Vertrouwen in de wetenschap, enquête 2021

In de periode 19 maart tot en met donderdag 1 april 2021 is een enquête uitgezet onder een representatieve groep Nederlanders. De enquête gaat over vertrouwen in de wetenschap

Vertrouwen in de wetenschap, enquête 2021

In de periode 19 maart tot en met donderdag 1 april 2021 is een enquête uitgezet onder een representatieve groep Nederlanders. De enquête gaat over vertrouwen in de wetenschap

Data Base on Peer Evaluation of Research in the Netherlands - PER-Base - 1993-2013

PER-Base contains information on institutional research evaluation in the Netherlands. It covers results from evaluations with the 'Vereniging van Samenwerkende Nederlandse Universiteiten' - VSNU 1993, VSNU 1994 and VSNU 1998 protocols as well as the 'Standard Evaluation Protocol' - SEP 2003-2009 and SEP 2009-2015 protocols. The information in the database is derived from the 222 known evaluation reports: protocol used for the evaluation, title of the evaluation report, year of publication of the evaluation report, organisations involved, programs involved, score per criterion per program. The 'Hoger Onderwijs en Onderzoek Plan' - HOOP codes (discipline) are allocated by the authors. PER-Base is developed in 2010-2012 by the 'Center for Higher Education Policy Studies'- CHEPS - University of Twente. The Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science has paid for the development as part of the CHERPA project. In 2012 the database has been transferred to the Rathenau Institute, that will maintain the database

Drijfveren van onderzoekers

Dit rapport is gebaseerd op een enquête onder onderzoekers die werken aan een van de universiteiten, universitaire medische centra (UMC’s) of hogescholen in Nederland, in een van de instituten van de NWO of KNAW, of in een publieke kennisorganisatie. Dit onderzoek is gedaan op verzoek van het ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap en bouwt voort op een enquête uit 2013. **LET OP: Vanwege privacybescherming is de data van 5 respondenten weggelaten uit deze datase

Resilience: On‐going wave or subsiding trend in flood risk research and practice?

Resilience in relation to flood risk management (FRM) is not a new concept, yet parts of the FRM community are still struggling to apply it. The main challenge this study addresses is the question as to whether parts of the FRM community should still adopt, or rather “leap‐frog,” resilience. The main purpose is to evaluate whether resilience is a still on‐going trend or, already subsiding. Research suggests that resilience is an on‐going trend that connects research and policy and has gained international recognition as expressed by international guidelines and bodies promoting its research but also its operationalization. Academic literature in the area of FRM also shows a significant continuing development. Resilience enables to analyze dynamics and transformations of riverine areas, or coastal zones in connection to an integrated social‐environmental system approach with more emphasis and conceptual basis than previous concepts. Resilience is more than a short‐lived notion and it appears that FRM researchers cannot avoid addressing it. Resilience often is a convergence of ideas and mainstreaming of efforts, which in many venues is absolutely necessary and can help, for example, to decrease silo‐thinking. But as academics, we have a mandate to remain skeptical and remain on the look‐out for novel ideas, too. This article is categorized under: Engineering Water > Planning Wate