The dyadic self-care experience of stroke survivors and their caregivers: A qualitative descriptive study

background promoting self-care is the core response strategy of the global health system to the burden of stroke. although self-care in stroke represents a dyadic phenomenon, the dyadic self-care experience of stroke survivors and their caregivers is often overlooked in clinical practice. objectives the aim of this study was to explore the dyadic self-care experience of stroke survivors and their caregivers. design a descriptive qualitative design was used to conduct the study. results the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research was used for study reporting. a total of 21 stroke survivor-caregiver dyads were recruited for this study between may 2022 and september 2022. data were collected through semistructured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. In this study, four themes were identified: (1) poor relationship quality of the dyads, (2) dyadic incongruence in managing stroke, (3) a slow and tiring dyadic self-care process and (4) happy cooperation in coping with dyadic self-care. discussion and conclusion healthcare professionals should give greater consideration to the contradictions and disparities that may arise between stroke survivors and caregivers during the self-care process. It is crucial for them to provide personalized and tailored support and interventions that can assist these individuals in achieving a more optimal balance in their dyadic self-care. patient/public contribution patients were involved in the formulation of interview questions for this study. no members of the public were involved in this study

Nurses and Stigma at the Time of COVID-19: A Phenomenological Study

The COVID-19 pandemic is putting strain on every country in the world and their health systems. Healthcare professionals struggle on the frontline and they can experience stigma, which can create difficulties in controlling epidemic diseases, influencing the mental health of healthcare professionals, caregivers, families, communities, and the provided quality of care. The aim of this study is to explore the lived experience of Italian nurses about perceived stigma during COVID-19 pandemic with the phenomenological Cohen method. The principal themes that emerged from data analysis were “stigma in the working environment” and “stigma in everyday life”. Each of these themes had subthemes: “looks like gun sights”, “avoiding closeness to others”, “nobody wants to touch you”, and “the fault of being your family members”. Public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, are stressful events for individuals and communities. Stigma can be more dangerous than the disease, and a major obstacle to appropriate medical and mental health interventions. Understanding how healthcare professionals experience stigma is essential to design and implement specific educational, psychological, and organisational programmes

Assessment of facial asymmetry using stereophotogrammetry

Asymmetry in the dimensions and spatial position of facial structures is a common finding in healthy individuals and in esthetically pleasing faces (1). Additionally, a variety of craniofacial anomalies are characterized by severe hard- and soft-tissue asymmetry (2). Facial asymmetry can impair the affected people from both aesthetical and functional points of view. Currently, facial asymmetry is mainly evaluated using the entire facial surface, thus providing measurements that give only general information about facial morphology. In contrast, several pathologies affecting facial appearance are localized in selected parts of the face, and a local assessment can provide helpful information for clinical decisions. For these reasons a detailed, focused and objective evaluation of facial asymmetry is advised, both for surgical planning and treatment evaluation. In this study we present a new quantitative method to assess symmetry in different facial thirds, objectively defined on the territories of distribution of trigeminal branches. Forty healthy young adults (21 women; 19 men; average age 39 ± 12 years) were acquired with a stereophotogrammetric system and the level of asymmetry of their hemi-facial thirds was evaluated, comparing the root mean square of the distances (RMSD) between their original and mirrored facial surfaces. The method resulted highly reproducible (Bland and Altman coefficient of reproducibility for area selection, 98.8%). In the upper facial third, median asymmetry was 0.726 mm (IQ range: 0.579-0.954 mm); in the middle facial third, median asymmetry was 0.739 mm (IQ range: 0.558-0.887 mm); in the lower facial third, median asymmetry was 0.679 mm (IQ range: 0.552-0.907 mm). No significant differences in RMSD values among the facial thirds were found (ANOVA, p>0.05). The presented method provides an accurate, reproducible and local facial symmetry analysis, that can be used for different conditions, especially when only part of the face is asymmetric.This work was supported by grants from University of Milan (Grant for Research 2015-2017)

Evaluation of different registration approaches in 3D cephalometric landmark estimation

Thanks to the development of dedicated CBCT scanners, 3D cephalometric analysis is become a widely used tool for the diagnosis and treatment of dentofacial disharmonies in maxillofacial surgery and dentistry [1]. Traditionally, an expert manually annotates a set of cephalometric landmarks on a CBCT scan. Accuracy and repeatability of this manual approach are limited because of intra- and inter-subject variability in landmarks identification [2]. To improve the manual annotation, we are developing a nearly-automatic method that estimates the positions of a set of landmarks registering a previously annotated reference subject to the patient skull. In this study, in order to reduce the estimation error, we compare different registration approaches by varying two registration parameters, such as elasticity (affine or elastic) and domain (local or global) of geometric transformation. The algorithms were tested on 21 CBCT scans of adult caucasian women. To evaluate the outcome of the registration process, Euclidean distances in the 3D space between automatically and manually annotated landmarks were computed. Finally, for each landmark, accuracy and precision of the annotation process were calculated as the mean and standard deviation of the distances of the analyzed sample. Results show that the combination of a global affine registration followed by a global elastic registration significantly reduces the annotation error (p<0.001), increasing both accuracy (p<0.001) and precision (p>0.05). Paired Student’s t tests were used for comparisons. The obtained results are promising, nevertheless the study should be continued in order to reduce further estimation error

Morphometric parameters for nasal septum deviation identification in CBCT data

Advances in the upper airway imaging allow to better evaluate and understand their morphology, pathology and mechanics [1]. In particular, Cone beam CT technology (CBCT), with its isotropic spatial resolution, undistorted images, X-ray lower radiation exposure, versatility and relatively low cost, takes over other imaging modalities [2]. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether CBCT scans can be valuable tools for the extraction of quantitative parameters to confirm the deviation of the nasal septum in a specific patient. First, we assessed the difference in angle of septal deviation, calculated as proposed by Orhan et al., among a control group and a patient group [3]. Subsequently, we evaluated the percentage difference between the volume of the upper airways in the right side and left side of the nose in the same sample. The measurements were performed on 23 CBCT scans of Caucasian adult women, divided into 7 control subjects and 16 patients. The results demonstrate that there is a significant difference both in the deviation angle (p<0.05) and in the volume difference between healthy and patient subjects (p<0.001). Duplicate measurements of the deviation angle and the volume found no significant difference (p>0.05); random errors explained 0.77% (angle) and 0.99% (volume) of the sample variance. Paired Student’s t tests were used for comparisons. In particular, the volume difference appears to be less sensitive to the presence of isolated cartilaginous ridges that increase the angle of deviation even if the septum is not pathological. This makes it more suited to the identification of this pathology. The obtained outcomes are encouraging and it is advisable to continue the study on a larger sample

Comparison of direct linear measurements on dental plaster cast and digital measurements obtained from laser scanner and Cone-Beam CT dental models

Different dental imaging technologies are now daily used in clinical practice to evaluate oral anatomy. These new techniques allow to replace dental plaster casts with digital models that are easier to manage and store. Such models can be acquired with optical methods like laser scanner, stereophotogrammetry and intraoral scanner or reconstructed by 3D CT or CBCT images [1]. Since these digital casts are used in clinical routine, it is important to evaluate accuracy and reliability of measurements taken from them, in relation to traditional methods [2]. We wanted to compare linear measurements taken on digital models obtained from CBCT images and laser scanner surfaces, with direct measurements obtained with digital calliper on dental plaster casts. Data from 6 adult Caucasian subjects with full dentition, no history of implant surgery and without dental filling were obtained. The absence of implants and metal fillings was selected as inclusion criterion to reduce the presence of metal artefacts that can affect the measurement process. All patients were retrospectively selected from a clinical database and underwent CBCT examination for clinical reasons uncorrelated with this study. Six dental distances in the upper and six in the lower jaw were examined: the mesio-distal distance of teeth 21, 23, 24 and 26, the palatal-vestibular distance of teeth 24 and 26, and the corresponding distances on teeth 41, 43, 44 and 46. All measurements were performed using: 1) a digital calliper on dental plaster casts; 2) a virtual calliper on digital models obtained from CBCT images; and 3) a virtual calliper on laser scanner surfaces. Kruskal-Wallis test compared measurements performed with the 3 different techniques. There was no statistical significant difference among different techniques for all measurements (p>0.05) except for one distance, the mesio-distal distance of tooth 24 (

Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility in manual point picking during 3D cephalometry on CBCT data

Three-dimensional cephalometry is currently emerging as an innovative diagnos- tic tool, due to accessibility and radiation low dose of Cone Beam CT (CBCT) scan ners (1). Despite annotation made by specialists is now considered the gold standard in clinical practice and research, reliability of manual point picking can be biased by intra and inter-operator differences (2). In order to estimate the variability of the manual procedure, in this study an evaluation of accuracy, precision and reproducibility was performed. Three experienced operators analyzed ten CBCT images, retrospectively selected from the SST Dentofacial Clinic database. They annotated 9 chosen landmarks on all the images for three times, under the same conditions and at least one week of distance. Accuracy and precision were calculated as the median and the interquartile range of the distances from each landmark to the corresponding barycenter, calculated as the mean of all operator annotations. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to evaluate reproducibility, and post-hoc tests were carried out to assess whether the significance depended from operators. A remarkable difference was found in accuracy between anatomic and geometrical landmarks, in both the intra and inter-operator repetitions. The intra-operator analysis showed higher accuracy and precision values than the inter-operator one. Statistical analyses revealed significant differences in reproducibility (p<0.05) for all landmarks except for Sella turcica, but the post-hoc tests did not show a clear pattern between operators. Results demonstrate that both accuracy and reproducibility may vary, depending on the operators, suggesting the need for automatic or semiautomatic tools that will help the operator during annotation

The impact of anastomotic leak on long-term oncological outcomes after low anterior resection for mid-low rectal cancer: extended follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

The impact of anastomotic leaks (AL) on oncological outcomes after low anterior resection for mid-low rectal cancer is still debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local and distant recurrence in patients with AL following low anterior resection

Minimally invasive vs. open segmental resection of the splenic flexure for cancer: a nationwide study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology-Colorectal Cancer Network (SICO-CNN)

Background Evidence on the efficacy of minimally invasive (MI) segmental resection of splenic flexure cancer (SFC) is not available, mostly due to the rarity of this tumor. This study aimed to determine the survival outcomes of MI and open treatment, and to investigate whether MI is noninferior to open procedure regarding short-term outcomes. Methods This nationwide retrospective cohort study included all consecutive SFC segmental resections performed in 30 referral centers between 2006 and 2016. The primary endpoint assessing efficacy was the overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included cancer-specific mortality (CSM), recurrence rate (RR), short-term clinical outcomes (a composite of Clavien-Dindo > 2 complications and 30-day mortality), and pathological outcomes (a composite of lymph nodes removed >= 12, and proximal and distal free resection margins length >= 5 cm). For these composites, a 6% noninferiority margin was chosen based on clinical relevance estimate. Results A total of 606 patients underwent either an open (208, 34.3%) or a MI (398, 65.7%) SFC segmental resection. At univariable analysis, OS and CSM were improved in the MI group (log-rank test p = 0.004 and Gray's tests p = 0.004, respectively), while recurrences were comparable (Gray's tests p = 0.434). Cox multivariable analysis did not support that OS and CSM were better in the MI group (p = 0.109 and p = 0.163, respectively). Successful pathological outcome, observed in 53.2% of open and 58.3% of MI resections, supported noninferiority (difference 5.1%; 1-sided 95%CI - 4.7% to infinity). Successful short-term clinical outcome was documented in 93.3% of Open and 93.0% of MI procedures, and supported noninferiority as well (difference - 0.3%; 1-sided 95%CI - 5.0% to infinity). Conclusions Among patients with SFC, the minimally invasive approach met the criterion for noninferiority for postoperative complications and pathological outcomes, and was found to provide results of OS, CSM, and RR comparable to those of open resection

Segmental transverse colectomy. Minimally invasive versus open approach: results from a multicenter collaborative study

none65noThe role of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of transverse colon cancer is still controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the advantages of a totally laparoscopic technique comparing open versus laparoscopic/robotic approach. Three hundred and eighty-eight patients with transverse colon cancer, treated with a segmental colon resection, were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, tumor stage, operative time, intraoperative complications, number of harvested lymph nodes and recovery outcomes were recorded. Recurrences and death were also evaluated during the follow-up. No differences were found between conventional and minimally invasive surgery, both for oncological long-term outcomes (recurrence rate p = 0.28; mortality p = 0.62) and postoperative complications (overall rate p = 0.43; anemia p = 0.78; nausea p = 0.68; infections p = 0.91; bleeding p = 0.62; anastomotic leak p = 0.55; ileus p = 0.75). Nevertheless, recovery outcomes showed statistically significant differences in favor of minimally invasive surgery in terms of time to first flatus (p = 0.001), tolerance to solid diet (p = 0.017), time to first mobilization (p = 0.001) and hospital stay (p = 0.004). Compared with laparoscopic approach, robotic surgery showed significantly better results for time to first flatus (p = 0.001), to first mobilization (p = 0.005) and tolerance to solid diet (p = 0.001). Finally, anastomosis evaluation confirmed the superiority of intracorporeal approach which showed significantly better results for time to first flatus (p = 0.001), to first mobilization (p = 0.003) and tolerance to solid diet (p = 0.001); moreover, we recorded a statistical difference in favor of intracorporeal approach for infection rate (p = 0.04), bleeding (p = 0.001) and anastomotic leak (p = 0.03). Minimally invasive approach is safe and effective as the conventional open surgery, with comparable oncological results but not negligible advantages in terms of recovery outcomes. Moreover, we demonstrated that robotic approach may be considered a valid option and an intracorporeal anastomosis should always be preferred.noneMilone, Marco; Degiuli, Maurizio; Velotti, Nunzio; Manigrasso, Michele; Vertaldi, Sara; D'Ugo, Domenico; De Palma, Giovanni Domenico; Dario Bruzzese, Giuseppe Servillo, Giuseppe De Simone, Katia Di Lauro, Silvia Sofia, Marco Ettore Allaix, Mario Morino, Rossella Reddavid, Carlo Alberto Ammirati, Stefano Scabini, Gabriele Anania, Cristina Bombardini, Andrea Barberis, Roberta Longhin, Andrea Belli, Francesco Bianco, Giampaolo Formisano, Giuseppe Giuliani, Paolo Pietro Bianchi, Davide Cavaliere, Leonardo Solaini, Claudio Coco, Gianluca Rizzo, Andrea Coratti, Raffaele De Luca, Michele Simone, Alberto Di Leo, Giovanni De Manzoni, Paola De Nardi, Ugo Elmore, Riccardo Rosati, Andrea Vignali, Paolo Delrio, Ugo Pace, Daniela Rega, Antonio Di Cataldo, Giovanni Li Destri, Annibale Donini, Luigina Graziosi, Andrea Fontana, Michela Mineccia, Sergio Gentilli, Manuela Monni, Mario Guerrieri, Monica Ortenzi, Francesca Pecchini, Micaela Piccoli, Italy. Corrado Pedrazzani, Giulia Turri, Sara Pollesel, Franco Roviello, Marco Rigamonti, Michele Zuolo, Mauro Santarelli, Federica Saraceno, Pierpaolo Sileri Giuseppe Sigismondo Sica, Luigi Siragusa Salvatore Pucciarelli, Matteo ZuinMilone, Marco; Degiuli, Maurizio; Velotti, Nunzio; Manigrasso, Michele; Vertaldi, Sara; D'Ugo, Domenico; De Palma, Giovanni Domenico; Dario Bruzzese, Giuseppe Servillo, Giuseppe De Simone, Katia Di Lauro, Silvia Sofia, Marco Ettore Allaix, Mario Morino, Rossella Reddavid, Carlo Alberto Ammirati, Stefano Scabini, Gabriele Anania, Cristina Bombardini, Andrea Barberis, Roberta Longhin, Andrea Belli, Francesco Bianco, Giampaolo Formisano, Giuseppe Giuliani, Paolo Pietro Bianchi, Davide Cavaliere, Leonardo Solaini, Claudio Coco, Gianluca Rizzo, Andrea Coratti, Raffaele De Luca, Michele Simone, Alberto Di Leo, Giovanni De Manzoni, Paola De Nardi, Ugo Elmore, Riccardo Rosati, Andrea Vignali, Paolo Delrio, Ugo Pace, Daniela Rega, Antonio Di Cataldo, Giovanni Li Destri, Annibale Donini, Luigina Graziosi, Andrea Fontana, Michela Mineccia, Sergio Gentilli, Manuela Monni, Mario Guerrieri, Monica Ortenzi, Francesca Pecchini, Micaela Piccoli, Italy. Corrado Pedrazzani, Giulia Turri, Sara Pollesel, Franco Roviello, Marco Rigamonti, Michele Zuolo, Mauro Santarelli, Federica Saraceno, Pierpaolo Sileri Giuseppe Sigismondo Sica, Luigi Siragusa Salvatore Pucciarelli, Matteo Zui