Molecular Targets for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Over the past years, colorectal cancer (CRC) was subtyped according to its molecular and genetic characteristics, allowing the development of therapeutic strategies, based on predictive biomarkers. Biomarkers such as microsatellite instability (MSI), RAS and BRAF mutations, HER2 amplification or NTRK fusions represent major tools for personalized therapeutic strategies. Moreover, the routine implementation of molecular predictive tests provides new perspectives and challenges for the therapeutic management of CRC patients, such as liquid biopsies and the reintroduction of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. In this review, we summarize the current landscape of targeted therapies for metastatic CRC patients, with a focus on new developments for EGFR blockade and emerging biomarkers (MSI, HER2, NTRK)

Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Harboring Microsatellite Instability or Mismatch Repair Deficiency

International audienceMicrosatellite instability (MSI) is a tumor phenotype related to a deficient DNA mismatch repair system (dMMR). This phenotype, observed in 5% of metastatic mCRC but 10–18% of localized CRC, is associated with high tumor mutational burden with highly immunogenic neoantigens. It has emerged as a major predictive biomarker for the efficacy of ICIs. In this review, we will present a comprehensive overview of the literature concerning the efficacy of ICIs in MSI/dMMR mCRC, with a focus on new developments in first-line metastatic setting. Then, we will present current and future challenges of immuno-oncology for patients with MSI/dMMR metastatic CRC

Targetable Molecular Alterations in the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancers: An Overview of the Available Treatments

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare tumours, most often diagnosed at an unresectable stage, associated with poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate not exceeding 10%. Only first- and second-line treatments are well codified with the combination of cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy and immunotherapy followed by 5-FU and oxaliplatin chemotherapy, respectively. Many studies have shown that BTC, and more particularly intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), have a high rate of targetable somatic alteration. To date, the FDA has approved several drugs. Ivosidenib targeting IDH1 mutations, as well as futibatinib and pemigatinib targeting FGFR2 fusions, are approved for pre-treated advanced CCA. The combination of dabrafenib and trametinib are approved for BRAFV600E mutated advanced tumours, NTRK inhibitors entrectinib and larotrectinib for tumours bearing NTRK fusion and prembrolizumab for MSI-H advanced tumours, involving a small percentage of BTC in these three settings. Several other potentially targetable alterations are found in BTC, such as HER2 mutations or amplifications or KRASG12C mutations and mutations in genes involved in DNA repair mechanisms. This review aims to clarify the specific diagnostic modalities for gene alterations and to summarize the results of the main trials and developments underway for the management of advanced BTC with targetable alterations

Treatments after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with dMMR/MSI Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

International audienceBackground: Several studies reported improved outcomes with conventional treatments (CT, i.e., chemotherapy ± targeted therapy) administered after immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) in certain tumor types. No data are available concerning patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI). We aimed to assess the outcomes of dMMR/MSI mCRC pts receiving CT after ICI failure.Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study investigating the outcomes of all dMMR/MSI mCRC pts who received post-ICI CT between 2015 and 2020.Results: 31 pts (male 61%, median age 56 years) were included. ICI was an anti-PD(L)1 monotherapy in 71% of pts, and 61% received >2 lines before post-ICI CT. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 13% and 45%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival of 2.9 and 7.4 months, respectively. No association of the outcomes with either ICI efficacy or anti-angiogenic agents was observed. Prolonged PFS (range 16.1-21.3 months) was observed in 4 pts (13%).Conclusions: Although conducted on a limited number of patients, our results do not support an association of previous ICI treatment with an enhanced efficacy of CT in dMMR/MSI mCRC. However, prolonged disease control was observed in several cases, suggesting that some pts might derive an unexpected benefit from post-ICI treatments

Nutrition and physical activity professional education in gastrointestinal oncology: a national multidisciplinary survey

Objectives Sarcopenia, present in more than 50% of digestive oncology patients, has a negative impact on clinical outcomes. Nutrition and adapted physical activity are two major interventions for the management of sarcopenia. However, young hepato-gastroenterologists, oncologists and surgeons in France have limited awareness on these topics. We aimed to evaluate the need for training programmes of physicians (residents and senior doctors) involved in digestive oncology on nutrition and adapted physical activity. Methods A 42-question survey was developed, by a working group of clinicians, dieticians and adapted physical activity teachers, to assess five areas related to demographics of respondents, nutrition practices, nutrition training, adapted physical activity practices and adapted physical activity training. The national survey was undertaken between April and July of 2019. Results 230 physicians participated in the survey; 34% were hepato-gastroenterologists, 31% were oncologists, 23% were surgeons and 40% were residents. Sixty-one per cent of participants had received training in nutrition and only 21% in adapted physical activity. Ninety per cent of the physicians expressed their desire for more effective training on these two topics. Disparities in clinical practices were observed between hepato-gastroenterologists, oncologists and surgeons. Conclusions More initial and continuing training on nutrition and adapted physical activity is needed for French physicians in the current digestive oncology clinical practice

Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab and adjuvant nivolumab in patients (pts) with localized microsatellite instability-high (MSI)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) oeso-gastric adenocarcinoma (OGA): The GERCOR NEONIPIGA phase II study

International audienceBackground: In pts with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma or OGA, radical surgery is the only curative option and perioperative chemotherapy seems worthless for those with MSI/dMMR tumors. Methods: We conducted phase II study evaluating the efficacy of neo-adjuvant nivolumab and ipilimumab followed by adjuvant nivolumab in pts with resectable MSI/dMMR, T2-T4 NxM0 tumors. Treatment consisted of nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks (6 infusions) and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks (2 infusions), followed by radical surgery 5 weeks (±1 week) after last injection of nivolumab. Pts with Becker tumor regression grade (TRG) < 3 were treated with adjuvant nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks (9 infusions). The primary objective was pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Results: From 10/2019 to 06/2021, a total of 32 pts were enrolled (all had dMMR±MSI-H status; 16 with gastric cancer and 16 with OGA). The median age was 65.5 years (range, 40-80). Initial stage was: usT3Nx = 22, usT2Nx = 4, and usTxNx = 6 (not evaluable by ultrasound endoscopy). At data lock, 32 pts had terminated neo-adjuvant period and 27 (84%) completed all 6 neo-adjuvant cycles. 8 pts (32%) experienced G3/4 adverse events (AEs) during neo-adjuvant treatment. 29 pts underwent surgery; 2 refused surgery and had complete endoscopic response with tumor-free biopsies, 1 had surgery not performed in relation with a metastatic progression. The median delay between last injection and surgery was 35 days (extreme, 25-170). Overall surgical morbidity (54%, n = 14) was related to: anastomotic leakage = 4, pancreatitis = 2, pneumonia = 2, and other = 6. The incidence of post-operative mortality was 3.8% (n = 1) due to cardiovascular AE at post-operative day 3. All the 29 pts who underwent surgery had R0 resection: 17 (59%) had pCR (i.e., TRG 1a as per Becker grade, ypT0N0) and 4 (14%) had TRG 1b as per Beker grade (< 10% residual tumor per tumor bed). 1 pt had TRG 2 (10-50% of residual tumor) and 7 pts had TRG 3 (˃50% of residual tumor) as per Becker grade, per local pathological assessment (central pathological review is awaited). With a median follow-up of 10.9 months, 1 pt had metastatic relapse, 1 pt died without relapse and 30 pts were recurrence/progression-free. Conclusions: Neo-adjuvant therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab is feasible and is associated with a high pCR rate in pts with MSI/dMMR resectable OGA. Data will be updated for the congress. Clinical trial information: NCT04006262

Patients atteints d’un cancer gastrique localisé MSI/dMMR, pas de chimiothérapie mais une immunothérapie périopératoire : l’essai de phase II GERCOR NEONIPIGA vient d’être ouvert au recrutement

International audienceIntroductionPerioperative chemotherapy is the standard strategy for localized gastric cancers. Nevertheless, this strategy seems to be inefficient, if not deleterious, for patients with tumors harboring microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), a tumor phenotype predictive for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICKi).AimThe GERCOR NEONIPIGA single-arm phase II study (NCT04006262; EUDRACT 2018-004712-22) aims at evaluating the efficacy of a peri-operative strategy with nivolumab and ipilimumab in neoadjuvant setting, then nivolumab alone after surgery for patients with resectable MSI/dMMR gastric cancer.Material and methodsMain inclusion criteria are: gastric and oesogastric junction adenocarcinoma (GOA), T2-T4, all N stage and M0, MSI/dMMR. Patients will be treated with nivolumab 240 mg Q2 W, 6 infusions, and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6 W, 2 infusions in neoadjuvant setting. Following surgery, patients with TRG 1-2-3 (Mandard tumor regression grade), acceptable tolerance of neoadjuvant treatment and postoperative ECOG performance status 0–1, will be treated with adjuvant nivolumab 480 mg Q4 W, 9 infusions.ResultsThe primary endpoint is pathological complete response rate (pCR-R). Based on a Fleming design, with α = 5% and β = 20%, 27 patients have to be evaluated (H0 = 5%; H1 = 20%). Secondary endpoints include disease-free survival, overall survival and safety.ConclusionThis study is planned to include 32 patients to evaluate the pCR-R with the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in neoadjuvant setting for MSI/dMMR localized GOA. The MSI/MMR status should be systematically assessed on diagnostic biopsies of all GOA. If it meets its primary endpoint, the GERCOR NEONIPIGA study might mark a turning point in the management of localized MSI/dMMR GOA patients.IntroductionLa chimiothérapie périopératoire est la stratégie de référence pour les cancers gastriques (CG) localisés, mais semble inefficace voire délétère pour les patients avec un cancer MSI/dMMR (microsatellites instables/MMR-déficient), biomarqueur prédictif de l’efficacité de l’immunothérapie.ObjectifL’essai de phase 2 mono-bras GERCOR NEONIPIGA (NCT04006262; EUDRACT 2018-004712-22) évalue l’efficacité du nivolumab plus ipilimumab en néo-adjuvant puis nivolumab seul en adjuvant pour les CG ou de la jonction œsogastrique (JOG) MSI/dMMR résécables.Matériel et méthodesLes principaux critères d’inclusion sont : CG/JOG, T2-4 tout N M0, MSI/dMMR. Les patients sont traités en néo-adjuvant par nivolumab 240 mg Q2 W, 6 perfusions, et ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6 W, deux injections. Les patients avec un degré de régression tumorale 1-3 selon Mandard, une tolérance acceptable du traitement néo-adjuvant et un indice de performance postopératoire ECOG 0-1 recevront neuf perfusions mensuelles de nivolumab 480 mg en adjuvant.RésultatsL’objectif principal est le taux de réponse complète pathologique (pCR). Selon un design de Fleming avec α = 5 % et β = 20 %, 27 patients évaluables sont à analyser (H0 = 5 % ; H1 = 20 %). Les critères secondaires de jugement sont la survie sans maladie, la survie globale et le profil de tolérance.ConclusionIl est prévu d’inclure 32 patients pour évaluer le taux de pCR pour les CG/JOG MSI/dMMR traités par nivolumab et ipilimumab néo-adjuvant. Le statut MSI/MMR doit être systématiquement analysé sur les biopsies diagnostiques de tout CG/JOG. L’étude NEONIPIGA pourrait marquer un tournant dans la prise en charge des CG/JOG MSI/dMMR si elle atteint son objectif principal