43 research outputs found

    Анализ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² вибродиагностики ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΡ€Π΅ΠΆΡƒΡ‰ΠΈΡ… станков

    Get PDF
    ЦСль Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‹ - Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ° Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² вибродиагностики ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΡ€Π΅ΠΆΡƒΡ‰ΠΈΡ… станков Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡ€Π΅Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ‡Π΅. ΠžΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ исслСдования - ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ ΠΈ комплСксы вибродиагностики ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΡ€Π΅ΠΆΡƒΡ‰ΠΈΡ… станков. ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ исслСдования – систСматизация ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² вибродиагностики ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΡ€Π΅ΠΆΡƒΡ‰ΠΈΡ… станков. ΠΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ - отсутствиС простой для Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ виброиспытаний. Π’ процСссС Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‹ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ рассмотрСны Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ вибродиагностики ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΡ€Π΅ΠΆΡƒΡ‰ΠΈΡ… станков, сдСланы прСдлоТСния ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² вибродиагностики ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΡ€Π΅ΠΆΡƒΡ‰ΠΈΡ… станков Π² ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡ€Π΅Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ‡Π΅, создана ΡƒΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° провСдСния вибродиагностики ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΡ€Π΅ΠΆΡƒΡ‰ΠΈΡ… станков диагностичСским комплСксом "ВиброрСгистратор-М2".The aim of the work is to develop recommendations on the application of vibration diagnostics methods for metal-cutting machine tools in a specific task. The object of research is methods and complexes of vibration diagnostics of metal cutting machines. The subject of the study is the systematization and generalization of methods of vibration diagnostics of metal-cutting machines. Actuality is the absence of a simple vibration testing technique. In the course of the work various methods of vibration diagnostics of metal cutting machines were considered, suggestions were made on the application of vibration diagnostics methods for metal cutting machines in each specific task, a universal technique for performing vibration diagnostics of metal cutting machines with the Vibroregistrator-M2

    Consensus Report on the Future of Animal-Free Systemic Toxicity Testing

    Get PDF
    Since March 2013, animal use for cosmetics testing for the European market has been banned. This requires a renewed view on risk assessment in this field. However, in other fields as well, traditional animal experimentation does not always satisfy requirements in safety testing, as the need for human-relevant information is ever increasing. A general strategy for animal-free test approaches was outlined by the US National Research Council’s vision document for Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century in 2007. It is now possible to provide a more defined roadmap on how to implement this vision for the four principal areas of systemic toxicity evaluation: repeat dose organ toxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity and allergy induction (skin sensitization), as well as for the evaluation of toxicant metabolism (toxicokinetics) (Fig. 1). CAAT-Europe assembled experts from Europe, America and Asia to design a scientific roadmap for future risk assessment approaches and the outcome was then further discussed and refined in two consensus meetings with over 200 stakeholders. The key recommendations include: focusing on improving existing methods rather than favoring de novo design; combining hazard testing with toxicokinetics predictions; developing integrated test strategies; incorporating new high content endpoints to classical assays; evolving test validation procedures; promoting collaboration and data-sharing of different industrial sectors; integrating new disciplines, such as systems biology and high throughput screening; and involving regulators early on in the test development process. A focus on data quality, combined with increased attention to the scientific background of a test method, will be important drivers. Information from each test system should be mapped along adverse outcome pathways. Finally, quantitative information on all factors and key events will be fed into systems biology models that allow a probabilistic risk assessment with flexible adaptation to exposure scenarios and individual risk factors

    t4 Workshop Report: Integrated Testing Strategies (ITS) for Safety Assessment

    Get PDF
    Integrated testing strategies (ITS), as opposed to single definitive tests or fixed batteries of tests, are expected to efficiently combine different information sources in a quantifiable fashion to satisfy an information need, in this case for regulatory safety assessments. With increasing awareness of the limitations of each individual tool and the development of highly targeted tests and predictions, the need for combining pieces of evidence increases. The discussions that took place during this workshop, which brought together a group of experts coming from different related areas, illustrate the current state of the art of ITS, as well as promising developments and identifiable challenges. The case of skin sensitization was taken as an example to understand how possible ITS can be constructed, optimized and validated. This will require embracing and developing new concepts such as adverse outcome pathways (AOP), advanced statistical learning algorithms and machine learning, mechanistic validation and β€œGood ITS Practices”.JRC.I.5-Systems Toxicolog

    Local Lymph Node Assay : how testing laboratories apply OECD TG 429 for REACH purposes

    No full text
    The Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) is the official method for assessing the allergic contact dermatitis potential of chemicals for the purposes of REACH regulation. The LLNA went through a validation process that allowed the delineation of a robust protocol for performing new tests. The OECD accepted this method in 2002 and published OECD TG 429. The European Chemical Agency (ECHA) recently published data that were submitted in the registration dossiers of chemicals. This database was analysed to determine how testing laboratories apply OECD TG 429. This analysis comes after a detailed analysis of four full study reports that were also prepared for REACH purposes. Although the majority of the tests are fully compliant with OECD TG 429, some showed major deviations, and a number of others used more animals than necessary. This suggests that in vivo tests need to be planned more carefully and consciously to obtain meaningful results with the minimum animal number necessary.publishe

    Safety Evaluations Under the Proposed US Safe Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Act of 2013 : Animal Use and Cost Estimates

    No full text
    The proposed Safe Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Act of 2013 calls for a new evaluation program for cosmetic ingredients in the US, with the new assessments initially dependent on expanded animal testing. This paper considers possible testing scenarios under the proposed Act and estimates the number of test animals and cost under each scenario. It focuses on the impact for the first 10 years of testing, the period of greatest impact on animals and costs. The analysis suggests the first 10 years of testing under the Act could evaluate, at most, about 50% of ingredients used in cosmetics. Testing during this period would cost about 1.7βˆ’ 1.7- 9 billion and 1-11.5 million animals. By test year 10, alternative, high-throughput test methods under development are expected to be available, replacing animal testing and allowing rapid evaluation of all ingredients. Given the high cost in dollars and animal lives of the first 10 years for only about half of ingredients, a better choice may be to accelerate development of high-throughput methods. This would allow evaluation of 100% of cosmetic ingredients before year 10 at lower cost and without animal testing

    Re-Evaluation of Animal Numbers and Costs for In Vivo Tests to Accomplish REACH Legislation Requirements for Chemicals : a Report by the Transatlantic Think Tank for Toxicology (t(4))

    No full text
    The EU REACH legislation for chemicals of 2006 represents the largest investment into consumer product safety ever. A reanalysis of cost and animal use estimates was carried out based on the final legislation, test guidance for industry published by the European Chemical Agency, and the preregistration completed in December 2008. The new estimates for the number of substances falling under REACH range from 68 to 101,000 chemicals, substantially exceeding the earlier estimates of 29,000 substances. The latter estimates were, however, based on data before 1994 and both expansion of the EU and growth of the chemical industry since have contributed to higher numbers today. The lower estimate of 68,000 chemicals was carried through current testing requirements with due regard to emerging alternative approaches, using in all cases the most optimistic assumptions (minimal animal numbers per test and neglecting most triggering of additional tests and confirmatory (re-)tests as well as tests requested but not yet defined for endocrine disruption, respiratory irritation, respiratory sensitization and developmental neurotoxicity). The most demanding studies are in the area of reproductive toxicity testing with about 90% of all animal use and 70% of the required costs for registration. The overall result suggests a demand of 54 million vertebrate animals and testing costs of 9.5 billion euro. This clearly challenges the feasibility of the program without a major investment into high-throughput methodologies.publishe

    On the usefulness of animals as a model system (part I) : Overview of criteria and focus on robustness

    No full text
    Banning or reduction of the use of animals for laboratory experiments is a frequently-discussed societal and scientific issue. Moreover, the usefulness of animals needs to be considered in any decision process on the permission of specific animal studies. This complex issue is often simplified and generalized in the media around the question, "Are animals useful as a model?" To render an often emotional discussion about animal experimentation more rational, it is important to define "usefulness" in a structured and transparent way. To achieve such a goal, many sub-questions need to be asked, and the following aspects require clarification: (i) consistency of animal-derived data (robustness of the model system); (ii) scientific domain investigated (e.g., toxicology vs disease modelling vs therapy); (iii) measurement unit for "benefit" (inte-grating positive and negative aspects); (iv) benchmarking to alternatives; (v) definition of success criteria (how good is good enough); (vi) the procedure to assess benefit and necessity. This series of articles discusses the overall benchmarking process by specifying the six issues. The goal is to provide guidance on what needs to be clarified in scientific and political discussions. This framework should help in the future to structure available information, to identify and fill information gaps, and to arrive at rational decisions in various sub-fields of animal use. In part I of the series, we focus on the robustness of animal models. This describes the capacity of models to produce the same output/response when faced with the "same" input. Follow-up articles will cover the remaining usefulness aspects.publishe

    Integrated Testing Strategies (ITS) for safety assessment

    No full text
    Integrated testing strategies (ITS), as opposed to a single definitive test or fixed batteries of tests, are expected to efficiently combine different information sources in a quantifiable fashion to satisfy an information need, in this case for regulatory safety assessments. With increasing awareness of the limitations of each individual tool and the development of highly targeted tests and predictions, the need for combining pieces of evidence increases. The discussions that took place during this workshop, which brought together a group of experts coming from different related areas, illustrate the current state of the art of ITS, as well as promising developments and identifiable challenges. The case of skin sensitization was taken as an example to understand how possible ITS can be constructed, optimized and validated. This will require embracing and developing new concepts such as adverse outcome pathways (AOP), advanced statistical learning algorithms and machine learning, mechanistic validation and β€œGood ITS Practices”
    corecore