80 research outputs found
The determinants of genetic diversity in butterflies
This is the final version. Available on open access from Nature Research via the DOI in this recordUnder the neutral theory, genetic diversity is expected to increase with population size. While comparative analyses have
consistently failed to find strong relationships between census population size and genetic diversity, a recent study across
animals identified a strong correlation between propagule size and genetic diversity, suggesting that r-strategists that produce
many small offspring, have greater long-term population sizes. Here we compare genome-wide genetic diversity across 38
species of European butterflies (Papilionoidea), a group that shows little variation in reproductive strategy. We show that
genetic diversity across butterflies varies over an order of magnitude and that this variation cannot be explained by differences
in current abundance, propagule size, host or geographic range. Instead, neutral genetic diversity is negatively correlated
with body size and positively with the length of the genetic map. This suggests that genetic diversity is determined both by
differences in long-term population size and the elect of selection on linked sites.Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)European Research CouncilNatural Environmental Research Council (NERC)Institute of Evolutionary Biology at Edinburgh Universit
Personality psychology: Lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts reveal only half of the story—Why it is time for a paradigm shift
This article develops a comprehensive philosophy-of-science for personality psychology that goes far beyond the scope of the lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts that currently prevail. One of the field’s most important guiding scientific assumptions, the lexical hypothesis, is analysed from meta-theoretical viewpoints to reveal that it explicitly describes two sets of phenomena that must be clearly differentiated: 1) lexical repertoires and the representations that they encode and 2) the kinds of phenomena that are represented. Thus far, personality psychologists largely explored only the former, but have seriously neglected studying the latter. Meta-theoretical analyses of these different kinds of phenomena and their distinct natures, commonalities, differences, and interrelations reveal that personality psychology’s focus on lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts entails a) erroneous meta-theoretical assumptions about what the phenomena being studied actually are, and thus how they can be analysed and interpreted, b) that contemporary personality psychology is largely based on everyday psychological knowledge, and c) a fundamental circularity in the scientific explanations used in trait psychology. These findings seriously challenge the widespread assumptions about the causal and universal status of the phenomena described by prominent personality models. The current state of knowledge about the lexical hypothesis is reviewed, and implications for personality psychology are discussed. Ten desiderata for future research are outlined to overcome the current paradigmatic fixations that are substantially hampering intellectual innovation and progress in the field
“I Don’t Like Being Stereotyped, I Decided I Was Never Going Back to the Doctor”: Sexual Healthcare Access Among Young Latina Women in Alabama
- …