5 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Efficacy of Low Dose Chemoprophylaxis for Coccidioidomycosis Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients
Background: Coccidioidomycosis (CM) infections among transplant recipients result in significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of our study was to establish the efficacy of low dose (LD) versus standard dose (LD, 50 mg daily) fluconazole in preventing CM infection. Methods: This was a retrospective study utilizing electronic medical records of liver transplant recipients at the University of Arizona. The primary end point was post-transplant CM status, such as infection, complications and survival. Results: We detected a statistically significant correlation between positive pre-transplant status and positive post-transplant status (hazards ratio: 8.25 (95% confidence interval: 1.028 - 66.192)). There was a trend towards improved survival in patients who had a positive post-transplant CM status in the SD group versus LD group (90.9% versus 81.3%), although not statistically significant. Conclusion: The risk of CM infection among transplant recipients in the absence of prophylaxis is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We currently use SD fluconazole as universal prophylaxis in all transplant recipients despite not establishing statistical significance between LD and SD. We believe that the survival trend detected may have not reached statistical significance due to low power impact. Since the standardization of SD prophylaxis at our institution, we have not diagnosed further new post-transplant CM infections.Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]
Fluorinated Benzofuran and Dihydrobenzofuran as Anti-Inflammatory and Potential Anticancer Agents
Benzofuran and 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran scaffolds are heterocycles of high value in medicinal chemistry and drug synthesis. Targeting inflammation in cancer associated with chronic inflammation is a promising therapy. In the present study, we investigated the anti-inflammatory effects of fluorinated benzofuran and dihydrobenzofuran derivatives in macrophages and in the air pouch model of inflammation, as well as their anticancer effects in the human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line HCT116. Six of the nine compounds suppressed lipopolysaccharide-stimulated inflammation by inhibiting the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and nitric oxide synthase 2 and decreased the secretion of the tested inflammatory mediators. Their IC50 values ranged from 1.2 to 9.04 ”M for interleukin-6; from 1.5 to 19.3 ”M for Chemokine (C-C) Ligand 2; from 2.4 to 5.2 ”M for nitric oxide; and from 1.1 to 20.5 ”M for prostaglandin E2. Three novel synthesized benzofuran compounds significantly inhibited cyclooxygenase activity. Most of these compounds showed anti-inflammatory effects in the zymosan-induced air pouch model. Because inflammation may lead to tumorigenesis, we tested the effects of these compounds on the proliferation and apoptosis of HCT116. Two compounds with difluorine, bromine, and ester or carboxylic acid groups inhibited the proliferation by approximately 70%. Inhibition of the expression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 and concentration-dependent cleavage of PARP-1, as well as DNA fragmentation by approximately 80%, were described. Analysis of the structureâactivity relationship suggested that the biological effects of benzofuran derivatives are enhanced in the presence of fluorine, bromine, hydroxyl, and/or carboxyl groups. In conclusion, the designed fluorinated benzofuran and dihydrobenzofuran derivatives are efficient anti-inflammatory agents, with a promising anticancer effect and a combinatory treatment in inflammation and tumorigenesis in cancer microenvironments
Dental studentsâ attitudes and perceptions about intraprofessional collaboration/education
ۧÙÙ
Ù۟۔: ŰŁÙŰŻŰ§Ù Ű§ÙŰšŰŰ«: ÙÙŰȘŰÙÙÙ ÙÙ Ù
ÙۧÙÙ ÙŰȘŰ”Ù۱ۧŰȘ Ű·Ùۧۚ Ű·Űš ۧÙŰŁŰłÙŰ§Ù ŰÙÙ Ű§ÙŰȘŰčۧÙÙ / ۧÙŰȘŰčÙÙÙ
ۧÙÙ
ÙÙÙ Ű§Ùۯۧ۟ÙÙ (ۧÙŰȘŰčÙÙÙ
ۧÙۯۧ۟ÙÙ) ÙۧÙŰȘŰčÙÙ
ۧÙÙ
ŰŽŰȘŰ±Ù Ùۧ۳ŰȘÙŰŽŰ§Ù ŰȘŰŁŰ«Ù۱ ۧÙŰȘŰčÙÙÙ
ۧÙۯۧ۟ÙÙ ŰčÙÙ Ű§ÙŰȘŰ·ÙÙ۱ ۧÙŰŽŰźŰ”Ù ÙۧÙÙ
ÙÙÙ ÙÙŰ·Ùۧۚ ۧÙÙ
ێۧ۱ÙÙÙ. Ű·Ű±Ù Ű§ÙŰšŰŰ«: ŰȘÙ
ۧ۳ŰȘ۟ۯۧÙ
ۧ۳ŰȘۚۧÙŰ© Ù
Ű”Ù
Ù
۟۔Ù۔ۧ ÙÙ ÙŰ°Ù Ű§Ùۯ۱ۧ۳۩ ۧÙÙ
ÙŰ·ŰčÙŰ©. ŰȘŰȘÙÙÙ Ű§Ùۧ۳ŰȘۚۧÙŰ© Ù
Ù ŰłŰšŰčŰ© Űčێ۱ ۳ۀۧÙۧ ÙŰłŰȘÙŰŻÙ Ù
Űč۱ÙŰ© ŰȘŰ”Ù۱ۧŰȘ ۧÙŰ·Ùۧۚ ŰÙÙ: 1- ŰȘÙ۶ÙÙ / Ű±ŰŁÙ Ű·Ùۧۚ Ű·Űš ۧÙŰŁŰłÙŰ§Ù ŰÙÙ Ű§ÙŰȘŰčÙÙÙ
ۧÙۯۧ۟ÙÙŰ 2- ۟ۚ۱۩ Ű·Ùۧۚ Ű·Űš ۧÙŰŁŰłÙŰ§Ù ŰÙÙ ŰȘŰŁŰ«Ù۱ ۧÙŰȘŰčÙÙÙ
ۧÙۯۧ۟ÙÙ ŰčÙÙ ÙŰȘۧۊۏ ۧÙŰȘŰčÙÙ
ÙۧÙŰȘŰ·ÙÙ۱ ۧÙÙ
ÙÙÙŰ 3- Ù
ÙۧŰ۞ۧŰȘ ۧÙŰ·Ùۧۚ ŰÙÙ ŰŁÙÙ
ÙŰ© ۧÙŰȘŰčÙÙÙ
ۧÙۯۧ۟ÙÙ ÙÙ Ù
ŰźŰȘۚ۱ۧŰȘ ۧÙÙ
ŰۧÙۧ۩ ۧÙ۳۱Ù۱ÙŰ© ÙŰ„ŰčۯۧۯۧŰȘ Ù
ÙŰ§Ù Ű§ÙŰčÙ
Ù. ÙۧÙ
ۧÙŰ·Ùۧۚ ŰšŰȘÙÙÙÙ
ÙÙ Ù
Ù Ű§ÙŰčۚۧ۱ۧŰȘ ۧÙ۳ۚŰčŰ© Űčێ۱ ŰčÙÙ Ù
ÙÙۧ۳ ÙÙÙ۱ŰȘ Ù
Ù 5 ÙÙۧ۷ (ۧÙÙ۷ۧÙ: 1 = Ùۧ ŰŁÙۧÙÙ ŰšŰŽŰŻŰ©Ű 5 = ŰŁÙۧÙÙ ŰšŰŽŰŻŰ©). ۧÙÙŰȘۧۊۏ: ŰȘÙ
ŰȘŰÙÙÙ Ù
ۧ Ù
ŰŹÙ
ÙŰčÙ 259 ۧ۳ŰȘۚۧÙŰ© (Ù
ŰčŰŻÙ Ű§Ùۧ۳ŰȘۏۧۚ۩ = 65ÙȘ). ÙŰ§Ù ŰŹÙ
ÙŰč ۧÙŰ·Ùۧۚ ŰčÙÙ ŰŻŰ±Ű§ÙŰ© ۚۧÙŰȘŰčÙÙÙ
ۧÙۯۧ۟ÙÙ ÙÙ Ù
ŰŹŰ§Ù Ű·Űš ۧÙŰŁŰłÙŰ§Ù (Ù
ŰȘÙ۳۷ ۧÙۯ۱ۏ۩ = 4.22). ÙŰ¶Ù Ű§ÙŰ·Ùۧۚ ۧÙŰȘŰčÙÙ
ۧÙŰȘŰčۧÙÙÙ / ۧÙÙ
ŰŽŰȘŰ±Ù Ù
Űč ŰČÙ
ÙۧۊÙÙ
ÙÙ Ű§ÙÙŰ”Ù. ÙŰ§Ù ÙÙŰ§Ù Ű„ŰŹÙ
ۧŰč ŰšÙÙ Ű§ÙŰ·Ùۧۚ ŰÙÙ Ű§ÙŰȘŰŁŰ«Ù۱ ۧÙŰ„ÙŰŹŰ§ŰšÙ ÙÙŰȘŰčÙÙÙ
ۧÙۯۧ۟ÙÙ ŰčÙÙ Ű§ÙŰȘŰčÙÙ
ۧÙÙ
ŰčŰČŰČŰ ÙŰȘŰčŰČÙŰČ Ù
Ùۧ۱ۧŰȘ ۧÙۧŰȘ۔ۧÙŰ Ùۄ۫۱ۧۥ ۧÙŰčÙۧÙۧŰȘ ۧÙÙ
ÙÙÙŰ© Ù
Űč ۧÙÙ
ÙŰžÙÙÙ Ű§ÙۯۧŰčÙ
ÙÙ ÙÙŰ°ÙÙ Ù
Űč ۧÙÙ
۱۶ÙŰ ÙŰȘŰŰłÙÙ Ű§ÙÙ
Ùۧ۱ۧŰȘ ۧÙŰȘŰÙÙÙÙŰ© ÙۧÙÙÙŰłÙŰ© ۧÙŰ۱ÙÙŰ©Ű ÙÙÙÙ
ۧÙÙ
ێۧÙÙ Ű§ÙÙ
ŰčÙŰŻŰ© ÙÙ Ű§ÙŰčÙۧۯۧŰȘŰ ÙÙÙÙ
ÙÙۧ۷ ۧÙÙÙŰ© ÙۧÙÙÙÙŰŻ ۧÙŰȘÙ ŰȘŰ€ŰŻÙ Ű„ÙÙ ŰȘŰŰłÙÙ Ű§Ù۰ۧŰȘ ÙŰČÙۧۯ۩ ۧÙÙÙۧۥ۩ ÙۧÙŰ„ÙŰȘۧۏÙŰ©. ۧÙۧ۳ŰȘÙŰȘۧۏۧŰȘ: ÙŰ§Ù ÙÙŰȘŰčÙÙÙ
ۧÙۯۧ۟ÙÙ ŰȘŰŁŰ«Ù۱ Ù
ÙÙŰč ÙÙÙÙ ÙŰ„ÙŰŹŰ§ŰšÙ ÙÙÙۧ ÙŰȘۏ۱ۚ۩ Ű·Ùۧۚ Ű·Űš ۧÙŰŁŰłÙŰ§Ù Ű§ÙÙ
ێۧ۱ÙÙÙ ÙÙ Ű§Ùۯ۱ۧ۳۩. ÙÙŰ”Ù ŰšŰȘŰ”Ù
ÙÙ
Ù
ÙÙŰŹ Ù
ÙŰŰŻ ÙÙ۶Űč Ù
ۚۧۯۊ ŰȘÙŰŹÙÙÙŰ© ÙÙÙŰȘŰčÙÙÙ
ۧÙۯۧ۟ÙÙ ÙÙ Ù
ۀ۳۳ۧŰȘ Ű·Űš ۧÙŰŁŰłÙŰ§Ù Ù
Ù ŰŁŰŹÙ Ű§ÙŰȘÙۧŰčÙ Ű§ÙÙŰčŰ§Ù ŰšÙÙ Ű§ÙÙ
ŰȘŰčÙÙ
ÙÙ ÙÙ ŰŹÙ
ÙŰč ۧÙÙ
۱ۧŰÙ. Abstract: Objectives: To investigate dental studentsâ attitudes and perceptions about intraprofessional collaboration/education (IPC/IPE) and shared learning, and to explore the impact of IPC/IPE on the personal and professional development of participating students. Methods: A custom-designed questionnaire was used in this cross-sectional study. The questionnaire comprised 17 questions targeting to capture the student's perceptions about IPC/IPE using three factors: (1) dental students' preference/opinion about the IPC/IPE; (2) dental students' experience about the impact of IPC/IPE on learning outcomes and professional development; and (3) students' feedback about the significance of IPC/IPE in clinical/clinical simulation labs and workplace setting. The students rated each of the 17 statements on the 5-point Likert scale (range: 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Results: A total of 259 responses were analysed (response rate = 65%). All students were aware of IPC/IPE in the field of dentistry (mean score = 4.22). The students preferred collaborative/shared learning with their own classmates. There was a consensus among students about the positive impact of IPC/IPE on enhanced learning, enhancement of communication skills, and enrichment of professional relationships with supporting staff as well as with the patients. There was also improved analytical and psychomotor skills, understanding of complex problems in the clinic, and understanding of strengths and limitations leading to self-improvement and increased efficiency and productivity. Conclusion: IPC/IPE had a compelling, powerful, and positive impact according to the experience of the participating dental students. It is recommended that a standardized curriculum be designed and guidelines set for IPC/IPE at dental institutions for effective interactions among students of all stages
SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: data from an international prospective cohort study
Background: Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could support safer elective surgery. Vaccine numbers are limited so this study aimed to inform their prioritization by modelling.
Methods: The primary outcome was the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one COVID-19-related death in 1 year. NNVs were based on postoperative SARS-CoV-2 rates and mortality in an international cohort study (surgical patients), and community SARS-CoV-2 incidence and case fatality data (general population). NNV estimates were stratified by age (18-49, 50-69, 70 or more years) and type of surgery. Best- and worst-case scenarios were used to describe uncertainty.
Results: NNVs were more favourable in surgical patients than the general population. The most favourable NNVs were in patients aged 70 years or more needing cancer surgery (351; best case 196, worst case 816) or non-cancer surgery (733; best case 407, worst case 1664). Both exceeded the NNV in the general population (1840; best case 1196, worst case 3066). NNVs for surgical patients remained favourable at a range of SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates in sensitivity analysis modelling. Globally, prioritizing preoperative vaccination of patients needing elective surgery ahead of the general population could prevent an additional 58 687 (best case 115 007, worst case 20 177) COVID-19-related deaths in 1 year.
Conclusion: As global roll out of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination proceeds, patients needing elective surgery should be prioritized ahead of the general population