Comparación de los diferentes niveles de la presión espiratoria positiva en los volúmenes de la pared torácica en niños saludables y pacientes con fibrosis

ABSTRACT Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) improves lung function, however, PEP-induced changes are not fully established. The aim of this study was to assess the acute effects of different PEP levels on chest wall volumes and the breathing pattern in children with Cystic Fibrosis (CF). Anthropometric data, lung function values, and respiratory muscle strength were collected. Chest wall volumes were assessed by Optoelectronic plethysmography at rest and during the use of different PEP levels (10 and 20 cm H2O), randomly chosen. Eight subjects with CF (5M, 11.5±3.2 years, 32±9.5 kilograms) and seven control subjects (4M, 10.7±1.5 years, 38.2±7.8 kilograms) were recruited. The CF group showed significantly lower FEF values 25-75% (CF: 1.8±0.8 vs. CG: 2.3±0.6) and FEV1/FVC ratio (CF: 0.8±0.1 vs. CG: 1±0.1) compared with the control group (p<0.05). Different PEP levels increased the usual volume in chest wall and its compartments in both groups; however, this volume was significantly higher in the control group compared with the CF group during PEP20 (CW: 0.77±0.25 L vs. 0.44±0.16 L; RCp: 0.3±0.13 L vs. 0.18±0.1 L; RCa: 0.21±0.1 L vs. 0.12±0.1 L; AB: 0.25±0.1 L vs. 0.15±0.1 L; p<0.05 for all variables). Minute ventilation was significantly higher during PEP compared with breathing at rest in both groups (p<0.005). End-expiratory volume was also higher during PEP compared with breathing at rest for chest wall and pulmonary rib cage in both groups (p<0.05). Different PEP levels may increase chest wall volumes in CF patients

Comparison of different levels of positive expiratory pressure on chest wall volumes in healthy children and patients with fibrosis

La Presión Espiratoria Positiva (PEP) mejora la función pulmonar, mientras tanto, los cambios inducidos por la PEP no están totalmente establecidos. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar los efectos agudos de distintas intensidades de PEP en los volúmenes de la pared torácica (PT) y patrón respiratorio en niños con Fibrosis Cística (FC). Datos antropométricos, función pulmonar y fuerza de la musculatura respiratoria. Los volúmenes de la PT fueron evaluados a través de la Pletismografía Optoelectrónica (POE) en reposo y durante el uso de distintas intensidades de PEP (10 y 20 cm H2O). Fueron reclutados 8 sujetos con FC (5H; 11,5 ± 3,2 años; 32 ± 9,5 kg) y 7 sujetos (4H; 10,7 ± 1,5 años; 38,2 ± 7,8 kg). Grupo FC mostró valores significativamente menores para FEF 25-75% (FC: 1,8 ± 0,8 vs. GC: 2,3 ± 0,6) y relación VEF1/CVF (FC: 0,8 ± 0,1 vs. GC: 1 ± 0,1) comparado al grupo control (p>;0,05). Distintas intensidades de PEP conllevaron a un incremento del volumen corriente de la PT y sus compartimentos en ambos los grupos, mientras tanto, este volumen incrementó de manera significativa en el grupo control cuando comparado al grupo FC durante PEP20 (CW: 0,77 ± 0,25 L vs. 0,44 ± 0,16 L; RCp: 0,3 ± 0,13 L vs. 0,18 ± 0,1 L; RCa: 0,21 ± 0,1 L vs. 0,12 ± 0,1 L; AB: 0,25 ± 0,1 L vs. 0,15 ± 0,1 L; p>;0,05 para todas las variables). La ventilación minuto incrementó de manera significativa durante la PEP en comparación a la respiración en reposo para ambos grupos (p>;0,005). El volumen espiratorio final también fue más grande durante la PEP en comparación a la respiración en reposo para PT y la caja torácica pulmonar en ambos los grupos (p>;0,05). Las distintas intensidades de PEP pueden inducir incrementos en los volúmenes de la pared torácica en pacientes con FC.Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) improves lung function, however, PEP-induced changes are not fully established. The aim of this study was to assess the acute effects of different PEP levels on chest wall volumes and the breathing pattern in children with Cystic Fibrosis (CF). Anthropometric data, lung function values, and respiratory muscle strength were collected. Chest wall volumes were assessed by Optoelectronic plethysmography at rest and during the use of different PEP levels (10 and 20 cm H2O), randomly chosen. Eight subjects with CF (5M, 11.5±3.2 years, 32±9.5 kilograms) and seven control subjects (4M, 10.7±1.5 years, 38.2±7.8 kilograms) were recruited. The CF group showed significantly lower FEF values 25-75% (CF: 1.8±0.8 vs. CG: 2.3±0.6) and FEV1/FVC ratio (CF: 0.8±0.1 vs. CG: 1±0.1) compared with the control group (pPressão Expiratória Positiva (PEwP) melhora a função pulmonar, entretanto, as mudanças induzidas pela PEP não estão totalmente estabelecidas. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar os efeitos agudos de diferentes intensidades de PEP nos volumes da parede torácica (PT) e padrão respiratório em crianças com Fibrose Cística (FC). Dados antropométricos, função pulmonar e força da musculatura respiratória. Os volumes da PT foram avaliados através da Pletismografia Optoeletrônica (POE) em repouso e durante o uso de diferentes intensidades de PEP (10 e 20 cm H2O). Foram recrutados 8 sujeitos com FC (5H; 11,5 ± 3,2 anos; 32 ± 9,5 kg) e 7 sujeitos (4H; 10,7 ± 1,5 anos; 38,2 ± 7,8 kg). Grupo FC mostrou valores significativamente menores para FEF 25-75% (FC: 1,8 ± 0,8 vs. GC: 2,3 ± 0,6) e relação VEF1/CVF (FC: 0,8 ± 0,1 vs. GC: 1 ± 0,1) comparado ao grupo controle (p>;0,05). Diferentes intensidades de PEP levaram a um aumento do volume corrente da PT e seus compartimentos em ambos os grupos, entretanto, este volume aumentou de forma significativa no grupo controle quando comparado ao grupo FC durante PEP20 (CW: 0,77 ± 0,25 L vs. 0,44 ± 0,16 L; RCp: 0,3 ± 0,13 L vs. 0,18 ± 0,1 L; RCa: 0,21 ± 0,1 L vs. 0,12 ± 0,1 L; AB: 0,25 ± 0,1 L vs. 0,15 ± 0,1 L; p>;0,05 para todas as variáveis). A ventilação minuto aumentou de forma significativa durante a PEP em comparação a respiração em repouso para ambos os grupos (p>;0,005). Volume expiratório final também foi maior durante a PEP em comparação a respiração em repouso para PT e caixa torácica pulmonar em ambos os grupos (p>;0,05). Diferentes intensidades de PEP podem induzir aumentos nos volumes da parede torácica em pacientes com FC

Confiabilidade do teste da caminhada de seis minutos em pacientes com miastenia gravis generalizada

The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the six minutes walking test (6MWT) as a functional capacity test for patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). Eleven patients with generalized MG (5 men, six women), aged 55±9 years, were first assessed as to pulmonary function and then submitted to three 6MWT in different days. Heart rate and oxygen saturation were measured (by means of portable oxymeter) during, and dyspnea (by the Borg scale) and distance walked were measured after, each test. At the three tests distances walked were 498 m, 517 m and 520 m (respectively 99%, 103%, and 104% of predicted values). Mean heart rate, oxygen saturation, and dyspnea values showed constant behaviour through the three tests. A high relative reliability was found between the tests, with interclass coefficient correlation over 0.90 (6MWT1-6MWT2, 0.960; 6MWT1-6MWT3, 0.945; and 6MWT2-6MWT3, 0.970); absolute reliability of 4%, 3.5% and 4.8%, as well as good repeatability of 11%, 9.8% and 13.4% were found for respectively the first, second, and third tests. Upper and lower agreement limits, as well as bias mean values by the Bland-Altman test show clinically acceptability. It may hence be said that the 6MWT proved safe, reliable and reproducible, and may be used for exercise tolerance assessment and follow up of patients with generalized myasthenia gravis.Este estudo objetivou determinar a confiabilidade do teste da caminhada de seis minutos (TC6M) como um teste de capacidade funcional em pacientes com miastenia gravis generalizada (MG). Foram selecionados 11 pacientes com MG - 5 homens, 6 mulheres - com idade de 55±9 anos, avaliados inicialmente quanto à função fulmonar, que se submeteram a três TC6M em dias diferentes. Durante e/ou após cada teste foram medidas freqüência cardíaca e saturação de oxigênio (por oxímetro portátil), sensação de dispnéia (pela escala de Borg) e distância percorrida. Nos três testes as distâncias percorridas foram 498 m, 517 m e 520 m (respectivamente 99%, 103% e 104% do valor predito). Em média, a freqüência cardíaca, dispnéia e saturação de oxigênio mostraram comportamento constante nos três testes. Foram encontradas alta confiabilidade relativa, com coeficiente de correlação interclasse maior que 0,90 entre os testes (TC6M1-TC6M2, 0,960; TC6M1-TC6M3, 0,945; e TC6M2-TC6M3, 0,970) e confiabilidade absoluta de 4%, 3,5% e 4,8%, com reprodutibilidade de 11%, 9,8% e 13,4%, respectivamente para o primeiro, segundo e terceiro testes. Os limites superiores e inferiores de concordância e o valor médio das médias das diferenças (bias) calculados pelo teste de Bland-Altman mostraram-se clinicamente aceitáveis. Conclui-se que o TC6M se mostrou seguro, confiável e reprodutível, podendo ser aplicado para avaliação e seguimento da tolerância ao exercício em pacientes com MG generalizada

Acute effects of three pulmonary reexpansion modalities on thoracoabdominal motion of healthy subjects: Randomized crossover study

Background Chest physiotherapy can be an alternative to increase lung volumes through pulmonary expansion therapies, but there is still inconsistency in the literature in order to determine which device can promote a greater volume increase at the expense of a better ventilatory pattern. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the chest wall kinematics of healthy subjects submitted to the use of three different devices for pulmonary reexpansion. Methods Chest wall compartmental and operational volumes, breathing pattern and thoracoabdominal asynchrony were evaluated in 12 healthy individuals through optoelectronic plethysmography during quiet breathing, pulmonary reexpansion and recovery. Three different devices (volume-oriented incentive spirometer–IS-v; positive expiratory pressure–PEP; and incentive spirometer volume and pressure oriented–IS-vp) were administered in a random order with at least 48h between the devices. Results A greater volume variation in the chest wall and its compartments was observed when the IS-vp was used in comparison with the other devices (p<0.05). Furthermore, the IS-vp mobilizes a greater amount of volume accompanied by greater synchronism between the compartments when compared to IS-v (p <0.05). Conclusion The IS-vp may be able to increase total and compartmental chest wall volumes, as well as improve synchrony among compartments when compared to IS-v and PEP devices, thus constituting an important tool for treating patients with restrictive ventilatory pattern

Benefits of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program for patients with severe COPD

599 OBJECTIVE: The benefits of a domiciliary program of pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with severe to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are uncertain. We aimed to assess the short-and medium-term efficacy of such a program in this clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with severe COPD (stages III-IV, classification of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) and incapacitating dyspnea (scores 3-5, Medical Research Council [MRC] scale) were randomized to a control or domiciliary rehabilitation group. The 9-week supervised pulmonary rehabilitation program included educational sessions, respiratory physiotherapy, and muscle training in weekly sessions in the patient´s home. We assessed the following variables at baseline, 9 weeks, and 6 months: lung function, exercise tolerance (3-minute walk test), dyspnea (MRC score), and health-related quality of life with the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ). RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with a mean (SD) age of 68 (6) years were enrolled. The mean MRC score was 4 (0.8) and mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 29% of reference. Twenty-nine patients completed the study (6 months). Distance covered on the walk test increased significantly in the rehabilitation group (P=.001) and the difference was maintained at 6 months. Dyspnea also improved significantly with rehabilitation (P≤ ≤.05), but the reduction was not evident at 6 months. Statistically significant improvements in symptoms related to 2 CRQ domains were detected between baseline and 9 weeks: dyspnea (3. Beneficios de un programa de rehabilitación respiratoria domiciliaria en pacientes con EPOC grave OBJETIVO: Los beneficios de la rehabilitación respiratoria domiciliaria (RRD) en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) de grado grave-muy grave son controvertidos. Nuestro objetivo ha sido evaluar la eficacia a corto y medio plazo de un programa de RRD en pacientes con EPOC grave. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Se trata de un estudio prospectivo y aleatorizado en pacientes con EPOC grave (estadios III y IV de la clasificación GOLD) y disnea invalidante -puntuación de 3 a 5 en la escala del Medical Research Council (MRC)-, distribuidos en grupo control y grupo RRD. El programa de rehabilitación respiratoria fue de 9 semanas y consistía en educación, fisioterapia respiratoria y entrenamiento muscular con supervisión semanal en domicilio. Evaluamos en situación basal, a las 9 semanas y a los 6 meses la función pulmonar, la capacidad de ejercicio (prueba de la marcha de 3 min), la disnea (MRC) y la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, determinada con el Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ). RESULTADOS: Participaron en el estudio 38 pacientes, con una edad media ± desviación estándar de 68 ± 6 años (puntuación MRC: 4 ± 0,8; volumen espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo: 29% del valor de referencia), y 29 completaron el seguimiento a los 6 meses. En el grupo RRD se incrementó significativamente la distancia recorrida en la prueba de la marcha de 3 min (p = 0,001), resultado que se mantuvo a los 6 meses. La disnea mejoró significativamente tras la RRD (p ≤ ≤ 0,05), pero dicha mejoría desapareció a los 6 meses. Se observó una mejoría clínica y estadísticamente significativa en 2 dominios del CRQ, el de disnea (3,1 ± 0,8 frente a 3,6 ± 0,7; p = 0,02) y el de fatiga (3,7 ± 0,8 frente a 4,2 ± 0,9; p = 0,002), y tan sólo clí-nica (4,3 frente a 4,9) en el control de la enfermedad, mejorías que se mantuvieron a los 6 meses. CONCLUSIONES: La RRD en pacientes con EPOC gravemuy grave y alta incapacidad funcional aporta beneficios en la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud y la capacidad de ejercicio, que pueden mantenerse hasta los 6 meses. Palabras clave: Enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). Rehabilitación respiratoria domiciliaria. Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud. Capacidad del ejercicio

New reference values for maximum respiratory pressures in healthy Brazilian children following guidelines recommendations: A regional study

Objective To determine reference values for maximum static respiratory pressures in healthy children from a Brazilian region, following recommendations of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the Brazilian Society of Pneumology and Tisiology (SBPT). Methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with healthy children (6 to 11 years) of both sexes. The maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures (PImax and PEmax, respectively) were measured using a digital manometer. Each child performed a minimum of three and a maximum of five maneuvers; three acceptable and reproducible maneuvers were considered for analysis. Minimum time for each maneuver was 1.5 seconds, with a one-second plateau, and one minute of rest between them. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was conducted for PImax and PEmax, considering correlations between independent variables: age, weight, and sex. Results We included 121 children (62 girls [51%]). Boys reached higher values for maximum respiratory pressures than girls. Respiratory pressures increased with age showing moderate effect sizes (PImax: f = 0.36; PEmax: f = 0.30) between the stratified age groups (6–7, 8–9, and 10–11 years). Age and sex were included in the PImax equation (PImax = 24.630 + 7.044 x age (years) + 13.161 x sex; R2 = 0.189). PEmax equations were built considering age for girls and weight for boys [PEmax (girls) = 55.623 + 4.698 x age (years) and PEmax (boys) = 82.617 + 0.612 x weight (kg); R2 = 0.068]. Conclusions This study determined new reference equations for maximal respiratory pressures in healthy Brazilian children, following ERS and SBPT recommendations