29 research outputs found

    Central neurogenetic signatures of the visuomotor integration system

    Get PDF
    Visuomotor impairments characterize numerous neurological disorders and neurogenetic syndromes, such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and Dravet, Fragile X, Prader-Willi, Turner, and Williams syndromes. Despite recent advances in systems neuroscience, the biological basis underlying visuomotor functional impairments associated with these clinical conditions is poorly understood. In this study, we used neuroimaging connectomic approaches to map the visuomotor integration (VMI) system in the human brain and investigated the topology approximation of the VMI network to the Allen Human Brain Atlas, a whole-brain transcriptome-wide atlas of cortical genetic expression. We found the genetic expression of four genes-TBR1, SCN1A, MAGEL2, and CACNB4-to be prominently associated with visuomotor integrators in the human cortex. TBR1 gene transcripts, an ASD gene whose expression is related to neural development of the cortex and the hippocampus, showed a central spatial allocation within the VMI system. Our findings delineate gene expression traits underlying the VMI system in the human cortex, where specific genes, such as TBR1, are likely to play a central role in its neuronal organization, as well as on specific phenotypes of neurogenetic syndromes

    Opposing brain differences in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers

    Get PDF
    Deletions and duplications of the recurrent ∼600 kb chromosomal BP4–BP5 region of 16p11.2 are associated with a broad variety of neurodevelopmental outcomes including autism spectrum disorder. A clue to the pathogenesis of the copy number variant (CNV)'s effect on the brain is that the deletion is associated with a head size increase, whereas the duplication is associated with a decrease. Here we analyzed brain structure in a clinically ascertained group of human deletion (N = 25) and duplication (N = 17) carriers from the Simons Variation in Individuals Project compared with age-matched controls (N = 29 and 33, respectively). Multiple brain measures showed increased size in deletion carriers and reduced size in duplication carriers. The effects spanned global measures of intracranial volume, brain size, compartmental measures of gray matter and white matter, subcortical structures, and the cerebellum. Quantitatively, the largest effect was on the thalamus, but the collective results suggest a pervasive rather than a selective effect on the brain. Detailed analysis of cortical gray matter revealed that cortical surface area displays a strong dose-dependent effect of CNV (deletion > control > duplication), whereas average cortical thickness is less affected. These results suggest that the CNV may exert its opposing influences through mechanisms that influence early stages of embryonic brain development

    Abstracts from the 3rd International Genomic Medicine Conference (3rd IGMC 2015)

    Get PDF

    Abstract 1122‐000044: Endovascular Thrombectomy for Straight Sinus Thrombosis

    No full text
    Introduction: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is an under‐recognized disease that accounts for roughly 1% of all strokes1. It presents a diagnostic challenge due to its varied and ambiguous presentation, which on average, delays diagnosis by 7 days. Pre‐disposing factors include trauma, pregnancy, dehydration, and medications such as oral contraceptives. In one study, 50% of CVT occurred during pregnancy or puerperium2. Seven out of 8 cases of CVT presented postpartum among 50,700 deliveries in Canada3. Clinical signs and symptoms range from a mild headache to decreased level of consciousness depending on the location of thrombosis. Up to 13% of individuals can have poor outcomes despite anticoagulation therapy. Methods: A 28‐year‐old, 7‐week postpartum female awoke with a headache and difficulty speaking, followed by urinary and bowel incontinence. Her clinical status worsened and was admitted to an outside hospital where CT‐head without contrast revealed right temporal lobe hypodensity. A hyperdense straight sinus sign was present but not recognized at that time. She was transferred to our hospital and MRI brain demonstrated extensive vasogenic edema in the basal ganglia, thalami, and deep white matter with cytotoxic edema in bilateral watershed areas from severe hydrocephalus. MR‐Venography showed extensive cerebral venous thrombosis in the inferior sagittal sinus, vein of Galen, straight sinus, and left transverse and sigmoid sinuses. Upon transfer to our facility, NIHSS was 9 for decreased level of consciousness and aphasia with episodes of left‐sided clonic movements. Despite adequate anticoagulation therapy, she continued to decline with extensor posturing and a comatose state. Results: Since the findings on MRI‐brain were predominantly vasogenic edema, thrombectomy was performed with a stent‐retriever and aspiration, with complete recanalization of her straight sinus. Subsequent MRIs demonstrated improvement and resolution of the edema and hydrocephalus. Hypercoagulable work‐up revealed an elevated protein C and antithrombin III and she was transitioned to enoxaparin and discharged to LTACH. At four‐month follow‐up she was able to speak and walk with physical therapy. Conclusions: We highlight the importance of early recognition of deep venous thrombosis as it commonly affects level of consciousness. A subtle finding, it should be in the differential diagnosis of alteration in level of consciousness without obvious neuroimaging findings. The AAN guidelines for management of CVT do not advocate for thrombectomy in all patients as large randomized controlled trials do not currently exist. However, they recognize that thrombectomy may be considered if deterioration occurs despite intensive anticoagulation treatment. The TO‐ACT trial found no significant difference in mortality between intervention and medical therapy, aggressive intervention with thrombectomy prevented a larger stroke burden in our patient. Therefore, thrombectomy should be considered in patients suffering from CVT, particularly in refractory and extensive cases

    Perfusion imaging predicts favorable outcomes after basilar artery thrombectomy

    No full text
    Objective: Perfusion imaging identifies anterior circulation stroke patients who respond favorably to endovascular thrombectomy (ET), but its role in basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is unknown. We hypothesized that BAO patients with limited regions of severe hypoperfusion (time to reach maximum concentration in seconds [Tmax] &gt; 10) would have a favorable response to ET compared to patients with more extensive regions involved. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of BAO patients with perfusion imaging prior to ET. We prespecified a Critical Area Perfusion Score (CAPS; 0-6 points), which quantified severe hypoperfusion (Tmax &gt; 10) in cerebellum (1 point/hemisphere), pons (2 points), and midbrain and/or thalamus (2 points). Patients were dichotomized into favorable (CAPS ≤ 3) and unfavorable (CAPS &gt; 3) groups. The primary outcome was a favorable functional outcome 90 days after ET (modified Rankin Scale = 0-3). Results: One hundred three patients were included. CAPS ≤ 3 patients (87%) had a lower median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS; 12.5, interquartile range [IQR] = 7-22) compared to CAPS &gt; 3 patients (13%; 23, IQR = 19-36; p = 0.01). Reperfusion was achieved in 84% of all patients, with no difference between CAPS groups (p = 0.42). Sixty-four percent of reperfused CAPS ≤ 3 patients had a favorable outcome compared to 8% of nonreperfused CAPS ≤ 3 patients (odds ratio [OR] = 21.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.6-170; p &lt; 0.001). No CAPS &gt; 3 patients had a favorable outcome, regardless of reperfusion. In a multivariate regression analysis, CAPS ≤ 3 was a robust independent predictor of favorable outcome after adjustment for reperfusion, age, and pre-ET NIHSS (OR = 39.25, 95% CI = 1.34-&gt;999, p = 0.04). Interpretation: BAO patients with limited regions of severe hypoperfusion had a favorable response to reperfusion following ET. However, patients with more extensive regions of hypoperfusion in critical brain regions did not benefit from endovascular reperfusion. ANN NEUROL 2022;91:23-32.</p
    corecore