The Iranian Study of Opium and Cancer (IROPICAN): Rationale, design, and initial findings

Background: The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) recently classified opium use as a Group 1 carcinogen. However, much remains to be studied on the relation between opium and cancer. We designed the Iranian Opium and Cancer (IROPICAN) study to further investigate the association of opium use and cancers of the head and neck, bladder, lung, and colon and rectum. In this paper, we describe the rationale, design, and some initial results of the IROPICAN Study. Methods: The IROPICAN is a multi-center case-control study conducted in 10 provinces of Iran. The cases were all histologically confirmed and the controls were selected from hospital visitors who were free of cancer, were not family members or friends of the cancer patients, and were visiting the hospital for reasons other than their own ailment. The questionnaires included detailed questions on opium use (including age at initiation, duration, frequency, typical amount, and route), and potential confounders, such as tobacco use (e.g., cigarettes, nass and water-pipe), and dietary factors. Biological samples, including blood and saliva, were also collected. Results: The validation and pilot phases showed reasonably good validity, with sensitivities of 70% and 69% for the cases and controls, respectively, in reporting opium use. The results also showed excellent reliability, with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.96 for ever opium use and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.92) for regular opium use. In the main phase, we recruited 3299 cancer cases (99% response rate) and 3477 hospital visitor controls (89% response rate). The proportion of ever-use of opium was 40% among cases and 18% among controls. Conclusion: The IROPICAN study will serve as a major resource in studies addressing the effect of opium on risk of cancers of the head and neck, bladder, lung, and colon and rectum

Patient and Public Involvement in the Design of Clinical Trials: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Background Funders encourage lay-volunteer inclusion in research but this is not without controversy or resistance, given concerns of role confusion, exploratory methods and limited evidence about what value this brings to research. This overview explores these elements. Methods Eleven databases and gray literature were searched without date or language restrictions for systematic reviews of public involvement in clinical trials design. This systematic overview of patient and public involvement (PPI) included 27 reviews from which areas of good and bad practice were identified. PPI strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats were explored through use of meta-narrative analysis. Results Inclusion criteria was met by 27 reviews. Confidence in the findings was assessed using Cerqual, Nice-H, CASP for qualitative research and CASP systematic reviews. Quality ranged from high (n=7), medium (n=14) to low (n=6) in the reviews. Four reviews report the risk of bias. Public involvement roles were primarily in agenda setting, steering committees, ethical review, protocol development, and piloting. Research summaries, follow-up, and dissemination contained PPI, with lesser involvement in data collection, analysis, or manuscript authoring. Trialists report difficulty in finding, retaining, and reimbursing volunteers. Respectful inclusion, role recognition, mutual flexibility, advance planning and sound methods were reported as facilitating public involvement in research. Public involvement was reported to have increased the quantity and quality of patient relevant priorities and outcomes, enrollment, funding, design, implementation and dissemination. Challenges identified include lack of clarity within common language, roles and research boundaries; while logistical needs include extra time, training and funding, Researchers report struggling to report involvement and avoid tokenism. Conclusions Involving patients and the public in clinical trials design, can be beneficial but requires resources, preparation, training, flexibility and time. Issues to address include reporting deficits in the areas of risk of bias, study quality and conflicts of interests. There is a need for improved dissemination strategies to increase public involvement and health literacy. Improvements in funding, training, and reporting of PPI are needed to facilitate meaningful and effective PPI

Graduate entry to medicine in Iran

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Backgrounds</p> <p>In Iran medical students are selected from high school graduates via a very competitive national university entrance exam. New proposals have been seriously considered for admitting students from those with bachelor degrees. We assessed the opinions of different stakeholders on the current situation of admission into medicine in Iran, and their views on positive and negative aspects of admitting graduates into medicine.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted five focus group discussions and seven in-depth interviews with stakeholders including medical students, science students, university professors of basic sciences, medical education experts, and policy makers. Main themes were identified from the data and analyzed using content analysis approach.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Medical students believed "graduate admission" may lead to a more informed choice of medicine. They thought it could result in admission of students with lower levels of academic aptitude. The science students were in favor of "graduate admission". The education experts and the professors of basic science all mentioned the shortcomings of the current system of admission and considered "graduate admission" as an appropriate opportunity for correcting some of the shortcomings. The policy makers pointed out the potential positive influences of "graduate admission" on strengthening basic science research. They thought, however, that "graduate admission" may result in lengthening the overall duration of medical education, which is already long in Iran (over 7 years). On the whole, the participants thought that "graduate admission" is a step in the right direction for improving quality of medical education.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>"Graduate admission" has the potential to correct some of shortcomings of medical education. Unlike other countries where "graduate admission" is used mainly to admit students who are mentally mature, in Iran the main objective seems to be strengthening basic sciences.</p

COP27 climate change conference: Urgent action needed for Africa and the world

No Abstract

COP27 Climate Change Conference: urgent action needed for Africa and the world

No abstract

COP27 Climate Change Conference: urgent action needed for Africa and the world

No abstract

Parental willingness to pay for child safety seats in Mashad, Iran

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Iran has one of the highest rates of road traffic crash death rates throughout the world and road traffic injuries are the leading cause of years of life lost in the country. Using child car safety seats is not mandatory by law in Iran. The purpose of this research was to determine the parental willingness to pay (WTP) for child restraints in Mashad, the second most populated city in Iran with one of the highest rates of road traffic-related deaths.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We surveyed 590 car-owner parents of kindergarten children who were willing to participate in the study in the year 2009. We asked them about the maximum amount of money they were willing to pay for car safety seats using contingent valuation method.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mean age of children was 33.5 months. The median parental WTP for CSS was about $15. Considering the real price of CSSs in Iran, only 12 percent of responders could be categorized as being willing to pay for it. Family income level was the main predictor of being willing to pay.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The median parental WTP was much lower than the actual price of the safety seats, and those who were of lower socio-economic class were less willing to pay. Interventions to increase low-income families' access to child safety seats such as providing free of charge or subsidized seats, renting or health insurance coverage should be considered.</p

Multiparametric Immunoimaging Maps Inflammatory Signatures in Murine Myocardial Infarction Models.

In the past 2 decades, research on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease has uncovered inflammation to be a key driver of the pathophysiological process. A pressing need therefore exists to quantitatively and longitudinally probe inflammation, in preclinical models and in cardiovascular disease patients, ideally using non-invasive methods and at multiple levels. Here, we developed and employed in vivo multiparametric imaging approaches to investigate the immune response following myocardial infarction. The myocardial infarction models encompassed either transient or permanent left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion in C57BL/6 and Apoe-/-mice. We performed nanotracer-based fluorine magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using a CD11b-specific nanobody and a C-C motif chemokine receptor 2-binding probe. We found that immune cell influx in the infarct was more pronounced in the permanent occlusion model. Further, using 18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, we detected increased hematopoietic activity after myocardial infarction, with no difference between the models. Finally, we observed persistent systemic inflammation and exacerbated atherosclerosis in Apoe-/- mice, regardless of which infarction model was used. Taken together, we showed the strengths and capabilities of multiparametric imaging in detecting inflammatory activity in cardiovascular disease, which augments the development of clinical readouts.This work was supported by National Institute of Health grants R01HL143814 (to Dr Fayad), P01HL131478 (Drs Fayad and Mulder), P41EB025815 (Drs Liu and Gropler ), R35HL145212 (Dr Liu), and R35HL139598 (Dr Nahrendorf) and award K22CA226040 (Dr Rashidian). This work was also supported by an Innovation Research Fund Basic Research Award from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Dr Rashidian). Dr Maier was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grants (MA 7059/1 and MA 7059/3-1) and is part of SFB1425 funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (project no. 422681845). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.S