Parallel computation of 3-D soil-structure interaction in time domain with a coupled FEM/SBFEM approach

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10915-011-9551-xThis paper introduces a parallel algorithm for the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM). The application code is designed to run on clusters of computers, and it enables the analysis of large-scale soil-structure-interaction problems, where an unbounded domain has to fulfill the radiation condition for wave propagation to infinity. The main focus of the paper is on the mathematical description and numerical implementation of the SBFEM. In particular, we describe in detail the algorithm to compute the acceleration unit impulse response matrices used in the SBFEM as well as the solvers for the Riccati and Lyapunov equations. Finally, two test cases validate the new code, illustrating the numerical accuracy of the results and the parallel performances. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011.Jose E. Roman and Enrique S. Quintana-Orti were partially supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion under grants TIN2009-07519, and TIN2008-06570-C04-01, respectively.Schauer, M.; Román Moltó, JE.; Quintana Orti, ES.; Langer, S. (2012). Parallel computation of 3-D soil-structure interaction in time domain with a coupled FEM/SBFEM approach. Journal of Scientific Computing. 52(2):446-467. doi:10.1007/s10915-011-9551-xS446467522Anderson, E., Bai, Z., Bischof, C., Demmel, J., Dongarra, J., Croz, J.D., Greenbaum, A., Hammarling, S., McKenney, A., Sorensen, D.: LAPACK User’s Guide. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1992)Antes, H., Spyrakos, C.: Soil-structure interaction. In: Beskos, D., Anagnotopoulos, S. (eds.) Computer Analysis and Design of Earthquake Resistant Structures, p. 271. Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton (1997)Appelö, D., Colonius, T.: A high-order super-grid-scale absorbing layer and its application to linear hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 228(11), 4200–4217 (2009)Astley, R.J.: Infinite elements for wave problems: a review of current formulations and a assessment of accuracy. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 49(7), 951–976 (2000)Balay, S., Buschelman, K., Eijkhout, V., Gropp, W.D., Kaushik, D., Knepley, M., McInnes, L.C., Smith, B.F., Zhang, H.: PETSc users manual. Tech. Rep. ANL-95/11 - Revision 3.1, Argonne National Laboratory (2010)Benner, P.: Contributions to the numerical solution of algebraic Riccati equations and related eigenvalue problems. Dissertation, Fak. f. Mathematik, TU Chemnitz–Zwickau, Chemnitz, FRG (1997)Benner, P.: Numerical solution of special algebraic Riccati equations via an exact line search method. In: Proc. European Control Conf. ECC 97, Paper 786, BELWARE Information Technology, Waterloo (B) (1997)Benner, P., Quintana-Ortí, E.: Solving stable generalized Lyapunov equations with the matrix sign function. Numer. Algorithms 20(1), 75–100 (1999)Benner, P., Byers, R., Quintana-Ortí, E., Quintana-Ortí, G.: Solving algebraic Riccati equations on parallel computers using Newton’s method with exact line search. Parallel Comput. 26(10), 1345–1368 (2000)Benner, P., Quintana-Ortí, E.S., Quintana-Ortí, G.: Solving linear-quadratic optimal control problems on parallel computers. Optim. Methods Softw. 23(6), 879–909 (2008)Bettess, P.: Infinite Elements. Penshaw Press, Sunderland (1992)Blackford, L.S., Choi, J., Cleary, A., D’Azevedo, E., Demmel, J., Dhillon, I., Dongarra, J., Hammarling, S., Henry, G., Petitet, A., Stanley, K., Walker, D., Whaley, R.C.: ScaLAPACK Users’ Guide. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1997)Borsutzky, R.: Braunschweiger Schriften zur Mechanik - Seismic Risk Analysis of Buried Lifelines, vol. 63. Mechanik-Zentrum Technische Universität. Braunschweig (2008)Dongarra, J.J., Whaley, R.C.: LAPACK working note 94: A user’s guide to the BLACS v1.1. Tech. Rep. UT-CS-95-281, Department of Computer Science, University of Tennessee (1995)Engquist, B., Majda, A.: Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves. Math. Comput. 31(139), 629–651 (1977)Granat, R., Kågström, B.: Algorithm 904: The SCASY library – parallel solvers for Sylvester-type matrix equations with applications in condition estimation, part II. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 37(3), 33:1–33:4 (2010)Guerrero, D., Hernández, V., Román, J.E.: Parallel SLICOT model reduction routines: The Cholesky factor of Grammians. In: Proceedings of the 15th Triennal IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain (2002)Harr, M.E.: Foundations of Theoretical Soil Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York (1966)Hilbert, H., Hughes, T., Taylor, R.: Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 5, 283 (1977)Kleinman, D.: On an iterative technique for Riccati equation computations. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC-13, 114–115 (1968)Lehmann, L.: Wave Propagation in Infinite Domains. Springer, Berlin (2006)Lehmann, L., Langer, S., Clasen, D.: Scaled boundary finite element method for acoustics. J. Comput. Acoust. 14(4), 489–506 (2006)Liao, Z.P., Wong, H.L.: A transmitting boundary for the numerical simulation of elastic wave propagation. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 3(4), 174–183 (1984)Lysmer, J., Kuhlmeyer, R.L.: Finite dynamic model for infinite media. J. Eng. Mech. 95, 859–875 (1969)Meskouris, K., Hinzen, K.G., Butenweg, C., Mistler, M.: Bauwerke und Erdbeben - Grundlagen - Anwendung - Beispiele. Vieweg Teubner, Wiesbaden (2007)MPI Forum: The message passing interface (MPI) standard (1994). http://www.mcs.anl.gov/mpiNewmark, N.: A method of computation for structural dynamics. J. Eng. Mech. Div. 85, 67 (1959)Petersen, C.: Dynamik der Baukonstruktionen. Vieweg/Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft, Braunschweig (2000)Roberts, J.: Linear model reduction and solution of the algebraic Riccati equation by use of the sign function. Int. J. Control 32, 677–687 (1980)Schauer, M., Lehmann, L.: Large scale simulation with scaled boundary finite element method. Proc. Appl. Math. Mech. 9, 103–106 (2009)Wolf, J.: The Scaled Boundary Finite Element Method. Wiley, Chichester (2003)Wolf, J., Song, C.: Finite-Element Modelling of Unbounded Media. Wiley, Chichester (1996

Guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas: surgical treatment

The only curative treatment in biliary tract cancer is surgical treatment. Therefore, the suitability of curative resection should be investigated in the first place. In the presence of metastasis to the liver, lung, peritoneum, or distant lymph nodes, curative resection is not suitable. No definite consensus has been reached on local extension factors and curability. Measures of hepatic functional reserve in the jaundiced liver include future liver remnant volume and the indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test. Preoperative portal vein embolization may be considered in patients in whom right hepatectomy or more, or hepatectomy with a resection rate exceeding 50%–60% is planned. Postoperative complications and surgery-related mortality may be reduced with the use of portal vein embolization. Although hepatectomy and/or pancreaticoduodenectomy are preferable for the curative resection of bile duct cancer, extrahepatic bile duct resection alone is also considered in patients for whom it is judged that curative resection would be achieved after a strict diagnosis of its local extension. Also, combined caudate lobe resection is recommended for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Because the prognosis of patients treated with combined portal vein resection is significantly better than that of unresected patients, combined portal vein resection may be carried out. Prognostic factors after resection for bile duct cancer include positive surgical margins, especially in the ductal stump; lymph node metastasis; perineural invasion; and combined vascular resection due to portal vein and/or hepatic artery invasion. For patients with suspected gallbladder cancer, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not recommended, and open cholecystectomy should be performed as a rule. When gallbladder cancer invading the subserosal layer or deeper has been detected after simple cholecystectomy, additional resection should be considered. Prognostic factors after resection for gallbladder cancer include the depth of mural invasion; lymph node metastasis; extramural extension, especially into the hepatoduodenal ligament; perineural invasion; and the degree of curability. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is indicated for ampullary carcinoma, and limited operation is also indicated for carcinoma in adenoma. The prognostic factors after resection for ampullary carcinoma include lymph node metastasis, pancreatic invasion, and perineural invasion

An Indication of Anisotropy in Arrival Directions of Ultra-high-energy Cosmic Rays through Comparison to the Flux Pattern of Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Sources

A new analysis of the data set from the Pierre Auger Observatory provides evidence for anisotropy in the arrival directions of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays on an intermediate angular scale, which is indicative of excess arrivals from strong, nearby sources. The data consist of 5514 events above 20 EeV with zenith angles up to 80 degrees. recorded before 2017 April 30. Sky models have been created for two distinct populations of extragalactic gamma-ray emitters: active galactic nuclei from the second catalog of hard Fermi-LAT sources (2FHL) and starburst galaxies from a sample that was examined with Fermi-LAT. Flux-limited samples, which include all types of galaxies from the Swift-BAT and 2MASS surveys, have been investigated for comparison. The sky model of cosmic-ray density constructed using each catalog has two free parameters, the fraction of events correlating with astrophysical objects, and an angular scale characterizing the clustering of cosmic rays around extragalactic sources. A maximum-likelihood ratio test is used to evaluate the best values of these parameters and to quantify the strength of each model by contrast with isotropy. It is found that the starburst model fits the data better than the hypothesis of isotropy with a statistical significance of 4.0 sigma, the highest value of the test statistic being for energies above 39 EeV. The three alternative models are favored against isotropy with 2.7 sigma-3.2 sigma significance. The origin of the indicated deviation from isotropy is examined and prospects for more sensitive future studies are discussed

Inferences on mass composition and tests of hadronic interactions from 0.3 to 100 EeV using the water-Cherenkov detectors of the Pierre Auger Observatory

We present a new method for probing the hadronic interaction models at ultrahigh energy and extracting details about mass composition. This is done using the time profiles of the signals recorded with the water-Cherenkov detectors of the Pierre Auger Observatory. The profiles arise from a mix of the muon and electromagnetic components of air showers. Using the risetimes of the recorded signals, we define a new parameter, which we use to compare our observations with predictions from simulations. We find, first, inconsistencies between our data and predictions over a greater energy range and with substantially more events than in previous studies. Second, by calibrating the new parameter with fluorescence measurements from observations made at the Auger Observatory, we can infer the depth of shower maximum Xmax for a sample of over 81,000 events extending from 0.3 to over 100 EeV. Above 30 EeV, the sample is nearly 14 times larger than what is currently available from fluorescence measurements and extending the covered energy range by half a decade. The energy dependence of ?Xmaxcopyright is compared to simulations and interpreted in terms of the mean of the logarithmic mass. We find good agreement with previous work and extend the measurement of the mean depth of shower maximum to greater energies than before, reducing significantly the statistical uncertainty associated with the inferences about mass composition