8 research outputs found

    Engineering of Cyclodextrin Product Specificity and pH Optima of the Thermostable Cyclodextrin Glycosyltransferase from Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes EM1

    Get PDF
    The product specificity and pH optimum of the thermostable cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase) from Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes EM1 was engineered using a combination of x-ray crystallography and site-directed mutagenesis. Previously, a crystal soaking experiment with the Bacillus circulans strain 251 β-CGTase had revealed a maltononaose inhibitor bound to the enzyme in an extended conformation. An identical experiment with the CGTase from T. thermosulfurigenes EM1 resulted in a 2.6-Å resolution x-ray structure of a complex with a maltohexaose inhibitor, bound in a different conformation. We hypothesize that the new maltohexaose conformation is related to the enhanced α-cyclodextrin production of the CGTase. The detailed structural information subsequently allowed engineering of the cyclodextrin product specificity of the CGTase from T. thermosulfurigenes EM1 by site-directed mutagenesis. Mutation D371R was aimed at hindering the maltohexaose conformation and resulted in enhanced production of larger size cyclodextrins (β- and γ-CD). Mutation D197H was aimed at stabilization of the new maltohexaose conformation and resulted in increased production of α-CD. Glu258 is involved in catalysis in CGTases as well as α-amylases, and is the proton donor in the first step of the cyclization reaction. Amino acids close to Glu258 in the CGTase from T. thermosulfurigenes EM1 were changed. Phe284 was replaced by Lys and Asn327 by Asp. The mutants showed changes in both the high and low pH slopes of the optimum curve for cyclization and hydrolysis when compared with the wild-type enzyme. This suggests that the pH optimum curve of CGTase is determined only by residue Glu258.

    Engineering of factors determining α-amylase and cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase specificity in the cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes EM1

    No full text
    The starch-degrading enzymes α-amylase and cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase) are functionally and structurally closely related, with CGTases containing two additional domains (called D and E) compared to the three domains of α-amylases (A, B and C). Amino acid residue 196 (Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes EM1 CGTase numbering) occupies a dominant position in the active-site cleft. All α-amylases studied have a small residue at this position (Gly, Leu, Ser, Thr or Val), in contrast to CGTases which have a more bulky aromatic residue (Tyr or Phe) at this position, which is highly conserved. Characterization of the F196G mutant CGTase of T. thermosulfurigenes EM1 revealed that, for unknown reasons, apart from the F196G mutation, domain E as well as a part of domain D had become deleted [mutant F196G(Δ'DE)]. This, nevertheless, did not prevent the purification of a stable and active mutant CGTase protein (62 kDa). The mutant protein was more similar to an α-amylase protein in terms of the identity of residue 196, and in the domain structure containing, however, some additional C-terminal structure. The mutant showed a strongly reduced temperature optimum. Due to a frameshift mutation in mutant F196G, a separate protein of 19 kDa with the DE domains was also produced. Mutant F196G(Δ'DE) displayed a strongly reduced raw-starch-binding capacity, similar to the situation in most α-amylases that lack a raw-starch-binding E domain. Compared to wild-type CGTase, cyclization, coupling and disproportionation activities had become drastically reduced in the mutant F196G(Δ'DE), but its saccharifying activity had doubled, reaching the highest level ever reported for a CGTase. Under industrial production process conditions, wild-type CGTase converted starch into 35% cyclodextrins and 11% linear oligosaccharides (glucose, maltose and maltotriose), whereas mutant F196G(Δ'DE) converted starch into 21% cyclodextrins and 18% into linear oligosaccharides. These biochemical characteristics indicate a clear shift from CGTase to α-amylase specificity.

    Cyclodextrin Formation by the Thermostable α-Amylase of Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes EM1 and Reclassification of the Enzyme as a Cyclodextrin Glycosyltransferase

    Get PDF
    Extensive characterization of the thermostable α-amylase of Clostridium thermosulfurogenes EM1, recently reclassified as Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes, clearly demonstrated that the enzyme is a cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase). Product analysis after incubation of the enzyme with starch revealed formation of α-, β-, and γ-cyclodextrins, as well as linear sugars. The specific activity for cyclization of this CGTase was similar to those of other CGTases, whereas the specific activity for hydrolysis was relatively high in comparison with other CGTases. Alignment of the amino acid sequence of the T. thermosulfurigenes enzyme with sequences from known bacterial CGTases showed high homology. The four consensus regions of carbohydrate-converting enzymes, as well as a C-terminal raw-starch binding motif, could be identified in the sequence.

    Crystal Structure at 2.3 Ã… Resolution and Revised Nucleotide Sequence of the Thermostable Cyclodextrin Glycosyltransferase from Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes EM1

    No full text
    The crystal structure of the cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase) from the thermophilic microorganism Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes EM1 has been elucidated at 2.3 Å resolution. The final model consists of all 683 amino acid residues, two calcium ions and 343 water molecules, and has a crystallographic R-factor of 17.9% (Rfree 24.9%) with excellent stereochemistry. The overall fold of the enzyme is highly similar to that reported for mesophilic CGTases and differences are observed only at surface loop regions. Closer inspection of these loop regions and comparison with other CGTase structures reveals that especially loops 88–95, 335–339 and 534–539 possibly contribute with novel hydrogen bonds and apolar contacts to the stabilization of the enzyme. Other structural features that might confer thermostability to the T. thermosulfurigenes EM1 CGTase are the introduction of five new salt-bridges and three Gly to Ala/Pro substitutions. The abundance of Ser, Thr and Tyr residues near the active site and oligosaccharide binding sites might explain the increased thermostability of CGTase in the presence of starch, by allowing amylose chains to bind non-specifically to the protein. Additional stabilization of the A/E domain interface through apolar contacts involves residues Phe273 and Tyr187. No additional or improved calcium binding is observed in the structure, suggesting that the observed stabilization in the presence of calcium ions is caused by the reduced exchange of calcium from the protein to the solvent, rendering it less susceptible to unfolding. The 50% decrease in cyclization activity of the T. thermosulfurigenes EM1 CGTase compared with that of B. circulans strain 251 appears to be caused by the changes in the conformation and amino acid composition of the 88–95 loop. In the T. thermosulfurigenes EM1 CGTase there is no residue homologous to Tyr89, which was observed to take part in stacking interactions with bound substrate in the case of the B. circulans strain 251 CGTase. The lack of this interaction in the enzyme-substrate complex is expected to destabilize bound substrates prior to cyclization. Apparently, some catalytic functionality of CGTase has been sacrificed for the sake of structural stability by modifying loop regions near the active site.
    corecore