump on a force platform. Fmax ratios were calculated by dividing peak horizontal force by peak vertical force. A one-way ANOVA was used to compare Fmax ratios between athletes of the 4 major US sports. RESULTS: No differences were found in Fmax ratios between sports (Baseball = 0.22±0.03, Basketball = 0.20±0.02, Hockey = 0.21±0.02, Football = 0.20±0.01, p=0.34). CONCLUSION: Results contradict our hypothesis as no mean differences were found between any sports. Furthermore, an exploratory analysis found no differences in horizontal forces between groups. This suggests that regardless of predominant direction utilized in sport, athletes of different sports still produce the same magnitude of horizontal forces as well as ratios. Future studies that investigate Fmax ratios should aim to measure horizontal and vertical forces simultaneously rather than separately to best capture sport specificity

    GLBT Center Minutes from October 2010 Gender Neutral Bathroom Meeting‏

    Get PDF
    This document is the GLBT Center Minutes from October 2010 Gender Neutral Bathroom Meeting‏
    • …
    corecore