Erna Fitz levelei Lukács Györgynek

Flooding can increase tree susceptibility to root rot pathogens as well as attacks by ambrosia beetles attracted to stress-induced ethanol emissions. The objective of this study was to investigate the interaction of a preventative fungicide treatment and root infection with Phytophthora cinnamomi on ambrosia beetle attacks in flood stressed trees. A fungicide (Pageant® Intrinsic®) was evaluated in two flood trials using Eastern redbud and tulip poplar trees with treatments including the fungicide with or without pathogen or no fungicide with or without pathogen. Fungicide treated trees had fewer ambrosia beetle attacks, particularly in trees without P. cinnamomi co-infection. In a follow-up experiment, ethanol content was evaluated in flooded redbuds to determine if the fungicide treatment reduced stress-induced compounds. All flood stressed trees began producing ethanol within 24 h post flooding, regardless of fungicide treatment or P. cinnamomi infection. We conclude that pre-treatments of a fungicide can provide protection from ambrosia beetle attacks during an extreme flood event, but that protection is reduced if a root rot pathogen is also present. Additionally, rejection of fungicide treated trees was not related to the absence of ethanol, as the fungicide-treated plants released ethanol in quantities similar to non-treated trees

Trap Tree and Interception Trap Techniques for Management of Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in Nursery Production Get access Arrow

The majority of wood-boring ambrosia beetles are strongly attracted to ethanol, a behavior which could be exploited for management within ornamental nurseries. A series of experiments was conducted to determine if ethanol-based interception techniques could reduce ambrosia beetle pest pressure. In two experiments, trap trees injected with a high dose of ethanol were positioned either adjacent or 10–15 m from trees injected with a low dose of ethanol (simulating a mildly stressed tree) to determine if the high-dose trap trees could draw beetle attacks away from immediately adjacent stressed nursery trees. The high-ethanol-dose trees sustained considerably higher attacks than the low-dose trees; however, distance between the low- and high-dose trees did not significantly alter attack rates on the low-dose trees. In a third experiment, 60-m length trap lines with varying densities of ethanol-baited traps were deployed along a forest edge to determine if immigrating beetles could be intercepted before reaching sentinel traps or artificially stressed sentinel trees located 10 m further in-field. Intercept trap densities of 2 or 4 traps per trap line were associated with fewer attacks on sentinel trees compared to no traps, but 7 or 13 traps had no impact. None of the tested intercept trap densities resulted in significantly fewer beetles reaching the sentinel traps. The evaluated ethanol-based interception techniques showed limited promise for reducing ambrosia beetle pressure on nursery trees. An interception effect might be enhanced by applying a repellent compound to nursery trees in a push–pull strategy

Fertilité chimique des sols forestiers : concepts de base

Les diagnostics de fertilité chimique en forêt assimilent généralement le sol à un réservoir de nutriments disponibles pour les végétaux, quantifié à un instant donné puis comparé à des normes de nutrition établies par essence. Ce concept hérité de l’agronomie est régulièrement mis en défaut et de nombreux écosystèmes forestiers développés sur sols très pauvres chimiquement (notamment en Ca, Mg, K) affichent une production remarquable. L’objectif de cet article est d’illustrer les limites du concept « fertilité = réservoir sol » et de proposer les bases d’un nouveau concept rendant compte de la spécificité de la fertilité chimique des écosystèmes forestiers. Une base de données regroupant les résultats acquis sur 11 sites expérimentaux depuis les années 1970 a été utilisée. Les résultats démontrent que le concept de fertilité chimique des écosystèmes forestiers ne doit pas se limiter à la seule prise en compte des stocks de nutriments disponibles dans les sols mais doit également intégrer la circulation et le recyclage d’éléments propres aux cycles biogéochimiques

Approche isotopique pour tracer la dynamique de l’eau et des nutriments dans les sols forestiers

La fertilité des sols forestiers est généralement estimée par l’étude des cycles de l’eau et des éléments nutritifs essentiels aux êtres vivants (cycles biogéochimiques). Parmi l’ensemble des méthodes d’étude de ces cycles, une approche innovante, complémentaire des études plus classiques, consiste à utiliser des traceurs géochimiques ou isotopiques. Les démarches expérimentales et résultats de quelques études récentes dans le domaine, utilisant des traceurs naturellement présents dans les écosystèmes (ex. 18O, 13C, 26Mg) ou artificiellement apportés (ex. enrichissements en Sr, Rb, 15N, 44Ca, 26Mg, 32P) seront présentés. Ces résultats seront discutés pour faire un point sur la pertinence d’utilisation de ces outils pour définir les sources, avoir accès au temps de résidence de l’eau et des éléments, et tracer les flux de nutriments qu’ils soient d’origine organique ou minérale, internes ou externes à l’écosystème

Chemical fertility of forest ecosystems. Part 2: Towards redefining the concept by untangling the role of the different components of biogeochemical cycling

Many forest ecosystems are developed on acidic and nutrient-poor soils and it is not yet clearly understood how forests sustain their growth with low nutrient resources. In forestry, the soil chemical fertility is commonly defined, following concepts inherited from agronomy, as the pool of plant-available nutrients in the soil at a given time compared to the nutritional requirement of the tree species. In this two-part study, Part 1 (Hansson et al., 2020) showed, through the compiled dataset of 49 forest ecosystems in France, Brazil and Republic of Congo, the limits of this definition of soil chemical fertility in forest ecosystem contexts. In this study (Part 2), we investigated the nutrient pools and fluxes between the different ecosystem compartments at 11 of the 49 sites in order to better characterize the role of the biogeochemical cycling of nutrients in the chemical fertility of forest ecosystems, and in particular the roles of the biological and geochemical components of biogeochemical cycling. The analysis of our dataset shows different types of biogeochemical functioning. When the geochemical component (inputs through mineral weathering and/or atmospheric inputs, capillary rise) is predominant, sufficient nutrients are provided to the plant-soil system to ensure tree nutrition and growth. Conversely, when the geochemical component of the cycle brings too few nutrients to the plant-soil system, the biological component (litterfall, plant internal cycling) becomes predominant in tree nutrition and growth. In the latter case, forest production may be high even when pools of nutrients in the soil reservoir are low because small but active nutrient fluxes may continuously replenish the soil reservoir or may directly ensure tree nutrition by bypassing the soil reservoir. This study highlights the necessity to include biogeochemical cycling and recycling fluxes in the definition and diagnosis methods of soil chemical fertility in forest ecosystems. We show that the chemical fertility is not only supported by the soil in forest ecosystem but by the sum of all the ecosystem’s compartments and fluxes between these pools

Chemical fertility of forest ecosystems. Part 1: Common soil chemical analyses were poor predictors of stand productivity across a wide range of acidic forest soils

Forest soil fertility can be defined as a combination of physical, chemical and biological factors characterising the biomass production capacity of the soil. However, numerous ecological variables affect tree growth and the aim of the present study was to investigate the specific influence of soil chemical properties on tree productivity at 49 acidic forest sites. A standardized tree productivity index based on tree height expressed as dominant height of the studied stand divided by maximum tree height observed at the same age for the same species in the same climatic region was firstly computed at each site. This index is assumed to limit the influence of species, ages and climate. A soil database was also compiled with data on soil properties from 47 temperate (France) and two tropical (Congo, Brazil) sites. Data included seven tree species, varying in age from 1 to 175 years. Commonly used indicators such as C:N ratio, soil pH, as well as available and total pools of soil nutrients were compared to the standardized tree productivity index, to find the most reliable indicator(s). Nutrient pools at fixed mineral soil depths (down to 100 cm) were used, as well as (for 11 stands) the depth comprising 95% of fine roots. Our results show that none of the common soil chemical parameters tested in this paper could individually explain stand productivity. Combinations of different parameters were also tested using PCA and they could better explain the variability of the data set but without being able to separate the sites according to their standardized tree productivity index. Moreover, random Forests performed on our dataset were unable to properly predict the standardized tree productivity index. Our results reinforce the idea that the influence of the soil chemical fertility on stand productivity is complex and the soil chemical parameters alone (individually or combined) are poor predictors of tree productivity as assessed by the H0:Hmax index. In this paper we focused on static soil chemical indicator and more dynamic indictors, such as nutrient fluxes involved in the biogeochemical cycles, could better explain stand productivity. A companion paper (Legout et al., 2020) focuses on the connection between productivity and different components of the biogeochemical cycle, using data from 11 of the stands presented in this paper