Estimating the burden of minor ailment consultations in general practices and emergency departments through retrospective review of routine data in North East Scotland

Minor ailment attendances in general practices and emergency departments (EDs) place significant burden on health care resources

Challenging the Moral Status of Blood Donation

The World Health Organisation encourages that blood donation becomes voluntary and unremunerated, a system already operated in the UK. Drawing on public documents and videos, this paper argues that blood donation is regarded and presented as altruistic and supererogatory. In advertisements, donation is presented as something undertaken for the benefit of others, a matter attracting considerable gratitude from recipients and the collecting organisation. It is argued that regarding blood donation as an act of supererogation is wrongheaded, and an alternative account of blood donation as moral obligation is presented. Two arguments are offered in support of this position. First, the principle of beneficence, understood in a broad consequentialist framework obliges donation where the benefit to the recipient is large and the cost to the donor relatively small. This argument can be applied, with differing levels of normativity, to various acts of donation. Second, the wrongness of free riding requires individuals to contribute to collective systems from which they benefit. Alone and in combination these arguments present moral reasons for donation, recognised in communication strategies elsewhere. Research is required to evaluate the potential effects on donation of a campaign which presents blood donation as moral obligation, but of wider importance is the recognition that other-regarding considerations in relation to our own as well as others’ health result in a range not only of choices but also of obligations

Validation of a Hospital Clinical Pharmacy Workforce Calculator: A methodology for Pharmacy?

Background: The benefits of clinical pharmacy services are established within hospital practice but staff numbers required for service delivery are not well described and staffing levels vary. The need for a consistent, objective method of determining staffing levels was recognised at a UK University Hospital and a Clinical Pharmacy Workforce Calculator (CPWC) was developed. Objective: To develop the Activity Standard (AS) for pharmaceutical care and establish the reliability of the CPWC across acute hospital settings in UK. Setting: Acute hospital in-patient clinical pharmacy services on medical and surgical wards Method: Using the World Health Organisation’s Workload Indicators of Staffing Need (WISN) methodology, a two-round Delphi study was undertaken. This developed the Activity Standard for pharmaceutical care and identified the staff-time unavailable for clinical work. Consenting panel members then tested the CPWC, calculating the staff required for three scenarios to determine whether it could be reliably used by different operators. Results: Thirty-six participants consented to participate. Data was returned from 22 (61%) of whom 20 (56%) supplied analysable data. Consensus was achieved on the tasks required for pharmaceutical care delivery, the mean time each takes, how frequently they should be completed and the time unavailable for clinical work for each grade of staff. The CPWC calculates staffing requirements using this data. Eleven participants (55%) tested the CPWC and analysis of responses demonstrated that 30 of 33 (91%) calculations were accurately completed. Discussion: This study defined the WISN Activity Standard for UK pharmaceutical care delivery to hospital inpatients and showed content validity for the CPWC in acute medical and surgical hospital settings. Different operators used the CPWC reliably and applied it to local sites. Conclusion: The CPWC offers hospital pharmacy managers a useful tool to negotiate adequate staffing to deliver pharmaceutical care. Its development methodology could be applied widely in pharmacy practice