TCT-4 Efficacy and Safety of Concurrent Administration of Clopidogrel-loading (600mg) and Prasugrel-loading (60mg) in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background: Current STEMI guideline recommendations limit the use of prasugrel to clopidogrel-naïve patients. However, in daily clinical practice a considerable proportion of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI are preloaded with clopidogrel. Whether the use of prasugrel in clopidogrel pretreated STEMI patients is safe remains unknown. Similarly, the efficacy of a combined loading dose regimen has not been evaluated. Methods: Between 1 September 2009 and 15 October 2012, a total of 1,157 STEMI patients were included in the randomized COMFORTABLE AMI trial (NCT 00962416) and 891 STEMI patients in the SPUM ACS registry (NCT 01000701) at 12 centers. Patients were divided into three groups according to type of peri-procedural antiplatelet loading: (1) Clopidogrel and subsequent Prasugrel loading dose [CP], (2) Prasugrel loading dose alone [P] (3) Clopidogrel loading dose alone [C]; 23 patients were excluded because they were not exposed to Clopidogrel and Prasugrel. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of BARC type 3, 4 and 5 bleeding at 30 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, nonfatal MI and nonfatal stroke at 30 days. Outcomes were analyzed using Cox's Regressions (crude) and multinomial ITPW weighted Cox's Regressions. Results: A total of 2,025 patients were analysed of whom 428 (21.1%) had received CP, 447 (22.1%) patients P alone, and 1,150 (56.8%) patients C alone. The primary safety endpoint was observed among 1.2% of CP, 1.6% of P, and 1.5% of C patients (CP vs C ad. HR 0.99 (0.36-2.72), PC vs P ad. HR 0.73 (0.22-2.41). The primary safety endpoint occurred less frequently among CP (1.9%) compared with C patients (5.0%, adjusted HR 0.47 (0.22-1.00), but with similar frequency among P and C patients (2.9% vs 5.0%, ad. HR 0.68 (0.27-1.73). The net clinical benefit outcome parameter tended to be lower among CP (2.8%) compared with C patients (6.3%, ad. HR 0.56 (0.30-1.05), whereas no significant difference was observed between P and C patients (3.8% vs 6.3%, ad. HR 0.85 (0.39-1.86). Conclusions: Among STEMI patients preloaded with Clopidogrel, the concurrent administration of a Prasugrel loading dose appears safe and potentially more effective than Clopiogrel alone

MatchTheNet: an educational game on 3-dimensional polytopes

We present an interactive game which challenges a single player to match 3-dimensional polytopes to their planar nets. It is open source, and it runs in standard web browsers

Reply to 'Relationship between stent fracture and thrombosis'

status: publishe

Occurrence and impact of time delay to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the occurrence, duration and impact of time delays to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: A total of 357 consecutive STEMI patients enrolled in the prospective Special Program University Medicine ACS (SPUM-ACS) cohort were included. In order to identify the causes behind a possible treatment delay, we constructed four different time points which included: 1) symptom onset to hospital arrival, 2) hospital arrival to arrival in the catheterization laboratory, 3) hospital arrival to first balloon inflation, and 4) time from arrival in the catheterization laboratory to first balloon inflation in addition to total ischemic time. Patients were stratified according to a delay > 3 h, > 30 min, > 90 min and > 1 h, respectively and major adverse events at 0, 30 and 365 days were analyzed. Results: Resuscitated STEMI patients (23 patients) and STEMI patients presenting at weekends (101 patients) and to lesser extent at night hours (100 patients) experienced more time delays than stable patients and those presenting at office hours. Median door-to-balloon time averaged 93 min in resuscitated, but 65 min in stable patients. Median door-to-balloon time at weekends and public holidays was 89 min, but 68 min at office hours. Median time from hospital arrival to cathlab arrival at weekends and public holidays was 30 min, but 15 min during office hours. Corresponding times for resuscitated patients was 45 and 15 min in stable patients. Of note, resuscitated patients were late presenters as regards time from symptoms onset to hospital arrival with a median time of 180 min compared to 155 min in stable patients. Median total ischemic time was 225 min for all patients, 223 min at day hours, 239 at night hours, 244 min at weekends, 233 min at office days, 220 min in stable patients and 273 min in resuscitated patients. Patients with STEMI who arrived > 3 h after symptom onset had a higher rate of myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year (1.6% vs. 9% in 1 h from cathlab arrival to first balloon inflation had a higher rate of in hospital reinfarction at 0 day (0.6% vs. 0% in < 1 h; P = 0.007), MI at 30 days (0.8% vs. 0% in < 1 h; P = 0.001) and MI at 1 year (1.4% vs. 1.1% in < 1 h; P = 0.012). Similarly, in these patients, cardiac deaths at 0 day (0.8% vs. 0.6% in < 1 h; P = 0.035) and at 30 days (0.8% vs. 0.6% in < 1 h; P = 0.035) were higher as were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE) at 0 day (1.4% vs. 0.8% in < 1 h; P = 0.004). Conclusion: Resuscitated STEMI patients and those presenting at weekends and to lesser extent at night hours experienced more time delays and longer ischemic time than stable patients and those presenting at office hours. In STEMI patients, any delay in treatment increased their risk of MACCE. Efforts should focus on improving patient's awareness along with minimizing in-hospital transfer to the catheterization laboratory especially at weekends and in resuscitated patients