244 research outputs found
eCommerce for Small Enterprise Development: a Handbook for Entrepreneurs in Developing Countries
eCommerce for Small Enterprise Development: a Handbook for Enterprise Support Agencies in Developing Countries
Open source challenges for hospital information system (HIS) in developing countries: a pilot project in Mali
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We are currently witnessing a significant increase in use of Open Source tools in the field of health. Our study aims to research the potential of these software packages for developing countries. Our experiment was conducted at the Centre Hospitalier Mere Enfant in Mali.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>After reviewing several Open Source tools in the field of hospital information systems, Mediboard software was chosen for our study. To ensure the completeness of Mediboard in relation to the functionality required for a hospital information system, its features were compared to those of a well-defined comprehensive record management tool set up at the University Hospital "La Timone" of Marseilles in France. It was then installed on two Linux servers: a first server for testing and validation of different modules, and a second one for the deployed full implementation. After several months of use, we have evaluated the usability aspects of the system including feedback from end-users through a questionnaire.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Initial results showed the potential of Open Source in the field of health IT for developing countries like Mali.</p> <p>Five main modules have been fully implemented: patient administrative and medical records management of hospital activities, tracking of practitioners' activities, infrastructure management and the billing system. This last component of the system has been fully developed by the local Mali team.</p> <p>The evaluation showed that the system is broadly accepted by all the users who participated in the study. 77% of the participants found the system useful; 85% found it easy; 100% of them believe the system increases the reliability of data. The same proportion encourages the continuation of the experiment and its expansion throughout the hospital.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In light of the results, we can conclude that the objective of our study was reached. However, it is important to take into account the recommendations and the challenges discussed here to avoid several potential pitfalls specific to the context of Africa.</p> <p>Our future work will target the full integration of the billing module in Mediboard and an expanded implementation throughout the hospital.</p
Developing an Analytical Framework for Analyzing and Comparing National E-Government Strategies
Responsible, Inclusive Innovation and the Nano-divide
Policy makers from around the world are trying to emulate successful innovation systems in order to support economic growth. At the same time, innovation governance systems are being put in place to ensure a better integration of stakeholder views into the research and development process. In Europe, one of the most prominent and newly emerging governance frameworks is called Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). This article aims to substantiate the following points: (1) The concept of RRI and the concept of justice can be used to derive similar ethical positions on the nano-divide. (2) Given the ambitious policy aims of RRI (e.g. economic competitiveness enhancer), the concept may be better suited to push for ethical outcomes on access to nanotechnology and its products rather than debates based on justice issues alone. It may thus serve as a mediator concept between those who push solely for competitiveness considerations and those who push solely for justice considerations in nano-technology debates. (3) The descriptive, non-normative Systems of Innovation approaches (see below) should be linked into RRI debates to provide more evidence on whether the approach advocated to achieve responsible and ethical governance of research and innovation (R&I) can indeed deliver on competitiveness (in nano-technology and other fields)
Southern theories in ICT4D
This paper suggests that the dominance of northern research paradigms in ICT4D may be viewed as a continuation of colonial sway over the endeavors of the global South. The notion of Southern Theory - as introduced in the work of Raewyn Connell, the Comaroffs, and others - may be a route by which re-searchers in the global South can reclaim the intellectual territory of ICT4D, with indigenous and regional research paradigms and theories rather than those simply absorbed from the global North
Factors affecting e-government adoption in Liberia: A practitioner perspective
Globally, eâgovernment implementation is growing, including in subâSaharan Africa, evidenced by the frequently reported benefits of eâgovernment programs in developed countries. The government of Liberia is pursuing an eâgovernment agenda to improve governance through the effective and efficient use of technology in the public sector. Liberia, one of the most underdeveloped countries in the world is bedeviled by over 10âyears of civil war and most recently an Ebola virus outbreak which created severe human capacity gaps. The government has realized that in order to accelerate development and enhance its peoples' livelihood, it must integrate technology into its public administration procedures. However, the implementation of eâgovernment in Liberia has had mixed success. The objective of this research is to identify critical factors affecting the implementation of eâgovernment in Liberia. To achieve this aim, a reflective practitioner approach is employed as a lens to collect and guide the analysis of qualitative data. The data are collected through focus group discussion with senior IT practitioners (CIOs) of Liberia who are leading the delivery of eâinitiatives in Liberia. The factors identified are intended to guide how eâgovernment initiatives are implemented in Liberia. This research contributes to raising awareness about Liberia's eâgovernment program
Why Do Evaluations of eHealth Programs Fail? An Alternative Set of Guiding Principles
Trisha Greenhalgh and Jill Russell discuss the relative merits of âscientificâ and âsocial practiceâ approaches to evaluation and argue that eHealth evaluation is in need of a paradigm shift
- âŠ