102 research outputs found
Migration and Settlement in the F.R.G
According to estimates of the Central Statistical Office, some 8 million people (14%) in the Federal Republic of Germany have moved over the past thirty years. Slightly more than half of them have thereby crossed the border of a municipality, and have thus, according to statistical definition, undertaken a migration. In order to answer the question how these migratory movements of the past have influenced, and will influence, population development and settlement patterns, several methodological steps are required.
First, a short description of the settlement pattern in the FRG and an analysis of the influence of migrations on population development are offered on a global level. Then follows a description of regional population structures and developments. To enable us to estimate the future development of settlement patterns and population, methods of regional population analysis, further methods for trend-projections and labor-market oriented models of forecast are used. This permits an evaluation of the efficiency of multiregional population analysis. Presumptive population development and distribution will be set off against population-relevant objectives of regional planning and state planning
Migration and Settlement: 9. Federal Republic of Germany
This report discusses current patterns of spatial population growth in the FRG, describes a multiregional population analysis, and describes population distribution policy in the FRG
COVID-19 reveals the systemic nature of urban health globally
Statement by the scientific committee* of the International Science Council’s Programme on Urban Health and Wellbeing, on critical elements of urban health action in response to the epidemic
Resilience Management for Healthy Cities in a Changing Climate
Cities are experiencing multiple impacts from global environmental
change, and the degree to which they will need to cope with and adapt to these challenges
will continue to increase. We argue that a ‘complex systems and resilience
management’ view may significantly help guide future urban development through
innovative integration of, for example, grey, blue and green infrastructure embedded
in flexible institutions (both formal and informal) for multi-functionality and
improved health. For instance, the urban heat island effect will further increase city-centre
temperatures during projected more frequent and intense heat waves. The
elderly and people with chronic cardiovascular and respiratory diseases are particularly
vulnerable to heat. Integrating vegetation and especially trees in the urban
infrastructure helps reduce temperatures by shading and evapotranspiration. Great
complexity and uncertainty of urban social-ecological systems are behind this
heatwave-health
nexus, and they need to be addressed in a more comprehensive
manner. We argue that a systems perspective can lead to innovative designs of new
urban infrastructure and the redesign of existing structures. Particularly to promoting
the integration of grey, green and blue infrastructure in urban planning through
institutional innovation and structural reorganization of knowledge-action systems
may significantly enhance prospects for improved urban health and greater resilience
under various scenarios of climate change.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
The impact of regional and neighbourhood deprivation on physical health in Germany: a multilevel study
Voigtländer S, Berger U, Razum O. The impact of regional and neighbourhood deprivation on physical health in Germany: a multilevel study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1): 403.Background There is increasing evidence that individual health is at least partly determined by neighbourhood and regional factors. Mechanisms, however, remain poorly understood, and evidence from Germany is scant. This study explores whether regional as well as neighbourhood deprivation are associated with physical health and to what extent this association can be explained by specific neighbourhood exposures. Methods Using 2004 data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) merged with regional and neighbourhood characteristics, we fitted multilevel linear regression models with subjective physical health, as measured by the SF-12, as the dependent variable. The models include regional and neighbourhood proxies of deprivation (i.e. regional unemployment quota, average purchasing power of the street section) as well as specific neighbourhood exposures (i.e. perceived air pollution). Individual characteristics including socioeconomic status and health behaviour have been controlled for. Results This study finds a significant association between area deprivation and physical health which is independent of compositional factors and consistent across different spatial scales. Furthermore the association between neighbourhood deprivation and physical health can be partly explained by specific features of the neighbourhood environment. Among these perceived air pollution shows the strongest association with physical health (-2.4 points for very strong and -1.5 points for strong disturbance by air pollution, standard error (SE) = 0.8 and 0.4, respectively). Beta coefficients for perceived air pollution, perceived noise and the perceived distance to recreational resources do not diminish when including individual health behaviour in the models. Conclusions This study highlights the difference regional and in particular neighbourhood deprivation make to the physical health of individuals in Germany. The results support the argument that specific neighbourhood exposures serve as an intermediary step between deprivation and health. As people with a low socioeconomic status were more likely to be exposed to unfavourable neighbourhood characteristics these conditions plausibly contribute towards generating health inequalities
Governing of Agro-Ecosystem Services
In this paper we incorporate interdisciplinary New Institutional and Transaction Costs Economics (combining Economics, Organization, Law, Sociology, Behavioral and Political Sciences), and suggest a framework for analysis of mechanisms of governance of agro-ecosystem services. Firstly, we present a new approach for analysis and improvement of governance of agro-ecosystem services. It takes into account the role of specific institutional environment (formal and informal rules, distribution of rights, systems of enforcement); and behavioral characteristics of individual agents (preferences, bounded rationality, opportunism, risk aversion, trust); and transactions costs associated with ecosystem services and their critical factors (uncertainty, frequency, asset specificity, appropriability); and comparative efficiency of market, private, public and hybrid modes of governance. Secondly, we identify spectrum of market and private forms of governance of agro-ecosystem services (voluntary initiatives; market trade with eco-products and services; special contractual arrangements; collective actions; vertical integration), and evaluate their efficiency and potential. Next, we identify needs for public involvement in the governance of agro-ecosystem services, and assess comparative efficiency of alternative modes of public interventions (assistance, regulations, funding, taxing, provision, partnership, property right modernization).
Finally, we analyze structure and efficiency of governance of agro-ecosystems services in Zapadna Stara Planina – a mountainous region in North-West Bulgaria. Post-communist transition and EU integration has brought about significant changes in the state and governance of agro-ecosystems services. Newly evolved market, private and public governance has led to significant improvement of part of agro-ecosystems services introducing modern eco-standards and public support, enhancing environmental stewardship, desintensifying production, recovering landscape and traditional productions, diversifying quality, products, and services. At the same time, novel governance is associated with some new challenges such as unsustainable exploitation, lost biodiversity, land degradation, water and air contamination. What is more, implementation of EU common policies would have no desired impact on agro-ecosystem services unless special measures are taken to improve management of public programs, and extend public support to dominating small-scale and subsistence farms
- …