Natural history, phenotypic spectrum, and discriminative features of multisystemic RFC1 disease

Objective To delineate the full phenotypic spectrum, discriminative features, piloting longitudinal progression data, and sample size calculations of replication factor complex subunit 1 (RFC1) repeat expansions, recently identified as causing cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS). Methods Multimodal RFC1 repeat screening (PCR, Southern blot, whole-exome/genome sequencing?based approaches) combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal deep phenotyping in (1) cross-European cohort A (70 families) with ?2 features of CANVAS or ataxia with chronic cough (ACC) and (2) Turkish cohort B (105 families) with unselected late-onset ataxia. Results Prevalence of RFC1 disease was 67% in cohort A, 14% in unselected cohort B, 68% in clinical CANVAS, and 100% in ACC. RFC1 disease was also identified in Western and Eastern Asian individuals and even by whole-exome sequencing. Visual compensation, sensory symptoms, and cough were strong positive discriminative predictors (>90%) against RFC1-negative patients. The phenotype across 70 RFC1-positive patients was mostly multisystemic (69%), including dysautonomia (62%) and bradykinesia (28%) (overlap with cerebellar-type multiple system atrophy [MSA-C]), postural instability (49%), slow vertical saccades (17%), and chorea or dystonia (11%). Ataxia progression was ?1.3 Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia points per year (32 cross-sectional, 17 longitudinal assessments, follow-up ?9 years [mean 3.1 years]) but also included early falls, variable nonlinear phases of MSA-C?like progression (SARA points 2.5?5.5 per year), and premature death. Treatment trials require 330 (1-year trial) and 132 (2-year trial) patients in total to detect 50% reduced progression. Conclusions RFC1 disease is frequent and occurs across continents, with CANVAS and ACC as highly diagnostic phenotypes yet as variable, overlapping clusters along a continuous multisystemic disease spectrum, including MSA-C-overlap. Our natural history data help to inform future RFC1 treatment trials. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class II evidence that RFC1 repeat expansions are associated with CANVAS and ACC.FUNDING: Study Funding This work was supported via the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program by the BMBF under the frame of the E-Rare-3 network PREPARE (01GM1607; to M. Synofzik,M.A., H.P., B.P.v.d.W.), by the DFG under the frame of EJP-RD network PROSPAX (No. 441409627; M. Synofzik, B.P.v.d.W., A.N.B.), and grant 779257 “Solve-RD” (toM. Synofzik, B.P.v.d.W.). B.P.v.d.W. receives additional research support from ZonMW, Hersenstichting, Gossweiler Foundation, uniQure, and Radboud University Medical Centre. T.B.H. was supported by the DFG (No 418081722). A.T. receives funding from the University of T¨ubingen, medical faculty, for the Clinician Scientist Program grant 439-0-0. A.C. thanks Medical Research Council, MR/T001712/1) and Fondazione CARIPLO (2019-1836) for grant support. L.S., T.K., B.P.v.d.W., and M. Synofzik are members of the European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases, project 739510. A.N.B. is supported by the Suna and Inan Kirac Foundation and Koç University School of Medicine

Natural History, Phenotypic Spectrum, and Discriminative Features of Multisystemic RFC1-disease

OBJECTIVE: To delineate the full phenotypic spectrum, discriminative features, piloting longitudinal progression data, and sample size calculations of RFC1-repeat expansions, recently identified as causing cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS). METHODS: Multimodal RFC1 repeat screening (PCR, southern blot, whole-exome/genome (WES/WGS)-based approaches) combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal deep-phenotyping in (i) cross-European cohort A (70 families) with ≥2 features of CANVAS and/or ataxia-with-chronic-cough (ACC); and (ii) Turkish cohort B (105 families) with unselected late-onset ataxia. RESULTS: Prevalence of RFC1-disease was 67% in cohort A, 14% in unselected cohort B, 68% in clinical CANVAS, and 100% in ACC. RFC1-disease was also identified in Western and Eastern Asians, and even by WES. Visual compensation, sensory symptoms, and cough were strong positive discriminative predictors (>90%) against RFC1-negative patients. The phenotype across 70 RFC1-positive patients was mostly multisystemic (69%), including dysautonomia (62%) and bradykinesia (28%) (=overlap with cerebellar-type multiple system atrophy [MSA-C]), postural instability (49%), slow vertical saccades (17%), and chorea and/or dystonia (11%). Ataxia progression was ∼1.3 SARA points/year (32 cross-sectional, 17 longitudinal assessments, follow-up ≤9 years [mean 3.1]), but also included early falls, variable non-linear phases of MSA-C-like progression (SARA 2.5-5.5/year), and premature death. Treatment trials require 330 (1-year-trial) and 132 (2-year-trial) patients in total to detect 50% reduced progression. CONCLUSIONS: RFC1-disease is frequent and occurs across continents, with CANVAS and ACC as highly diagnostic phenotypes, yet as variable, overlapping clusters along a continuous multisystemic disease spectrum, including MSA-C-overlap. Our natural history data help to inform future RFC1-treatment trials. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that RFC1-repeat expansions are associated with CANVAS and ACC

Role of the repeat expansion size in predicting age of onset and severity in RFC1 disease

RFC1 disease, caused by biallelic repeat expansion in RFC1, is clinically heterogeneous in terms of age of onset, disease progression and phenotype. We investigated the role of the repeat size in influencing clinical variables in RFC1 disease. We also assessed the presence and role of meiotic and somatic instability of the repeat. In this study, we identified 553 patients carrying biallelic RFC1 expansions and measured the repeat expansion size in 392 cases. Pearson's coefficient was calculated to assess the correlation between the repeat size and age at disease onset. A Cox model with robust cluster standard errors was adopted to describe the effect of repeat size on age at disease onset, on age at onset of each individual symptoms, and on disease progression. A quasi-poisson regression model was used to analyse the relationship between phenotype and repeat size. We performed multi-variate linear regression to assess the association of the repeat size with the degree of cerebellar atrophy. Meiotic stability was assessed by Southern blotting on first-degree relatives of 27 probands. Finally, somatic instability was investigated by optical genome mapping on cerebellar and frontal cortex and unaffected peripheral tissue from four post-mortem cases. A larger repeat size of both smaller and larger allele was associated with an earlier age at neurological onset (smaller allele HR = 2.06, p < 0.001; larger allele HR = 1.53, p < 0.001) and with a higher hazard of developing disabling symptoms, such as dysarthria or dysphagia (smaller allele HR = 3.40, p < 0.001; larger allele HR = 1.71, p = 0.002) or loss of independent walking (smaller allele HR = 2.78, p < 0.001; larger allele HR = 1.60; p < 0.001) earlier in disease course. Patients with more complex phenotypes carried larger expansions (smaller allele: complex neuropathy RR = 1.30, p = 0.003; CANVAS RR = 1.34, p < 0.001; larger allele: complex neuropathy RR = 1.33, p = 0.008; CANVAS RR = 1.31, p = 0.009). Furthermore, larger repeat expansions in the smaller allele were associated with more pronounced cerebellar vermis atrophy (lobules I-V β=-1.06, p < 0.001; lobules VI-VII β=-0.34, p = 0.005). The repeat did not show significant instability during vertical transmission and across different tissues and brain regions. RFC1 repeat size, particularly of the smaller allele, is one of the determinants of variability in RFC1 disease and represents a key prognostic factor to predict disease onset, phenotype, and severity. Assessing the repeat size is warranted as part of the diagnostic test for RFC1 expansion

GAA-FGF14 ataxia (SCA27B): phenotypic profile, natural history progression and 4-aminopyridine treatment response

Ataxia due to an autosomal dominant intronic GAA repeat expansion in FGF14 (GAA-FGF14 ataxia, Spinocerebellar ataxia 27B [SCA27B]) has recently been identified as one of the most common genetic late-onset ataxias. We here aimed to characterise its phenotypic profile, natural history progression, and 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) treatment response. We conducted a multi-modal cohort study of 50 GAA-FGF14 patients, comprising in-depth phenotyping, cross-sectional and longitudinal progression data (up to 7 years), MRI findings, serum neurofilament light (sNfL) levels, neuropathology, and 4-AP treatment response data, including a series of n-of-1 treatment studies. GAA-FGF14 ataxia consistently presented as late-onset (60.0 years (53.5-68.5), median (IQR)) pancerebellar syndrome, partly combined with afferent sensory deficits (55%) and dysautonomia (28%). Dysautonomia increased with duration while cognitive impairment remained infrequent, even in advanced stages. Cross-sectional and longitudinal assessments consistently indicated mild progression of ataxia (0.29 SARA points/year), not exceeding a moderate disease severity even in advanced stages (max. SARA score: 18 points). Functional impairment increased relatively slowly (unilateral mobility aids after 8 years in 50% of patients). Corresponding to slow progression and low extra-cerebellar involvement, sNfL was not increased relative to controls. Concurrent second diseases (including progressive supranuclear palsy neuropathology) represented major individual aggravators of disease severity, constituting important caveats for planning future GAA-FGF14 trials. A treatment response to 4-AP with relevance for everyday living was reported by 86% of treated patients. A series of three prospective n-of-1 treatment experiences with on/off design showed marked reduction in daily symptomatic time and symptom severity on 4-AP. Our study characterises the phenotypic profile, natural history progression, and 4-AP treatment response of GAA-FGF14 ataxia. It paves the way towards large-scale natural history studies and 4-AP treatment trials in this newly discovered, possibly most frequent, and treatable late-onset ataxia

Role of the repeat expansion size in predicting age of onset and severity in RFC1 disease

RFC1 disease, caused by biallelic repeat expansion in RFC1, is clinically heterogeneous in terms of age of onset, disease progression and phenotype. We investigated the role of the repeat size in influencing clinical variables in RFC1 disease. We also assessed the presence and role of meiotic and somatic instability of the repeat. In this study, we identified 553 patients carrying biallelic RFC1 expansions and measured the repeat expansion size in 392 cases. Pearson's coefficient was calculated to assess the correlation between the repeat size and age at disease onset. A Cox model with robust cluster standard errors was adopted to describe the effect of repeat size on age at disease onset, on age at onset of each individual symptoms, and on disease progression. A quasi-poisson regression model was used to analyse the relationship between phenotype and repeat size. We performed multi-variate linear regression to assess the association of the repeat size with the degree of cerebellar atrophy. Meiotic stability was assessed by Southern blotting on first-degree relatives of 27 probands. Finally, somatic instability was investigated by optical genome mapping on cerebellar and frontal cortex and unaffected peripheral tissue from four post-mortem cases. A larger repeat size of both smaller and larger allele was associated with an earlier age at neurological onset (smaller allele HR = 2.06, p &lt; 0.001; larger allele HR = 1.53, p &lt; 0.001) and with a higher hazard of developing disabling symptoms, such as dysarthria or dysphagia (smaller allele HR = 3.40, p &lt; 0.001; larger allele HR = 1.71, p = 0.002) or loss of independent walking (smaller allele HR = 2.78, p &lt; 0.001; larger allele HR = 1.60; p &lt; 0.001) earlier in disease course. Patients with more complex phenotypes carried larger expansions (smaller allele: complex neuropathy RR = 1.30, p = 0.003; CANVAS RR = 1.34, p &lt; 0.001; larger allele: complex neuropathy RR = 1.33, p = 0.008; CANVAS RR = 1.31, p = 0.009). Furthermore, larger repeat expansions in the smaller allele were associated with more pronounced cerebellar vermis atrophy (lobules I-V β=-1.06, p &lt; 0.001; lobules VI-VII β=-0.34, p = 0.005). The repeat did not show significant instability during vertical transmission and across different tissues and brain regions. RFC1 repeat size, particularly of the smaller allele, is one of the determinants of variability in RFC1 disease and represents a key prognostic factor to predict disease onset, phenotype, and severity. Assessing the repeat size is warranted as part of the diagnostic test for RFC1 expansion