Somatic mutations and clonal hematopoiesis in congenital neutropenia

© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology. Severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) and Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) are congenital neutropenia syndromes with a high rate of leukemic transformation. Hematopoietic stressors may contribute to leukemic transformation by increasing the mutation rate in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) and/or by promoting clonal hematopoiesis. We sequenced the exome of individual hematopoietic colonies derived from 13 patients with congenital neutropenia to measure total mutation burden and performed error-corrected sequencing on a panel of 46 genes on 80 patients with congenital neutropenia to assess for clonal hematopoiesis. An average of 3.6 ± 1.2 somatic mutations per exome was identified in HSPCs from patients with SCN compared with 3.960.4 for healthy controls (P = NS). Clonal hematopoiesis due to mutations in TP53 was present in 48% (13/ 27) of patients with SDS but was not seen in healthy controls (0/17, P \u3c .001) or patients with SCN (0/40, P \u3c .001). Our SDS cohort was young (median age 6.3 years), and many of the patients had multiple TP53 mutations. Conversely, clonal hematopoiesis due to mutations of CSF3R was present in patients with SCN but was not detected in healthy controls or patients with SDS. These data show that hematopoietic stress, including granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, do not increase the mutation burden in HSPCs in congenital neutropenia. Rather, distinct hematopoietic stressors result in the selective expansion of HSPCs carrying specific gene mutations. In particular, in SDS there is enormous selective pressure to expand TP53-mutated HSPCs, suggesting that acquisition of TP53 mutations is an early, likely initiating event, in the transformation to myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia in patients with SDS

1191O MRTX-500: Phase II trial of sitravatinib (sitra) + nivolumab (nivo) in patients (pts) with non-squamous (NSQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing on or after prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy

Background: Therapy with CPI has improved OS across many tumor types, including in a subset of pts with NSCLC. Mechanisms of CPI resistance, however, have been described, including an immunosuppressive TME, which may include recruitment of immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), regulatory T cells (Tregs), and M2-polarized macrophages within the TME. Sitra, a spectrum-selective TKI targeting TAM (Tyro3/Axl/MerTK) receptors and VEGFR2, reduces the number of MDSCs and Tregs while increasing the ratio of M1/M2-polarized macrophages, and thus is hypothesized to overcome an immunosuppressive TME and augment antitumor immune responses. Methods: MRTX-500 (NCT02954991) is a phase II study evaluating sitra (120 mg QD) + nivo (Q2W or Q4W) in pts with NSQ NSCLC who have progressed on or after treatment, with a CPI-based regimen (anti-PD1/PD-L1) and/or platinum doublet chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is ORR per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include OS, PFS, and safety. We report updated efficacy data for pts with NSCLC with PCB (prior clinical benefit; CR, PR, or SD ≥12 weeks) from a CPI who were treated with sitra + nivo as either 2L or 3L therapy. Results: As of 17 October 2020, 68 pts with PCB (57% female; median age, 66 years; ECOG PS 0/1/2, 27%/66%/7%) were treated. Median follow-up was 28 months, median OS was 15 months (95% CI 9.3, 21.1),1- and 2-year OS rates were 56% and 32%, respectively. Median PFS was 6 months, and ORR was 16% (11/68), including 2 CRs. Median duration of response was 13 months. In all CPI-experienced pts evaluable for safety (n=124), treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 91% of pts, with Gr 3/4 TRAEs occurring in 60% of pts. The most common (≥10%) Gr 3/4 TRAEs were hypertension and diarrhea. There were no Gr 5 TRAEs. Discontinuation rates for sitra and nivo due to any AE were 30% and 27%, respectively. Conclusions: Sitra + nivo demonstrated antitumor activity and encouraging OS compared to historical controls and no new safety signals were observed in pts with NSQ NSCLC who progressed on prior CPI. This combination is being evaluated in the phase III SAPPHIRE study

43P MRTX-500: Phase II trial of sitravatinib (sitra) + nivolumab (nivo) in patients (pts) with non-squamous (NSQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing on or after prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy

Background: Therapy with CPI has improved OS in a subset of pts with NSCLC. Mechanisms of CPI resistance, however, have been described, including an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), which may recruit immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), regulatory T cells (Tregs), and M2-polarized macrophages in the TME. Sitra, a spectrum-selective TKI targeting TAM (Tyro3/Axl/MerTK) receptors and VEGFR2, reduces the number of MDSCs and Tregs and increases the M1/M2-polarized macrophage ratio. It is hypothesized to overcome an immunosuppressive TME and augment antitumor immune responses. Methods: MRTX-500 (NCT02954991) is a phase II study evaluating sitra (120 mg QD) + nivo (Q2W or Q4W) in pts with NSQ NSCLC who have progressed on or after treatment, with a CPI-based regimen (anti-PD1/PD-L1) and/or platinum doublet chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is ORR per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include OS, PFS, and safety. We report updated efficacy data for pts with NSCLC with PCB (prior clinical benefit; CR, PR, or SD ≥12 weeks) from a CPI who were treated with sitra + nivo as either 2L or 3L therapy. Results: As of 17 October 2020, 68 pts with PCB (57% female; median age, 66 years; ECOG PS 0/1/2, 27%/66%/7%) were treated. Median follow-up was 28 months, median OS was 15 months (95% CI 9.3, 21.1),1- and 2-year OS rates were 56% and 32%, respectively. Median PFS was 6 months, and ORR was 16% (11/68), including 2 CRs. Median duration of response was 13 months. In all CPI-experienced pts evaluable for safety (n=124), treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 91% of pts, with Gr 3/4 TRAEs occurring in 60% of pts. The most common (≥10%) Gr 3/4 TRAEs were hypertension and diarrhea. There were no Gr 5 TRAEs. Discontinuation rates for sitra and nivo due to any AE were 30% and 27%, respectively. Conclusions: Sitra + nivo demonstrated antitumor activity and encouraging OS compared to historical controls and no new safety signals were observed in pts with NSQ NSCLC who progressed on prior CPI. This combination is being evaluated in the phase III SAPPHIRE study. Previously presented at ESMO 2021, FPN (Final Publication Number): 1191O, Ticiana Leal et al. - Reused with permission. Clinical trial identification: NCT02954991

Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Squamous NSCLC (IMpower131): Results From a Randomized Phase III Trial

Introduction: Cytotoxic agents have immunomodulatory effects, providing a rationale for combining atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 [anti–PD-L1]) with chemotherapy. The randomized phase III IMpower131 study (NCT02367794) evaluated atezolizumab with platinum-based chemotherapy in stage IV squamous NSCLC. Methods: A total of 1021 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive atezolizumabþcarboplatinþpaclitaxel (AþCP) (n ¼ 338), atezolizumabþcarboplatinþnab-paclitaxel (AþCnP) (n ¼ 343), or carboplatinþnab-paclitaxel (CnP) (n ¼ 340) for four or six 21-day cycles; patients randomized to the AþCP or AþCnP arms received atezolizumab maintenance therapy until progressive disease or loss of clinical benefit. The coprimary end points were investigatorassessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. The secondary end points included PFS and OS in PD-L1 subgroups and safety. The primary PFS (January 22, 2018) and final OS (October 3, 2018) for AþCnP versus CnP are reported. Results: PFS improvement with AþCnP versus CnP was seen in the ITT population (median, 6.3 versus 5.6 mo; hazard ratio [HR] ¼ 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60–0.85; p ¼ 0.0001). Median OS in the ITT population was 14.2 and 13.5 months in the AþCnP and CnP arms (HR ¼ 0.88, 95% CI: 0.73–1.05; p ¼ 0.16), not reaching statistical significance. OS improvement with AþCnP versus CnP was observed in the PD-L1–high subgroup (HR ¼ 0.48, 95% CI: 0.29–0.81), despite not being formally tested. Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events and serious adverse events occurred in 68.0% and 47.9% (AþCnP) and 57.5% and 28.7% (CnP) of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Adding atezolizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in patients with first-line squamous NSCLC; OS was similar between the arms

RESILIENT Part 2: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study of Liposomal Irinotecan Versus Topotecan in Adults With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE The phase III RESILIENT trial compared second-line liposomal irinotecan with topotecan in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with SCLC and progression on or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous (IV) liposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or IV topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2) daily for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks in a 6-week cycle). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS Among 461 randomly assigned patients, 229 received liposomal irinotecan and 232 received topotecan. The median follow-up was 18.4 months. The median OS was 7.9 months with liposomal irinotecan versus 8.3 months with topotecan (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.37]; P = .31). The median PFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) was 4.0 months with liposomal irinotecan and 3.3 months with topotecan (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.20]; nominal P = .71); ORR per BICR was 44.1% (95% CI, 37.6 to 50.8) and 21.6% (16.4 to 27.4), respectively. Overall, 42.0% and 83.4% of patients receiving liposomal irinotecan and topotecan, respectively, experienced grade >= 3 related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most common grade >= 3 related TEAEs were diarrhea (13.7%), neutropenia (8.0%), and decreased neutrophil count (4.4%) with liposomal irinotecan and neutropenia (51.6%), anemia (30.9%), and leukopenia (29.1%) with topotecan. CONCLUSION Liposomal irinotecan and topotecan demonstrated similar median OS and PFS in patients with relapsed SCLC. Although the primary end point of OS was not met, liposomal irinotecan demonstrated a higher ORR than topotecan. The safety profile of liposomal irinotecan was consistent with its known safety profile; no new safety concerns emerged

Randomized, Phase II Trial of Pemetrexed and Carboplatin with or without Enzastaurin versus Docetaxel and Carboplatin as First-Line Treatment of Patients with Stage IIIB/IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Enzastaurin is an oral serine/threonine kinase inhibitor that targets protein kinase C-beta (PKC-β) and the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/AKT pathway. This trial assessed pemetrexed-carboplatin ± enzastaurin to docetaxel-carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Patients with stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or IV non-small cell lung cancer and performance status 0 or 1 were randomized to one of the three arms: (A) pemetrexed 500 mg/m and carboplatin area under the curve 6 once every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles with a loading dose of enzastaurin 1125 or 1200 mg followed by 500 mg daily until disease progression, (B) the same regimen of pemetrexed-carboplatin without enzastaurin, or (C) docetaxel 75 mg/m and carboplatin area under the curve 6 once every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary end point was time to disease progression (TTP).Between March 2006 and May 2008, 218 patients were randomized. Median TTP was 4.6 months for pemetrexed-carboplatin-enzastaurin, 6.0 months for pemetrexed-carboplatin, and 4.1 months for docetaxel-carboplatin (differences not significant). Median survival was 7.2 months for pemetrexed-carboplatin-enzastaurin, 12.7 months for pemetrexed-carboplatin, and 9.2 months for docetaxel-carboplatin (log-rank = 0.05). Compared with the other arms, docetaxel-carboplatin was associated with lower rates of grade 3 thrombocytopenia and anemia but a higher rate of grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia.There was no difference in TTP between the three arms, but survival was longer with pemetrexed-carboplatin compared with docetaxel-carboplatin. Enzastaurin did not add to the activity of pemetrexed-carboplatin

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Cytochrome P450 2C9-Related Tolbutamide Drug Interactions with Sulfaphenazole and Tasisulam

Background and Objectives: Cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) is involved in the biotransformation of many commonly used drugs, and significant drug interactions have been reported for CYP2C9 substrates. Previously published physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of tolbutamide are based on an assumption that its metabolic clearance is exclusively through CYP2C9; however, many studies indicate that CYP2C9 metabolism is only responsible for 80–90% of the total clearance. Therefore, these models are not useful for predicting the magnitude of CYP2C9 drug–drug interactions (DDIs). This paper describes the development and verification of SimCYP-based PBPK models that accurately describe the human pharmacokinetics of tolbutamide when dosed alone or in combination with the CYP2C9 inhibitors sulfaphenazole and tasisulam. Methods: A PBPK model was optimized in SimCYP for tolbutamide as a CYP2C9 substrate, based on published in vitro and clinical data. This model was verified to replicate the magnitude of DDI reported with sulfaphenazole and was further applied to simulate the DDI with tasisulam, a small molecule investigated for the treatment of cancer. A clinical study (CT registration # NCT01185548) was conducted in patients with cancer to assess the pharmacokinetic interaction of tasisulum with tolbutamide. A PBPK model was built for tasisulam, and the clinical study design was replicated using the optimized tolbutamide model. Results: The optimized tolbutamide model accurately predicted the magnitude of tolbutamide AUC increase (5.3–6.2-fold) reported for sulfaphenazole. Furthermore, the PBPK simulations in a healthy volunteer population adequately predicted the increase in plasma exposure of tolbutamide in patients with cancer (predicted AUC ratio = 4.7–5.4; measured mean AUC ratio = 5.7). Conclusions: This optimized tolbutamide PBPK model was verified with two strong CYP2C9 inhibitors and can be applied to the prediction of CYP2C9 interactions for novel inhibitors. Furthermore, this work highlights the utility of mechanistic models in navigating the challenges in conducting clinical pharmacology studies in cancer patients