21 research outputs found

    Effectiveness of dog rabies vaccination programmes: comparison of owner-charged and free vaccination campaigns

    Get PDF
    We investigated the percentage of dogs that could be vaccinated against rabies by conducting a pilot campaign in N'Djaména, Chad. Owners were charged US4.13perdogvaccinated,and244.13 per dog vaccinated, and 24% of all dogs in the three city districts covered by the campaign were vaccinated. Total campaign costs were US7623, resulting in an average of US19.40pervaccinateddog.Thisisfivetimesmoreexpensivethanthecostperanimalvaccinatedduringapreviousfreevaccinationcampaignfordogowners,conductedinthesamedistricts.Thefreecampaign,whichvaccinated2605moredogsthanthiscampaign,costanadditionalUS19.40 per vaccinated dog. This is five times more expensive than the cost per animal vaccinated during a previous free vaccination campaign for dog-owners, conducted in the same districts. The free campaign, which vaccinated 2605 more dogs than this campaign, cost an additional US1.45 per extra dog vaccinated. Campaigns in which owners are charged for vaccinations result in lower vaccination rates than in free campaigns. Public health officials can use these results when evaluating the costs and benefits of subsidizing dog rabies vaccination programme

    Challenges to improved animal rabies surveillance: experiences from pilot implementation of decentralized diagnostic units in Chad

    Get PDF
    Better surveillance is desperately needed to guide rabies prevention and control to achieve the goal of zero dog-mediated human rabies by 2030, defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) and partners in 2015. With the help of funding from the Vaccine Alliance (GAVI) learning agenda, we implemented animal rabies surveillance based on One Health communication, improved accessibility of diagnostic testing and facilitated sample transport to increase case detection in three regions of Chad. Through the project, rabies surveillance, previously only available in N'Djamena, was extended to selected provincial rural and urban areas. Nine decentralized diagnostic units (DDU) were established, hosted by veterinary district agencies (VDA) in four different administrative regions. Four additional VDAs in the study area were reinforced with facilitation of sample collection and transport. Staff from all these 13 veterinary facilities were trained in sample collection and diagnostics. DDUs performed Rapid Immunodiagnostic Tests (RIDT) providing a preliminary result before samples were sent to the central laboratory in N'Djamena for confirmation with the standard Florescent Antibody Test (FAT). Within the project period from June 2016 to March 2018, 115 samples were reported by veterinary facilities in the study areas compared to 63 samples received from outside the study area, the vast majority of them originating from the capital city N'Djamena (N=61). Eighty nine percent of all 178 samples reported to IRED during the project period tested positive. Most of the samples originated from dogs (92%). Other confirmed rabies positive animals observed were cats, a donkey and a pig. Although surveillance of animal rabies was the focus, four human saliva samples were also submitted for diagnosis. We observed high differences in reporting rates between the four study regions. This could be attributable to differences in rabies epidemiology but are also influenced by the distance to the central laboratory in N'Djamena, the cultural background and the level of public awareness. The possibility for local testing through RIDT was very welcomed by local veterinary staff and preliminary insights suggest a positive influence on One Health communication and PEP initiation. However, these aspects as well as the relative impact of local testing on sample collection in comparison to reinforcement of sample collection and transport alone, need to be further investigated. Challenges encountered related to poor infrastructure (buildings, appliances, materials) and low logistic capacity (lacking means and material for transport and communication) of veterinary services in Chad. In addition, veterinary personnel lack experience in data management. Together with staff turnover, this leads to a need for repeated training. Major shortcoming of the approach was the high cost per sample and limited sustainability beyond the project timeframe

    Cost Description and Comparative Cost Efficiency of Post-Exposure Prophylaxis and Canine Mass Vaccination against Rabies in N'Djamena, Chad

    Get PDF
    This is the final version of the article. Available from Frontiers Media via the DOI in this record.Rabies claims approximately 59,000 human lives annually and is a potential risk to 3.3 billion people in over 100 countries worldwide. Despite being fatal in almost 100% of cases, human rabies can be prevented by vaccinating dogs, the most common vector, and the timely administration of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to exposed victims. For the control and prevention of human rabies in N'Djamena, the capital city of Chad, a free mass vaccination campaign for dogs was organized in 2012 and 2013. The campaigns were monitored by parallel studies on the incidence of canine rabies based on diagnostic testing of suspect animals and the incidence of human bite exposure recorded at selected health facilities. Based on the cost description of the campaign and the need for PEP registered in health centers, three cost scenarios were compared: cumulative cost-efficiency of (1) PEP alone, (2) dog mass vaccination and PEP, (3) dog mass vaccination, PEP, and maximal communication between human health and veterinary workers (One Health communication). Assuming ideal One Health communication, the cumulative prospective cost of dog vaccination and PEP break even with the cumulative prospective cost of PEP alone in the 10th year from the start of the calculation (2012). The cost efficiency expressed in cost per human exposure averted is much higher with canine vaccination and One Health communication than with PEP alone. As shown in other studies, our cost-effectiveness analysis highlights that canine vaccination is financially the best option for animal rabies control and rabies prevention in humans. This study also provides evidence of the beneficial effect of One Health communication. Only with close communication between the human and animal health sectors will the decrease in animal rabies incidence be translated into a decline for PEP. An efficiently applied One Health concept would largely reduce the cost of PEP in resource poor countries and should be implemented for zoonosis control in general.This study was funded by UBS Optimus Foundation and the Chadian Government

    Rabies Diagnosis for Developing Countries

    Get PDF
    A new diagnostic test for rabies in animals was evaluated in N'Djaména, capital of Chad. The test is based on a direct immuno-histochemical detection of rabies virus in brain tissue (dRIT) visible by normal light microscopy. Rabies detection by dRIT light microscopy is 10 times less expensive than fluorescence microscopy required for the current gold standard of rabies diagnosis. The test showed ideal results in fresh samples with 100% agreement with the gold standard and confirms the results of a first study in Tanzania. Thus, it has a significant potential for diagnosing rabies in low-income countries, and under field conditions where rabies diagnosis is unavailable for the moment. This new test opens up a great potential to train technical staff and to establish rabies diagnosis without delay in low-income countries with urban rabies

    The economics of dog rabies control and the potential for combining it with other interventions

    No full text

    Coverage of pilot parenteral vaccination campaign against canine rabies in N'Djaména, Chad

    No full text
    Canine rabies, and thus human exposure to rabies, can be controlled through mass vaccination of the animal reservoir if dog owners are willing to cooperate. Inaccessible, ownerless dogs, however, reduce the vaccination coverage achieved in parenteral campaigns. This study aimed to estimate the vaccination coverage in dogs in three study zones of N'Djaména, Chad, after a pilot free parenteral mass vaccination campaign against rabies. We used a capture-mark-recapture approach for population estimates, with a Bayesian, Markov chain, Monte Carlo method to estimate the total number of owned dogs, and the ratio of ownerless to owned dogs to calculate vaccination coverage.When we took into account ownerless dogs, the vaccination coverage in the dog populations was 87% (95% confidence interval (CI), 84-89%) in study zone I, 71% (95% CI, 64-76%) in zone II, and 64% (95% CI, 58-71%) in zone III. The proportions of ownerless dogs to owned dogs were 1.1% (95% CI, 0-3.1%), 7.6% (95% CI, 0.7-16.5%), and 10.6%(95% CI, 1.6-19.1%) in the three study zones, respectively. Vaccination coverage in the three populations of owned dogs was 88% (95% CI, 840-92%) in zone I, 76% (95% CI, 71-81%) in zone II, and 70% (95% CI, 66-76%) in zone III. Participation of dog owners in the free campaign was high, and the number of inaccessible ownerless dogs was low. High levels of vaccination coverage could be achieved with parenteral mass vaccination. Regular parenteral vaccination campaigns to cover all of N'Djaména should be considered as an ethical way of preventing human rabies when post-exposure treatment is of limited availability and high in cost

    A metapopulation model of dog rabies transmission in N'Djamena, Chad.

    No full text
    Rabies transmission was interrupted for several months in N'Djamena, the capital city of Chad, after two mass vaccination campaigns of dogs. However, there was a resurgence in cases, which was not predicted by previous models of rabies transmission. We developed a deterministic metapopulation model with importation of latent dogs, calibrated to four years of weekly incidence data from passive surveillance, to investigate possible causes for the early resurgence. Our results indicate that importation of latently infective dogs better explains the data than heterogeneity or underreporting. Stochastic implementations of the model suggest that the two vaccination campaigns averted approximately 67 cases of dog rabies (out of an estimated 74 cases without vaccination) and 124 human exposures (out of an estimated 148 human exposures without vaccination) over two years. Dog rabies vaccination is therefore an effective way of preventing rabies in the dog population and to subsequently reduce human exposure. However, vaccination campaigns have to be repeated to maintain the effect or reintroduction through importation has to be prevented

    Survey of animal bite injuries and their management for an estimate of human rabies deaths in N'Djaména, Chad

    Get PDF
    To estimate the annual human rabies incidence as a baseline prior to mass dog vaccination campaigns in N'Djaména, Chad.; Survey of animal bites, involving 50% of all healthcare providers in N'Djaména, from September 2008 to April 2009. Of 86 people exposed to a suspected rabid animal, 50% received post-exposure vaccination and a further 8% had their wound cleaned. We estimated annual incidence of bites from suspected rabid animals of 12.9/100 000 and an incidence of 0.7 human rabies deaths/100 000, resulting in 7 estimated deaths (95% confidence interval 4-10 deaths) per year in N'Djaména. 14% of bite victims sought help from veterinarians.; Closer cooperation between physicians and veterinarians warrants more effective rabies control. The high proportion (42%) of potentially exposed people without post-exposure vaccination or wound treatment necessitates urgent attention
    corecore