Seller and buyer obligations and guarantee of its implementation in the trade law of Iran and Egypt

The purpose of this article is to study the obligations of the parties to the law in Iran and Egypt and guarantee its implementation. The main question that has been proposed and examined in this regard is what are the obligations of the seller and the buyer in the law of Iran and Egypt? And how can the guarantee of its implementation be assessed in the law of the two countries? The present article is a descriptive-analytical and examines the question using the library method. The results of this research show that by concluding a series of obligations, the parties will be responsible which must be observed, which have the same view of these obligations in both laws; obligations such as delivery of price and cost are the delivery of both documents. Of course, there are differences in the guarantee of fulfillment of obligations and effects. In Iran law, unlike in Egypt law, the effects of termination appear from the time of the termination, not from the time of the contract, therefore, until the day of termination, the contractor leaves all his works so, the return of benefits is from the day of termination; another major difference is that in the case of Iran law, loss, defects or transfer of goods do not preclude termination, except in the case of discretion. What can be concluded is that in Egyptian law, the return of benefits is officially accepted, but the legislator in Iranian law has not explicitly commented on this

Seller and buyer obligations and guarantee of its implementation in the trade law of Iran and Egypt

The purpose of this article is to study the obligations of the parties to the law in Iran and Egypt and guarantee its implementation. The main question that has been proposed and examined in this regard is what are the obligations of the seller and the buyer in the law of Iran and Egypt? And how can the guarantee of its implementation be assessed in the law of the two countries? The present article is a descriptive-analytical and examines the question using the library method. The results of this research show that by concluding a series of obligations, the parties will be responsible which must be observed, which have the same view of these obligations in both laws; obligations such as delivery of price and cost are the delivery of both documents. Of course, there are differences in the guarantee of fulfillment of obligations and effects. In Iran law, unlike in Egypt law, the effects of termination appear from the time of the termination, not from the time of the contract, therefore, until the day of termination, the contractor leaves all his works so, the return of benefits is from the day of termination; another major difference is that in the case of Iran law, loss, defects or transfer of goods do not preclude termination, except in the case of discretion. What can be concluded is that in Egyptian law, the return of benefits is officially accepted, but the legislator in Iranian law has not explicitly commented on this

The Relationship between EQ & Constructive and Non-Constructive Problem Solving Styles among Payame Noor University's students of Abadan in the year 2014

The objective of the present study is considering the relationship between EQ & constructive and non-constructive problem solving styles among students. The applied methodology is cross-correlation method. The statistical population in this study is all the educational sciences' students of Payame Noor university of Abadan in the year 2014 and the sampling is taken totally randomly and voluntary. Two surveys of EQ which proposed by Siryashring (1988) have used in this study that contain 33 questions. This study will measure 5 components of emotional intelligence: Self-awareness, self-control, self-motivation, social awareness and social skills. In addition the problem solving styles' survey that proposed by Velang (1996) has been applied that has made in two stages and has 24 questions, 12 items measure the problem-oriented style and rest of them measure the excitement-orientation. According to Cronbach's alpha the reliability coefficient of EQ is reported about 0.84. The validity of 0.63 is confirmed in Shirng's test of EQ. reliability coefficient of solving problem style is reported about 87%.Either reliability coefficient or factor content are confirmed by the faculty. Data analysis is done in two level of descriptive statistical (frequencies, percentages mean) and inferential statistics (Pearson correlation, chi-square test). The obtained results of assumptions show that there is no significant relationship between EQ and constructive problem solving; also there is no significant relationship between EQ and non-constructive problem solving. Moreover there is significant relationship between EQ in creative styles, avoidance and style tendencies. Nevertheless there is no relationship between EQ and distress styles. And the confidence style shows an inverse relationship. Keywords: EQ, Constructive problem solving styles, non- constructive problem solving style

The Relationship between Time Management and Student Achievement

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between time management and achievement of students. The statistical population of this study includes the students of educational sciences in the Payame Noor University of Abadan City in 2013. The population consists of 256 members. A sample of 70 students was selected randomly. In order to collect the research data, a self-administrated questionnaire was used. The research data were analyzed through both descriptive and inferential statistics in the SPSS. The results of this study revealed that there is a significant relationship between time management and achievement of students. Another part of our results showed that there is a significant positive relationship between age and time management. Keywords: Time Management, Planning, Achievemen

Seller and buyer obligations and guarantee of its implementation in the trade law of Iran and Egypt

The purpose of this article is to study the obligations of the parties to the law in Iran and Egypt and guarantee its implementation. The main question that has been proposed and examined in this regard is what are the obligations of the seller and the buyer in the law of Iran and Egypt? And how can the guarantee of its implementation be assessed in the law of the two countries? The present article is a descriptive-analytical and examines the question using the library method. The results of this research show that by concluding a series of obligations, the parties will be responsible which must be observed, which have the same view of these obligations in both laws; obligations such as delivery of price and cost are the delivery of both documents. Of course, there are differences in the guarantee of fulfillment of obligations and effects. In Iran law, unlike in Egypt law, the effects of termination appear from the time of the termination, not from the time of the contract, therefore, until the day of termination, the contractor leaves all his works so, the return of benefits is from the day of termination; another major difference is that in the case of Iran law, loss, defects or transfer of goods do not preclude termination, except in the case of discretion. What can be concluded is that in Egyptian law, the return of benefits is officially accepted, but the legislator in Iranian law has not explicitly commented on this.El propósito de este artículo es estudiar las obligaciones de las partes de la ley en Irán y Egipto y garantizar su implementación. La cuestión principal que se ha propuesto y examinado a este respecto es ¿cuáles son las obligaciones del vendedor y del comprador en la legislación de Irán y Egipto? ¿Y cómo se puede valorar la garantía de su implementación en la legislación de los dos países? El presente artículo es de carácter descriptivo-analítico y examina la cuestión mediante el método de biblioteca. Los resultados de esta investigación muestran que al concluir una serie de obligaciones, las partes serán responsables las cuales deben ser observadas, las cuales tienen la misma visión de estas obligaciones en ambas leyes; Obligaciones como entrega de precio y costo son la entrega de ambos documentos. Por supuesto, existen diferencias en la garantía de cumplimiento de obligaciones y efectos. En la ley de Irán, a diferencia de la ley de Egipto, los efectos de la rescisión aparecen desde el momento de la rescisión, no desde el momento del contrato, por lo tanto, hasta el día de la rescisión, el contratista deja todas sus obras por lo que la devolución de los beneficios es desde el día de la terminación; otra diferencia importante es que en el caso de la ley de Irán, la pérdida, los defectos o la transferencia de bienes no excluyen la rescisión, excepto en el caso de discreción. Lo que se puede concluir es que en la ley egipcia, la devolución de beneficios está oficialmente aceptada, pero el legislador en la ley iraní no ha comentado explícitamente sobre esto